Abstract
Background: Large randomised trials performed in the 1980s and early 1990s showed that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is beneficial for patients with recently symptomatic severe stenosis. Some surgeons have argued that the operative risk of stroke and death has fallen over the last decade due to refinements in operative technique, and that the indications for surgery should therefore now be broadened. Yet, studies of routinely collected data report higher operative mortality than in the trials, and surgical case series without independent post-operative assessment by a neurologist may not provide reliable data on stroke risk. Methods: We performed a systematic review of all studies published between 1994 and 2001 inclusive that which reported the risks of stroke and death for symptomatic carotid stenosis, and compared the reported risks and patient characteristics with those in the ECST and NASCET and with our previous review of studies published prior to 1995. Pooled estimates of the operative risk of stroke and death were obtained by Mantel-Haenszel meta-analysis. Results: Of 383 studies published between 1994 and 2001, only 45 reported operative risks for patients with symptomatic stenosis separately. The pooled operative risk of stroke and death reported in studies published by surgeons only (4.2%, 95% CI = 2.9–5.5, 34 studies) was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) than that in the ECST and NASCET combined (7.0%, 95% CI = 6.2–8.0), whereas the pooled risk reported in studies that involved neurologists was similar (6.5%, 95% CI = 4.3–8.7, 11 studies, p = 0.6). In contrast, operative mortality in ECST and NASCET was significantly lower than in other studies published between 1994 and 2001. By comparison with our previous review, when stratified according to involvement of neurologists, we found no evidence of a reduction in published risks of death or stroke and death due to CEA between 1985 and 2001. Conclusions: There is no evidence of a systematic reduction over the last decade in the published risks of stroke and death due to CEA for symptomatic stenosis. Operative risks in studies with comparable outcome assessment are similar to ECST and NASCET. The surgical data from the large trials are still likely therefore to be applicable to routine clinical practice.
References
1.
Rothwell PM, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP, for the ECST: Re-analysis of the final results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial. Stroke 2003;34:514–523.
2.
Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB, et al for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators: Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1415–1425.
3.
Rothwell PM, Gutnikov SA, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Taylor W, Mayberg MR, Warlow CP, Barnett HJM for the Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists’ Collaboration: Pooled analysis of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003;361:107–116.
4.
Wong JH, Findlay JM, Suarez-Almazor ME: Regional performance of carotid endarterectomy. Appropriateness, outcomes, and risk factors for complications. Stroke 1997;28:891–898.
5.
Naylor AR, Hayes PD, Allroggen H, Lennard N, Gaunt ME, Thompson MM, et al: Reducing the risk of carotid surgery: A 7-year audit of the role of monitoring and quality control assessment. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:750–759.
6.
Brittenden J, Bradbury AW: Are we still performing inappropriate carotid endarterectomy? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000;20:158–162.
7.
Rothwell PM, Slattery J, Warlow CP: A systematic comparison of the risks of stroke and death due to carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis. Stroke 1996;27:266–269.
8.
Rothwell PM, Slattery J, Warlow CP: A systematic review of the risks of stroke and death due to endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 1996;27:260–265.
9.
Cebul RD, Snow RJ, Pine R, Hertzer NR, Norris DG: Indications, outcomes, and provider volumes for carotid endarterectomy. JAMA 1998;279:1282–1287.
10.
Hannan EL, Popp AJ, Tranmer B, Fuestel P, Waldman J, Shah D: Relationship between provider volume and mortality for carotid endarterectomies in New York state. Stroke 1998;29:2292–2297.
11.
Rothwell P, Warlow C: Is self-audit reliable? Lancet 1995;346:1623.
12.
Beebe HG, Clagett GP, DeWeese JA, Moore WS, Robertson JT, Sandok B, et al: Assessing risk associated with carotid endarterectomy. A statement for health professionals by an Ad hoc Committee on Carotid Surgery Standards of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Circulation 1989;79:472–473.
13.
Moore WS, Barnett HJ, Beebe HG, Bernstein EF, Brener BJ, Brott T, et al: Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad hoc Committee, American Heart Association. Stroke 1995;26:188–201.
14.
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–453.
15.
European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group: MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1235–1243.
16.
McCullagh P, Nelder JA: Generalised linea models, London, Chapman & Hall, 1979.
17.
Boontje AH: Carotid endarterectomy without a temporary indwelling shunt: Results and analysis of back pressure measurements. Cardiovasc Surg 1994;2:549–554.
18.
Poulias GE, Doundoulakis N, Skoutas B, Haddad H, Karkanias G, Papadakis E: Carotid artery surgery and the principle of prophylaxis: Recurrence in operated and nonoperated patients. Cardiovasc Surg 1994;2:586–591.
19.
Libman RB, Sacco RL, Shi T, Correll JW, Mohr JP: Outcome after carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Surg Neurol 1994;41:443–449.
20.
Perler BA, Williams GM: Carotid endarterectomy in the very elderly: Is it worthwhile? Surgery 1994;116:479–483.
21.
Urbinati S, Di Pasquale G, Andreoli A, Lusa AM, Carini G, Grazi P, et al: Preoperative noninvasive coronary risk stratification in candidates for carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 1994;25:2022–2027.
22.
Taylor DW, Barnett HJ, Haynes RB, Ferguson GG, Sackett DL, Thorpe KE, et al and Carotid Endarterectomy (ACE) Trial Collaborators: Low-dose and high-dose acetylsalicylic acid for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999;353:2179–2184.
23.
Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): A randomised trial. Lancet 2001;357:1729–1737.
24.
Rothwell PM,Warlow CP for the European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group: Interpretation of operative risks of individual surgeons. Lancet 1999;353:1325.
25.
Lennard N, Smith JL, Gaunt ME, Abbott RJ, London NJ, Bell PR, et al: A policy of quality control assessment helps to reduce the risk of intraoperative stroke during carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999;17:234–240.
26.
Biller J, Feinberg WM, Castaldo JE, Whittemore AD, Harbaugh RE, Dempsey RJ, et al: Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 1998;29:554–562.
27.
Naik DK, Shirer WC, Stephenson CB, Meech PR: Carotid endarterectomy at Wellington Hospital. N Z Med J 1994;107:334–335.
28.
Musser DJ, Nicholas GG, Reed JF III: Death and adverse cardiac events after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1994;19:615–622.
29.
Riles TS, Imparato AM, Jacobowitz GR, Lamparello PJ, Giangola G, Adelman MA, et al: The cause of perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1994;19:206–214.
30.
Mattos MA, Modi JR, Mansour MA, Mortenson D, Karich T, Hodgson KJ, et al: Evolution of carotid endarterectomy in two community hospitals: Springfield revisited – Seventeen years and 2,243 operations later. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:719–728.
31.
Perler BA, Ursin F, Shanks U, Williams GM: Carotid Dacron patch angioplasty: Immediate and long-term results of a prospective series. Cardiovasc Surg 1995;3:631–636.
32.
Perler BA: The impact of advanced age on the results of carotid endarterectomy: An outcome analysis. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:559–564.
33.
Frawley JE, Hicks RG, Gray LJ, Niesche JW: Carotid endarterectomy without a shunt for symptomatic lesions associated with contralateral severe stenosis or occlusion. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:421–427.
34.
Golledge J, Cuming R, Beattie DK, Davies AH, Greenhalgh RM: Influence of patient-related variables on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1996;24:120–126.
35.
Musser DJ, Calligaro KD, Dougherty MJ, Raviola CA, DeLaurentis DA: Safety and cost-efficiency of 24-hour hospitalization for carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 1996;10:143–146.
36.
Bratzler DW, Oehlert WH, Murray CK, Bumpus LJ, Moore LL, Piatt DS: Carotid endarterectomy in Oklahoma Medicare beneficiaries: Patient characteristics and outcomes. J Okla State Med Assoc 1996;89:423–429.
37.
Plestis KA, Kantis G, Haygood K, Earl N, Howell JF: Carotid endarterectomy with homologous vein patch angioplasty: A review of 1,006 cases. J Vasc Surg 1996;24:109–119.
38.
Spencer MP: Transcranial Doppler monitoring and causes of stroke from carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 1997;28:685–691.
39.
Tan LC, Sutton GL, Taffinder NJ, Perry M, Fail T: Audit of 149 consecutive carotid endarterectomies performed by a single surgeon in a district general hospital over a 12-year period. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996;78:340–344.
40.
Kerdiles Y, Lucas A, Podeur L, Ferte P, Cardon A: Results of carotid surgery in elderly patients. J Cardiovasc Surg 1997;38:327–334.
41.
Paty PS, Darling RC, III, Woratyla S, Chang BB, Kreienberg PB, Shah DM: Timing of carotid endarterectomy in patients with recent stroke. Surgery 1997;122:850–854.
42.
Hertzer NR, O’hara PJ, Mascha EJ, Krajewski LP, Sullivan TM, Beven EG: Early outcome assessment for 2,228 consecutive carotid endarterectomy procedures: The Cleveland Clinic experience from 1989 to 1995. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:1–10.
43.
Jordan WD Jr, Voellinger DC, Fisher WS, Redden D, McDowell HA: A comparison of carotid angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy with regional anesthesia. J Vasc Surg 1998;28:397–403.
44.
Karp HR, Flanders WD, Shipp CC, Taylor B, Martin D: Carotid endarterectomy among Medicare beneficiaries: A statewide evaluation of appropriateness and outcome. Stroke 1998;29:46–52.
45.
Rigdon EE: Racial and gender differences in outcome after carotid endarterectomy. Am Surg 1998;64:527–530.
46.
Hoffmann M, Robbs JV, Abdool Carrim AT: Carotid endarterectomy after recent stroke – how soon? An interim analysis. S Afr J Surg 1998;36:63–67.
47.
Mayo SW, Eldrup JJ, Lucas FL, Wennberg DE, Bredenberg CE, Ruby ST, et al: Carotid endarterectomy after NASCET and ACAS: A statewide study. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:1017–1023.
48.
Kucey DS, Bowyer B, Iron K, Austin P, Anderson G, Tu JV: Determinants of outcome after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1998;28:1051–1058.
49.
Syrek JR, Calligaro KD, Dougherty MJ, Doerr KJ, McAfee BS, Raviola CA, et al: Five-step protocol for carotid endarterectomy in the managed health care era. Surgery 1999;125:96–101.
50.
Gao MY, Sillesen HH, Lorentzen JE, Schroeder TV: Eversion carotid endarterectomy generates fewer microemboli than standard carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000;20:153–157.
51.
Love A, Hollyoak MA: Carotid endarterectomy and local anaesthesia: Reducing the disasters. Cardiovasc Surg 2000;8:429–435.
52.
Clement-Darling R III, Kreienberg PB, Roddy SP, Paty PSK, Chang BB, Lloyd WE, et al: Analysis of the effect of asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study on the outcome and volume of carotid endarterectomy. Cardiovasc Surg 2000;8:436–440.
53.
Kresowik TF, Hemann RA, Grund SL, Hendel ME, Brenton M, Wiblin RT, et al: Improving the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy: Results of a statewide quality improvement project. J Vasc Surg 2000;31:918–926.
54.
Goldstein LB, McCrory DC, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Ancukiewicz M, Oddone EZ, et al: Multicenter review of preoperative risk factors for carotid endarterectomy in patients with ipsilateral symptoms. Stroke 1994;25:1116–1121.
55.
Kawaguchi S, Sakaki T, Tsunoda S, Morimoto T, Hoshida T, Hiramatsu K, et al: Strategies to improve the outcome of carotid endarterectomy. Neurol Med Chir Tokyo 1994;34:86–90.
56.
Wilkinson JM, Rochester JR, Sivaguru A, Cameron IC, Fisher R, Beard JD: Middle cerebral artery blood velocity, embolisation, and neurological outcome during carotid endarterectomy: A prospective comparison of the Javid and the Pruitt-Inahara shunts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;14:399–402.
57.
Ballota E, Da Giau G, Guerra M: Carotid endarterectomy and contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion: Perioperative risks and long-term stroke and survival rates. Surgery 1998;123:234–240.
58.
Blohme L, Sandstrom V, Hellstrom G, Swedenborg J, Takolander R: Complications in carotid endarterectomy are predicted by qualifying symptoms and preoperative CT findings. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999;17:213–218.
59.
Kahn MB, Patterson HK, Seltzer J, Fitzpatrick M, Smullens S, Bell R, et al: Early carotid endarterectomy in selected stroke patients. Ann Vasc Surg 1999;13:463–467.
60.
Hartmann A, Hupp T, Koch HC, Dollinger P, Stapf C, Schmidt R, et al: Prospective study on the complication rate of carotid surgery. Cerebrovasc Dis 1999;9:152–156.
61.
Chatraverdi S, Aggarwal R, Murugappan A: Results of carotid endarterectomy with prospective neurologist follow-up. Neurology 2000;55:769–772.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
