We report the case of an otherwise healthy 17-year-old female who presented for surgical removal of an enlarging “atypical cyst” on her scalp. During subtotal excision, only friable serosanguinous translucent ribbons of tissue were found. A histopathologic diagnosis of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) was rendered and imaging studies revealed extradural invasion of the tumor. Within weeks, the patient also developed progressive lymphadenopathy with grossly elevated levels of Epstein-Barr virus viral capsid antigen antibody levels. This report aims to highlight a unique presentation of LCH with discussion of workup, management, and avoidance of potential surgical complications.

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare clonal proliferative disorder of epidermal dendritic cells with a wide range of clinical manifestations. The pathogenesis of LCH is incompletely understood. Some studies posit a viral or immunologic origin. BRAF mutants are also a frequent occurrence [1, 2]. It has been reported that approximately 57% of reviewed LCH cases displayed this mutation [1, 3]. The most common clinical presentation of LCH are bony lesions. The skin is the second most commonly affected organ [1, 4, 5]. Dissemination to other organs is less frequently seen; however, a comprehensive history, thorough physical examination, and appropriate workup should be undertaken. When atypical subcutaneous lesions on the head are encountered, the dermatologist’s approach must be cautious, and conditions such as LCH, which can extend intracranially, must be considered.

In this report, we describe an unusual case of multifocal LCH with intracranial extension, massive lymphadenopathy, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in an adolescent female and review the current diagnostic workup and treatment options.

An otherwise healthy 17-year-old female (Fitzpatrick skin type I) presented with a 1-month history of an enlarging nodule on the right frontal scalp. Prior to this point, her pediatrician prescribed her oral antibiotics (cephalexin) which resulted in no improvement. She was referred to dermatology for excision. The patient had no prior history of trauma, weight loss, fevers, chills, visual symptoms, headaches, polydipsia, polyuria, or other constitutional symptoms. Furthermore, there was no personal or family history of seizures, hemangiomas, neurofibromatosis, or other neurocutaneous disorders.

Physical examination revealed a young woman with no neurologic deficits. A 4 × 4 cm soft, semimobile, nontender subcutaneous mass on the right frontal scalp was identified (Fig. 1). No lymphadenopathy was palpated. Administration of local anesthesia with 0.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate was uneventful. During subtotal excision, the lesion was explored only to the layer of the deep dermis due to atypical findings. No cystic structures were identified. Instead, friable serosanguinous translucent ribbons of tissue and gelatinous material were encountered. Due to the unexpected features of the lesion, complete excision was forgone and only a partial specimen was removed.

Fig. 1.

Subcutaneous mass on the right frontal scalp.

Fig. 1.

Subcutaneous mass on the right frontal scalp.

Close modal

Histopathologic analysis demonstrated proliferation of dendritic cells with mitotic figures, widespread tissue necrosis, eosinophils, lymphocytes, histiocytes, and large osteoclast-like giant cells (Fig. 2, 3). Immunohistochemistry staining was positive for vimentin, S100 (Fig. 4), CD1a (Fig. 5), CD68, and CD207 (langerin), confirming a diagnosis of LCH. Testing of the tissue for BRAF mutant assay for the V600E variant and in situ hybridization for EBV DNA were negative.

Fig. 2.

A diffuse infiltrate of poorly cohesive cells was present.

Fig. 2.

A diffuse infiltrate of poorly cohesive cells was present.

Close modal
Fig. 3.

Cells with reniform nuclei, some multinucleate, were present along with eosinophils.

Fig. 3.

Cells with reniform nuclei, some multinucleate, were present along with eosinophils.

Close modal
Fig. 4.

Lesional cells stained with S100. They were also positive for CD207/langerin (not shown).

Fig. 4.

Lesional cells stained with S100. They were also positive for CD207/langerin (not shown).

Close modal
Fig. 5.

Lesional cells stained with CD1a. They were also positive for CD207/langerin (not shown).

Fig. 5.

Lesional cells stained with CD1a. They were also positive for CD207/langerin (not shown).

Close modal

Within 2 weeks, the patient reported new painful lymphadenopathy on her right neck (Fig. 6). She was referred to hematology-oncology for evaluation. Imaging studies (CT scan, MRI, PET scan) revealed tumor extension from the scalp through the calvarium with extradural invasion (Fig. 7); prominent lymphadenopathy was seen within the supraclavicular and cervical chains as well as palatine tonsillar enlargement. Chest X-ray and skeletal survey (noncranial) were normal.

Fig. 6.

Cervical lymphadenopathy in the right anterior neck.

Fig. 6.

Cervical lymphadenopathy in the right anterior neck.

Close modal
Fig. 7.

CT scan of the head showing tumor extension from the scalp through the calvarium with extradural invasion.

Fig. 7.

CT scan of the head showing tumor extension from the scalp through the calvarium with extradural invasion.

Close modal

Screening laboratory testing was obtained to exclude other organ system involvement. Complete blood count with differential was normal except for slight iron deficiency anemia (hemoglobin 10.9 g/dL, hematocrit 33.7%, ferritin 8 ng/mL) and mild reactive thrombocytosis (platelet 495,000/μL). Comprehensive metabolic profile and urinalysis were normal, ruling out diabetes insipidus. Lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and coagulation studies were also normal. Vitamin D levels were normal. After consulting with oncology, the patient and her family initially opted for clinical monitoring.

Serology studies were also ordered, and grossly elevated levels of EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) antibody (IgG) levels (306.00 U/mL) were noted. She was started on empiric antiviral therapy (ganciclovir 450 mg orally twice daily for 8 weeks). Her lymphadenopathy and the cutaneous aspect of her scalp lesion resolved. At 2 months, the patient requested further surgical evaluation because she perceived that the lesion was “going deeper” due to the focal deficit of the calvarium. As an active teenager, she was also uncomfortable with the recommendation to refrain from participation in contact sports. To address her concerns, she was referred to neurosurgery. Cranioplasty was later performed to restore the cranial contour, which resulted in improved patient satisfaction.

The incidence of LCH is estimated to be about 2–10 cases in 100,000 per year [6]. The majority of cases occur in young children [1]. In dermatology, any indication that a subcutaneous scalp lesion might extend more deeply should raise concern and prompt a cautious diagnostic and therapeutic approach. The skeletal system is most commonly affected in LCH [1, 4, 5, 7]. In our patient, her initial benign clinical presentation of LCH gave no indication of the underlying calvarium erosion. Had a full-on excision been performed in this case, penetration of the dura and deeper structures could have resulted. Responding to intraoperative clues allowed us to modify our course of action and avoid a potentially very adverse event. Additionally, the prescribed oral antibiotics (doxycycline hyclate 120 mg daily for 4 weeks) may have helped to prevent infection and inflammation.

Since testing for the BRAF mutant assay for V600E variant yielded a negative result, treatment with BRAF or mitogen-activating protein kinase inhibitors was not indicated. Some studies [8, 9] have indicated that EBV may be a causative agent in some cases of LCH. While in situ hybridization testing for EBV viral DNA performed on her cutaneous specimen was negative, her serology revealed elevated levels of VCA IgG levels. Given these data and her evolving clinical presentation, we started the patient on a course of ganciclovir. Fang et al. [8] previously described a case of LCH and EBV in a 1-year-old male who presented with prolonged fever, cervical and abdominal lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, pneumonia, and anemia [8]. EBV was initially confirmed through elevated IgM antibody titer and later with VCA IgG positivity. This patient was treated intravenously with ceftriaxone, ganciclovir, and immunoglobulin. While this patient’s multifocal LCH did not resolve, it was postulated that active EBV infection played a causative role in the development of his LCH. Shimakage et al. [9] described a 1-year-old male who developed a skull tumor. CT scan revealed the presence of an osteolytic lesion with intradural extension. Biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of LCH and EBV was detected on mRNA in situ hybridization. Successful remission of this boy’s LCH followed treatment with intravenous acyclovir. These reports and ours suggest a possible role of antiviral therapy in confirmed cases of EBV with LCH. Other treatment options available for LCH, based on disease involvement and patient preference, include chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, phototherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, other medications (examples include retinoids and anti-inflammatory medications), stem cell transplantation, and close clinical monitoring [2, 7, 10-13].

Histopathology and immunohistochemical techniques are commonly used to confirm the diagnosis of LCH, with langerin (CD207) being the key diagnostic stain [2, 4, 5]. Positive staining for CD1a and S100 is also seen [4, 8]. Electron microscopy can be used to identify Birbeck granules, a langerin-based organelle unique to Langerhans cells [5]. Upon immunohistochemical and microscopic diagnosis of LCH, distant organ involvement can be assessed by detailed history and physical examination, laboratory testing, and imaging studies [2, 4-6, 14, 15]. Query regarding constitutional symptoms and review of all systems is essential. When conducting the physical examination, it is imperative to palpate for lymphadenopathy, identify any cutaneous lesions, and assess for liver, spleen, and bone involvement. Laboratory testing and workup include, but are not limited to, a complete blood count, coagulation studies, complete metabolic profile including liver enzymes, endocrine studies, and urinalysis [6]. Imaging studies such as an abdominal ultrasound, chest radiograph, whole-body CT scan, and head MRI can assess the extent of disease involvement in the hepatic, hematopoietic (spleen), pulmonary, lymphatic, endocrine (thyroid), osseous, and the central nervous systems [2, 4, 5]. Assessment of BRAF mutant assay for V600E variant status within the affected tissue as well as testing for EBV infection may also be of value. Given the rare nature and the myriad of clinical manifestations of LCH, it is still typically a diagnosis of exclusion. This case serves as a reminder that particular care and attention should be taken when approaching atypical scalp lesions, as this and other types of growths may penetrate through bone and deeper structures. As in all procedures, it is vital for the physician and medical team to react appropriately to intraoperative feedback so that optimal outcomes may be attained.

Encountering an atypical scalp lesion warrants careful acquisition of tissue for histopathologic analysis. If LCH is diagnosed, extensive workup and collaboration with hematology-oncology for complete staging and management is recommended.

Our thanks go to Jessica Wishnew, MD for her advice and guidance on therapy.

This study complies with the guidelines for human studies and was conducted ethically in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The parents/guardians gave their written informed consent for publication of this case, including publication of images.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

K.W. Foster contributed as the primary author of the manuscript and to data gathering. S.K. Robinson, BS contributed to manuscript writing and data gathering. E. Tung-Hahn contributed to manuscript writing and data gathering. G. Gibbons, MD contributed to manuscript data gathering and review. C.W. Cruse, MD contributed to manuscript data gathering and review. K. Mudaliar, MD contributed to manuscript data gathering and review. R. Tung, MD contributed to manuscript data gathering, writing, and review. W. Kim, DO contributed to manuscript data gathering, writing, and review.

1.
Krooks
J
,
Minkov
M
,
Weatherall
AG
.
Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children: History, classification, pathobiology, clinical manifestations, and prognosis
.
J Am Acad Dermatol
.
2018
Jun
;
78
(
6
):
1035
44
.
[PubMed]
0190-9622
2.
Krooks
J
,
Minkov
M
,
Weatherall
AG
.
Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children: Diagnosis, differential diagnosis, treatment, sequelae, and standardized follow-up
.
J Am Acad Dermatol
.
2018
Jun
;
78
(
6
):
1047
56
.
[PubMed]
0190-9622
3.
Badalian-Very
G
,
Vergilio
JA
,
Degar
BA
,
MacConaill
LE
,
Brandner
B
,
Calicchio
ML
, et al.
Recurrent BRAF mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis
.
Blood
.
2010
Sep
;
116
(
11
):
1919
23
.
[PubMed]
0006-4971
4.
Howarth
DM
,
Gilchrist
GS
,
Mullan
BP
,
Wiseman
GA
,
Edmonson
JH
,
Schomberg
PJ
.
Langerhans cell histiocytosis: diagnosis, natural history, management, and outcome
.
Cancer
.
1999
May
;
85
(
10
):
2278
90
.
[PubMed]
0008-543X
5.
Haupt
R
,
Minkov
M
,
Astigarraga
I
,
Schäfer
E
,
Nanduri
V
,
Jubran
R
, et al.;
Euro Histio Network
.
Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH): guidelines for diagnosis, clinical work-up, and treatment for patients till the age of 18 years
.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
.
2013
Feb
;
60
(
2
):
175
84
.
[PubMed]
1545-5009
6.
PDQ® Pediatric Treatment Editorial Board. PDQ Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis Treatment. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Updated [{LT}]
06
/
13
/
2019
[{GT}]. Available at: https://www.cancer.gov/types/langerhans/hp/langerhans-treatment-pdq. Accessed [{LT}]11/13/2019[{GT}].
[PMID: 26389240]
7.
Lindahl
LM
,
Fenger-Grøn
M
,
Iversen
L
.
Topical nitrogen mustard therapy in patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis
.
Br J Dermatol
.
2012
Mar
;
166
(
3
):
642
5
.
[PubMed]
0007-0963
8.
Fang
YH
,
Lou
JG
,
Zhao
H
,
Chen
J
.
Association of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis with Chronic Active Epstein-Barr Virus Infection: Case Report and Review of the Literature
.
Hong Kong J Paediatr
.
2015
;
20
:
252
5
.2309-5393
9.
Shimakage
M
,
Sasagawa
T
,
Kimura
M
,
Shimakage
T
,
Seto
S
,
Kodama
K
, et al.
Expression of Epstein-Barr virus in Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis
.
Hum Pathol
.
2004
Jul
;
35
(
7
):
862
8
.
[PubMed]
0046-8177
10.
Kudo
K
,
Ohga
S
,
Morimoto
A
,
Ishida
Y
,
Suzuki
N
,
Hasegawa
D
, et al.
Improved outcome of refractory Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Japan
.
Bone Marrow Transplant
.
2010
May
;
45
(
5
):
901
6
.
[PubMed]
0268-3369
11.
Zinn
DJ
,
Grimes
AB
,
Lin
H
,
Eckstein
O
,
Allen
CE
,
McClain
KL
.
Hydroxyurea: a new old therapy for Langerhans cell histiocytosis
.
Blood
.
2016
Nov
;
128
(
20
):
2462
5
.
[PubMed]
0006-4971
12.
Simko
SJ
,
McClain
KL
,
Allen
CE
.
Up-front therapy for LCH: is it time to test an alternative to vinblastine/prednisone?
Br J Haematol
.
2015
Apr
;
169
(
2
):
299
301
.
[PubMed]
0007-1048
13.
Büchler
T
,
Cervinek
L
,
Belohlavek
O
,
Kantorova
I
,
Mechl
M
,
Nebesky
T
, et al.
Langerhans cell histiocytosis with central nervous system involvement: follow-up by FDG-PET during treatment with cladribine
.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
.
2005
Mar
;
44
(
3
):
286
8
.
[PubMed]
1545-5009
14.
Grois
N
,
Pötschger
U
,
Prosch
H
,
Minkov
M
,
Arico
M
,
Braier
J
, et al.;
DALHX- and LCH I and II Study Committee
.
Risk factors for diabetes insipidus in langerhans cell histiocytosis
.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
.
2006
Feb
;
46
(
2
):
228
33
.
[PubMed]
1545-5009
15.
Gatalica
Z
,
Bilalovic
N
,
Palazzo
JP
,
Bender
RP
,
Swensen
J
,
Millis
SZ
, et al.
Disseminated histiocytoses biomarkers beyond BRAFV600E: frequent expression of PD-L1
.
Oncotarget
.
2015
Aug
;
6
(
23
):
19819
25
.
[PubMed]
1949-2553
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.