The aim of this study was to assess the specific influence of age on basal functional status and rehabilitation results. We conducted a case-comparison study on 150 stroke inpatients. They were enrolled in homogeneous subgroups, matched for severity of stroke (measured by Canadian Neurological Scale – CNS) and onset admission interval (within 3 days) and divided into five subgroups according toage: ≤50; 51–64; 65–74; 75–84; and ≧85 years. Even when severity of stroke was the same, increasing age was associated with greater disability in activities of daily living (ADL) and mobility, minor results of rehabilitation treatment and shorter length of stay. Patients ≧85 years were nearly ten times as likely to show a low response in ADL (OR = 9.28, 95% CI = 2.89–29.76) and nearly six times in mobility (OR = 6.13, 95% CI = 2.18–17.25) than younger patients. However, rehabilitation treatment was efficacious also in patients ≧85 years, with effectiveness of treatment 27.96% on ADL and 18.64% on mobility. On one hand our results confirm the unfavorable influence of age on functional outcome and on the other that inpatient rehabilitation is substantially effective also for very old patients, although less than for younger ones.

1.
Stewart DG: Stroke rehabilitation. 1. Epidemiologic aspects and acute management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:S4–S7.
2.
Carolei A, Marini C, Di Napoli M, Di Gianfilippo G, Santalucia P, Baldassarre M, De Matteis G, di Orio F: High stroke incidence in the prospective community-based L’Aquila registry (1994–1998). First year’s results. Stroke 1997;28:2500–2506.
3.
Marini C, Triggiani L, Cimini N, Ciancarelli I, De Santis F, Russo T, Baldassarre M, di Orio F, Carolei A: Proportion of older people in the community as a predictor of increasing stroke incidence. Neuroepidemiology 2001;20:91–95.
4.
Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC: Discharge outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1992;23:978–982.
5.
Johnston MV, Kirshblum S, Zorowitz R, Shiflett SC: Prediction of outcomes following rehabilitation of stroke patients. Neurorehabil 1992;2:72–97.
6.
Chamie M: What does morbidity have to do with disability? Disabil Rehabil 1995;17:323–337.
7.
Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS: The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1994;25:808–813.
8.
Kalra L: Does age affect benefits of stroke unit rehabilitation? Stroke 1994;25:346–351.
9.
Ween JE, Alexander MP, D’Esposito M, Roberts M: Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology 1996;47:388–392.
10.
Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Pratesi L, Traballesi M, Lubich S, Grasso MG: Functional outcome in stroke inpatient rehabilitation: predicting no, low and high response patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 1998;8:228–234.
11.
Flick CL: Stroke rehabilitation. 4. Stroke outcome and psychosocial consequences. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:S21–S26.
12.
Sanchez-Blanco I, Ochoa-Sangrador C, Lopez-Munain L, Izquierdo-Sanchez M, Fermoso-Garcia J: Predictive model of functional independence in stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation programme. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:464–475.
13.
Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W: Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2002;33:179–185.
14.
Falconer JA, Naughton BJ, Strasser DC, Sinacore JM: Stroke inpatient rehabilitation: a comparison across age groups. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994;42:39–44.
15.
Sharma JC, Fletcher S, Vassallo M: Strokes in the elderly – higher acute and 3-month mortality – an explanation. Cerebrovasc Dis 1999;9:2–9.
16.
Tesio L, Franchignoni FP, Perucca L, Porta GL: The influence of age on length of stay, functional independence and discharge destination of rehabilitation inpatients in Italy. Disabil Rehabil 1996;18:502–508.
17.
Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Vataja R, Kaste M: Comparison of stroke features and disability in daily life in patients with ischemic stroke aged 55 to 70 and 71 to 85 years. Stroke 1997;28:729–735.
18.
Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Pracucci G, Basile AM, Trefoloni G, Vanni P, Wolfe CD, Tilling K, Ebrahim S, Inzitari D: Stroke in the very old: clinical presentation and determinants of 3- month functional outcome: A European perspective. European BIOMED Study of Stroke Care Group. Stroke 1999;30:2313–2319.
19.
Aruin AS, Hanke T, Chaudhuri G, Harvey R, Rao N: Compelled weightbearing in persons with hemiparesis following stroke: the effect of a lift insert and goal-directed balance exercise. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000;37:65–72.
20.
Galski T, Bruno RL, Zorowitz R, Walker J: Predicting length of stay, functional outcome, and aftercare in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. The dominant role of higher-order cognition. Stroke 1993;24:1794–1800.
21.
Thommessen B, Bautz-Holter E, Laake K: Predictors of outcome of rehabilitation of elderly stroke patients in a geriatric ward. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:123–128.
22.
Rossi PW, Forer S, Wiechers D: Effective rehabilitation for patients with stroke: analysis of entry, functional gain, and discharge to community. J Neuro Rehab 1997;11:27–33.
23.
Hochstenbach J: Rehabilitation is more than functional recovery. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22:201–204.
24.
Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, Morelli D, Troisi E, Coiro P, Bragoni M: Early versus delayed inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a matched comparison conducted in Italy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:695–700.
25.
Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, Mohr JP, Hier DB: The stroke data bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke 1988;19:547–554.
26.
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-III-R). 3rd ed. Washington, American Psychiatric Press, 1987.
27.
Liu M, Domen K, Chino N: Comorbidity measures for stroke outcome research: a preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:166–172.
28.
Liu M, Tsuji T, Tsujiuchi K, Chino N: Comorbidities in stroke patients as assessed with a newly developed comorbidity scale. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999;78:416–424.
29.
Coté R, Battista RN, Wolfson C, Boucher J, Adam J, Hachinski V: The Canadian Neurological Scale: validation and reliability assessment. Neurology 1989;39:638–643.
30.
Mahoney F,Barthel DW: Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61–65.
31.
Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM: The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud 1991;13:50–54.
32.
Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B: Efficiency, effectiveness and duration of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1990;21:241–246.
33.
Pizzamiglio L, Antonucci G, Judica A, Montenero P, Razzano C, Zoccolotti P: Cognitive rehabilitation of the hemineglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1992;14:901–923.
34.
Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, Pizzamiglio L: The role of unilateral spatial neglect in rehabilitation of right brain- damaged ischemic stroke patients: A matched comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:743–749.
35.
Basso A: Approaches to neuropsychological rehabilitation: language disorders; in Meter MJ, Benson AL, Dialer L (eds.): Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1989, pp. 294–314.
36.
Rankin J: Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II: Prognosis. Scott Med J 1957;2:200–215.
37.
Kalra L: The influence of stroke unit rehabilitation on functional recovery from stroke. Stroke 1994;25:821–825.
38.
Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB: Atrial fibrillation: a major contributor to stroke in the elderly. The Framingham Study. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1561–1564.
39.
Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB: Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 1991;22:983–988.
40.
Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Pedersen PM, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS: Prevalence and risk factors of incontinence after stroke. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1997;28:58–62.
41.
Kong KH, Chua KS, Tow AP: Clinical characteristics and functional outcome of stroke patients 75 years old and older. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1535–1539.
42.
Ween JE, Alexander MP, D’Esposito M, Roberts M: Incontinence after stroke in a rehabilitation setting: outcome associations and predictive factors. Neurology 1996;47:659–663.
43.
Paolucci S, Silvestri G, Lubich S, Pratesi L, Traballesi M, Gigli GL: Poststroke late seizures and their role in rehabilitation of inpatients. Epilepsia 1997;38:266–270.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.