Background: The predicting value of age on stroke rehabilitation has been controversial. There is a lack of large-scale studies in the Chinese population to examine the effect of age on stroke rehabilitation outcomes. This study examines the predictors of a good outcome after rehabilitation in Chinese stroke patients with special attention to age as a factor. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes stroke patients receiving a standard inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation program in a neuro-rehabilitation ward of a convalescence hospital in Hong Kong from January 2000 to December 2003. Functional independence measure (FIM) ≧90 was used to define a good outcome. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the independent predictors of a good outcome. Results: There were important differences in clinical characteristics and complications of stroke among patients of three age groups: <65, ≧65 and <80, and ≧80 years. The total FIM scores both upon admission and at discharge were lower in the older age groups. No significant difference was observed in the changes in FIM scores across these age groups. Age was not an independent predictor for a good outcome. FIM upon admission was an independent predictor for a good outcome (discharge FIM ≧90) in all patients and in individual age groups. Having employment before stroke was a predictor for good outcome in all patients. Living at home prior to stroke was a predictor for the total population and the ≧65 and <80 years group. The length of stay predicted a good outcome in the group ≧80 years. Conclusions: Admission functional status, employment and living at home before stroke but not age per se are predictors of a good outcome following stroke rehabilitation. As older patients show comparable improvement during rehabilitation, intensive rehabilitation should not be withheld in stroke patients simply because of advanced age.

Keywords:
Elderly, Outcome, Rehabilitation, Stroke
1.
Census and Statistics Department: Hong Kong 2001 Population By-Census. Census and Statistics Department. Hong Kong, Hong Kong Government Printer, 1996.
2.
Hospital Authority Population and Health Statistics 2001. http://www.ha.org.hk/hesd/nsapi.
3.
Luk JKH, Pau MML, Chan FHW, Yu C: Outreach geriatric private nursing home service in Hong Kong Central and Western cluster. J HK Geriatr Soc 2002;11:5–10.
4.
Jongbloed L: Prediction of function after stroke: A critical review. Stroke 1986;17:765–776.
5.
Wade DT, Langton HR: Stroke: associations with age, sex and side of weakness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:540–545.
6.
Falconer JA, Naughton BJ, Strasser DC, Sinacore JM: Stroke inpatient rehabilitation: a comparison across age groups. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994;42:39–44.
7.
Inouye M: Predicting models of outcome stratified by age after first stroke rehabilitation in Japan. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:586–591.
8.
Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, Bravo G, Boutin C: Predictors of handicap situations following post-stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:774–785.
9.
Kugler C, Altenhoner T, Lochner P, Ferbert A: Does age influence early recovery from ischaemic stroke? A study from the Hessian Stroke Data Bank. J Neurol 2003;250:676–681.
10.
Macciocchi SN, Diamond PT, Alves WM, Mertz T: Ischemic stroke: relation of age, lesion location, and initial neurologic deficit to functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1255–1257.
11.
Sze KH, Wong E, Or KH, Lum CM, Woo J: Factors predicting stroke disability at discharge: a study of 793 Chinese. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:876–880.
12.
Woo J, Kay R, Teoh R, Wong HY, Nicholls MG: Predictors of survival and Barthel score at three months after acute stroke. J Neurol Rehab 1992;6:49–57.
13.
Dimitrios E, Kevorkain CG, Rintala D: Rehabilitation of the older stroke patient: functional outcome and comparison with younger patients. Am J Phy Med Rehabil 2002;81:881–889.
14.
Kong KH, Chua KSG, Tow AP: Clinical characteristics and functional outcome of stroke patients 75 years old and older. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1535–1539.
15.
Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W: Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2002;23:179–185.
16.
Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Troisi E, et al: Aging and stroke rehabilitation. A case-comparison study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;15:98–105.
17.
Cheung RT, Mak W, Chan KH: Circadian variation of stroke onset among Hong Kong Chinese: a hospital-based study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2001;12:1–6.
18.
Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, et al: Functional outcome of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients after inpatient rehabilitation: a matched comparison. Stroke 2003;34:2861–2865.
19.
Ee CH, Kwan PE, Tan ES: Stroke rehabilitation of elderly patients in Singapore. Singapore Med J 1991;32:55–60.
20.
Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Granger CV, Kayton RM: Interrater agreement of the seven-level functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:79–81.
21.
Zhu L, Fratiglioni L, Guo Z, et al: Association of stroke with dementia, cognitive impairment, and functional disability in the very old: a population-based study. Stroke 1998;29:2094–2099.
22.
Dromerick AW, Edwards EF, Diringer MN, et al: Sensitivity to changes in disability after stroke: a comparison of four scales useful in clinical trials. J Rehabil Res Dev 2003;40:1–8.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
2006
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.