Background and Purpose: Gavestinel, GV150526, is a selective antagonist at the glycine site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. The safety and efficacy of GV150526 were studied in two phase III randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of acute ischemic stroke patients within 6 h from onset [The Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection (GAIN) International and GAIN Americas Trials]. A planned MRI substudy within these trials investigated the effect of gavestinel on infarct volume. Methods: Patients enrolled in the GAIN trials at designated MRI substudy sites were eligible if they had a pretreatment acute cortical lesion on diffusion-weighted MRI of at least 1.5 cm diameter or 5 cm3. Final lesion assessment was performed on T2-weighted MRI at month 3. Blinded image analysis was performed centrally. The primary hypothesis was that gavestinel would attenuate lesion growth from baseline relative to placebo. Results: A total of 106 patients were eligible, 75 (34 gavestinel, 41 placebo) of whom had month 3 scans (primary analysis population). No effects of gavestinel on infarct volume were observed in the primary or other analyses. However, significant associations of lesion volume to clinical severity and outcomes were observed. Ischemic lesion volume decrease was predictive of substantial clinical improvement. Conclusion: Consistent with the clinical outcomes in the GAIN trials, no effects of gavestinel on ischemic infarction was observed. Concordance of results of the clinical outcome trials with those of this infarct volume substudy as well the associations of infarct volume to clinical outcomes further support the potential role of infarct volume as a marker of outcome in dose finding and proof of principle acute stroke trials.

Keywords:
Placebo-controlled clinical trial, Gavestinel, Neuroprotection, Diffusion MRI
1.
Muir K, Lees K: Systematic review of glutamate antagonists in acute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003.
2.
Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable: Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development. Stroke 1999;30:2752–2758.
3.
Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable II (STAIR II): Recommendations for clinical trial evaluation of acute stroke therapies. Stroke 2001;32:1598–1606.
4.
Lees KR, Hankey GJ, Hacke W: Design of future acute-stroke treatment trials. Lancet Neurol 2003;2:54–61.
5.
Warach S: Use of diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging as a tool in acute stroke clinical trials. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2001;2:38–44.
6.
Young FB, Lees KR, Weir CJ: Strengthening acute stroke trials through optimal use of disability end points. Stroke 2003;34:2676–2680.
7.
Lees KR, Asplund K, Carolei A, Davis SM, Diener HC, Kaste M, Orgogozo JM, Whitehead J: Glycine antagonist (gavestinel) in neuroprotection (GAIN International) in patients with acute stroke: a randomised controlled trial. GAIN International Investigators. Lancet 2000;355:1949–1954.
8.
Lyden P, Shuaib A, Ng K, Levin K, Atkinson RP, Rajput A, Wechsler L, Ashwood T, Claesson L, Odergren T, Salazar-Grueso E: Clomethiazole Acute Stroke Study in ischemic stroke (CLASS-I): final results. Stroke 2002;33:122–128.
9.
Diener HC, Cortens M, Ford G, Grotta J, Hacke W, Kaste M, Koudstaal PJ, Wessel T: Lubeluzole in acute ischemic stroke treatment: A double-blind study with an 8-hour inclusion window comparing a 10-mg daily dose of lubeluzole with placebo. Stroke 2000;31:2543–2551.
10.
Sacco RL, DeRosa JT, Haley EC Jr, Levin B, Ordronneau P, Phillips SJ, Rundek T, Snipes RG, Thompson JL: Glycine antagonist in neuroprotection for patients with acute stroke: GAIN Americas: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;285:1719–1728.
11.
Muir KW, Lees KR, Ford I, Davis S: Magnesium for acute stroke (Intravenous Magnesium Efficacy in Stroke trial): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;363:439–445.
12.
Warach S, Dashe JF, Edelman RR: Clinical outcome in ischemic stroke predicted by early diffusion-weighted and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:53–59.
13.
Warach S, Pettigrew LC, Dashe JF, Pullicino P, Lefkowitz DM, Sabounjian L, Harnett K, Schwiderski U, Gammans R: Effect of citicoline on ischemic lesions as measured by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Citicoline 010 Investigators. Ann Neurol 2000;48:713–722.
14.
Lovblad KO, Baird AE, Schlaug G, Benfield A, Siewert B, Voetsch B, Connor A, Burzynski C, Edelman RR, Warach S: Ischemic lesion volumes in acute stroke by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging correlate with clinical outcome. Ann Neurol 1997;42:164–170.
15.
Tong DC, Yenari MA, Albers GW, O’Brien M, Marks MP, Moseley ME: Correlation of perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MRI with NIHSS score in acute (<6.5 h) ischemic stroke. Neurology 1998;50:864–870.
16.
Warach S, Sabounjian LA: ECCO 2000 study of citicoline for treatment of acute ischemic stroke: Effects on infarct volumes measured by MRI. Stroke 2000;31:42.
17.
Davalos A, Castillo J, Alvarez-Sabin J, Secades JJ, Mercadal J, Lopez S, Cobo E, Warach S, Sherman D, Clark WM, Lozano R: Oral citicoline in acute ischemic stroke: an individual patient data pooling analysis of clinical trials. Stroke 2002;33:2850–2857.
18.
Bordi F, Pietra C, Ziviani L, Reggiani A: The glycine antagonist GV150526 protects somatosensory evoked potentials and reduces the infarct area in the MCAo model of focal ischemia in the rat. Exp Neurol 1997;145:425–433.
19.
Phase II studies of the glycine antagonist GV150526 in acute stroke: the North American experience. The North American Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection (GAIN) Investigators. Stroke 2000;31:358–365.
20.
Schlaug G, Benfield A, Baird AE, Siewert B, Lovblad KO, Parker RA, Edelman RR, Warach S: The ischemic penumbra: operationally defined by diffusion and perfusion MRI. Neurology 1999;53:1528–1537.
21.
Neumann-Haefelin T, Wittsack HJ, Wenserski F, Siebler M, Seitz RJ, Modder U, Freund HJ: Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI. The DWI/PWI mismatch region in acute stroke. Stroke 1999;30:1591–1597.
22.
Baird AE, Benfield A, Schlaug G, Siewert B, Lovblad KO, Edelman RR, Warach S: Enlargement of human cerebral ischemic lesion volumes measured by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1997;41:581–589.
23.
Parsons MW, Barber PA, Chalk J, Darby DG, Rose S, Desmond PM, Gerraty RP, Tress BM, Wright PM, Donnan GA, Davis SM: Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI response to thrombolysis in stroke. Ann Neurol 2002;51:28–37.
24.
Rother J, Schellinger PD, Gass A, Siebler M, Villringer A, Fiebach JB, Fiehler J, Jansen O, Kucinski T, Schoder V, Szabo K, Junge-Hulsing GJ, Hennerici M, Zeumer H, Sartor K, Weiller C, Hacke W: Effect of intravenous thrombolysis on MRI parameters and functional outcome in acute stroke <6 h. Stroke 2002;33:2438–2445.
25.
Hacke W, Albers G, Al-Rawi Y, Bogousslavsky J, Davalos A, Eliasziw M, Fischer M, Furlan A, Kaste M, Lees KR, Soehngen M, Warach S, DIAS Study Group: The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke 2005;36:66–73.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
2006
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.