Background/Aim: Peritonitis rates in peritoneal dialysis (PD) vary considerably not only across countries but also between centers in the same country. Patient education has been shown to significantly reduce infection rates but up till now training lacks standardization with patients being trained using different methods and media (e.g., illustrations, videos). As a result, patients may be insufficiently experienced in performing PD, which might be one of the causes for high peritonitis rates. To address these issues, we developed a PD training program based on virtual reality (VR). Methods: To become acquainted with the PD procedure, patients are equipped with a VR headset and controllers. They are presented with a virtual PD set, which simulates the feeling of sitting in front of a real PD set. The patient is enabled to run through the program as often as necessary to become familiarized with the whole PD procedure. The aim is to standardize, facilitate, and accelerate the individual learning process. To compare the effect of the applied training method to traditional training, a randomized controlled trial is underway. Conclusion: Previous studies on the effectiveness of learning showed that VR training applications are superior to traditional methods, such as text- or video-based training. However, no study has been undertaken in the context of dialysis. We believe that the implementation of VR training programs in clinical practice will be beneficial in improving the patient’s proficiency, and thereby the quality and safety of PD.

Keywords:
Peritoneal dialysis, Peritonitis rate, Virtual reality training program, Standardization, Education
1.
Figueiredo AE, Bernardini J, Bowes E, Hiramatsu M, Price V, Su C, Walker R, Brunier G: A syllabus for teaching peritoneal dialysis to patients and caregivers. Perit Dial Int 2016; 36: 592–605.
2.
VR Intelligence, Superdata: XR Industry Survey 2018, vol. 7, pp 1–20.
3.
Cunningham M, Fernando B, Berlingieri P: The emerging role of screen based simulators in the training and assessment of colonoscopists. Frontline Gastroenterol 2010; 1: 76–81.
4.
Harpham-Lockyer L, Laskaratos FM, Berlingieri P, Epstein O: Role of virtual reality simulation in endoscopy training. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7: 1287–1294.
5.
Dale E: Audiovisual Methods in Teaching. NY, Dryden Press, 1969.
6.
Pellen M, Horgan L, Roger Barton J, Attwood S: Laparoscopic surgical skills assessment: can simulators replace experts? World J Surg 2009; 33: 440–447.
7.
Moyano-Cuevas JL, Sanchez-Margallo FM, Sanchez-Peralta LF, Pagador JB, Enciso S, Sanchez-Gonzalez P, Gomez-Aguilera EJ, Uson-Gargallo J: Validation of SINERGIA as training tool: a randomized study to test the transfer of acquired basic psychomotor skills to LapMentor. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2011; 6: 839–846.
8.
Sinitsky DM, Fernando B, Berlingieri P: Establishing a curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skills the virtual reality environment. Am J Surg 2012; 204: 367–376.e1.
9.
Jerald J: The VR Book: Human-Centered Design for Virtual Reality, ed 1. New York, San Rafael, Association for Computing Machinery and Morgan & Claypool Publishers (ACM Books Series) 2016, p 31.
10.
Burdea GC, Coiffet P: Virtual Reality Technology, ed 2. Hoboken, Wiley-Inter-Science, 2003, p 2.
11.
Clark JA, Volchok JA, Hazey JW, Sadighi PJ, Fanelli RD: Initial experience using an endoscopic simulator to train surgical residents in flexible endoscopy in a community medical center residency program. Curr Surg 2005; 62: 59–63.
12.
Bloom MB, Rawn CL, Salzberg AD, Krummel TM: Virtual reality applied to procedural testing: the next era. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 442–448.
13.
Ferlitsch A, Glauninger P, Gupper A, Schillinger M, Haefner M, Gangl A, Schoefl R: Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 697–702.
14.
Buzink SN, Koch AD, Heemskerk J, Botden SM, Goossens RH, de Ridder H, Schoon EJ, Jakimowicz JJ: Acquiring basic endoscopy skills by training on the GI Mentor II. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1996–2003.
15.
Ferlitsch A, Schoefl R, Puespoek A, Miehsler W, Schoeniger-Hekele M, Hofer H, Gangl A, Homoncik M: Effect of virtual endoscopy simulator training on performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients: a randomized controlled trial. Endosc 2010; 42: 1049–1056.
16.
Shirai Y, Yoshida T, Shiraishi R, Okamoto T, Nakamura H, Harada T, Nishikawa J, Sakaida I: Prospective randomized study on the use of a computer-based endoscopic simulator for training in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 1046–1050.
17.
Eversbusch A, Grantcharov TP: Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1514–1518.
18.
Ahlberg G, Hultcrantz R, Jaramillo E, Lindblom A, Arvidsson D: Virtual reality colonoscopy simulation: a compulsory practice for the future colonoscopist? Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1198–1204.
19.
Yiannakopoulou E, Nikiteas N, Perrea D, Tsigris C: Virtual reality simulators and training in laparoscopic surgery. Int J Surg 2015; 13: 60–64.
20.
Hutchinson L: Evaluating and researching the effectiveness of educational interventions. BJM 1999; 318: 1267–1269.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.