The order Carnivora is a large and highly diverse mammalian group with a long and well-documented evolutionary history. Nevertheless, our knowledge on the degree of cortical folding (or degree of gyrification) is limited to just a few species. Here we investigate the degree of cortical folding in 64 contemporary and 37 fossil carnivore species. We do so by measuring the length of gyri impressions on endocranial casts. We use this approach because we have found that there is a very good correlation between the degree of cortical folding and the relative length of the gyri that are exposed on the outer surface of the hemispheres. Our results indicate that aquatic and semiaquatic carnivores have higher degrees of cortical folding than terrestrial carnivores. The degree of cortical folding varies among modern families, with viverrids having the lowest values. Furthermore, the scaling of cortical folding with brain size follows different patterns across specific carnivore families. Forty million years ago, the first carnivores had a relatively small cortex and limited cortical folding. Both the size of the cortex and the degree of cortical folding increased independently in each family during evolution.

1.
Benoit J (2015): A new method of estimating brain mass through cranial capacity in extinct proboscideans to account for the non-neural tissues surrounding their brain. J Verteb Paleontol 35:e991021.
2.
Bininda-Emonds ORP, Cardillo M, Jones KE, MacPhee RDE, Beck RMD, Grenyer R, Price SA, Vos RA, Gittleman JL, Purvis A (2007): The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature 446:507-512.
3.
Cohen KM, Finney SC, Gibbard PL, Fan J-X (2013): The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart. Episodes 36:199-204.
4.
Datta R, Lee J, Duda J, Avants BB, Vite CH, Tseng B, Gee JC, Aguirre GD, Aguirre GK (2013): A digital atlas of the dog brain. PLoS One 7:e52140.
5.
Edinger T (1948): Evolution of the horse brain. Geol Soc Am Mem 25:1-177.
6.
Elias H, Schwartz D (1969): Surface areas of the cerebral cortex of mammals determined by stereological methods. Science 166:1011-1013.
7.
Elias H, Schwartz D (1971): Cerebro-cortical surface areas, volumes, lengths of gyri and their interdependence in mammals, including man. Z Säugetierkd 36:147-163.
8.
England DR (1973): The Phylogeny of the Order Carnivora Based on the Cerebral Structure; PhD thesis, Texas A & M University, College Station.
9.
Finarelli JA, Goswami A (2013): Potential pitfalls of reconstructing deep time evolutionary history with only extant data, a case study using the Canidae (Mammalia, Carnivora). Evolution 67:3678-3685.
10.
Flynn JJ, Wesley-Hunt GD (2005): Carnivora; in Archibald D, Rose KD (eds): Origin, Timing, and Relationships of the Major Clades of Extant Placental Mammals. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, pp 175-198.
11.
Goswami A (2010): Introduction to Carnivora; in Goswami A, Friscia A (eds): Carnivoran Evolution: New Views on Phylogeny, Form and Function. Cambridge, Cambridge Univeristy Press, pp 1-25.
12.
Herculano-Houzel S (2011): Not all brains are made the same: new views on brain scaling in evolution. Brain Behav Evol 78:22-36.
13.
Herculano-Houzel S, Manger PR, Kaas JH (2014): Brain scaling in mammalian evolution as a consequence of concerted and mosaic changes in numbers of neurons and average neuronal cell size. Front Neuroanat 8:77.
14.
Hofman MA (1985): Size and shape of the cerebral cortex in mammals. 1. The cortical surface. Brain Behav Evol 27:28-40.
15.
Hofman MA (2014): Evolution of the human brain: when bigger is better. Front Neuroanat 8:15.
16.
Jerison HJ (1990): Fossil evidence on the evolution of the neocortex; in Jones EG, Peters A (eds): Cerebral Cortex. New York, Plenum, vol 8A, pp 285-309.
17.
Jerison HJ (2007): What fossils tell us about the evolution of the neocortex; in Kaas JH (ed): Evolution of Nervous Systems. San Diego, Academic Press, vol 3, pp 1-12.
18.
Jerison HJ (2012): Digitized fossil brains: neocorticalization. Biolinguistics 6:383-392.
19.
Jorstad A, Nigro B, Cali C, Wawrzyniak M, Fua P, Knott G (2015): NeuroMorph: a toolset for the morphometric analysis and visualization of 3D models derived from electron microscopy image stacks. Neuroinformatics 13:83-92.
20.
Lewitus E, Kelava I, Huttner WB (2013): Conical expansion of the outer subventricular zone and the role of neocortical folding in evolution and development. Front Hum Neurosci 7:424.
21.
Lewitus E, Kelava I, Kalinka AT, Tomancak P, Huttner WB (2014): An adaptive threshold in mammalian neocortical evolution. PLoS Biol 12:e1002000.
22.
Lewitus E, Kelava I, Kalinka AT, Tomancak P, Huttner WB (2016): Comment on “Cortical folding scales universally with surface area and thickness, not number of neurons”. Science 351:825.
23.
Lyras GA (2009): The evolution of the brain in Canidae (Mammalia: Carnivora). Scr Geol 139:1-93.
24.
Magnotta VA, Andreasen NC, Schultz SK, Harris G, Cizadlo T, Heckel D, Nopoulos P, Flaum M (1999): Quantitative in vivo measurement of gyrification in the human brain: changes associated with aging. Cereb Cortex 9:151-160.
25.
Marshall CD, Rozas K, Kot B, Gill V (2014): Innervation patterns of sea otter (Enhydra lutris) mystacial follicle-sinus complexes. Front Neuroanat 8:121.
26.
Molnár Z, Kaas JH, de Carlos JA, Hevner RF, Lein E, Němec P (2014): Evolution and development of the mammalian cerebral cortex. Brain Behav Evol 83:126-139.
27.
Mota B, Herculano-Houzel S (2015): Cortical folding scales universally with surface area and thickness, not number of neurons. Science 349:74-77.
28.
Neubauer S (2014): Endocasts: possibilities and limitations for the interpretation of human brain evolution. Brain Behav Evol 84:117-134.
29.
Nowak RM, Paradiso JL (1999): Walker's Mammals of the World, ed 6. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
30.
Pillay P, Manger PR (2007): Order-specific quantitative patterns of cortical gyrification. Eur J Neurosci 25:2705-2712.
31.
Preuss T (2000): Taking the measure of diversity: comparative alternatives to the model-animal paradigm in cortical neuroscience. Brain Behav Evol 55:287-299.
32.
Prothero JW, Sundsten JW (1984): Folding of the cerebral cortex in mammals: a scaling model. Brain Behav Evol 24:152-167.
33.
Pyka M, Hertog M, Fernandez R, Hauke S, Heider D, Dannlowski U, Konrad C (2010): fMRI data visualization with BrainBlend and Blender. Neuroinformatics 8:21-31.
34.
Radinsky LB (1968): Evolution of somatic sensory specialization in otter brains. J Comp Neurol 134:495-506.
35.
Radinsky LB (1971): An example of parallelism in carnivore brain evolution. Evolution 25:518-522.
36.
Radinsky LB (1973): Evolution of the canid brain. Brain Behav Evol 7:169-202.
37.
Radinsky LB (1975a): Evolution of the felid brain. Brain Behav Evol 11:214-254.
38.
Radinsky LB (1975b): Viverrid neuroanatomy: phylogenetic and behavioral implications. J Mammal 56:130-150.
39.
Radinsky LB (1979): The Fossil Record of Primate Brain Evolution. James Arthur Lecture on the Evolution of the Human Brain. New York, American Museum of Natural History.
40.
Revell LJ (2009): Size-correction and principal components for interspecific comparative studies. Evolution 63:3258-3268.
41.
Revell LJ (2012): phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol Evol 3:217-223.
42.
Revell LJ (2013): Two new graphical methods for mapping trait evolution on phylogenies. Methods Ecol Evol 4:754-759.
43.
Rohlf FJ (2001): Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:2143-2160.
44.
Rybczynski N, Dawson MR, Tedford RH (2009): A semi-aquatic arctic mammalian carnivore from the Miocene epoch and origin of Pinnipedia. Nature 458:1021-1024.
45.
Sanides F (1970): Functional architecture of motor and sensory cortices in primates in the light of a new concept of neocortex evolution; in Noback C, Montagna W (eds): Advances in Primatology. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, vol 1, pp 137-208.
46.
Slater GJ, Harmon LJ, Alfaro ME (2012): Integrating fossils with molecular phylogenies improves inference of trait evolution. Evolution 66:3931-3944.
47.
Smaers JB (2014): evomap: R package for the evolutionary mapping of continuous traits. https://github.com/JeroenSmaers/evomap.
48.
Smaers JB, Rohlf J (2016): Testing species' deviation from allometric predictions using the phylogenetic regression. Evolution 70:1145-1149.
49.
Uylings HBM, van Eden CG (1990): Qualitative and quantitative comparison of the prefrontal cortex in rat and primates, including humans. Prog Brain Res 85:31-62.
50.
Van Valkenburgh B, Wayne R (2010): Carnivores. Curr Biol 20:R915-R919.
51.
Von Bonin G (1941): Side lights on cerebral evolution: brain size of lower vertebrates and degree of cortical folding. J Gen Psychol 25:273-282.
52.
Welker W (1990): Why does cerebral cortex fissure and fold? A review of determinants of gyri and sulci; in Jones E, Peters A (eds): Cerebral Cortex. New York, Plenum Press, vol 8b, pp 3-136.
53.
Wesley-Hunt GD, Flynn JJ (2005): Phylogeny of the Carnivora: basal relationships among the carnivoramorphans, and assessment of the position of “Miacoidea” relative to crown-clade Carnivora. J Syst Palaeontol 3:1-28.
54.
Zilles K, Amunts K, Smaers JB (2011): Three brain collections for comparative neuroanatomy and neuroimaging. Ann NY Acad Sci 1225 S1: E94-E104.
55.
Zilles K, Armstrong E, Moser K, Schleicher A, Stephen H (1989): Gyrification in the cerebral cortex of primates. Brain Behav Evol 34:143-150.
56.
Zilles K, Armstrong E, Schleicher A, Kretschmann HJ (1988): The human pattern of gyrification in the cerebral cortex. Anat Embryol 179:173-179.
57.
Zilles K, Palomero-Gallagher N, Amunts K (2013): Development of cortical folding during evolution and ontogeny. Trends Neurosci 36:275-284.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.