Background and Objective: The carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity is a well-established index of aortic stiffness, and the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) has recently been developed as a new method for evaluating arterial stiffness. However, whether the baPWV is also useful in evaluating the risk of stroke is currently controversial. Moreover, it is also unknown which types of stroke and neuroradiological findings are associated with increased arterial stiffness. We investigated the association between the baPWV and risk of stroke using a case-control design. Methods: This study enrolled 223 stroke patients (aged 65.6 ± 10.3 years, mean ± SD) and the same number of age- and sex-matched controls. All of the subjects in this study underwent a structured interview and had their vascular risk factors assessed. We reviewed brain magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography data of stroke patients to assessthe severity of white-matter hyperintensity lesions, number of cerebral microbleeds, and the stenosis of both intracranial and extracranial arteries. The baPWV was measured noninvasively by an oscillometric method. Results: The baPWV was most affected by the instantaneous systolic blood pressure, and was significantly higher in stroke patients than control subjects (1,721 ± 395 cm/s vs. 1,657 ± 366 cm/s, p = 0.03). However, the baPWV did not differ significantly with a specific type of stroke or subtype of ischemic stroke. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the baPWV was not independently associated with increased risk of stroke, or the severity of white-matter hyperintensity lesions or cerebral microbleeds. Conclusion: Although the baPWV was significantly higher in stroke patients than control subjects, it was not independently associated with increased risk of stroke or specific subtypes of ischemic stroke or neuroradiological findings.

1.
Mattace-Raso FU, van der Cammen TJ, Hofman A, van Popele NM, Bos ML, Schalekamp MA, Asmar R, Reneman RS, Hoeks AP, Breteler MM, Witteman JC: Arterial stiffness and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation 2006;113:657–663.
2.
Sutton-Tyrrell K, Najjar SS, Boudreau RM, Venkitachalam L, Kupelian V, Simonsick EM, Havlik R, Lakatta EG, Spurgeon H, Kritchevsky S, Pahor M, Bauer D, Newman A: Elevated aortic pulse wave velocity, a marker of arterial stiffness, predicts cardiovascular events in well-functioning older adults. Circulation 2005;111:3384–3390.
3.
Nichols WW, O’Rourke MF: McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries, ed 5. London, Horder Arnold, 2005.
4.
Yambe M, Tomiyama H, Hirayama Y, Gulniza Z, Takata Y, Koji Y, Motobe K, Yamashina A: Arterial stiffening as a possible risk factor for both atherosclerosis and diastolic heart failure. Hypertens Res 2004;27:625–631.
5.
Munakata M, Ito N, Nunokawa T, Yoshinaga K: Utility of automated brachial ankle pulse wave velocity measurements in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 2003;16:653–657.
6.
Ohnishi H, Saitoh S, Takagi S, Ohata J, Isobe T, Kikuchi Y, Takeuchi H, Shimamoto K: Pulse wave velocity as an indicator of atherosclerosis in impaired fasting glucose: the Tanno and Sobetsu study. Diabetes Care 2003;26:437–440.
7.
Nakanishi N, Shiraishi T, Wada M: Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and metabolic syndrome in a Japanese population: the Minoh study. Hypertens Res 2005;28:125–131.
8.
Ito N, Ohishi M, Takagi T, Terai M, Shiota A, Hayashi N, Rakugi H, Ogihara T: Clinical usefulness and limitations of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in the evaluation of cardiovascular complications in hypertensive patients. Hypertens Res 2006;29:989–995.
9.
Nakano T, Ohkuma H, Suzuki S: Assessment of vascular injury in patients with stroke by measurement of pulse wave velocity. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;13:74–80.
10.
Ogawa O, Onuma T, Kubo S, Mitsuhashi N, Muramatsu C, Kawamori R: Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and symptomatic cerebral infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2003;2:10.
11.
Yokokawa H, Goto A, Watanabe K, Yasumura S: Evaluation of atherosclerosis-associated factors and pulse wave velocity for predicting cerebral infarction: a hospital-based, case-control study in Japan. Intern Med J 2007;37:161–167.
12.
Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE 3rd: Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993;24:35–41.
13.
O’Rourke MF, Safar ME: Relationship between aortic stiffening and microvascular disease in brain and kidney: cause and logic of therapy. Hypertension 2005;46:200–204.
14.
Kim DH, Kim J, Kim JM, Lee AY: Increased brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity is independently associated with risk of cerebral ischemic small vessel disease in elderly hypertensive patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2008;110:599–604.
15.
Pantoni L, Garcia JH: Pathogenesis of leukoaraiosis: a review. Stroke 1997;28:652–659.
16.
Viswanathan A, Chabriat H: Cerebral microhemorrhage. Stroke 2006;37:550–555.
17.
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, Roccella EJ: The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003;289:2560–2571.
18.
Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2005;28(suppl 1):S37–S42.
19.
Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, Hurtig HI, Zimmerman RA: MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:351–356.
20.
Yamashina A, Tomiyama H, Takeda K, Tsuda H, Arai T, Hirose K, Koji Y, Hori S, Yamamoto Y: Validity, reproducibility, and clinical significance of noninvasive brachial- ankle pulse wave velocity measurement. Hypertens Res 2002;25:359–364.
21.
Tomiyama H, Yamashina A, Arai T, Hirose K, Koji Y, Chikamori T, Hori S, Yamamoto Y, Doba N, Hinohara S: Influences of age and gender on results of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement – A survey of 12,517 subjects. Atherosclerosis 2003;166:303–309.
22.
Greenland P, Abrams J, Aurigemma GP, Bond MG, Clark LT, Criqui MH, Crouse JR 3rd, Friedman L, Fuster V, Herrington DM, Kuller LH, Ridker PM, Roberts WC, Stanford W, Stone N, Swan HJ, Taubert KA, Wexler L: Prevention Conference V: beyond secondary prevention: identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention: noninvasive tests of atherosclerotic burden: Writing Group III. Circulation 2000;101:E16–E22.
23.
Li S, Chen W, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS: Influence of metabolic syndrome on arterial stiffness and its age-related change in young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Atherosclerosis 2005;180:349–354.
24.
Yamashina A, Tomiyama H, Arai T, Koji Y, Yambe M, Motobe H, Glunizia Z, Yamamoto Y, Hori S: Nomogram of the relation of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity with blood pressure. Hypertens Res 2003;26:801–806.
25.
Lehmann ED, Hopkins KD, Jones RL, Rudd AG, Gosling RG: Aortic distensibility in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 1995;89:247–253.
26.
Sugioka K, Hozumi T, Sciacca RR, Miyake Y, Titova I, Gaspard G, Sacco RL, Homma S, Di Tullio MR: Impact of aortic stiffness on ischemic stroke in elderly patients. Stroke 2002;33:2077–2081.
27.
O’Rourke MF, Pauca A, Jiang XJ: Pulse wave analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2001;51:507–522.
28.
Nakano T, Ohkuma H, Suzuki S: Measurement of ankle brachial index for assessment of atherosclerosis in patients with stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;17:212–217.
29.
van der Heijden-Spek JJ, Staessen JA, Fagard RH, Hoeks AP, Boudier HA, van Bortel LM: Effect of age on brachial artery wall properties differs from the aorta and is gender dependent: a population study. Hypertension 2000;35:637–642.
30.
Shirai K, Utino J, Otsuka K, Takata M: A novel blood pressure-independent arterial wall stiffness parameter; cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). J Atheroscler Thromb 2006;13:101–107.
31.
Jones WJ, Williams LS, Meschia JF: Validating the Questionnaire for Verifying Stroke-Free Status (QVSFS) by neurological history and examination. Stroke 2001;32:2232–2236.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.