Abstract
Ultrasonographic imaging of the carotid arteries allows assessment of both early and advanced atherosclerotic disease. This noninvasive technique has played a central role in many recent epidemiological studies and is being used increasingly for evaluating the efficacy of atherosclerosis prevention trials. New developments in ultrasound equipment, the use of echocontrast agents, novel applications of three- and four-dimensional sonography and in vivo characterization of plaque constituents with high-resolution MRI have broadened the scope of imaging of arterial walls, providing both enhanced information on disease progression as well as new insights into pathomechanisms of carotid plaque embolization. This article highlights pertinent issues of imaging of arterial wall disease and discusses important areas of current and future research in this field.
References
1.
Pignoli P, Tremoli E, Poli A, Oreste P, Paoletti R: Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: A direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. Circulation 1986;74:1399–1406.
2.
Wong M, Edelstein J, Wollman J, Bond MG: Ultrasonic-pathological comparison of the human arterial wall: Verification of intima-media thickness. Arterioscler Thromb 1993;13:482–486.
3.
Riley WA, Barnes RW, Applegate WB, Dempsey R, Hartwell T, Davis VG, et al: Reproducibility of noninvasive ultrasonic measurement of carotid atherosclerosis: The Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Plaque Study. Stroke 1992;23:1062–1068.
4.
Gamble G, Beaumont B, Smith H, Zorn J, Sanders G, Merrilees M, et al: B-mode ultrasound images of the carotid artery wall: Correlation of ultrasound with histological measurements. Atherosclerosis 1993;102:163–173.
5.
Nolsoe CP, Engel U, Karstrup S, Torp-Pedersen S, Garre K, Holm HH: The aortic wall: An in vitro study of the double-line pattern in high-resolution US [see comments]. Radiology 1990;175:387–390.
6.
Poli A, Tremoli E, Colombo A, Sirtori M, Pignoli P, Paoletti R: Ultrasonographic measurement of the common carotid artery wall thickness in hypercholesterolemic patients. A new model for the quantitation and follow-up of preclinical atherosclerosis in living human subjects. Atherosclerosis 1988;70:253–261.
7.
O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Savage PJ, Borhani NO, Kittner SJ, et al: Thickening of the carotid wall: A marker for atherosclerosis in the elderly? Stroke 1996;27:224–231.
8.
Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE: Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: The Rotterdam Study. Circulation 1997;96:1432–1437.
9.
Azen SP, Qian D, Mack WJ, Sevanian A, Selzer RH, Liu CR, et al: Effect of supplementary antioxidant vitamin intake on carotid arterial wall intima-media thickness in a controlled clinical trial of cholesterol lowering. Circulation 1996;94:2369–2372.
10.
O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK Jr: Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. N Engl J Med 1999;340:14–22.
11.
Adams MR, Nakagomi A, Keech A, Robinson J, McCredie R, Bailey BP, et al: Carotid intima-media thickness is only weakly correlated with the extent and severity of coronary artery disease [see comments]. Circulation 1995;92:2127–2134.
12.
Touboul PJ, Prati P, Scarabin PY, Adrai V, Thibout E, Ducimetière P: Use of monitoring software to improve the measurement of carotid wall thickness by B-mode imaging. J Hypertens Suppl 1992;10:S37–S41.
13.
Selzer RH, Hodis HN, Kwong-Fu H, Mack WJ, Lee PL, Liu CR, et al: Evaluation of computerized edge tracking for quantifying intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery from B-mode ultrasound images. Atherosclerosis 1994;111:1–11.
14.
Dwyer JH, Sun P, Kwong-Fu H, Dwyer KM, Selzer RH: Automated intima-media thickness: The Los Angeles Atherosclerosis Study. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998;24:981–987.
15.
Wendelhag I, Liang Q, Gustavsson T, Wikstrand J: A new automated computerized analyzing system simplifies readings and reduces the variability in ultrasound measurement of intima-media thickness. Stroke 1997;28:2195–2200.
16.
Schmidt C, Wendelhag I: How can the variability in ultrasound measurement of intima-media thickness be reduced? Studies of interobserver variability in carotid and femoral arteries. Clin Physiol 1999;19:45–55.
17.
Girerd X, Mourad JJ, Acar C, Heudes D, Chiche S, Bruneval P, et al: Noninvasive measurement of medium-sized artery intima-media thickness in humans: In vitro validation. J Vasc Res 1994;31:114–120.
18.
Hoeks AP, Willekes C, Boutouyrie P, Brands PJ, Willigers JM, Reneman RS: Automated detection of local artery wall thickness based on M-line signal processing. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;23:1017–1023.
19.
Crouse JR, Harpold GH, Kahl FR, Toole JF, McKinney WM: Evaluation of a scoring system for extracranial carotid atherosclerosis extent with B-mode ultrasound. Stroke 1986;17:270–275.
20.
Folsom AR, Eckfeldt JH, Weitzman S, Ma J, Chambless LE, Barnes RW, et al: Relation of carotid artery wall thickness to diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose and insulin, body size, and physical activity. Stroke 1994;25:66–73.
21.
Furberg CD, Borhani NO, Byington RP, Gibbons ME, Sowers JR: Calcium antagonists and atherosclerosis: The Multicenter Isradipine/Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study. Am J Hypertens 1993;6(3 Pt 2):24S–29S.
22.
Crouse JR. Sources of arterial wall thickness measurement variability; in Touboul PJ (ed): Intima media Thickness and Atherosclerosis: Predicting the Risk? New York, Parthenon Publishing, 1997, pp 59–68.
23.
Baldassarre D, Werba JP, Tremoli E, Poli A, Pazzucconi F, Sirtori CR: Common carotid intima-media thickness measurement. A method to improve accuracy and precision. Stroke 1994;25:1588–1592.
24.
Bruschi G, Cabassi A, Orlandini G, Regolisti G, Zambrelli P, Calzolari M, et al: Use of Fourier shape descriptors to improve the reproducibility of echographic measurements of arterial intima-media thickness. J Hypertens 1997;15:467–474.
25.
Chan KH, Dearden NM, Miller JD: Transcranial Doppler-sonography in severe head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1993;59:81–85.
26.
Sliwka U, Rother J, Steinke W, Hennerici M: Die Bedeutung der Duplexsonographie bei zerebralen Ischämien. Bildgebung 1991;58:182–191.
27.
Middleton WD, Foley WD, Lawson TL: Color-flow Doppler imaging of carotid artery abnormalities. AJR 1988;150:419–425.
28.
Steinke W, Kloetzsch C, Hennerici M: Variability of flow patterns in the normal carotid bifurcation. Atherosclerosis 1990;84:121–127.
29.
Steinke W, Hennerici M, Rautenberg W, Mohr JP: Symptomatic and asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenoses in Doppler color-flow imaging. Neurology 1992;42:131–138.
30.
Steinke W, Meairs S, Ries S, Hennerici M: Sonographic assessment of carotid artery stenosis: Comparison of power Doppler imaging and color Doppler flow imaging. Stroke 1996;27:91–94.
31.
Gortler M, Goldmann A, Mohr W, Widder B: Tissue characterisation of atherosclerotic carotid plaques by MRI. Neuroradiology 1995;37:631–635.
32.
von Ingersleben G, Schmiedl UP, Hatsukami TS, Nelson JA, Subramaniam DS, Ferguson MS, et al: Characterization of atherosclerotic plaques at the carotid bifurcation: Correlation of high-resolution MR imaging with histologic analysis – preliminary study. Radiographics 1997;17:1417–1423.
33.
Yuan C, Beach KW, Smith LHJ, Hatsukami TS: Measurement of atherosclerotic carotid plaque size in vivo using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 1998;98:2666–2671.
34.
Goes E, Janssens W, Maillet B, Freson M, Steyaert L, Osteaux M: Tissue characterization of atheromatous plaques: Correlation between ultrasound image and histological findings. J Clin Ultrasound 1990;18:611–617.
35.
Hennerici M, Reifschneider G, Trockel U, Aulich A: Detection of early atherosclerotic lesions by duplex scanning of the carotid artery. J Clin Ultrasound 1984;12:455–464.
36.
Wolverson MK, Bashiti HM, Peterson GJ: Ultrasonic tissue characterisation of atheromatous plaques using high resolution real time scanner. Ultrasound Med Biol 1983;9:599–609.
37.
Comerota AJ, Katz ML, White JV, Grosh JD: The preoperative diagnosis of the ulcerated carotid atheroma. J Vasc Surg 1990;11:505–510.
38.
Bock RW, Lusby RJ: Carotid plaque morphology and interpretation of the echolucent lesion; in Labs KH, Jäger KA, Fitzgerald DE, Woodcock JP, Neuerburg-Heusler D (eds): Diagnostic Vascular Imaging. London, Arnold, 1992, pp 225–236.
39.
Bluth EI, Kay D, Merritt CRB, Sullivan M, Farr G, Mills NL: Sonographic characterization of carotid plaque: detection of hemorrhage. AJR 1986;146:1061–1065.
40.
Langsfeld M, Gray Weale AC, Lusby RJ: The role of plaque morphology and diameter reduction in the development of new symptoms in asymptomatic carotid arteries. J Vasc Surg 1989;9:548–557.
41.
O’Donnell TF, Erdoes L, Mackay WC, McCullough J, Shepard A, Heggerick P: Correlation of B-mode ultrasound imaging and arteriography with pathologic findings at carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg 1985;120:443–449.
42.
Sterpetti AV, Schultz RD, Feldhaus RJ, Davenport KL, Richardson M, Farina C, et al: Ultrasonographic features of carotid plaque and the risk of subsequent neurologic deficits. Surgery 1988;104:652–660.
43.
Aldoori MI, Baird R: Duplex scanning and plaque histology in cerebral ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Surg 1987;1:159–164.
44.
Imparato AM, Riles TS, Gostein F: The carotid bifurcation plaque: Pathologic findings associated with cerebral ischemia. Stroke 1979;10:238–245.
45.
Fisher M, Blumenfeld AM, Smith TW: The importance of carotid artery plaque disruption and hemorrhage. Arch Neurol 1987;44:1086–1089.
46.
Imparato AM, Riles TS, Mintzer R, Baumann FG: The importance of hemorrhage in the relationship between gross morphologic characteristics and cerebral symptoms in 376 carotid artery plaques. Ann Surg 1983;197:195–203.
47.
Lusby RJ, Ferrell LD, Ehrenfeld WK, Stoney RJ, Wylie EJ: Carotid plaque hemorrhage. Its role in production of cerebral ischemia. Arch Surg 1982;117:1479–1488.
48.
Bassiouny HS, Davis H, Massawa N, Gewertz BL, Glagov S, Zarins CK: Critical carotid stenoses: Morphologic and chemical similarity between symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques. J Vasc Surg 1989;9:202–212.
49.
Leen EJ, Feeley TM, Colgan MP, O’Malley MK, Moore DJ, Hourihane DO, et al: ‘Haemorrhagic’ carotid plaque does not contain haemorrhage. Eur J Vasc Surg 1990;4:123–128.
50.
Lennihan L, Kupsky WJ, Mohr JP, Hauser WA, Correll JW, Quest DO: Lack of association between carotid plaque hematoma and ischemic cerebral symptoms. Stroke 1987;18:879–881.
51.
Abu Rahma AF, Kyer PD, Robinson PA, Hannay RS: The correlation of ultrasonic carotid plaque morphology and carotid plaque hemorrhage: Clinical implications. Surgery 1998;124:721–726.
52.
Park AE, McCarthy WJ, Pearce WH, Matsumura JS, Yao JS: Carotid plaque morphology correlates with presenting symptomatology. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:872–878.
53.
Golledge J, Cuming R, Ellis M, Davies AH, Greenhalgh RM: Carotid plaque characteristics and presenting symptom. Br J Surg 1997;84:1697–1701.
54.
Gronholdt ML, Wiebe BM, Laursen H, Nielsen TG, Schroeder TV, Sillesen H: Lipid-rich carotid artery plaques appear echolucent on ultrasound B-mode images and may be associated with intraplaque haemorrhage. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;14:439–445.
55.
Droste DW, Karl M, Bohle RM, Kaps M: Comparison of ultrasonic and histopathological features of carotid artery stenosis. Neurol Res 1997;19:380–384.
56.
Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Beach KW, Gordon D, Detmer PR, Burns DH, et al: Carotid plaque morphology and clinical events. Stroke 1997;28:95–100.
57.
Joakimsen O, Bonaa KH, Stensland-Bugge E: Reproducibility of ultrasound assessment of carotid plaque occurrence, thickness, and morphology: The Tromsø Study. Stroke 1997;28:2201–2207.
58.
Hartmann A, Mohr JP, Thompson JL, Ramos O, Mast H: Interrater reliability of plaque morphology classification in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1999;99:61–64.
59.
Arnold JA, Modaresi KB, Thomas N, Taylor PR, Padayachee TS: Carotid plaque characterization by duplex scanning: Observer error may undermine current clinical trials. Stroke 1999;30:61–65.
60.
Montauban van Swijndregt AD, Elbers HR, Moll FL, de Letter J, Ackerstaff RG: Ultrasonographic characterization of carotid plaques. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998;24:489–493.
61.
El Atrozy T, Nicolaides A, Tegos T, Griffin M: The objective characterisation of ultrasonic carotid plaque features. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998;16:223–230.
62.
Gronholdt ML, Nordestgaard BG, Wiebe BM, Wilhjelm JE, Sillesen H: Echo-lucency of computerized ultrasound images of carotid atherosclerotic plaques is associated with increased levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins as well as increased plaque lipid content. Circulation 1998;97:34–40.
63.
Noritomi T, Sigel B, Swami V, Justin J, Gahtan V, Chen X, et al: Carotid plaque typing by multiple-parameter ultrasonic tissue characterization. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;23:643–650.
64.
Robinson ML, Sacks D, Perlmutter GS, Marinelli DL: Diagnostic criteria for carotid duplex sonography. AJR 1988;151:1045–1049.
65.
Widder B, Paulat K, Hackspacher J, Hamann H, Hutschenreiter S, Kreutzer C, et al: Morphological characterization of carotid artery stenoses by ultrasound duplex scanning. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990;16:349–354.
66.
Hennerici M, Neuerburg-Heusler D: Vascular Diagnosis with Ultrasound. Stuttgart, Thieme, 1998.
67.
Bluth EI, McVay LVI, Merritt CR, Sullivan MA: The identification of ulcerative plaque with high resolution duplex carotid scanning. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7:73–76.
68.
Rothwell PM, Gibson RJ, Villagra R, Sellar R, Warlow CP: The effect of angiographic technique and image quality on the reproducibility of measurement of carotid stenosis and assessment of plaque surface morphology. Clin Radiol 1998;53:439–443.
69.
Eliasziw M, Strifler JY, Fox AJ, Hachinski VC, Ferguson GG, Barnett HJ: Significance of plaque ulceration in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. Stroke 1994;25:304–308.
70.
Fischer CM, Ojemann RJ: A clinico-pathologic study of carotid endarterectomy plaques. Rev Neurol 1986;142:573.
71.
Svindland A, Torvik A: Atherosclerotic carotid disease in asymptomatic individuals: An histological study of 53 cases. Acta Neurol Scand 1988;78:506–517.
72.
Glagov S, Bassiouny HS, Giddens DP, Zarins CK: Intimal thickening: Morphogenesis, functional significance and detection. J Vasc Invest 1995;1:1–14.
73.
Strandness DE, Eikelboom BC: Carotid artery stenosis – where do we go from here? Eur J Ultrasound 1998;7(Suppl 3):S17–S26.
74.
Sitzer M, Fürst G, Siebler M, Steinmetz H: Usefulness of an intravenous contrast medium in the characterization of high-grade internal carotid stenosis with color Doppler-assisted duplex imaging. Stroke 1994;25:385–389.
75.
Sitzer M, Rose G, Fürst G, Siebler M, Steinmetz H: Characteristics and clinical value of an intravenous echo-enhancement agent in evaluation of high-grade internal carotid stenosis. J Neuroimaging 1997;7(Suppl 1):S22–S25.
76.
Fürst G, Saleh A, Wenserski F, Malms J, Cohnen M, Aulich A, et al: Reliability and validity of noninvasive imaging of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion. Stroke 1999;30:1444–1449.
77.
Glagov S, Zarins CK, Giddens DP, Ku DN: Hemodynamics and atherosclerosis. Insights and perspectives gained from studies of human arteries. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1988;112:1018–1031.
78.
Loree HM, Kamm RD, Atkinson CM, Lee RT: Turbulent pressure fluctuations on surface of model vascular stenoses. Am J Physiol 1991;261:H644–H650.
79.
Dirksen MT, van der Wal AC, van den Berg FM, van der Loos CM, Becker AE: Distribution of inflammatory cells in atherosclerotic plaques relates to the direction of flow. Circulation 1998;98:2000–2003.
80.
Brands PJ, Hoeks AP, Hofstra L, Reneman RS: A noninvasive method to estimate wall shear rate using ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995;21:171–185.
81.
Meairs S, Röther J, Neff W, Hennerici M: New and future developments in cerebrovascular ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography, and related techniques. J Clin Ultrasound 1995;23:139–149.
82.
Milner JS, Moore JA, Rutt BK, Steinman DA: Hemodynamics of human carotid artery bifurcations: computational studies with models reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects. J Vasc Surg 1998;28:143–156.
83.
Meairs S, Hennerici M: Four-dimensional ultrasonographic characterization of plaque surface motion in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1999;30:1807–1813.
84.
Guo Z, Moreau M, Rickey DW, Picot PA, Fenster A: Quantitative investigation of in vitro flow using three-dimensional colour Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995;21:807–816.
85.
Detmer PR, Bashein G, Hodges T, Beach KW, Filer EP, Burns DH, et al: 3D ultrasonic image feature localization based on magnetic scanhead tracking: In vitro calibration and validation. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994;20:923–936.
86.
Hodges TC, Detmer PR, Burns DH, Beach KW, Strandness DE Jr: Ultrasonic three-dimensional reconstruction: In vitro and in vivo volume and area measurement. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994;20:719–729.
87.
Leotta DF, Detmer PR, Martin RW: Performance of a miniature magnetic position sensor for three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;23:597–609.
88.
Barry CD, Allott CP, John NW, Mellor PM, Arundel PA, Thomson DS, et al: Three-dimensional freehand ultrasound: Image reconstruction and volume analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;23:1209–1224.
89.
Meairs S, Beyer J, Hennerici M: Reconstruction and visualization of irregularly sampled three- and four-dimensional ultrasound data for cerebrovascular applications. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000;26:263–272.
90.
Perktold K, Rappitsch G: Computer simulation of local blood flow and vessel mechanics in a compliant carotid artery bifurcation model. J Biomech 1995;28:845–856.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
2000
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
