Even though the disruption of motor activity and function caused by stroke is at times severe, recovery is often highly dynamic. Recuperation reflects the ability of the neuronal network to adapt. Next to an unmasking of latent network representations, other adaptive processes, such as excitatory metabolic stress, an imbalance in activating and inhibiting transmission, leading to salient hyperexcitability, or the consolidation of novel connections, prime the plastic capabilities of the system. Rehabilitative interventions may modulate mechanisms of neurofunctional plasticity and influence the natural course after stroke, both positively, but potentially also acting detrimentally. Though routine rehabilitative procedures are an integral part of stroke care, evidence as to their effectiveness remains equivocal. The present review describes the natural course of motor recovery, focusing on ischemic stroke, and discusses use- and training-dependent adaptive effects. It complements a prior article which highlighted the pathophysiology of plasticity. Though the interaction between rehabilitation and plasticity remains elusive, an attempt is made to clarify how and to what extent rehabilitative therapy shapes motor recovery.

1.
Kreisel SH, Bäzner H, Hennerici MG: Pathophysiology of stroke rehabilitation: temporal aspects of neurofunctional recovery. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006;21:6–17.
2.
Bogousslavsky J, Van Melle G, Regli F: The Lausanne Stroke Registry: analysis of 1,000 consecutive patients with first stroke. Stroke 1988;19:1083–1092.
3.
Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS: Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. 2. Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:406–412.
4.
Nudo RJ, Plautz EJ, Frost SB: Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex. Muscle Nerve 2001;24:1000–1019.
5.
van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, van der Wees PJ, Dekker J: The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what’s the evidence? Clin Rehabil 2004;18:833–862.
6.
Teasell RW, Jutai JW, Bhogal SK, Foley NC: Research gaps in stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2003;10:59–70.
7.
Dobkin BH: Neurobiology of rehabilitation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004;1038:148–170.
8.
Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Müller F, König E: Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Lancet 2001;358:787–790.
9.
Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, Watanabe I, Ikoma K: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function. Stroke 2005;36:2681–2686.
10.
Muellbacher W, Richards C, Ziemann U, Wittenberg G, Weltz D, Boroojerdi B, Cohen L, Hallett M: Improving hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Neurol 2002;59:1278–1282.
11.
Hesse S, Schmidt H, Werner C, Bardeleben A: Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control. Curr Opin Neurol 2003;16:705–710.
12.
Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K: Advances in the understanding and treatment of stroke impairment using robotic devices. Top Stroke Rehabil 2005;12:22–35.
13.
Dobkin BH: Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 2004;3:528–536.
14.
Wohlin Wottrich A, Stenstrom CH, Engardt M, Tham K, von Koch L: Characteristics of physiotherapy sessions from the patient’s and therapist’s perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1198–1205.
15.
Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Mallinson T: Patterns of therapy activities across length of stay and impairment levels: peering inside the ‘black box’ of inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1901–1908.
16.
Jette DU, Latham NK, Smout RJ, Gassaway J, Slavin MD, Horn SD: Physical therapy interventions for patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Phys Ther 2005;85:238–248.
17.
Wittwer JE, Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Galea MP: Quantification of physiotherapy treatment time in stroke rehabilitation – criterion-related validity. Aust J Physiother 2000;46:291–298.
18.
Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM: Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci 1996;16:785–807.
19.
Kozlowski DA, James DC, Schallert T: Use-dependent exaggeration of neuronal injury after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions. J Neurosci 1996;16:4776–4786.
20.
Schallert T, Leasure JL, Kolb B: Experience-associated structural events, subependymal cellular proliferative activity, and functional recovery after injury to the central nervous system. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000;20:1513–1528.
21.
Calautti C, Baron JC: Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke 2003;34:1553–1566.
22.
Hallett M: Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2001;36:169–174.
23.
Johansson BB: Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation. The Willis lecture. Stroke 2000;31:223–230.
24.
Rossini PM, Calautti C, Pauri F, Baron JC: Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain. Lancet Neurol 2003;2:493–502.
25.
Schaechter JD: Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke. Prog Neurobiol 2004;73:61–72.
26.
Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E: Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004;22:281–299.
27.
Counsell C, Dennis M: Systematic review of prognostic models in patients with acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2001;12:159–170.
28.
Adams HP Jr, Davis PH, Leira EC, Chang KC, Bendixen BH, Clarke WR, Woolson RF, Hansen MD: Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: a report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Neurology 1999;53:126–131.
29.
Pineiro R, Pendlebury ST, Smith S, Flitney D, Blamire AM, Styles P, Matthews PM: Relating MRI changes to motor deficit after ischemic stroke by segmentation of functional motor pathways. Stroke 2000;31:672–679.
30.
Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS: The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1994;25:808–813.
31.
Samuelsson M, Soderfeldt B, Olsson GB: Functional outcome in patients with lacunar infarction. Stroke 1996;27:842–846.
32.
Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J: Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke 1992;23:1084–1089.
33.
Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS: Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. 1. Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:399–405.
34.
Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS: Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:27–32.
35.
Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS: Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:394–398.
36.
Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ: Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1629–1637.
37.
Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT: Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000;31:1429–1438.
38.
Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB: Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke 1994;25:1181–1188.
39.
Twitchell TE: The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain 1951;74:443–480.
40.
Colebatch JG, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Marsden CD: Cortical outflow to proximal arm muscles in man. Brain 1990;113:1843–1856.
41.
Turton A, Lemon RN: The contribution of fast corticospinal input to the voluntary activation of proximal muscles in normal subjects and in stroke patients. Exp Brain Res 1999;129:559–572.
42.
Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Gialloreti LE, Traballesi M, Lubich S, Pratesi L, Palombi L: Predicting stroke inpatient rehabilitation outcome: the prominent role of neuropsychological disorders. Eur Neurol 1996;36:385–390.
43.
Denes G, Semenza C, Stoppa E, Lis A: Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. Brain 1982;105:543–552.
44.
Felberg RA, Okon NJ, El-Mitwalli A, Burgin WS, Grotta JC, Alexandrov AV: Early dramatic recovery during intravenous tissue plasminogen activator infusion: clinical pattern and outcome in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Stroke 2002;33:1301–1307.
45.
Toni D, Fiorelli M, Gentile M, Bastianello S, Sacchetti ML, Argentino C, Pozzilli C, Fieschi C: Progressing neurological deficit secondary to acute ischemic stroke. A study on predictability, pathogenesis, and prognosis. Arch Neurol 1995;52:670–675.
46.
Arboix A, Garcia-Eroles L, Comes E, Oliveres M, Balcells M, Pacheco G, Targa C: Predicting spontaneous early neurological recovery after acute ischemic stroke. Eur J Neurol 2003;10:429–435.
47.
Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, Weiller C: Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000;31:1210–1216.
48.
Hebb DO: The effects of early experience on problem solving at maturity. Am Psychol 1947;2:306–307.
49.
Greenough WT, Volkmar FR, Juraska JM: Effects of rearing complexity on dendritic branching in frontolateral and temporal cortex of the rat. Exp Neurol 1973;41:371–378.
50.
Greenough WT, Volkmar FR: Pattern of dendritic branching in occipital cortex of rats reared in complex environments. Exp Neurol 1973;40:491–504.
51.
Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG: Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature 1995;377:155–158.
52.
Elbert T, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Rockstroh B, Taub E: Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science 1995;270:305–307.
53.
Sanes JN, Wang J, Donoghue JP: Immediate and delayed changes of rat motor cortical output representation with new forelimb configurations. Cereb Cortex 1992;2:141–152.
54.
Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ: Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2000;74:27–55.
55.
Zhuang P, Dang N, Waziri A, Gerloff C, Cohen LG, Hallett M, Warzeri A: Implicit and explicit learning in an auditory serial reaction time task. Acta Neurol Scand 1998;97:131–137.
56.
Kilgard MP, Merzenich MM: Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity. Science 1998;279:1714–1718.
57.
Lotze M, Braun C, Birbaumer N, Anders S, Cohen LG: Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Brain 2003;126:866–872.
58.
Hund-Georgiadis M, von Cramon DY: Motor-learning-related changes in piano players and non-musicians revealed by functional magnetic-resonance signals. Exp Brain Res 1999;125:417–425.
59.
Pascual-Leone A, Nguyet D, Cohen LG, Brasil-Neto JP, Cammarota A, Hallett M: Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. J Neurophysiol 1995;74:1037–1045.
60.
Karni A, Meyer G, Rey-Hipolito C, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG: The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:861–868.
61.
Classen J, Liepert J, Wise SP, Hallett M, Cohen LG: Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. J Neurophysiol 1998;79:1117–1123.
62.
Greenough WT, Larson JR, Withers GS: Effects of unilateral and bilateral training in a reaching task on dendritic branching of neurons in the rat motor-sensory forelimb cortex. Behav Neural Biol 1985;44:301–314.
63.
van Reempts J, Dikova M, Werbrouck L, Clincke G, Borgers M: Synaptic plasticity in rat hippocampus associated with learning. Behav Brain Res 1992;51:179–183.
64.
Goelet P, Castellucci VF, Schacher S, Kandel ER: The long and the short of long-term memory – a molecular framework. Nature 1986;322:419–422.
65.
Neeper SA, Gomez-Pinilla F, Choi J, Cotman C: Exercise and brain neurotrophins. Nature 1995;373:109.
66.
Rioult-Pedotti MS, Friedman D, Hess G, Donoghue JP: Strengthening of horizontal cortical connections following skill learning. Nat Neurosci 1998;1:230–234.
67.
Nudo RJ, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM: Repetitive microstimulation alters the cortical representation of movements in adult rats. Somatosens Mot Res 1990;7:463–483.
68.
Xerri C, Merzenich MM, Peterson BE, Jenkins W: Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1998;79:2119–2148.
69.
Ivanco TL, Greenough WT: Physiological consequences of morphologically detectable synaptic plasticity: potential uses for examining recovery following damage. Neuropharmacology 2000;39:765–776.
70.
Jones TA, Chu CJ, Grande LA, Gregory AD: Motor skills training enhances lesion-induced structural plasticity in the motor cortex of adult rats. J Neurosci 1999;19:10153–10163.
71.
Bury SD, Eichhorn AC, Kotzer CM, Jones TA: Reactive astrocytic responses to denervation in the motor cortex of adult rats are sensitive to manipulations of behavioral experience. Neuropharmacology 2000;39:743–755.
72.
Nudo RJ, Milliken GW: Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1996;75:2144–2149.
73.
Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW: Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 1996;272:1791–1794.
74.
Dijkhuizen RM, Singhal AB, Mandeville JB, Wu O, Halpern EF, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR, Lo EH: Correlation between brain reorganization, ischemic damage, and neurologic status after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 2003;23:510–517.
75.
Friel KM, Heddings AA, Nudo RJ: Effects of postlesion experience on behavioral recovery and neurophysiologic reorganization after cortical injury in primates. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000;14:187–198.
76.
Schallert T, Humm JL, Black SE, Jones TA, Kolb B, Aronowski J, Grotta J: Activity-associated growth factor expression and related neural events in recovery of function after brain injury; in Choi DW, Dacey RG, Hsu CY, Powers WJ (eds): Cerebrovascular Disease: Momentum at the End of the Second Millenium. Armonk, Futura, 2002, pp 401–426.
77.
Jones TA, Schallert T: Use-dependent growth of pyramidal neurons after neocortical damage. J Neurosci 1994;14:2140–2152.
78.
Grabowski M, Brundin P, Johansson BB: Paw-reaching, sensorimotor, and rotational behavior after brain infarction in rats. Stroke 1993;24:889–895.
79.
Biernaskie J, Corbett D: Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury. J Neurosci 2001;21:5272–5280.
80.
Yang YR, Wang RY, Wang PS: Early and late treadmill training after focal brain ischemia in rats. Neurosci Lett 2003;339:91–94.
81.
Biernaskie J, Chernenko G, Corbett D: Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci 2004;24:1245–1254.
82.
Stroemer RP, Kent TA, Hulsebosch CE: Neocortical neural sprouting, synaptogenesis, and behavioral recovery after neocortical infarction in rats. Stroke 1995;26:2135–2144.
83.
Schallert T, Hernandez TD, Barth TM: Recovery of function after brain damage: severe and chronic disruption by diazepam. Brain Res 1986;379:104–111.
84.
Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, Morelli D, Troisi E, Coiro P, Bragoni M: Early versus delayed inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a matched comparison conducted in Italy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:695–700.
85.
Hayes SH, Carroll SR: Early intervention care in the acute stroke patient. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:319–321.
86.
Novack TA, Satterfield WT, Lyons K, Kolski G, Hackmeyer L, Connor M: Stroke onset and rehabilitation: time lag as a factor in treatment outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984;65:316–319.
87.
Smith ME, Garraway WM, Smith DL, Akhtar AJ: Therapy impact on functional outcome in a controlled trial of stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;63:21–24.
88.
Hossmann KA: Glutamate-mediated injury in focal cerebral ischemia: the excitotoxin hypothesis revised. Brain Pathol 1994;4:23–36.
89.
Bland ST, Gonzale RA, Schallert T: Movement-related glutamate levels in rat hippocampus, striatum, and sensorimotor cortex. Neurosci Lett 1999;277:119–122.
90.
Bland ST, Jonson MS, Schallert T, Gonzales RA: Extracellular glutamate and other free amino acids in sensorimotor cortex is related to forelimb use during exploratory behavior (abstract). Soc Neurosci 1997.
91.
Humm JL, Kozlowski DA, Bland ST, James DC, Schallert T: Use-dependent exaggeration of brain injury: is glutamate involved? Exp Neurol 1999;157:349–358.
92.
Jones TA, Schallert T: Overgrowth and pruning of dendrites in adult rats recovering from neocortical damage. Brain Res 1992;581:156–160.
93.
Risedal A, Zeng J, Johansson BB: Early training may exacerbate brain damage after focal brain ischemia in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999;19:997–1003.
94.
Humm JL, Kozlowski DA, James DC, Gotts JE, Schallert T: Use-dependent exacerbation of brain damage occurs during an early post-lesion vulnerable period. Brain Res 1998;783:286–292.
95.
Bland ST, Schallert T, Strong R, Aronowski J, Grotta JC, Feeney DM: Early exclusive use of the affected forelimb after moderate transient focal ischemia in rats: functional and anatomic outcome. Stroke 2000;31:1144–1152.
96.
Humm JL, Kozlowski DA, Gibb R: Forced disuse of the impaired forelimb by restraint after sensorimotor cortical injury inhibits expression of endogenous bFGF in astrocytes and adversely affects behavioral function (abstract). Soc Neurosci 1997.
97.
Martinsson L, Eksborg S, Wahlgren NG: Intensive early physiotherapy combined with dexamphetamine treatment in severe stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;16:338–345.
98.
Di Lauro A, Pellegrino L, Savastano G, Ferraro C, Fusco M, Balzarano F, Franco MM, Biancardi LG, Grasso A: A randomized trial on the efficacy of intensive rehabilitation in the acute phase of ischemic stroke. J Neurol 2003;250:1206–1208.
99.
Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M: Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke 2000;31:2984–2988.
100.
Teasell R, Foley N, Salter K, Bhogal SK, Bayona N, Jutai J, Speechley M: Evidence based review of stroke rehabilitation. Toronto, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario and Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care of Ontario, 2002.
101.
Wagenaar RC, Meijer OG: Effects of stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Sci 1991;4:61–73.
102.
van Vliet PM, Lincoln NB, Foxall A: Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:503–508.
103.
Luke C, Dodd KJ, Brock K: Outcomes of the Bobath concept on upper limb recovery following stroke. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:888–898.
104.
Pollock A, Baer G, Pomeroy V, Langhorne P: Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003:CD001920.
105.
Lincoln NB, Parry RH, Vass CD: Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke 1999;30:573–579.
106.
Hummelsheim H, Hauptmann B, Neumann S: Influence of physiotherapeutic facilitation techniques on motor evoked potentials in centrally paretic hand extensor muscles. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;97:18–28.
107.
Dickstein R, Hocherman S, Pillar T, Shaham R: Stroke rehabilitation. Three exercise therapy approaches. Phys Ther 1986;66:1233–1238.
108.
Basmajian JV, Gowland C, Brandstater ME, Swanson L, Trotter J: EMG feedback treatment of upper limb in hemiplegic stroke patients: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;63:613–616.
109.
Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK: Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:361–369.
110.
Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC: Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke 1997;28:1550–1556.
111.
Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood Dauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, Miller K, Lincoln N, Partridge C, Wellwood I, Langhorne P: Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004;35:2529–2539.
112.
Stern PH, McDowell F, Miller JM, Robinson M: Effects of facilitation exercise techniques in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970;51:526–531.
113.
Logigian MK, Samuels MA, Falconer J, Zagar R: Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64:364–367.
114.
Sivenius J, Pyorala K, Heinonen OP, Salonen JT, Riekkinen P: The significance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke – a controlled trial. Stroke 1985;16:928–931.
115.
Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC: Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999;354:191–196.
116.
Parry RH, Lincoln NB, Vass CD: Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:187–198.
117.
Hummelsheim H: Rationales for improving motor function. Curr Opin Neurol 1999;12:697–701.
118.
Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, Villringer K, Villringer A, Taub E, Flor H: Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:624–628.
119.
Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC: Modified constraint-induced therapy in acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005;19:27–32.
120.
Liepert J, Graef S, Uhde I, Leidner O, Weiller C: Training-induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand 2000;101:321–326.
121.
Liepert J, Uhde I, Graf S, Leidner O, Weiller C: Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. J Neurol 2001;248:315–321.
122.
Schaechter JD, Kraft E, Hilliard TS, Dijkhuizen RM, Benner T, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR, Cramer SC: Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:326–338.
123.
DeBow SB, McKenna JE, Kolb B, Colbourne F: Immediate constraint-induced movement therapy causes local hyperthermia that exacerbates cerebral cortical injury in rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2004;82:231–237.
124.
Kilgard MP, Pandya PK, Engineer ND, Moucha R: Cortical network reorganization guided by sensory input features. Biol Cybern 2002;87:333–343.
125.
Butefisch CM, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH: Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995;130:59–68.
126.
Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C, Ruckriem S: Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2002;33:553–558.
127.
Woldag H, Waldmann G, Heuschkel G, Hummelsheim H: Is the repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements beneficial for motor recovery in stroke patients? Clin Rehabil 2003;17:723–730.
128.
Luft AR, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, Forrester LW, Macko R, Sorkin JD, Schulz JB, Goldberg AP, Hanley DF: Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;292:1853–1861.
129.
Rose DK, Winstein CJ: Bimanual training after stroke: are two hands better than one? Top Stroke Rehabil 2004;11:20–30.
130.
Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KH, Macko RF: Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 2000;31:2390–2395.
131.
Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC: Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:473–479.
132.
Tangeman PT, Banaitis DA, Williams AK: Rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients: changes in functional performance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71:876–880.
133.
Dam M, Tonin P, Casson S, Ermani M, Pizzolato G, Iaia V, Battistin L: The effects of long-term rehabilitation therapy on poststroke hemiplegic patients. Stroke 1993;24:1186–1191.
134.
Wade DT, Collen FM, Robb GF, Warlow CP: Physiotherapy intervention late after stroke and mobility. Br Med J 1992;304:609–613.
135.
Green J, Forster A, Bogle S, Young J: Physiotherapy for patients with mobility problems more than 1 year after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002;359:199–203.
136.
Dombovy ML, Basford JR, Whisnant JP, Bergstralh EJ: Disability and use of rehabilitation services following stroke in Rochester, Minnesota, 1975–1979. Stroke 1987;18:830–836.
137.
Feys H, De Weerdt W, Verbeke G, Steck GC, Capiau C, Kiekens C, Dejaeger E, Van Hoydonck G, Vermeersch G, Cras P: Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: a 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial. Stroke 2004;35:924–929.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.