We prospectively examined 128 patients with acute first-ever stroke to determine the prevalence of swallowing disorders, the diagnostic accuracy of our clinical assessment of swallowing function compared with videofluoroscopy, and interobserver agreement for the clinical and videofluoroscopic diagnosis of swallowing disorders and aspiration. We found clinical and videofluoroscopic evidence of a swallowing disorder in 51% [95% confidence interval (CI) 42–60%] and 64% (95% CI 55–72%) of patients, respectively, and aspiration in 49% (95% CI 40–58%) and 22% (95% CI 15–29%) of patients, respectively. The optimal clinical criteria for detecting videofluoroscopic evidence of a swallowing disorder and aspiration were any clinical evidence of a swallowing disorder (sensitivity 73%, 95% CI 62–82%; specificity 89%, 95% CI 76–96%), and any clinical evidence of aspiration (sensitivity 93%, 95% CI 76–99%; specificity 63%, 95% CI 53–72%). The interobserver agreement between two speech pathologists for the clinical diagnosis of a swallowing disorder (κ: 0.82 ± 0.09) and aspiration (κ: 0.75 ± 0.09) was good, and between a speech pathologist and radiologist for the videofluoroscopic diagnosis of a swallowing disorder (κ: 0.75 ± 0.09) and aspiration (κ: 0.41 ± 0.09), it was good and fair, respectively. Although clinical bedside examination underestimates the frequency of swallowing abnormalities and overestimates the frequency of aspiration compared with videofluoroscopy, it may still offer valuable information for the diagnosis of swallowing impairment. Long-term follow-up studies are required to determine the independent functional significance of the findings of the bedside and videofluoroscopic examinations in predicting the occurrence of important outcome events such as aspiration pneumonia.

Keywords:
Stroke, Swallowing disorders, Dysphagia, Aspiration, Prevalence
1.
Gordon C, Langton-Hewer RL, Wade DT: Dysphagia in acute stroke. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987;295:411–414.
2.
Barer DH: The natural history and functional consequences of dysphagia after hemispheric stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989;52:236–241.
3.
Horner J, Brazer SR, Massey EW: Aspiration in bilateral stroke patients: A validation study. Neurology 1993;43:430–433.
4.
Smithard D, O’Neill P, Park C, Morris J, Wyatt R, England R, Martin D: Complications and outcome after acute stroke: Does dysphagia matter? Stroke 1996;27:1200–1204.
5.
Holas MA, DePippo KL, Reding MJ: Aspiration and relative risk of medical complications following stroke. Arch Neurol 1994;51:1051–1053.
6.
Davenport RJ, Dennis MS, Warlow CP: Improving the recording of the clinical assessment of stroke patients using a clerking pro forma. Age Ageing 1995;24:43–48.
7.
Ellul J, Barer D: Detection and management of dysphagia in patients with acute stroke (abstract). Age Ageing 1993;22(suppl 2):17.
8.
Smithard DG, Renwick D, O’Neill PA: Change in nutritional status following acute stroke (abstract). Age Ageing 1993;22(suppl 3):11.
9.
Stanners AJ, Chapman AN, Bamford JM: Clinical predictors of aspiration soon after stroke (abstract). Age Ageing 1993;22(suppl 2):17.
10.
Kidd D, Lawson J, Nesbitt R, MacMahon J: Aspiration in acute stroke: A clinical study with videofluoroscopy. Q J Med 1993;86:825–829.
11.
Splaingard ML, Hutchins B, Sulton LD, Chaudhuri G: Aspiration in rehabilitation patients: Videofluoroscopy vs bedside clinical assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:637–640.
12.
Horner J, Massey EW, Riski JE, Lathrop DL, chase KN: Aspiration following stroke: Clinical correlates and outcome. Neurology 1988;38:1359–1362.
13.
DePippo KL, Holas MA, Reding MJ: Validation of the 3-oz water swallow test for aspiration following stroke. Arch Neurol 1992;49:1259–1261.
14.
Huxley EJ, Viroslav J, Gray WR: Pharyngeal aspiration in normal adults and patients with depressed consciousness. Am J Med 1978;64:564–568.
15.
Mann G, Hankey G, Cameron D: Swallowing function after stroke: Prognosis and prognostic factors at 6 months. Stroke 1999;30:744–748.
16.
Logemann JA: Evaluation and Treatment of Swallowing Disorders. San Diego, College-Hill, 1983.
17.
Gardner MJ, Altman DG: Calculating Confidence Intervals for Proportions and Their Differences. Statistics with Confidence. Belfast, The Universities’ Press, 1989.
18.
Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH: Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials, ed 2. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1988.
19.
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29–36.
20.
Cohen J: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37–46.
21.
Fleiss JL: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, Wiley, 1981, pp 212–236.
22.
Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174.
23.
Anderson CS, Taylor BV, Hankey GJ, Stewart-Wynne EG, Jamrozik KD: Validation of a clinical classification of subtypes of acute cerebral infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:1173–1179.
24.
Ott D, Pikna LA: Clinical and videofluoroscopic evaluation of swallowing disorders. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:507–513.
25.
Linden P, Siebens AA: Dysphagia: Predicting laryngeal penetration. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64:281–284.
26.
Logemann JA: Factors affecting ability to resume oral nutrition in the oropharyngeal dysphagic individual. Dysphagia 1990;4:202–208.
27.
Smithard DG, O’Neill PA, England R, Park CL, Wyatt R, Martin DF, Morris J: The natural history of dysphagia following a stroke. Dysphagia 1997;12:188–193.
28.
Langemore SE, Logemann JA: After the clinical bedside examination: What next? Am J Speech Lang Path 1991;9:13–20.
29.
Linden P, Kuhlemeier KV, Patterson C: The probability of correctly predicting subglottic penetration from clinical observations. Dysphagia 1993;8:170–179.
30.
Wade D, Langton-Hewer R: Motor loss and swallowing difficulty after stroke: Frequency, recovery and prognosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1987;76:50–54.
31.
Axelsson K, Asplund K, Norberg A, Eriksson S: Eating problems and nutritional status during hospital stay of patients with severe stroke. J Am Diet Assoc 1989;89:1092–1096.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
2000
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.