We report a new case of neuroendocrine carcinoma for which it was not possible to find the primary site until now. The recent medical literature about skin metastasis of neuroendocrine carcinoma (neuroendocrine tumor) is discussed.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasia, gathered together because of their common features: tumors capable of secreting hormones, neurotransmitters, neuromodulators and neuropeptides. Neuroendocrine cells, supposedly precursors of this group of neoplasia, are found in all solid organs, skin and mucosae; therefore, NETs may originate in several locations [1,2,3].

Their incidence varies in different studies. Data from the US and Europe indicate an approximate incidence rate of 1-2 new cases/100,000 inhabitants per year. This represents about 0.5% of all malignancies. Some articles indicate that, although rare, NETs are presenting a discreet and progressive rise in their incidence [4].

The gastrointestinal tract is the most common primary site (62%), where appendix (27%) and the small intestine (15%) are the most prevailing, followed by the lungs (23%). It is relevant to highlight that up to 12% of the patients present metastases from an unknown primary site [4].

Within the spectrum of NETs, on the one side, well-differentiated NETs can be found (formerly called carcinoid tumors), usually with a painless clinical course, besides being curable by simple resection when viable. On the other side of the spectrum, there are poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), of a more aggressive clinical course, producing metastases with greater frequency and, usually, requiring isolated or adjuvant chemotherapy [1,2]. Cutaneous manifestations from NETs are not uncommon, especially those exhibiting carcinoid syndrome. Flushing is the most common manifestation, present in all secretory tumors. Cutaneous metastases, however, are rare [3,5].

We present the case of a patient with a diagnosis of NEC of undetermined primary site, diagnosed with lymph node metastasis and cutaneous lesions.

A 65-year-old man with arterial hypertension was diagnosed 2 years before with NEC based on histopathological examination of a swollen lymph node in the right inguinal region. The patient was scanned with CT and scintigraphy; however, the site of the neoplasia was not identified. Nevertheless, 6 months ago, chemotherapy treatment was initiated with a combined scheme of carboplatin and etoposide.

Three months ago the patient noted nodular lesions visible on the right lower limb with progressive growth that led to the request of a consultation by a dermatologic peer.

At clinical examination, the lesions were more palpable than visible. There was no overlying erythema. They were restricted to the right thigh, in a linear trajectory, and the right buttock (fig. 1, fig. 2, fig. 3). The lesions were painless at touch, had a hardened consistency, measured up to 1.5 cm and were not adhered to deeper planes.

Fig. 1

Marking of the site of the inguinal lymph node previously excised and, in the smaller round markings, the nodular subcutaneous lesions on the right thigh.

Fig. 1

Marking of the site of the inguinal lymph node previously excised and, in the smaller round markings, the nodular subcutaneous lesions on the right thigh.

Close modal
Fig. 2

Palpation of the nodular subcutaneous lesion on the right thigh (in detail).

Fig. 2

Palpation of the nodular subcutaneous lesion on the right thigh (in detail).

Close modal
Fig. 3

Nodular isolated lesion on the right buttock.

Fig. 3

Nodular isolated lesion on the right buttock.

Close modal

An excisional biopsy of one of the skin lesions was performed. Histopathological examination showed a nodule occupying the medium/deep reticular dermis and hypodermis, with expansive growth, comprising monomorphic cells with poorly defined cytoplasmic borders, round nucleus, and fine granular chromatin, delimited by delicate septa of connective tissue (fig. 4, fig. 5). Numerous figures of mitoses were noted. Immunohistochemistry showed focal positivity in paranuclear dot for CK20 (fig. 6), positivity for chromogranin (fig. 7) and synaptophysin and a cell proliferation index evaluated by Ki67 of about 60% (fig. 8). These findings were interpreted as compatible with cutaneous NEC metastasis.

Fig. 4

Nodular lesion on the dermis and hypodermis. HE. ×40.

Fig. 4

Nodular lesion on the dermis and hypodermis. HE. ×40.

Close modal
Fig. 5

Monomorphic proliferation of cells with poorly defined cytoplasmic borders and round nucleus with uniformly distributed fine granular chromatin. HE. ×400.

Fig. 5

Monomorphic proliferation of cells with poorly defined cytoplasmic borders and round nucleus with uniformly distributed fine granular chromatin. HE. ×400.

Close modal
Fig. 6

Focal positivity in dot for CK20. CK20. ×400.

Fig. 6

Focal positivity in dot for CK20. CK20. ×400.

Close modal
Fig. 7

Positivity for Chromogranin. Chromogranin. ×400.

Fig. 7

Positivity for Chromogranin. Chromogranin. ×400.

Close modal
Fig. 8

Positivity for Ki67 (MIB-1) of about 60%. Ki67. ×400.

Fig. 8

Positivity for Ki67 (MIB-1) of about 60%. Ki67. ×400.

Close modal

The case was considered by the clinical oncologist as loss of response to treatment and progression of disease. Therefore, a chemotherapy rescue scheme was initiated with irinotecan. The patient is being followed up by both specialties.

Carcinomas with unknown primary site represent about 2.3-4.2% of all malignant neoplasia cases (being seventh or eighth in frequency, depending on the casuistry). They seem to affect men more frequently, with onset in the fifth or sixth decade of life, being the fourth cause of death in both genders. Of these, 50% are at least moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas. Up to 30% are poorly differentiated, and the NETs of unknown primary site are included in this group [6].

The detection of the primary site in metastatic NET is a challenge. The approach includes endoscopy and imaging (tomography and scintigraphy). Recently, evidences indicate benefits by using endoscopic ultrasound and PET CT [7].

As a group, NETs produce metastases in 30% of cases, and among these a greater portion is attributed to NEC. The metastatic disease signals a worse prognosis. Other worse prognostic factors identified at histopathological examination are vascular and lymphatic invasion, a high grade of cell atypia, an increased nucleus/cytoplasm ratio, the presence and extension of necrosis, besides an increased mitotic index [2,8]. The cell proliferation index analyzed by immunohistochemistry (Ki67) contributes to this assessment. Poorly differentiated NEC, with a Ki67 >20%, are associated with worse prognosis [2].

The most common metastatic sites of NETs are the lymph nodes, liver and lung. Cutaneous metastases are considered rare. Only 28 articles were accessed, totaling 31 cases, which are summarized in table 1. There was a slight prevalence in men (16/31), with a mean age of 55 years at the time of diagnosis (ranging from 19 to 82 years). In most cases, the lesions were single or multiple nodules, nonulcerated, painless, of slow growth, ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 cm in diameter and clinically unspecific like other cutaneous metastasis. The location was most frequently on the cephalic segment (typically on the scalp) and/or trunk. We call attention to two distinct cases: (1) painful spots referred by the patient without visible or palpable cutaneous lesions; (2) single hardened lesion on the eyelid, simulating the primary cutaneous lesion [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35].

Table 1

Cases of cutaneous metastasis of NEC found in PubMed

Cases of cutaneous metastasis of NEC found in PubMed
Cases of cutaneous metastasis of NEC found in PubMed

Most of the cases presented with painless lesions, although in some patients the lesions can be painful. In this context, primary painful cutaneous tumors are important differential diagnoses. They can be easily remembered by the acronym LEND AN EGG (leiomyoma, eccrine spiradenoma, neuroma, dermatofibroma, angiolipoma, neurilemmoma, endometrioma, glomus tumor and granular cell tumor) [36].

Prognosis is not good. The 5-year survival rate is 19% for patients with metastatic NEC [3]. Despite chemotherapy, an effort should be made for the identification of the primary site, since its resection will increase the disease-free survival and allow appropriate chemotherapy [7].

Cutaneous metastases of NEC are rare, but it is important to emphasize the relevance of the dermatologist in such cases. Clinical suspicion and histopathology diagnosis permitted the identification of the disease progression, which was a determinant factor for modifying the chemotherapy protocol.

Our patient gave his written authorization for the publication of his case, and the authors followed all ethical guidelines.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

1.
Klimstra DS, Beltran H, Lilenbaum R, Bergsland E: The spectrum of neuroendocrine tumors: histologic classification, unique features and areas of overlap. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2015;35:92-103.
2.
Araujo NAA, Pantaroto A, Oliveira CT: Tumores neuroendócrinos: revisão de literatura. Perspectivas médicas 2012;23:35-41.
3.
Niwa ABM, Nico MMS: Síndrome carcinóide: relato de caso. An Bras Dermatol 2008;83:549-553.
4.
Taal BG, Visser O: Epidemiology of neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 2004;80(suppl 1):3-7.
5.
Bell HK, Poston GJ, Vora J, Wilson NJ: Cutaneous manifestations of the malignant carcinoid syndrome. Br J Dermatol 2005;152:71-75.
6.
Pavlidis N, Fizazi K: Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2009;69:271-278.
7.
Santhanam P, Chandramahanti S, Kroiss A, et al: Nuclear imaging of neuroendocrine tumors with unknown primary: why, when and how? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015;42:1144-1155.
8.
Jedrych J, Busam K, Pulitzer K, Pulitzer M: Cutaneous metastases as an initial manifestation of visceral well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor: a report of four cases and review of literature. J Cutan Pathol 2014;41:113-122.
9.
Reingold IM, Escovitz WE: Metastatic cutaneous carcinoid: report of a case of functioning malignant bronchial carcinoid. Arch Dermatol 1960;82:971-975.
10.
Bean SF, Fusaro RM: An unusual manifestation of the carcinoid syndrome: report of a case. Arch Dermatol 1968;98:268-269.
11.
Colin-Jones DG, Copping RM, Gibbs DD, Sharr MM: Malignant Zollinger-Ellison syndrome with gastrin-containing skin metastases. Lancet 1969;1:492-494.
12.
Sullivan JL, Packer JT, Bryant M: Primary malignant carcinoid of the testis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1981;105:515-517.
13.
Archer CB, Wells RS, MacDonald DM: Metastatic cutaneous carcinoid. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985;13(2 pt 2):363-366.
14.
Rodriguez G, Villamizar R: Carcinoid tumor with skin metastasis. Am J Dermatopathol 1992;14:263-269.
15.
Schmidt U, Metz KA, Schrader M, Leder LD: Well-differentiated (oncocytoid) neuroendocrine carcinoma of the larynx with multiple skin metastases: a brief report. J Laryngol Otol 1994;108:272-274.
16.
Grunewald B, Viggiano J, Chapman E: Widespread intraabdominal carcinoid tumor presenting as an umbilical metastasis: diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;15:457-458.
17.
McCracken GA, Washington CV, Templeton SF: Metastatic cutaneous carcinoid. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;35:997-998.
18.
Ereño C, Lopez JI, Sanchez JM: Atypical carcinoid of larynx: presentation with scalp metastases. J Laryngol Otol 1997;111:89-91.
19.
De Argila D, Bureo JC, Márquez FL, Pimentel JJ: Small-cell carcinoma of the lung presenting as a cutaneous metastasis of the lip mimicking a Merkel cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Dermatol 1999;24:170-172.
20.
Ottinetti A, Colombo E, Dardano F, et al: Cutaneous metastasis of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the larynx: report of a case. J Cutan Pathol 2003;30:512-515.
21.
Zhang Y, Selvaggi SM: Metastatic islet cell carcinoma to the umbilicus: diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29:91-94.
22.
Bell HK, Poston GJ, Vora J, Wilson NJ: Cutaneous manifestations of the malignant carcinoid syndrome. Br J Dermatol 2005;152:71-75.
23.
Vidulich KA, Donley SE, Duvic M: Multinodular cutaneous spread in neuroendocrine tumor of the breast: an unusual presentation. Am J Clin Dermatol 2007;8:379-383.
24.
Santi R, Massi D, Mazzoni F, Antonuzzo L, Comin CE: Skin metastasis from typical carcinoid tumor of the lung. J Cutan Pathol 2008;35:418-422.
25.
Chung WK, Yang JH, Chang SE, et al: A case of cutaneous metastasis of small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Am J Dermatopathol 2008;30:636-638.
26.
Lee WJ, Kim CH, Chang SE, et al: Cutaneous metastasis from large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary bladder expressing CK20 and TTF-1. Am J Dermatopathol 2009;31:166-169.
27.
Simpson LK, Ostlere LS, Harland C, Gharaie S: Treatment with carbon dioxide laser of painful skin metastases from a laryngeal neuroendocrine carcinoma. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009;34:e873-e875.
28.
Blochin E, Stein JA, Wang NS: Atypical carcinoid metastasis to the skin. Am J Dermatopathol 2010;32:735-739.
29.
Yu R, Wolin E, Fan X: Single subcutaneous nodule as initial presentation of atypical lung carcinoid. World J Oncol 2010;1:204-207.
30.
Sanii S, Tavangar SM: Cutaneous metastasis of medullary carcinoma as the initial manifestation an otherwise limited malignancy: a case report. Am J Dermatopathol 2011;33:716-718.
31.
Boyd AS, Hayes BB: Metastatic small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast. J Cutan Pathol 2012;39:1042-1046.
32.
Fluehler C, Quaranta L, di Meo N, Ulessi B, Trevisan G: Cutaneous metastasis of neuroendocrine carcinoma. Indian J Dermatol 2013;58:247.
33.
Yuan C, Keating B, Farricielli LA, Zhang K: Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) without pulmonary symptoms diagnosed in a cutaneous metastasis. Am J Case Rep 2014;15:97-102.
34.
Ishida M, Iwai M, Kagotani A, Iwamoto N, Okabe H: Cutaneous metastasis from pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in the scalp. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014;7:2701-2706.
35.
Wang SM, Ye M, Ni SM: Multiple scalp metastases from colonic neuroendocrine carcinoma: case report and literature review. BMC Cancer 2014;14:305.
36.
Naversen DN, Trask DM, Watson FH, Burket JM: Painful tumors of the skin: ‘LEND AN EGG'. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993;28(2 pt 2):298-300.
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.