Background: Paramedics require an effective prehospital tool to eliminate stroke mimics and to assist in the identification of suitable candidates for thrombolytic therapy. The Faster Access to Stroke Therapies study combined two validated stroke assessment tools (the Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen, LAPSS, and the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale, CPSS) to form the Melbourne Ambulance Stroke Screen (MASS), and performed an in-field validation by Australian paramedics. Methods: Over a 12-month period, 18 paramedics participated in the Faster Access to Stroke Therapies study and prospectively collected data contained in the MASS on all stroke dispatches, and for other patients with a focal neurological deficit. Sensitivity and specificity analysis of the LAPSS, CPSS and MASS was calculated and equivalence analysis performed. Results: Paramedics completed 100 MASS assessments for 73 (73%) stroke/transient ischemic attack patients and 27 (27%) stroke mimics. The sensitivity of the MASS (90%, 95% CI: 81–96%) showed statistical equivalence to the sensitivity of the CPSS (95%, p = 0.45) and superiority to the LAPSS (78%, p = 0.008). The specificity of the MASS (74%, 95% CI: 53–88%) was equivalent to that of the LAPSS (85%, p = 0.25) and superior to the CPSS (54%, p = 0.007). All patients misidentified by the MASS (7 strokes, 7 mimics) were ineligible for thrombolytic therapy. Conclusion: The MASS is simple to use, with accurate prehospital identification of stroke. It distinguishes stroke mimics, with good recognition of suitable patients for thrombolytic therapy.

1.
Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581–1587.
2.
Suyama J, Crocco T: Prehospital care of the stroke patient. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2002;20:537–552.
3.
Brainin M, Olsen TS, Chamorro A, Diener HC, Ferro J, Hennerici MG, Langhorne P, Sivenius J: Organization of stroke care: Education, referral, emergency management and imaging, stroke units and rehabilitation. European Stroke Initiative. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;17(suppl 2):1–14.
4.
Kothari R, Jauch E, Broderick J, Brott T, Sauerbeck L, Khoury J, Liu T: Acute stroke: Delays to presentation and emergency department evaluation. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:3–8.
5.
Lacy CR, Suh DC, Bueno M, Kostis JB: Delay in presentation and evaluation for acute stroke: Stroke Time Registry for Outcomes Knowledge and Epidemiology (S.T.R.O.K.E.). Stroke 2001;32:63–69.
6.
Rosamond WD, Gorton RA, Hinn AR, Hohenhaus SM, Morris DL: Rapid response to stroke symptoms: The Delay in Accessing Stroke Healthcare (DASH) study. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:45–51.
7.
Wein TH, Staub L, Felberg R, Hickenbottom SL, Chan W, Grotta JC, Demchuk AM, Groff J, Bartholomew LK, Morgenstern LB: Activation of emergency medical services for acute stroke in a nonurban population: The T.L.L. Temple Foundation Stroke Project. Stroke 2000;31:1925–1928.
8.
Wester P, Radberg J, Lundgren B, Peltonen M: Factors associated with delayed admission to hospital and in-hospital delays in acute stroke and TIA: A prospective, multicenter study. Seek-Medical-Attention-in-Time Study Group. Stroke 1999;30:40–48.
9.
Brice JH, Griswell JK, Delbridge TR, Key CB: Stroke: From recognition by the public to management by emergency medical services. Prehosp Emerg Care 2002;6:99–106.
10.
Harbison J, Massey A, Barnett L, Hodge D, Ford GA: Rapid ambulance protocol for acute stroke. Lancet 1999;353:1935.
11.
Kothari R, Barsan W, Brott T, Broderick J, Ashbrock S: Frequency and accuracy of prehospital diagnosis of acute stroke. Stroke 1995;26:937–941.
12.
Smith WS, Isaacs M, Corry MD: Accuracy of paramedic identification of stroke and transient ischemic attack in the field. Prehosp Emerg Care 1998;2:170–175.
13.
Harbison J, Hossain O, Jenkinson D, Davis J, Louw SJ, Ford GA: Diagnostic accuracy of stroke referrals from primary care, emergency room physicians, and ambulance staff using the face arm speech test. Stroke 2003;34:71–76.
14.
Smith WS, Corry MD, Fazackerley J, Isaacs SM: Improved paramedic sensitivity in identifying stroke victims in the prehospital setting. Prehosp Emerg Care 1999;3:207–210.
15.
Kidwell CS, Saver JL, Schubert GB, Eckstein M, Starkman S: Design and retrospective analysis of the Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS). Prehosp Emerg Care 1998;2:267–273.
16.
Kidwell CS, Starkman S, Eckstein M, Weems K, Saver JL: Identifying stroke in the field. Prospective validation of the Los Angeles prehospital stroke screen (LAPSS). Stroke 2000;31:71–76.
17.
Kothari R, Hall K, Brott T, Broderick J: Early stroke recognition: Developing an out-of-hospital NIH Stroke Scale. Acad Emerg Med 1997;4:986–990.
18.
Kothari RU, Pancioli A, Liu T, Brott T, Broderick J: Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale: reproducibility and validity. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:373–378.
19.
Thrift AG, Dewey HM, Macdonell RA, McNeil JJ, Donnan GA: Stroke incidence on the east coast of Australia: The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2000;31:2087–2092.
20.
Bray J, Martin J, Bernard S, Bladin C: Are ambulance dispatcher protocols adequate in identifying stroke (abstract)? Intern Med J 2004;34(suppl):A1–A16.
21.
Warlow CP, Dennis MS, van Gijn, Hankey GJ, Sandercock PAG, Bamford JM, Wardlaw JM: Stroke: A Practical Guide to Management, ed 2. Oxford, Blackwell, 2001.
22.
Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581–1587.
23.
Hawass NE: Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic procedures performed on the same group of patients. Br J Radiol 1997;70:360–366.
24.
Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581–1587.
25.
Szoeke CE, Parsons MW, Butcher KS, Baird TA, Mitchell PJ, Fox SE, Davis SM: Acute stroke thrombolysis with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in an Australian tertiary hospital. Med J Aust 2003;178:324–328.
26.
Bray J, Bladin C, Martin J, Bernard S: Improving the pre-hospital diagnosis of acute stroke with stroke screening tools (abstract). Stroke 2004;34:283.
27.
Tirschwell D, Schubert G, Longstreth W, Cobb L, Copass M: Population-based comparison of the Cincinnati and Los Angeles prehospital stroke scales (abstract). Stroke 2003;34:267.
28.
Hankey GJ: Stroke: Your Questions Answered. London, Churchill Livingstone, 2002.
29.
Nor AM, McAllister C, Louw SJ, Dyker AG, Davis M, Jenkinson D, Ford GA: Agreement between ambulance paramedic- and physician-recorded neurological signs with Face Arm Speech Test (FAST) in acute stroke patients. Stroke 2004;35:1355–1359.
30.
Diez-Tejedor E, Fuentes B: Acute care in stroke: The importance of early intervention to achieve better brain protection. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;17(suppl 1):130–137.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.