Background: The regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) induces changes in total (Catot) and ionized (Ca2+) calcium. As of now, we do not have much information about parallel changes of total (Mgtot) and ionized (Mg2+) magnesium. Methods: The authors compared changes of Mg2+ and Mgtot with changes of Ca2+ and Catot in 32 critically ill patients on 4% trisodium citrate (4% TSC) with calcium-free fluids. Results: The median continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration balance of Mgtot was -0.91 (-1.18 to -0.53) mmol/h compared to the median balance of Catot 0.86 (0.08-1.55) mmol/h. Postfilter Mg2+ decreased by 68.3% (70.8-65.6) in parallel (r = 0.41, p = 0.03) to decrease of postfilter Ca2+ (by 70.2% (73.0-66.1)) and was significantly related to the postfilter Ca2+ (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). The decrease of prefilter to postfilter Ca2+ correlated to a dosage of 4% TSC per blood flow (r = 0.37, p = 0.04). Conclusions: The loss of Mgtot during RCA is not covered by magnesium concentration in ordinary dialysis/substitution fluid and may lead to the depletion of total body magnesium. The postfilter Mg2+ is significantly related to the postfilter Ca2+. Video Journal Club “Cappuccino with Claudio Ronco” at http://www.karger.com/?DOI=440972.

The efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) have been reflected in guidelines, suggesting the use of citrate for prevention of filter clotting in preference to standard heparin even in patients without an increased bleeding risk [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Citrate inhibits coagulation through the chelation of ionized calcium (Ca2+), which is the principle of all citrate modes of regional anticoagulation. The postfilter changes of Ca2+ are used to guide the dose of citrate, and substitution of calcium is required to maintain the systemic level of Ca2+.

Various citrate protocols have shown mild accumulation, deficit or even balance of total calcium (Catot), mostly depending on the intensity of calcium substitution [7,8,9,10]. Another bivalent cation likely to be chelated in a similar fashion as calcium is magnesium. The balance of total magnesium (Mgtot) is not well explored under various modalities and solutions used with citrate anticoagulation [11]. Brain found a significantly negative magnesium balance using dialysis/replacement fluids containing 0.5 mmol Mgtot per liter [12]. While balances in total cations (Catot and Mgtot) have implications for total body pools and substitutions during RCA, the changes in ionized forms (Ca2+ and Mg2+) represent changes of physiologic function (anticoagulation) and are included in the balances of the total ions. In contrast to Ca2+, the ionized magnesium (Mg2+) is not monitored as part of citrate modality of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT); yet, its decrease is directly related to patient's prognosis [13]. Besides a single paper on Mg2+ changes during platelet apheresis [14], the exact relationship of Ca2+ to changes of Mg2+ under citrate anticoagulation that are not monitored in renal failure patients is not known. The aims of the study were to determine whether the postfilter Mg2+ is related to postfilter Ca2+ and whether the decrease in postfilter Mg2+ is related to the decrease in postfilter Ca2+. RCA might cause a magnesium loss on filter similar to loss of calcium. Magnesium depletion potentiated by citrate may not be compensated by current levels of magnesium in dialysis and substitution fluid.

This prospective observational study was carried out in a 20-bed ICU of the university hospital. The study was approved by the university hospital ethical board and informed consent was obtained from the next of kin. All patients were critically ill and mechanically ventilated.

The fluxes of magnesium and calcium, changes of their ionized forms and possible relationships to citrate dosage and citratemias were studied during postdilution continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) performed on Aquarius device (Baxter®, Irvine, Calif., USA) with 1.9 m2 polysulfone filter (Aquamax®, Bellco, Mirandola, Italy). The commercially available trisodium citrate (4% TSC) and dialysis/substitution fluid were used. The bicarbonate buffered solution was calcium-free and had reduced levels of sodium and bicarbonate. The fluid was used as dialysis and replacement fluid (Citralysate®, GML, Czech Republic, Na 133 mmol/l, K 2.0 mmol/l, Mg 0.75 mmol/l, Cl 116.5 mmol/l, glucose 5.6 mmol/l, HCO3- 20 mmol/l).

Indications for RRT were renal failure with elevated levels of uremic toxins and loss of response to diuretics. Prescribed CVVHDF dose was 20-25 ml/kg/h [15,16]. The dialysis flow (Qd) was set at 1,500 ml/h and postdilution at 500 ml/h. The blood flow (Qb) was set at 100 ml/min. Reason to use a lower Qb was to allow for a lower citrate flow, which prevents metabolic alkalosis and hypernatremia [17,18]. A Qb of 100 ml/min is sufficient to saturate dialysate at a flow rate of 2 l/h [19]. Four percent TSC infusion was initiated at 200 ml/h and titrated in increments to maintain the postfilter Ca2+ under 0.4 mmol/l. Ca2+ was checked every hour until its level became stable and thereafter once in every 3 hours. Calcium chloride (10%) was infused into a port distal from the venous bubble trap to maintain arterial Ca2+ within a normal range (0.8-1.3 mmol/l). Arterial Ca2+ was monitored every 6 h. A routine substitution of intravenous 20-30 ml of 20% magnesium sulfate (16.2-24.3 mmol) per day was part of the RCA protocol.

The study commenced at least 24 h after the start of CRRT. Samples were drawn from the arterial blood, the effluent, the prefilter and postfilter ports of the circuit (fig. 1). To improve accuracy, the second sampling took place 60 min later. During this hour, the configuration of CRRT including anticoagulation did not change. Ca2+ and Mg2+ were measured using the STAT profile analyzer (Nova Biomedical) at the bedside. Besides measuring citrate levels (measured by capillary zone electrophoresis, P/ACE 5100, Beckman), the laboratory analysis also included the measuring of Catot and Mgtot.

Fig. 1

Configuration of the CVVHDF circuit under citrate anticoagulation. UF = Ultrafiltration, that is, net fluid removal (l/h); Qb = blood flow (l/h); Qc = 4% TSC flow (l/h); Qd = dialysis flow (l/h); Qeff = effluent flow (l/h) = UF + Qc + Qd + postdilution.

Fig. 1

Configuration of the CVVHDF circuit under citrate anticoagulation. UF = Ultrafiltration, that is, net fluid removal (l/h); Qb = blood flow (l/h); Qc = 4% TSC flow (l/h); Qd = dialysis flow (l/h); Qeff = effluent flow (l/h) = UF + Qc + Qd + postdilution.

Close modal

Calculation of Magnesium and Calcium Fluxes from Patient's CVVHDF Circuit to the Effluent

The amount of magnesium removed on filter was deducted from magnesium delivered as part of dialysis fluid and postdilution. Effluent removal of magnesium was calculated from the effluent flow (Qeff) multiplied by the magnesium concentration in the effluent ([Mg]eff). Magnesium input was calculated as Qd times magnesium concentration in the dialysis fluid ([Mg]d) plus postdilution flow times postdilution magnesium concentration ([Mg]d). The same fluid was used for dialysis and postdilution.

Magnesium flux = (Qd × [Mg]d + post-dilution × [Mg]d) - Qeff × [Mg]eff

The calcium flux was calculated similarly, that is, by deducting the calcium amount eliminated in the effluent from the calcium input. The effluent amount of calcium was calculated as Qeff multiplied by the effluent calcium concentration ([Ca]eff). Due to the fact that dialysate and postdilution calcium concentration ([Ca]d) equals zero, the calcium input was calculated as calcium replacement flow (Q[Ca]) times 10% calcium chloride concentration ([Ca]in = 0.456 mmol/ml). For better comparison to magnesium flux, the results were recorded as calcium balance without postfilter calcium substitution and overall calcium flux including postfilter CaCl2 infusion.

Calcium flux = Q[Ca] × [Ca]in - Qeff × [Ca]eff

The postfilter Mg2+ and postfilter Ca2+ were tested for correlations to prefilter levels. The postfilter Mg2+ levels were also tested for a relationship to postfilter Ca2+ levels. Changes of ionized cations in blood during passage through filter (i.e. absolute value of difference between prefilter and postfilter levels and the decrease of post to prefilter values in percent of prefilter values) were tested for correlations between Mg2+ and Ca2+. The decreases of both cations were tested for correlations with dosages of citrate, dosage of citrate per Qb and with changes of circuit citratemias (i.e. absolute value of difference between prefilter and postfilter levels of citrate).

The statistical analysis was performed using Statistica version 9 software. Data sets were checked for distribution, and the differences between groups were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Correlations between various parameters were tested using the Pearson's test. The level of significance was set at p = 0.05.

A sequential sample of 32 patients was analyzed (age 67 (54.5-72.3), admission APACHE II 31 (27.5-37.3), SOFA 14 (10-15)).

The median total Qeff was 2,370 (2,290-2,420) ml/h, citrate dose 200 (180-230) ml/h, that is, 26.5 (24.5-32.6) mmol/h, citrate dose per Qb 4.4 (4.1-5.4) mmol/l·h. The median dosage of 10% postfilter calcium chloride was 9.5 (8-12) ml/h, that is, 4.3 (3.7-5.5) mmol/h. Ultrafiltration (net fluid loss) was titrated according to the hemodynamic needs. Median circuit survival time was 67 (44.5-108) h.

The levels of citrate, total and ionized cations in arterial blood, prefilter, postfilter and effluent samples are shown in table 1. The median balance of Mgtot was -0.91 (-1.18 to -0.53) mmol/h compared to the median balance of Catot -3.80 (-4.03 to -3.5) mmol/h without inclusion of postfilter CaCl2 substitution. The Catot balance with input of postfilter calcium substitution was 0.86 (0.08-1.55) mmol/h. The postfilter Mg2+ correlated to prefilter Mg2+ (r = 0.86, p < 0.001; fig. 2) similarly as did postfilter Ca2+ to prefilter Ca2+ (r = 0.60, p < 0.001; fig. 3). In contrast to lack of significant relationship between prefilter Mg2+ to prefilter Ca2+ (r = 0.30, p = 0.13) the postfilter Mg2+ significantly correlated to postfilter Ca2+ (r = 0.50, p < 0.001; fig. 4). The percentual decrease of Mg2+ (-68.3% (-70.8 to -65.6)) was significantly related to the percentual decrease of Ca2+ (-70.2% (-73.0 to -66.1); r = 0.41, p = 0.03; table 1; fig. 5). The relationships between absolute and percentual decreases of cations to dosages of citrate and circuit citratemias are summarized in table 2. The absolute and percentual decreases of prefilter to postfilter Mg2+ did not significantly correlate to absolute dose of citrate prefilter, dose of citrate per Qb or change of citrate levels. The absolute and percentual decreases of prefilter to postfilter Ca2+ did not significantly correlate to the absolute dose of citrate prefilter and to the change of citrataemia. The absolute decrease of Ca2+ correlated to the dose of citrate per Qb (r = 0.37, p = 0.04) as well as the percentual decrease of Ca2+ did (r = 0.36, p = 0.04; table 2).

Table 1

Levels of citrate, total and ionized cations in arterial blood, prefilter, postfilter and effluent samples

Levels of citrate, total and ionized cations in arterial blood, prefilter, postfilter and effluent samples
Levels of citrate, total and ionized cations in arterial blood, prefilter, postfilter and effluent samples
Table 2

The relationships (Pearson's correlation, the significant ones are in bold) between changes (absolute and percentual) in Ca2+, Mg2+ and dose of citrate prefilter, dose of citrate prefilter in relation to blood flow and increase of circuit citratemia during RCA

The relationships (Pearson's correlation, the significant ones are in bold) between changes (absolute and percentual) in Ca2+, Mg2+ and dose of citrate prefilter, dose of citrate prefilter in relation to blood flow and increase of circuit citratemia during RCA
The relationships (Pearson's correlation, the significant ones are in bold) between changes (absolute and percentual) in Ca2+, Mg2+ and dose of citrate prefilter, dose of citrate prefilter in relation to blood flow and increase of circuit citratemia during RCA
Fig. 2

The relationship of postfilter Mg2+ to prefilter Mg2+ (r = 0.86, p < 0.001).

Fig. 2

The relationship of postfilter Mg2+ to prefilter Mg2+ (r = 0.86, p < 0.001).

Close modal
Fig. 3

The relationship of postfilter Ca2+ to prefilter Ca2+ (r = 0.60, p < 0.001).

Fig. 3

The relationship of postfilter Ca2+ to prefilter Ca2+ (r = 0.60, p < 0.001).

Close modal
Fig. 4

The postfilter Mg2+ was significantly correlated to postfilter Ca2+ (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). Postfilter Mg2+ = 0.08 + 0.22·postfilter Ca2+.

Fig. 4

The postfilter Mg2+ was significantly correlated to postfilter Ca2+ (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). Postfilter Mg2+ = 0.08 + 0.22·postfilter Ca2+.

Close modal
Fig. 5

The scatterplot of correlation between percentual decreases of Mg2+ and Ca2+ during passage through blood circuit under RCA (r = 0.41, p = 0.03).

Fig. 5

The scatterplot of correlation between percentual decreases of Mg2+ and Ca2+ during passage through blood circuit under RCA (r = 0.41, p = 0.03).

Close modal

The present prospective observational cohort study, comparing the flux of magnesium with the flux of calcium during citrate-anticoagulated CVVHDF shows that the RCA associates with changes of magnesium similar to changes of calcium. Mg2+ decreases to about one third during passage through citrate anticoagulated circuit, which is almost the same proportional decrease as for Ca2+. The effects of citrate upon ionized cations can also be seen by their correlation postfilter compared to relationship prefilter that is not significant. The measurement of Mg2+ is mostly unavailable; however, the postfilter Mg2+ significantly correlates with routinely taken postfilter Ca2+. In contrast to Mg2+, the absolute and percentual decreases of Ca2+ correlated to the dose of citrate per Qb. This could be partially due to the confounding effect of magnesium in the dialysate/substitution fluid, which was calcium free. This study including normomagnesemic patients (table 1) also shows very similar relationship between Mgtot and Mg2+ in systemic blood when using citrate anticoagulation compared to this relationship in non-renal failure patients [20,21]. The losses of Mgtot were in contrast to mild gain of Catot, which is caused by the routine postfilter calcium infusion during RCA compared to the absence of postfilter magnesium substitution. On the other hand, the losses of Mgtot were limited by Mg levels in dialysis and substitution fluid, which was calcium free and were balanced by the routine parenteral magnesium sulfate replenishment included in the institutional RCA protocol. The presence of magnesium in dialysis/substitution fluid in citrate anticoagulated CRRT is a matter of debate [8,22] because Mg is also chelated by citrate, which may neutralize a portion of citrate and increase the demand for its infusion to lower Ca2+ postfilter into a desired range. The importance of removing magnesium for reduction of filter clotting is questionable [23,] and the eventual reduction of citrate dosage for calcium chelation does not outweigh the risk of hypomagnesemia [13,20,24,25] if Mg is not replenished properly [9,17].

The study shows that the decreases of Mgtot are not sufficiently compensated by the amount of magnesium in dialysis/substitution fluid even with the level of 0.75 mmol/l. The estimated median loss of magnesium of 22 mmol/day (-0.91 mmol/h) may represent a depletion of about 15-20% of total body pool of magnesium during 1 week of CRRT with RCA. The loss is similar to the Brain's study reporting a median of -1.09 mmol/h with 0.5 mmol/l of magnesium in dialysis/substitution fluid and mildly higher Qeffs [12]. Considering the limited body pool of magnesium, the citrate anticoagulated CRRT may put critically ill patients at risk of hypomagnesemia [13,24]. A deficit of Mgtot and Mg2+ is related to cardiovascular stability, pulmonary hypertension, resistance to insulin, neuromuscular function as well as to non-recovery of renal function and mortality of patients [13,20,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. It is very likely that increasing the amount of magnesium in current dialysis/substitution fluids for RCA may eliminate a need for parenteral magnesium replenishment and contribute to the cost effectiveness of RCA modalities.

Our study suffers from several limitations. First, it is limited to only 1 hour of observations. The calculated daily loss of Mgtot is therefore only an estimate, because continuous is not always continuous [31]. We did not correct for filter-down time, which differs between centers and modalities. Estimates of total loss of Mgtot may therefore be 10-20% lower. However, this does not apply much to the RCA, because circuit life with citrate is longer and thus the downtime might be shorter. Second, Qb was limited as part of the RCA protocol, limiting the dosage of 4% TSC and its side effects [18]. Therefore, the magnesium and calcium losses on filter could be even more significant in higher Qbs and higher citrate dosage. Third, our conclusion should also be tested for CVVH, although clearance of magnesium is similar with diffusive transport (dialysis) as with a convective (filtration) mode if a similar dose (Qeff) is applied, because the sieving coefficient of the molecule is about one in both modalities. Fourth, the calcium fluxes and balances would be different if calcium containing fluid would have been used. There are still units where this modality is applied [32,33] leading to a high dosage of citrate and higher amount of calcium-citrate complexes in effluent. Fifth, the changes of calcium and magnesium might relate to citrate dosages and levels of citrate when analyzing larger cohort of patients.

This study shows that postfilter Mg2+ decreases similarly as does Ca2+ under RCA. The postfilter Mg2+ can be predicted from postfilter levels of Ca2+. While calcium is routinely replenished as part of the protocol, the loss of Mgtot in citrate CVVHDF is not balanced by the insufficient levels in commercially available dialysis/substitution fluids. Mg2+ is related to Mgtot similarly as in non-dialysis patients. Citrate anticoagulation of CRRT may lead to the inapparent depletion of magnesium body pool with resulting organ disorders.

The research was supported by the ESICM Stoutenbeek Award 2012.

1.
Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Bosman RJ, Koopmans M, van der Voort PH, Wester JP, van der Spoel JI, Dijksman LM, Zandstra DF: Citrate anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Crit Care Med 2009;37:545-552.
2.
Wu MY, Hsu YH, Bai CH, Lin YF, Wu CH, Tam KW: Regional citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2012;59:810-818.
3.
Zhang Z, Hongying N: Efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy. Intensive Care Med 2012;38:20-28.
4.
Hetzel GR, Schmitz M, Wissing H, Ries W, Schott G, Heering PJ, Isgro F, Kribben A, Himmele R, Grabensee B, Rump LC: Regional citrate versus systemic heparin for anticoagulation in critically ill patients on continuous venovenous haemofiltration: a prospective randomized multicentre trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011;26:232-239.
5.
Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Kellum JA, Bellomo R: Clinical review: anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy - heparin or citrate? Crit Care 2011;15:202.
6.
KDIGO; Acute Kidney Injury Work Group: KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Inter Suppl 2012;2:1-138.
7.
Swartz R, Pasko D, O'Toole J, Starmann B: Improving the delivery of continuous renal replacement therapy using regional citrate anticoagulation. Clin Nephrol 2004;61:134-143.
8.
Dorval M, Madore F, Courteau S, Leblanc M: A novel citrate anticoagulation regimen for continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:1186-1189.
9.
Morgera S, Haase M, Ruckert M, Krieg H, Kastrup M, Krausch D, Vargas-Hein O, Zuckermann-Becker H, Peters H, Pohlmeier R, Neumayer HH: Regional citrate anticoagulation in continuous hemodialysis - acid-base and electrolyte balance at an increased dose of dialysis. Nephron Clin Pract 2005;101:c211-c219.
10.
Brain M, Parkes S, Fowler P, Robertson I, Brown A: Calcium flux in continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration with heparin and citrate anticoagulation. Crit Care Resusc 2011;13:72-81.
11.
Zakharchenko M, Balik M, Leden P: Citrate anticoagulated continuous haemodiafiltration: focus on ionised magnesium. Intensive Care Med 2011;37:336.
12.
Brain M, Anderson M, Parkes S, Fowler P: Magnesium flux during continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration with heparin and citrate anticoagulation. Crit Care Resusc 2012;14:274-282.
13.
Soliman HM, Mercan D, Lobo SS, Melot C, Vincent JL: Development of ionized hypomagnesemia is associated with higher mortality rates. Crit Care Med 2003;31:1082-1087.
14.
Mercan D, Bastin G, Lambermont M, Dupont E: Importance of ionized magnesium measurement for monitoring of citrate-anticoagulated plateletpheresis. Transfusion 1997;37:418-422.
15.
RENAL Replacement Therapy Study Investigators, Bellomo R, Cass A, Cole L, Finfer S, Gallagher M, Lo S, McArthur C, McGuinness S, Myburgh J, Norton R, Scheinkestel C, Su S: Intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1627-1638.
16.
VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network, Palevsky PM, Zhang JH, O'Connor TZ, Chertow GM, Crowley ST, Choudhury D, Finkel K, Kellum JA, Paganini E, Schein RM, Smith MW, Swanson KM, Thompson BT, Vijayan A, Watnick S, Star RA, Peduzzi P: Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med 2008;359:7-20.
17.
Morgera S, Scholle C, Voss G, Haase M, Vargas-Hein O, Krausch D, Melzer C, Rosseau S, Zuckermann-Becker H, Neumayer HH: Metabolic complications during regional citrate anticoagulation in continuous venovenous hemodialysis: single-center experience. Nephron Clin Pract 2004;97:c131-c136.
18.
Morgera S, Schneider M, Slowinski T, Vargas-Hein O, Zuckermann-Becker H, Peters H, Kindgen-Milles D, Neumayer HH: A safe citrate anticoagulation protocol with variable treatment efficacy and excellent control of the acid-base status. Crit Care Med 2009;37:2018-2024.
19.
Relton S, Greenberg A, Palevsky PM: Dialysate and blood flow dependence of diffusive solute clearance during CVVHD. ASAIO J 1992;38:M691-M696.
20.
Escuela MP, Guerra M, Anon JM, Martinez-Vizcaino V, Zapatero MD, Garcia-Jalon A, Celaya S: Total and ionized serum magnesium in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:151-156.
21.
Huijgen HJ, Soesan M, Sanders R, Mairuhu WM, Kesecioglu J, Sanders GT: Magnesium levels in critically ill patients. What should we measure? Am J Clin Pathol 2000;114:688-695.
22.
Janssen MJ HP, Bouman AA, Oe PL, van der Meulen J: Citrate anticoagulation and divalent cations in hemodialysis. Blood Purif 1994;12:308-316.
23.
Ames WA, McDonnell N, Potter D: The effect of ionised magnesium on coagulation using thromboelastography. Anaesthesia 1999;54:999-1001.
24.
Ismail Y, Ismail AA, Ismail AA: The underestimated problem of using serum magnesium measurements to exclude magnesium deficiency in adults; a health warning is needed for ‘normal' results. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:323-327.
25.
Tong GM, Rude RK: Magnesium deficiency in critical illness. J Intensive Care Med 2005;20:3-17.
26.
Touvier M, Lioret S, Vanrullen I, Boclé JC, Boutron-Ruault MC, Berta JL, Volatier JL: Vitamin and mineral inadequacy in the French population: estimation and application for the optimization of food fortification. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 2006;76:343-351.
27.
Dittrich S, Germanakis J, Dähnert I, Stiller B, Dittrich H, Vogel M, Lange PE: Randomised trial on the influence of continuous magnesium infusion on arrhythmias following cardiopulmonary bypass surgery for congenital heart disease. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:1141-1144.
28.
Lima Mde L CT, Rodrigues LE, Bomfim O, Melo J, Correia R, Porto M, Cedro A, Vicente E: Serum and intracellular magnesium deficiency in patients with metabolic syndrome - evidences for its relation to insulin resistance. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2009;83:257-262.
29.
Alves SC, Tomasi CD, Constantino L, Giombelli V, Candal R, Bristot Mde L, Topanotti MF, Burdmann EA, Dal-Pizzol F, Fraga CM, Ritter C: Hypomagnesemia as a risk factor for the non-recovery of the renal function in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013;28:910-916.
30.
João Matias P, Azevedo A, Laranjinha I, Navarro D, Mendes M, Ferreira C, Amaral T, Jorge C, Aires I, Gil C, Ferreira A: Lower serum magnesium is associated with cardiovascular risk factors and mortality in haemodialysis patients. Blood Purif 2014;38:244-252.
31.
Uchino S, Fealy N, Baldwin I, Morimatsu H, Bellomo R: Continuous is not continuous: the incidence and impact of circuit ‘down-time' on uraemic control during continuous veno-venous haemofiltration. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:575-578.
32.
Gupta M, Wadhwa NK, Bukovsky R: Regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration using calcium-containing dialysate. Am J Kidney Dis 2004;43:67-73.
33.
Ong SC, Wille KM, Speer R, Tolwani AJ: A continuous veno-venous hemofiltration protocol with anticoagulant citrate dextrose formula A and a calcium-containing replacement fluid. Int J Artif Organs 2014;37:499-502.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.