Disagreement exists concerning the natural history and treatment of chiasmatic gliomas (CG) of childhood. We reviewed our experience in 21 cases of surgically verified CG with a median age of 4 years at time of diagnosis, followed for a median of 5.3 years (range 3–14.8 years). Initial treatment included radiation therapy (RT) in 18 patients, chemotherapy in 2, and observation in 1. Disease recurrence, defined as progressive visual or neurological deterioration, was documented in 10 children (48%), occurring at a median of 6 years after diagnosis. 5-year actuarial survival was 89%, but fell to 60% by 10 years. Visual improvement after RT was uncommon, occurring once. Intellectual deficits were noted in 5 of 17 survivors. We compared our results to that of other patients reported and concluded that: (1) CG may act aggressively independent of their location in the visual pathway at time of diagnosis; (2) the beneficial effects of RT are difficult to document; (3) progressive disease may occur late in the course of illness, and (4) intellectual sequelae are common in long-term survivors.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.