Cholesterol kinetics in the time course after LDL apheresis using a dextran sulfate cellulose column was analyzed by adapting a two-compartment cholesterol kinetic model. Fifteen sets of serial serum cholesterol concentrations after LDL apheresis from 4 patients with drug-resistant nephrotic hypercholesterolemia due to focal glomerulosclerosis (FGS) were analyzed and cholesterol kinetic parameters were estimated with the nonlinear least-squares method. The fractional cholesterol catabolic rates (Kc;0.171 ± 0.073/day, mean ± SD) were markedly decreased as reported in familial hypercholesterolemia (homo: 0.101/day, hetero: 0.280/day). Cholesterol generation rates (G; 68.0 ± 28.7 mg/dl/day, mean ± SD) considerably overlapped the normal range (39.2-77.5 mg/dl/day). This result was compatible with an earlier report that Kc was reduced earlier than G in nephrotic hypercholesterolemia. The time average serum cholesterol concentrations (TAC) in the rebound phase after LDL apheresis can be simulated using these kinetic parameters by the Runge-Kutta-Gill method. According to our previous report, TAC must be reduced to under a near-normal level in order to obtain a beneficial effect on nephrotic syndrome due to FGS. In 10 sets out of the 15, once-weekly treatment of LDL apheresis was sufficient to achieve this aim, but in the remaining 5 cases, more frequent LDL apheresis up to twice a week was necessary in the early phase of treatment. In conclusion, the two-compartment cholesterol kinetic model is useful in clarifying the abnormal cholesterol kinetics in nephrotic syndrome and may be helpful in establishing a more rational strategy of LDL apheresis for nephrotic hypercholesterolemia.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.