Background: Aphasia is considered a risk factor for disability after stroke. The aim of this study was to assess the specific influence of aphasia on rehabilitation results. Method: A case-control study in consecutive left brain-damaged stroke inpatients, enrolled in three homogeneous subgroups [nonaphasic (NA) patients, aphasic with comprehension deficit (CD), and without comprehension deficit (NCD)] matched for age and onset-admission interval. Rehabilitation results (gain, efficiency, effectiveness of treatment, percentage and odds ratio of dropouts and of each degree of therapeutic response, assessed by Barthel Index and Rivermead Mobility Index) were compared among the subgroups. Results: Two hundred and forty patients with sequelae of a first stroke were enrolled. CD patients, as compared with NCD and NA ones, had a significantly more severe basal neurological and functional status at admission, minor effectiveness on ADL and mobility, a higher percentage of low responders on ADL and urinary incontinence at discharge, and a risk of low therapeutic response on ADL nearly 4 times higher than the other patients (OR = 4.22, 95% CI = 1.90–9.38). The rehabilitative behavior between NCD and NA was similar. However, all subgroups (NA, CD and NCD) showed a significant improvement (p < 0.001) between their basal and discharge score, both on BI and RMI. Conclusions: Comprehension language deficit was confirmed to be a strong negative rehabilitation prognostic factor despite the speech therapy done by all CD patients.

1.
Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, Kahan T, Von Arbin M: Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med 2001;249:413–422.
2.
Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS: Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol 1995;38:659–666.
3.
Kauhanen ML, Korpelainen JT, Hiltunen P, Maatta R, Mononen H, Brusin E, Sotaniemi KA, Myllyla VV: Aphasia, depression, and non-verbal cognitive impairment in ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2000;10:455–461.
4.
Flick CL: Stroke rehabilitation. 4. Stroke outcome and psychosocial consequences. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:S21–S26.
5.
Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Pratesi L, Traballesi M, Lubich S, Grasso MG: Functional outcome in stroke inpatient rehabilitation: predicting no, low and high response patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 1998;8:228–234.
6.
Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B: Predicting discharge status at commencement of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1989;20:766–769.
7.
Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B: Efficiency, effectiveness and duration of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1990;21:241–246.
8.
Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS: Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. II. Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:406–412.
9.
Ween JE, Alexander MP, D’Esposito M, Roberts M: Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology 1996;47:388–392.
10.
Kalra L: Does age affect benefits of stroke unit rehabilitation? Stroke 1994;25:346–351.
11.
Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS: The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1994;25:808–813.
12.
Sanchez-Blanco I, Ochoa-Sangrador C, Lopez-Munain L, Izquierdo-Sanchez M, Fermoso-Garcia J: Predictive model of functional independence in stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation programme. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:464–475.
13.
Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W: Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2002;33:179–185.
14.
Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Troisi E, Bragoni M, Coiro P, De Angelis D, Pratesi L, Venturiero V, Grasso MG: Aging and stroke rehabilitation. A case-comparison study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;15:98–105.
15.
Rossi PW, Forer S, Wiechers D: Effective rehabilitation for patients with stroke: analysis of entry, functional gain, and discharge to community. J Neurol Rehabil 1997;11:27–33.
16.
Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, Morelli D, Troisi E, Coiro P, Bragoni M: Early versus delayed inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a matched comparison conducted in Italy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:695–700.
17.
Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, Mohr JP, Hier DB: The stroke data bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke 1988;19:547–554.
18.
Coté R, Battista RN, Wolfson C, Boucher J, Adam J, Hachinski V: The Canadian Neurological Scale: validation and reliability assessment. Neurology 1989;39:638–643.
19.
American Psychiatric Association: DSM-IV. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 4. Washington, American Psychiatric Press, 1994.
20.
Arruda JE, Stern RA, Somerville JA: Measurement of mood states in stroke patients: validation of the visual analog mood scales. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:676–680.
21.
Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C: Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991;337:1521–1526.
22.
Mahoney F, Barthel DW: Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61–65.
23.
Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM: The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud 1991;13:50–54.
24.
Vanclay F: Functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1991;22:105–108.
25.
Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, Bragoni M, Coiro P, De Angelis D, Fusco FR, Morelli D, Venturiero V, Troisi E: Functional outcome of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients after inpatient rehabilitation: a matched comparison. Stroke 2003;34:2861–2865.
26.
Troisi E, Paolucci S, Silvestrini M, Matteis M, Vernieri F, Grasso MG, Caltagirone C: Prognostic factors in stroke rehabilitation: the possible role of pharmacological treatment. Acta Neurol Scand 2002;105:100–106.
27.
Ciurli P, Marangolo P, Basso A: Esame del Linguaggio – II. Firenze, OS Organizzazioni Speciali, 2004.
28.
De Renzi E, Faglioni P: Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the token test. Cortex 1978;14:41–49.
29.
Godefroy O, Dubois C, Debachy B, Leclerc M, Kreisler A: Vascular aphasias: main characteristics of patients hospitalized in acute stroke units. Stroke 2002;33:702–705.
30.
Basso A: Approaches to neuropsychological rehabilitation. Language disorders; in: Meier MJ, Benton AL, Diller L (eds): Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. London, Churchill Livingstone, 1987, pp 294–314.
31.
Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Pratesi L, Traballesi M, Grasso MG, Lubich S: Poststroke depression and its role in rehabilitation of inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:985–990.
32.
Albert ML: Aphasia therapy works! Stroke 2003;34:987–993.
33.
Greener J, Enderby P, Whurr R: Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; CD000425.
34.
Ruchinskas RA, Singer HK, Repetz NK: Cognitive status and ambulation in geriatric rehabilitation: walking without thinking? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:1224–1228.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.