Dialysate conductivity is routinely used as a surrogate for dialysate sodium concentration. However, dialysis machine manufacturers apply different conductivity temperature correction coefficients. With the same conductivity in dialysis machines manufactured by different manufacturers, dialysate sodium may significantly differ. Also, electrolyte prescriptions are individualized (K, Ca, HCO3) and this is associated with another variation in dialysate sodium in the order of 1–5 mmol/L and both deviations are cumulative and chronic for each patient. Equivalence of the prescribed dialysate sodium and the concentration measured in it is not granted. Both variables differ and it is machine dependent! This paper analyses those variations from a technical point of view and suggests how to detect them and how to deal with or avoid them in clinical practice.

Keywords:
Dialysis sodium prescription, Dialysate sodium, Dialysate conductivity, Dialysate sodium correction, Conductivity cell monitoring
1.
Gembala M, Kumar S: Sodium and Hemodialysis; in Carpi A, Donadio C, Tramonti G (eds): Progress in Hemodialysis – from Emergent Biotechnology to Clinical Practice, In Tech, 2011, ISBN 978–953–307–377–4.
2.
Stragier A: The conductivity of dialysis fluid. EDTNA ERCA J 2005; 31: 118–119.
3.
Descombes E, Fellay B, Riedo E, Hemett O, Magnin JL, Fallay G: Research Gate, Conference Papers. 2014. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280716437
4.
Gul A, Miskulin DC, Paine SS, Narsipur SS, Arbeit LA, Harford AM, Weber DE, Schrader R, Horowitz BL, Zager PG: Comparison of prescribed and measured dialysate sodium: a quality improvement project. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 67: 439–445.
5.
Mion CM, Hegstrom RM, Boen ST, Scribner BH: Substitution of sodium acetate for sodium bicarbonate in the bath fluid for hemodialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1964; 10: 110–115.
6.
Sargent JA, Gotch FA, Lam M, Prowitt M, Keen M: Technical aspects of on-line proportioning of bicarbonate dialysate. Proc Clin Dial Transplant Forum 1977; 7: 109–116.
7.
Determination of Electrical Conductivity, ISO 7888: 1985 and EN 27 888: 1993.
8.
Bertinsson GI: The conductivity of the dialysis fluid. EDTNA ERCA J 2005; 31: 31–34.
9.
Barron J, Ashton C: The Effect of Temperature on Conductivity Measurement. Technical Services Department, Reagecon Diagnostics Ltd. https://www.reagecon.com/pdf/technicalpapers/Effect_of_Temperature_TSP-07_Issue3.pdf
10.
Pfingstmann W: Dialysis Meters – IBP Medical. http://www.ibpmt.com/d_pdf_hdm/HDMBackgroundinfo_ENG.pdf
11.
De Vos JY, Hombroeckx R, Jacobs P, Sansen P: Electrical conductivity in the dialysate interval. EDTNA ERCA J 1993; 19: 41–42.
12.
International Standard ISO 13958: Concentrates for Haemodialysis and Related Therapies, ed 2. Published on April 15, 2009.
13.
Polaschegg HD, Levin W: Hemodialysis Machines and Monitors; In Jacobs C, Koch M, Winchester JF (eds): Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis, Springer, 1996, pp 333–373.
14.
Ekbal NJ, Consalus A, Persaud J, Davenport A: Reliability of delivered dialysate sodium concentration. Hemodial Int 2016; 20:S2–S6.
15.
Santos SF, Peixoto AJ: Sodium balance in maintenance hemodialysis. Sem Dial 2010; 23: 549–555.
16.
Trinh E, Weber C: The dialysate sodium gradient: a modifiable risk factor for fluid overload. Nephron Extra 2017; 7: 10–17.
17.
Obialo CI, John S, Bashir K: Iatrogenic hypernatremia in hemodialysis patients: A result of erroneous online conductivity monitor and conductivity meter reading. Hemodial Int 2017; 21:E73–E75.
18.
Hecking M, Wong MMY, Port FK, Robinson BM, McCullough KP: Regional differences in the associations between prescribed dialysate sodium concentration and interdialytic weight gain in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Am J Kidney Dis 2017; 70: 450–451.
19.
Moret K, Aalten J, van den Wall Bake W, Gerlag P, Beerenhout C, van der Sande F, Leunissen K, Kooman J: The effect of sodium profiling and feedback technologies on plasma conductivity and ionic mass balance: a study in hypotension-prone dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 138–144.
20.
Titze J, Shakibaei M, Schafflhuber M, Schulze-Tanzil G, Porst M, Schwind K, Dietsch P, Hilgers K: Glycosaminoglycan polymerization may enable osmotically inactive Na+ storage in the skin. Am J Physiol Heart Circul Physiol 2004; 287: 203–208.
21.
Titze J: Water-free sodium accumulation. Sem Dial 2009; 22: 253–255.
22.
Flythe JE, Mc Causland FR: Dialysate sodium: rationale for evolution over time. Sem Dial 2017; 30: 99–111.
23.
Odudu A, Lambie S, Taal MW, Fluck RJ, McIntyre CW: Use of online conductivity monitoring to study sodium mass balance in chronic haemodialysis patients: prospects for treatment individualisation. Kidney Blood Press Res 2011; 34: 439–446.
24.
NKF KDOQI GUIDELINES: Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations. Updates; Hemodialysis Adequacy, 2006.
25.
Peixoto AJ, Gowda N, Parikh CR, Santos SF: Long-term stability of serum sodium in hemodialysis patients. Blood Purif 2010; 29: 264–272.
27.
Gotch F, Evans M, Metzner K, Westphal D, Polaschegg H: An on-line monitor of dialyzer Na and K flux in hemodialysis. ASAIO Trans 1990; 36: 359–361.
28.
Locatelli F, Di Filippo S, Manzoni C, Corti M, Andrulli S, Pontoriero G: Monitoring sodium removal and delivered dialysis by conductivity. Int J Artif Organs 1995; 18: 716–721.
29.
Lomonte C, Basile C: Do not forget to individualize dialysate sodium prescription. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 1126–1128.
30.
Basile C, Lomonte C: It is time to individualize the dialysate sodium prescription. Sem Dial 2016; 29: 24–27.
31.
Sharma MK, Frijns AJ, Mandamparambil R, Kooman JP, Smeulders DM: Ion-Selective Optical Sensor for Continuous On-line Monitoring of Dialysate Sodium During Dialysis; in: Optical Fibres and Sensors for Medical Diagnostics and Treatment Applications XVII, Proceedings of SPIE (ed): Israel Gannot, 2017, vol 1005804, DOI: 10.1117/12.2251923.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.