Amphibians are central to discussions of vertebrate evolution because they represent the transition from aquatic to terrestrial life, a transition with profound consequences for the selective pressures shaping brain evolution. Spatial navigation is one class of behavior that has attracted the interest of comparative neurobiologists because of the relevance of the medial pallium/hippocampus, yet, surprisingly, in this regard amphibians have been sparsely investigated. In the current study, we trained toads to locate a water goal relying on the boundary geometry of a test environment (Geometry-Only) or boundary geometry coupled with a prominent, visual feature cue (Geometry-Feature). Once learning had been achieved, the animals were given one last training session and their telencephali were processed for c-Fos activation. Compared to control toads exposed to the test environment for the first time, geometry-only toads were found to have increased neuronal labeling in the medial pallium, the presumptive hippocampal homologue, while geometry-feature toads were found to have increased neuronal labeling in the medial, dorsal, and lateral pallia. The data indicate medial pallial participation in guiding navigation by environmental geometry and lateral, and to a lesser extent dorsal, pallial participation in guiding navigation by a prominent visual feature. As such, participation of the medial pallium/hippocampus in spatial cognition appears to be a conserved feature of terrestrial vertebrates even if their life history is still tied to water, a brain-behavior feature seemingly at least as ancient as the evolutionary transition to life on land.

1.
Angevine JB (1975): Development of the hippocampal region; in Isaacson RL, Pribram KH (eds): The Hippocampus: Structure and Development. New York, Plenum, pp 61-94, vol 1.
2.
Bailey JD, Rosebush JC, Wade J (2002): The hippocampus and caudomedial neostriatum show selective responsiveness to conspecific song in the female zebra finch. www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/neu.10070/pdf.
3.
Ball GF, Gentner TQ (1998): They're playing our song: gene expression and birdsong perception. Neuron 21:271-274.
4.
Bingman VP, Erichsen JT, Anderson JD, Good MA, Pearce JM (2006): Spared feature-structure discrimination but diminished salience of environmental geometry in hippocampal lesioned homing pigeons (Columba livia). Behav Neurosci 120:835-841.
5.
Butler AB, Hodos W (2005): Comparative Vertebrate Neuroanatomy: Evolution and Adaptation, ed 2. Hoboken, Wiley-Liss.
6.
Calle M, Kozicz T, van der Linden E, Desfeux A, Veening JG, Barendregt HP, Roubos EW (2006): Effect of starvation on Fos and neuropeptide immunoreactivities in the brain and pituitary gland of Xenopus laevis. Gen Comp Endocrinol 147:237-246.
7.
Cheng K (1986): A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition 23:149-178.
8.
Cheng K, Huttenlocher J, Newcombe N (2013): 25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective. Psychon Bull Rev 20:1033-1054.
9.
Cheng K, Newcombe NS (2005): Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychon B Rev 12:1-23.
10.
Chiandetti C, Spelke ES, Vallortogara G (2015): Inexperienced newborn chicks use geometry to spontaneously reorient to an artificial social partner. Dev Sci 18;972-978.
11.
Chiandetti C, Vallortigara G (2008): Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial reorientation based on the shape of the environment. Anim Cogn 11:139-146.
12.
Clayton DF (1997): Role of gene regulation in song circuit development and song learning. J Neurobiol 33:549-571.
13.
Daneri MF, Casanave E, Muzio RN (2011): Control of spatial orientation in terrestrial toads (Rhinella arenarum). J Comp Psychol 125:296-307.
14.
Daneri MF, Casanave EB, Muzio RN (2015): Use of local visual landmarks for spatial orientation in toads (Rhinella arenarum): the role of distance to a goal. J Comp Psychol 129:247-255.
15.
Ebbesson SOE (1980): Comparative Neurology of the Telencephalon. New York, Plenum.
16.
Estes R, Reig OA (1973): The early fossil record of frogs: a review of the evidence; in Vial JL (ed): Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans. Columbia, University of Missouri Press, pp 11-63.
17.
Gallistel CR (1990): The Organization of Learning. Cambridge, MIT Press.
18.
Gray ER, Bloomfield LL, Ferrey A, Spetch ML, Sturdy CB (2005): Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry. Biol Lett 1:314-317.
19.
Hermer L, Spelke ES (1994): A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature 370:57-59.
20.
Huang ACW, Shyu B, Hsiao S, Chen T, He AB (2013): Neural substrates of fear conditioning, extinction, and spontaneous recovery in passive avoidance learning: a C-Fos study in rats. Behav Brain Res 237:23-31.
21.
IUCN (2014): IUCN Red List of Threatened Species - version 2014.3. http://www.iucnredlist.org.
22.
Kelly DM, Spetch ML, Heth CD (1998): Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. J Comp Psychol 112:259-269.
23.
Kokoros JJ (1973): Efferent projections of the telencephalon in the toad (Bufo marinus) and tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum); PhD dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland.
24.
Laberge F, Feldhoff PW, Houck LD (2008): Courtship pheromone-induced c-Fos-like immunolabeling in the female salamander brain. Neuroscience 151:329-339.
25.
Learmonth AE, Nadel L, Newcombe NS (2002): Children's use of landmarks: implications for modularity theory. Psychol Sci 13:337-341.
26.
López JC, Bingman VP, Rodríguez F, Gómez Y, Salas C (2000a): Dissociation of place and cue learning by telencephalic ablation in goldfish. Behav Neurosci 114:687-699.
27.
López JC, Broglio C, Rodríguez F, Thinus-Blanc C, Salas C (1999): Different learning strategies in goldfish trained in a spatial constancy task versus a cued one. Anim Cogn 2:109-120.
28.
López JC, Broglio C, Rodríguez F, Thinus-Blanc C, Salas C (2000b): Reversal learning deficit in a spatial task but not in a cued one after telencephalic ablation in goldfish. Behav Brain Res 109:91-98.
29.
Mayer U, Bischof HJ (2012): Brain activation pattern depends on the strategy chosen by zebra finches to solve an orientation task. J Exp Biol 215:426-434.
30.
Mayer U, Pecchia T, Bingman VP, Flore M, Vallortigara G (2016): Hippocampus and medial striatum dissociation during goal navigation by geometry or features in the domestic chick: an immediate early gene study. Hippocampus 26:27-40.
31.
Mayer U, Watanabe S, Bischof HJ (2010): Hippocampal activation of immediate early genes Zenk and c-Fos in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) during learning and recall of a spatial memory task. Neurobiol Learn Mem 93:322-329.
32.
McGregor A, Hayward AJ, Pearce JM, Good MA (2004): Hippocampal lesions disrupt navigation based on the shape of the environment. Behav Neurosci 118:1011-1021.
33.
Moreno N, González A (2004): Localization and connectivity of the lateral amygdala in anuran amphibians. J Comp Neurol 479:130-148.
34.
Muzio RN (2013): Aprendizaje en anfibios, el eslabón perdido: un modelo simple cerebral en el estudio de conductas complejas. Cuad Herpetol 27:87-100.
35.
Muzio RN, Pistone Creydt V, Iurman M, Rinaldi M, Sirani B, Papini MR (2011): Incentive or habit learning in amphibians? PLoS One 6:e25798.
36.
Muzio RN, Segura ET, Papini MR (1992): Effect of schedule and magnitude of reinforcement on instrumental acquisition and extinction in the toad, Bufo arenarum. Learn Motiv 23:406-429.
37.
Muzio RN, Segura ET, Papini MR (1993): Effects of lesions in the medial pallium on instrumental learning in the toad (Bufo arenarum). Physiol Behav 54:185-188.
38.
Muzio RN, Segura ET, Papini MR (1994): Learning under partial reinforcement in the toad (Bufo arenarum): effects of lesions in the medial pallium. Behav Neural Biol 61:36-46.
39.
Nardi D, Bingman VP (2007): Asymmetrical participation of the left and right hippocampus for representing environmental geometry in homing pigeons. Behav Brain Res 178:160-171.
40.
National Research Council (2011): Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, ed. 8. Washington, National Academies Press.
41.
Neal JK, Wade J (2007): Effects of season, testosterone and female esposure on c-Fos expression in the preoptic area and amygdala of male green anoles. Brain Res 1166:124-131.
42.
Neary TJ (1984): Anterior thalamic nucleus projections to the dorsal pallium in ranid frogs. Neurosci Lett 51:213-218.
43.
Northcutt RG (1974): Some histochemical observations on the telencephalon of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana Shaw. J Comp Neurol 157:379-390.
44.
Northcutt RG, Kicliter E (1980): Organization of the amphibian telencephalon; in Ebbesson SOE (ed): Comparative Neurology of the Telencephalon. New York, Plenum, pp 203-255.
45.
Northcutt RG, Ronan M (1992): Afferent and efferent connections of the bullfrog medial pallium. Brain Behav Evol 40:1-16.
46.
Northcutt RG, Royce GJ (1975): Olfactory bulb projections in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana Shaw. J Morphol 145:251-268.
47.
O'Keefe J, Burgess N (1996): Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons. Nature 381:425-428.
48.
O'Keefe J, Nadel L (1978): The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
49.
Packard MG, Hirsh R, White NM (1989): Differential effects of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: evidence for multiple memory systems. J Neurosci 9:1465-1472.
50.
Panchen AL, Smithson TR (1988): The relationship of the earliest tetrapods; in Benton MJ (ed): The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods. Oxford, Clarendon Press, vol 1, pp 1-32.
51.
Papini MR, Muzio RN, Segura ET (1995): Instrumental learning in toads (Bufo arenarum): reinforcer magnitude and the medial pallium. Brain Behav Evol 46:61-71.
52.
Pecchia T, Vallortigara G (2010): View-based strategy for reorientation by geometry. J Exp Biol 213:2987-2996.
53.
Rodríguez F, López JC, Vargas JP, Gómez Y, Broglio C, Salas C (2002): Conservation of spatial memory function in the pallial forebrain of reptiles and ray-finned fishes. J Neurosci 22:2894-2903.
54.
Roth G, Grunwald W, Westhoff G (2003): Morphology, axonal projection pattern, and responses to optic nerve stimulation of thalamic neurons in the fire-bellied toad Bombina orientalis. J Comp Neurol 461:91-110.
55.
Roth G, Laberge F, Mühlenbrock-Lenter S, Grunwald W (2007): Organization of the pallium in the fire-bellied toad Bombina orientalis. 1. Morphology and axonal projection pattern of neurons revealed by intracellular biocytin labeling. J Comp Neurol 501:443-464.
56.
Ruibal R (1962): The adaptive value of bladder water in the toad, Bufo cognatus. Physiol Zool 35:218-223.
57.
Scalia F (1976): Structure of the olfactory and accessory olfactory systems; in Llinas R, Precht W (eds): Frog Neurobiology. New York, Springer, pp 213-233.
58.
Shimizu T, Bowers AN, Budzynski CA, Kahn,MC, Bingman VP (2004): What does a pigeon (Columba livia) brain look like during homing? Selective examination of ZENK expression. Behav Neurosci 118:845-851.
59.
Smeets WJ, González A (2006): Amphibian brains; in: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. Chichester, Wiley.
60.
Sotelo MI, Bingman VP, Muzio RN (2015): Goal orientation by geometric and feature cues: spatial learning in the terrestrial toad Rhinella arenarum. Anim Cogn 18:315-323.
61.
Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2003): Modularity as a fish views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 29:199-210.
62.
Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2007): How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces. Anim Cogn 10:47-54.
63.
Sovrano VA, Vallortigara G (2006): Dissecting the geometric module A sense linkage for metric and landmark information in animals' spatial reorientation. Psychol Sci 17:616-621.
64.
Tommasi L, Chiandetti C, Pecchia T, Sovrano VA, Vallortigara G (2012): From natural geometry to spatial cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36:799-824.
65.
Tommasi L, Gagliardo A, Andrew RJ, Vallortigara G (2003): Separate processing mechanisms for encoding of geometric and landmark information in the avian hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 17:1695-1702.
66.
Vallortigara G (2009): Animals as natural geometers; in Tommasi L, Nadel L, Peterson M (eds): Cognitive biology: evolutionary and developmental perspectives on mind, brain and behaviour. Cambridge, MIT Press, pp 83-104.
67.
Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M, Pasti G (1990): Geometric modules in animals' spatial representation: a test with chicks. J Comp Psychol 104:248-254.
68.
Vargas JP, Bingman VP, Portavella M, López JC (2006): Telencephalon and geometric space in Goldfish. Eur J Neurosci 24:2870-2878.
69.
Vargas JP, López JC, Salas C, Thinus-Blanc C (2004a): Encoding of geometric and featural spatial information by Goldfish (Carassius auratus). J Comp Psychol 18:206-216.
70.
Vargas JP, Petruso E, Bingman V (2004b): Hippocampal formation is required for geometric navigation in pigeons. Eur J Neurosci 20:1937-1944.
71.
Vargas JP, Portavella M, Quintero E, López JC (2011): Neural basis of the spatial navigation based on geometric cues. Behav Brain Res 225:367-372.
72.
Westhoff G, Roth G (2002): Morphology and projection pattern of medial and dorsal pallial neurons in the frog Discoglossus pictus and the salamander Plethodon jordani. J Comp Neurol 445:97-121.
73.
Wilczynski W (2009): Evolution of the brain in amphibians; in: Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Berlin, Springer, pp 1301-1305.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.