Introduction: Classic hemodialysis schedules present inadequate middle-molecular-weight toxin clearance due to limitations of membrane-based separation processes. Accumulation of uremic retention solutes may result in specific symptoms (e.g., pruritus) and may affect clinical outcome and patient’s quality of life. Hemoperfusion (HP) is a blood purification modality based on adsorption that can overcome such limitations, and thus, it may be interesting to test the efficacy of at least one session per week of HP combined with hemodialysis. This is a randomized, open-label trial, controlled, multicenter clinical study to investigate the effect of long-term HP combined with hemodialysis on middle-molecular-weight toxins and uremic pruritus in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Methods: 438 MHD patients from 37 HD centers in China with end-stage kidney disease (63.9% males, mean age 51 years) suffering from chronic intractable pruritus were enrolled in the study. Eligible patients were randomized into four groups: low-flux hemodialysis (LFHD), high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD), HP + LFHD, and HP + HFHD at a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Beta-2 microglobulin (β2M) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured at baseline, 3–6, and 12 months. At the same time points, the pruritus score was evaluated. The primary outcome was the reduction of β2M and PTH, while the secondary outcome was the reduction of the pruritus score. Results: In the two groups HP + LFHD and HP + HFHD, there was a significant decrease of β2M and PTH levels after 12 months compared to the control groups. No significant differences were noted between HP + LFHD and HP + HFHD. Pruritus score reduction was 63% in the HP + LFHD group and 51% in the HP + HFHD group, respectively. Conclusion: The long-term HP + HD can reduce β2M and PTH levels and improve pruritus in MHD patients independently on the use of high- or low-flux dialyzers, showing that the results are linked to the effect of adsorption.

Keywords:
Hemoperfusion, Hemodialysis, Uremic toxins, Uremic pruritus, Adsorption
1.
Wolley MJ, Hutchison CA. Large uremic toxins: an unsolved problem in end-stage kidney disease.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
. 2018 Oct 1;33(Suppl_3):iii6–11.
2.
Furuya R, Kumagai H, Miyata T, Fukasawa H, Isobe S, Kinoshita N, et al. High plasma pentosidine level is accompanied with cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients.
Clin Exp Nephrol
. 2012 Jun;16(3):421–6.
3.
Lekawanvijit S, Kompa AR, Wang BH, Kelly DJ, Krum H. Cardiorenal syndrome: the emerging role of protein-bound uremic toxins.
Circ Res
. 2012 Nov 9;111(11):1470–83.
4.
Vanholder R, Schepers E, Pletinck A, Neirynck N, Glorieux G. An update on protein-bound uremic retention solutes.
J Ren Nutr
. 2012 Jan;22(1):90–4.
5.
Neirynck N, Vanholder R, Schepers E, Eloot S, Pletinck A, Glorieux G. An update on uremic toxins.
Int Urol Nephrol
. 2013 Feb;45(1):139–50.
6.
Niwa T. Targeting protein-bound uremic toxins in chronic kidney disease.
Expert Opin Ther Targets
. 2013 Nov;17(11):1287–301.
7.
Vanholder R, Pletinck A, Schepers E, Glorieux G. Biochemical and clinical impact of organic uremic retention solutes: a comprehensive update.
Toxins
. 2018 Jan 8;10(1):33.
8.
Hoshino J, Yamagata K, Nishi S, Nakai S, Masakane I, Iseki K, et al. Carpal tunnel surgery as proxy for dialysis-related amyloidosis: results from the Japanese Society for dialysis therapy.
Am J Nephrol
. 2014;39(5):449–58.
9.
Jadoul M, Drueke TB. Beta2 microglobulin amyloidosis: an update 30 years later.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
. 2016 Apr;31(4):507–9.
10.
Scarpioni R, Ricardi M, Albertazzi V, De Amicis S, Rastelli F, Zerbini L. Dialysis-related amyloidosis: challenges and solutions.
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis
. 2016;9:319–28.
11.
Kaneko S, Yamagata K. Hemodialysis-related amyloidosis: is it still relevant?
Semin Dial
. 2018 Nov;31(6):612–8.
12.
Cheung AK, Greene T, Leypoldt JK, Yan G, Allon M, Delmez J, et al. Association between serum 2-microglobulin level and infectious mortality in hemodialysis patients.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol
. 2008 Jan;3(1):69–77.
13.
Okuno S, Ishimura E, Kohno K, Fujino-Katoh Y, Maeno Y, Yamakawa T, et al. Serum beta2-microglobulin level is a significant predictor of mortality in maintenance haemodialysis patients.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
. 2009 Feb;24(2):571–7.
14.
Masuda M, Ishimura E, Ochi A, Tsujimoto Y, Tahahra H, Okuno S, et al. Serum beta2-microglobulin correlates positively with left ventricular hypertrophy in long-term hemodialysis patients.
Nephron Clin Pract
. 2014;128(1–2):101–6.
15.
Zumrutdal A. Role of β2-microglobulin in uremic patients may be greater than originally suspected.
World J Nephrol
. 2015 Feb 6;4(1):98–104.
16.
Yamashita K, Mizuiri S, Nishizawa Y, Shigemoto K, Doi S, Masaki T. Addition of novel biomarkers for predicting all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in prevalent hemodialysis patients.
Ther Apher Dial
. 2018 Feb;22(1):31–9.
17.
Palmer SC, Rabindranath KS, Craig JC, Roderick PJ, Locatelli F, Strippoli GF. High-flux versus low-flux membranes for end-stage kidney disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD005016.
18.
Roumelioti ME, Nolin T, Unruh ML, Argyropoulos C. Revisiting the middle molecule hypothesis of uremic toxicity: a systematic review of beta 2 microglobulin population kinetics and large scale modeling of hemodialysis trials in silico.
PLoS One
. 2016;11(4):e0153157.
19.
Svara F, Lopot F, Valkovsky I, Pecha O. Phosphorus removal in low-flux hemodialysis, high-flux hemodialysis, and hemodiafiltration.
ASAIO J
. 2016 Mar–Apr;62(2):176–81.
20.
Donadio C, Kanaki A, Sami N, Tognotti D. High-flux dialysis: clinical, biochemical, and proteomic comparison with low-flux dialysis and on-line hemodiafiltration.
Blood Purif
. 2017;44(2):129–39.
21.
Davenport A. Moving beyond small solute clearance: what evidence is there for more permeable dialyzers and haemodiafiltration?
Hemodial Int
. 2018 Oct;22(S2):S24–8.
22.
Han S, Yang K, Zhu H, Liu J, Zhang L, Zhao J. Proteomics investigation of the changes in serum proteins after high- and low-flux hemodialysis.
Ren Fail
. 2018 Nov;40(1):506–13.
23.
Ronco C, Clark WR. Haemodialysis membranes.
Nat Rev Nephrol
. 2018 Jun;14(6):394–410.
24.
Eknoyan G, Beck GJ, Cheung AK, Daugirdas JT, Greene T, Kusek JW, et al. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis.
N Engl J Med
. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):2010–9.
25.
Locatelli F, Martin-Malo A, Hannedouche T, Loureiro A, Papadimitriou M, Wizemann V, et al. Effect of membrane permeability on survival of hemodialysis patients.
J Am Soc Nephrol
. 2009 Mar;20(3):645–54.
26.
Chen SJ, Jiang GR, Shan JP, Lu W, Huang HD, Ji G, et al. Combination of maintenance hemodialysis with hemoperfusion: a safe and effective model of artificial kidney.
Int J Artif Organs
. 2011 Apr;34(4):339–47.
27.
Zhang Y, Mei CL, Rong S, Liu YY, Xiao GQ, Shao YH, et al. Effect of the combination of hemodialysis and hemoperfusion on clearing advanced glycation end products: a prospective, randomized, two-stage crossover trial in patients under maintenance hemodialysis.
Blood Purif
. 2015;40(2):127–32.
28.
Jiang X, Ji F, Chen ZW, Huang QL. Comparison of high-flux hemodialysis with hemodialysis filtration in treatment of uraemic pruritus: a randomized controlled trial.
Int Urol Nephrol
. 2016 Sep;48(9):1533–41.
29.
Li WH, Yin YM, Chen H, Wang XD, Yun H, Li H, et al. Curative effect of neutral macroporous resin hemoperfusion on treating hemodialysis patients with refractory uremic pruritus.
Medicine
. 2017 Mar;96(12):e6160.
30.
Cheng W, Luo Y, Wang H, Qin X, Liu X, Fu Y, et al. Survival outcomes of hemoperfusion and hemodialysis versus hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Blood Purif
. 2022;51(3):213–25.
31.
Mapar MA, Pazyar N, Siahpoosh A, Latifi SM, Beladi Mousavi SS, Khazanee A. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of zinc sulfate vs. placebo in the treatment of pruritus of hemodialytic patients: a pilot randomized, triple-blind study.
G Ital Dermatol Venereol
. 2015 Aug;150(4):351–5.
32.
Chinese National Renal Data System. Available from: www.cnrds.net.
33.
Rodriguez M, Lorenzo V. Parathyroid hormone, a uremic toxin.
Semin Dial
. 2009 Jul–Aug;22(4):363–8.
34.
Barreto FC, Stinghen AE, de Oliveira RB, Franco AT, Moreno AN, Barreto DV, et al. The quest for a better understanding of chronic kidney disease complications: an update on uremic toxins.
J Bras Nefrol
. 2014 Apr–Jun;36(2):221–35.
35.
Attia EA, Hassan AA. Uremic pruritus pathogenesis, revisited.
Arab J Nephrol Transplant
. 2014 May;7(2):91–6.
36.
Rodriguez M, Caravaca F, Fernandez E, Borrego MJ, Lorenzo V, Cubero J, et al. Evidence for both abnormal set point of PTH stimulation by calcium and adaptation to serum calcium in hemodialysis patients with hyperparathyroidism.
J Bone Miner Res
. 1997 Mar;12(3):347–55.
37.
Malberti F, Farina M, Imbasciati E. The PTH-calcium curve and the set point of calcium in primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
. 1999 Oct;14(10):2398–406.
38.
Gardham C, Stevens PE, Delaney MP, LeRoux M, Coleman A, Lamb EJ. Variability of parathyroid hormone and other markers of bone mineral metabolism in patients receiving hemodialysis.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol
. 2010 Jul;5(7):1261–7.
39.
Huang CY, Zheng CM, Wu CC, Lo L, Lu KC, Chu P. Effects of pamidronate and calcitriol on the set point of the parathyroid gland in postmenopausal hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.
Nephron Clin Pract
. 2012;122(3–4):93–101.
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel
2022
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.