Background: Lacunar stroke has been defined as an infarct <15 mm in diameter in the presence of symptoms of lacunar syndromes. We investigated a new approach in predicting whether a deep infarct is caused by small arterial occlusion. Methods: A total of 319 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic infarcts within the striatocapsular territory underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diagnostic workups, including vascular and cardiological studies. Predictors for nonlacunar mechanisms were evaluated by logistic regression analysis, with the size of infarct (1-mm increase) and stroke syndrome (traditional vs. atypical lacunar syndrome vs. cortical syndrome) graded rather than dichotomized. Results: Amongst the 171 patients who did not meet the established criteria for lacunar stroke, that is, deep infarct of ≧15 mm or presenting symptoms of nontraditional lacunar syndrome, a documented etiology could not be determined in 97 (56.7%) patients. In contrast, amongst the 148 patients who met the criteria, 27 (18.2%) had nonlacunar mechanisms. Logistic regression analysis identified the variables that predicted nonlacunar stroke mechanisms with statistical significance as nontraditional lacunar syndromes (OR 2.19 for atypical lacunar syndrome, and OR 6.72 for cortical syndrome), infarct size on DWI (OR 1.05 per 1-mm increase), and unilateral multiple deep infarcts on DWI (OR 2.22, p < 0.05 in all cases). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that discrimination power of the model derived from logistic regression analysis (grading system) was better than that of the previously established dichotomizing criterion in predicting nonlacunar mechanisms (p = 0.004). Conclusions: A clinically significant proportion of clinical MRI lacunae are associated with underlying nonlacunar mechanisms. Decisions regarding the extent of diagnostic procedures in patients with subcortical infarcts can be guided by the point value in terms of the stroke syndrome and infarct patterns, as well as the size of infarct.

Keywords:
Ischemic stroke, Lacunar infarction, diagnosis, Diffusion-weighted imaging
1.
Fisher CM: Lacunes: small, deep cerebral infarcts. Neurology 1965;15:774–784.
2.
Fisher CM: The arterial lesion underlying lacunes. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1969;12:1–15.
3.
Bamford J, Sandercock P, Jones L, Warlow C: The natural history of lacunar infarction: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke 1987;18:545–551.
4.
Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE 3rd: Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993;24:35–41.
5.
Donnan GA, Norrving B, Bamford JM, Bougousslavsky J: Subcortical infarction: classification and terminology. Cerebrovasc Dis 1993;3:248–251.
6.
Fisher CM: Lacunar strokes and infarcts: a review. Neurology 1982;32:871–876.
7.
Donnan GA, Bladin PF, Berkovic SF, Longley WA, Saling MM: The stroke syndrome of striatocapsular infarction. Brain 1991;114:51–70.
8.
Gan R, Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Roberts JK, Boden-Albala B, Gu Q: Testing the validity of the lacunar hypothesis: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study Experience. Neurology 1997;48:1204–1211.
9.
Boiten J, Lodder J: Lacunar infarcts: pathogenesis and validity of the clinical syndromes. Stroke 1991;22:1374–1378.
10.
Lodder J, Bamford J, Kappelle J, Boiten J: What causes false clinical prediction of small deep infarcts? Stroke 1994;25:86–91.
11.
Horowitz DR, Tuhrim S, Weinberger JM, Rudolph SH: Mechanisms in lacunar infarction. Stroke 1992;23:325–327.
12.
Bang OY, Heo JH, Kim JY, Park JH, Huh K: Middle cerebral artery stenosis in a major clinical determinant in striatocapsular small, deep infarction. Arch Neurol 2002;59:259–263.
13.
Kang DW, Chalela JA, Ezzeddine MA, Warach S: Association of ischemic lesion patterns on early diffusion-weighted imaging with TOAST stroke subtypes. Arch Neurol 2003;60:1730–1734.
14.
Besson G, Hommel M: Lacunar syndromes; in Pullicino PM, Caplan LR, Hommel M (eds): Advances in Neurology. New York, Raven Press, 1993, vol 62, pp 141–160.
15.
Tatu L, Moulin T, Bogousslavsky J, Duvernoy HM: Arterial vascular territories of human brain: hemispheres. Neurology 1998;50:1699–1708.
16.
Bang OY, Lee PH, Joo SY, Lee JS, Joo IS, Huh K: Frequency and mechanisms of stroke recurrence after cryptogenic stroke. Ann Neurol 2003;54:227–234.
17.
Bang OY, Joo SY, Lee PH, Joo US, Lee JH, Joo IS, Huh K: The course of patients with lacunar infarcts and a parent arterial lesion: similarities to large artery vs small artery disease. Arch Neurol 2004;61:514–519.
18.
van Swieten JC, Hijdra A, Koudstaal PJ, van Gijn J: Grading white matter lesions on CT and MRI: a simple scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:1080–1083.
19.
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults: Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486–2497.
20.
Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr: A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 1982;115:92–106.
21.
Ay H, Oliveira-Filho J, Buonanno FS, Ezzeddine M, Schaefer PW, Rordorf G, Schwamm LH, Gonzalez RG, Koroshetz WJ: Diffusion-weighted imaging identifies a subset of lacunar infarction associated with embolic source. Stroke 1999;30:2644–2650.
22.
Baumgartner RW, Sidler C, Mosso M, Georgiadis D: Ischemic lacunar stroke in patients with and without potential mechanism other than small-artery disease. Stroke 2003;34:653–659.
23.
Nakano S, Yokogami K, Ohta H, Goya T, Wakisaka S: CT-defined large subcortical infarcts: correlation of location with site of cerebrovascular occlusive disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1581–1585.
24.
Lodder J, Bamford JM, Sandercock PA, Jones LN, Warlow CP: Are hypertension or cardiac embolism likely causes of lacunar infarction? Stroke 1990;21:375–381.
25.
Kappelle LJ, Koudstaal PJ, van Gijn J, Ramos LM, Keunen JE: Carotid angiography in patients with lacunar infarction: a prospective study. Stroke 1988;19:1093–1096.
26.
Norrving B, Cronqvist S: Clinical and radiologic features of lacunar versus nonlacunar minor stroke. Stroke 1989;20:59–64.
27.
Santamaria J, Graus F, Rubio F, Arbizu T, Peres J: Cerebral infarction of the basal ganglia due to embolism from the heart. Stroke 1983;14:911–914.
28.
Ghika J, Bogousslavsky J, Regli F: Infarcts in the territory of the deep perforators from the carotid system. Neurology 1989;39:507–512.
29.
Nelson RF, Pullicino P, Kendall BE, Marshall J: Computed tomography in patients presenting with lacunar syndromes. Stroke 1980;11:256–261.
30.
Sterzer P, Meintzschel F, Rösler A, Lanfermann H, Steinmetz H, Sitzer M: Pravastatin improves cerebral vasomotor reactivity in patients with subcortical small-vessel disease. Stroke 2001;32:2817–2820.
31.
Fisher CM: Capsular infarcts: the underlying vascular lesions. Arch Neurol 1979;36:65–73.
32.
Mohr JP: Progress in cerebrovascular disease: lacunes. Stroke 1982;13:3–11.
33.
Cho AH, Kang DW, Kwon SU, Kim JS: Is 15 mm size criterion for lacunar infarction still valid? A study on strictly subcortical middle cerebral artery territory infarction using diffusion-weighted MRI. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;23:14–19.
34.
Marankovic SV, Milisavljevic MM, Kovacevic MS, Stevic ZD: Perforating branches of the middle cerebral artery: microanatomy and clinical significance of their intracerebral segments. Stroke 1985;16:1022–1029.
35.
Umansky F, Gomes FB, Dujovny M, Diaz FG, Ausman JI, Mirchandani HG, Berman SK: The perforating branches of the middle cerebral artery. J Neurosurg 1985;62:261–268.
36.
Norrving B, Staaf G: Pure motor stroke from presumed lacunar infarct: incidence, risk factors, and initial course. Cerebrovasc Dis 1991;1:203–209.
37.
Melo TP, Bogousslavsky J, van Malle G, Regli F: Pure motor stroke: a reappraisal. Neurology 1992;42:789–798.
38.
Arboix A, Lopez-Grau M, Casasnovas C, Garcia-Eroles L, Massons J, Balcells M: Clinical study of 39 patients with atypical lacunar syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:381–384.
39.
Ay H, Furie KL, Singhal A, Smith WS, Sorensen AG, Koroshetz WJ: An evidence-based causative classification system for acute ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol 2005;58:688–697.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.