Background and Purpose: To study the distribution, extent and sonographic characterisation of radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Methods: The distribution of plaques, the extent of stenosis, and the sonographic characterisation of the plaque at maximum stenosis were recorded in 71 NPC patients. The results were compared with the ultrasound results of a control group of 142 patients presenting with symptoms of cerebrovascular disease or carotid bruit. Results: NPC patients had a higher incidence of carotid stenosis (77 vs. 50.7%). The common carotid arteries were most commonly affected by radiation-induced stenosis (93/142 vs. 37/284 in the control group), whereas the carotid bulb was the most commonly affected (56/284) site in the control group. Significantly more NPC patients had moderate-to-severe stenosis (21/71 vs. 27/142). Analysis of the sonographic appearance of radiation-induced and atherosclerotic plaques showed more diffuse involvement in the post-radiation group. Non-calcified plaques and intraplaque hypoechoic foci were also more frequent in the post-radiation group. Conclusions: Radiation-induced carotid stenosis is more diffuse in distribution, is associated with more severe luminal stenosis and has different sonographic plaque characterisation compared with carotid stenosis without radiation exposure.

1.
Signorelli SS, Salvatore S, Luigi D, Pia CM, Giuseppe P, Sarina C: Serum lipids and lipoproteins and carotid artery wall intima-media thickness in a population of menopausal women. Menopause 1999;6:230–232.
2.
King LJ, Hasnain SN, Webb JAW, Kingston JE, Shafford EA, Lister TA, Shamash J, Reznek RH: Asymptomatic carotid arterial disease in young patients following neck radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma. Radiology 1999;213:167–172.
3.
Pauletto P, Palatini P, Da Ros S, Pagliara V, Santipolo N, Baccilieri S, Casiglia E, Mormino P, Pessina AC: Factors underlying the increase in carotid intima media thickness in borderline hypertensives. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:1231–1237.
4.
St. Louis EL, McLoughlin MJ, Wortzman G: Chronic damage to medium and large arteries following irradiation. Can Assoc Radiol J 1974;25:94–104.
5.
Pourcelot L, Tranquart F, De Bray JM, Philippot M, Bonithon MC, Salez F: Ultrasound characterization and quantification of carotid atherosclerosis lesions. Minerva Cardioangiol 1999;47:15–24.
6.
Bluth EI: Evaluation and characterization of carotid plaque. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1997;18:57–65.
7.
Ho JHC: Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Gann Monogr Cancer Res 1976;18:49–61.
8.
Lee AWM, Law SCK, Foo W, Poon YF, Chan DKK, O SK, Tung SY, Cheung FK, Thaw M, Ho JHC: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Local control by megavoltage irradiation. BJR 1993;66:528–536.
9.
McGuirt WF, Feehs RS, Bond G, Strickland HL, McKinney WM: Irradiation induced atherosclerosis: A factor in therapeutic planning. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:222–228.
10.
Cormier JM, Brisset D, Speir Y, Galiardo G, Marzelle J, Laurian C, Fichelle JM: Fifty-three atherosclerotic carotid stenosis in an irradiated environment. J Mal Vasc 1993;18:269–274.
11.
Winkelaar GB, Chen JC, Slvian AJ, Taylor DC, Teal PA, Hsiang YN: New duplex ultrasound scan criteria for managing symptomatic 50% or greater carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:986–994.
12.
Cina CS, Clase CM, Haynes BR: Refining the indications for carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis : A systematic review. J Vasc Surg 1999;30:606–617.
13.
Gray Weale AC, Graham JC, Burnett JR, Bryne K, Lusby RJ: Carotid artery atheroma: Comparison of preoperative B mode ultrasound appearance with carotid endarterectomy specimen pathology. J Cardiovasc Surg 1988;2:676–681.
14.
Geroulakos G, Ramaswarmi G, Nicolaides A, James K, Labropoulos N, Belcaro G, Holloway M: Characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques using high resolution real time ultrasonography. Br J Surg 1993;80:1274–1277.
15.
Reilly LM, Lusby RJ, Hughes L, Ferrell LD, Stoney RJ, Ehrenfeld WK: Carotid plaque histology using real-time ultrasonography: Clinical and therapeutic implications. Am J Surg 1983;146:188–193.
16.
Langsfield M, Gray-Weale AC, Lusby RJ: The role of plaque morphology and diameter reduction in the development of new symptoms in asymptomatic carotid arteries. J Vasc Surg 1989;9:548–557.
17.
Mohr JP: Asymptomatic carotid artery disease. Stroke 1982;13:431–433.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.