In their natural environment, big brown bats forage for small insects in open spaces, as well as in vegetation and in the presence of acoustic clutter. While searching and hunting for prey, bats experience sonar interference, not only from densely cluttered environments, but also from calls of conspecifics foraging in close proximity. Previous work has shown that when two bats compete for a single prey item in a relatively open environment, one of the bats may go silent for extended periods of time, which can serve to minimize sonar interference between conspecifics. Additionally, pairs of big brown bats have been shown to adjust frequency characteristics of their vocalizations to avoid acoustic interference in echo processing. In this study, we extended previous work by examining how the presence of conspecifics and environmental clutter influence the bat's echolocation behavior. By recording multichannel audio and video data of bats engaged in insect capture in open and cluttered spaces, we quantified the bats' vocal and flight behaviors. Big brown bats flew individually and in pairs in an open and cluttered room, and the results of this study shed light on the different strategies that this species employs to negotiate a complex and dynamic environment.

Keywords:
Adaptation, Bat echolocation, Biosonar signals, Flight behavior, Foraging strategies, Silent behavior, Vocal behavior
1.
Aytekin M, Grassi E, Sahota M, Moss CF (2004): The bat head-related transfer function reveals binaural cues for sound localization in azimuth and elevation. J Acoust Soc Am 116:3594-3605.
2.
Balcombe JP, Fenton MB (1988): Eavesdropping by bats: the influence of echolocation call design and foraging strategy. Ethology 79:158-166.
3.
Barclay RM (1982): Interindividual use of echolocation calls: eavesdropping by bats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:271-275.
4.
Bates ME, Simmons JA, Zorikov TV (2011): Bats use echo harmonic structure to distinguish their targets from background clutter. Science 333:627-630.
5.
Chiu C, Moss CF (2008): When echolocating bats do not echolocate. Commun Integr Biol 1:161-162.
6.
Chiu C, Xian W, Moss CF (2008): Flying in silence: echolocating bats cease vocalizing to avoid sonar jamming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:13116-13121.
7.
Chiu C, Xian W, Moss CF (2009): Adaptive echolocation behavior in bats for the analysis of auditory scenes. J Exp Biol 212:1392-1404.
8.
Falk B, Jakobsen L, Surlykke A, Moss CF (2014): Bats coordinate sonar and flight behavior as they forage in open and cluttered environments. J Exp Biol 217:4356-4364.
9.
Ghose K, Moss CF (2003): The sonar beam pattern of a flying bat as it tracks tethered insects. J Acoust Soc Am 114:1120-1131.
10.
Gillam EH (2007): Eavesdropping by bats on the feeding buzzes of conspecifics. Can J Zool 85:795-801.
11.
Greif S, Siemers B (2010): Innate recognition of water bodies in echolocating bats. Nat Commun 1:107.
12.
Griffin DR (1958): Listening in the Dark: The Acoustic Orientation of Bats and Men. New Haven, Yale University Press.
13.
Hartley DJ, Suthers RA (1989): The sound emission pattern of the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Acoust Soc Am 85:1348-1351.
14.
Hope GM, Bhatnagar KP (1979): Effect of light adaptation on electrical responses of the retinas of four species of bats. Experientia 35:1191-1193.
15.
Lawrence BD, Simmons JA (1982): Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats. J Acoust Soc Am 71:585-590.
16.
Moss CF, Schnitzler HU (1989): Accuracy of target ranging in echolocating bats: acoustic information processing. J Comp Physiol A 165:383-393.
17.
Moss CF, Schnitzler HU (1995): Behavioral studies of auditory information processing; in Popper AN, Fay RR (eds): Hearing by Bats. New York, Springer, pp 87-145.
18.
Moss CF, Surlykke A (2001): Auditory scene analysis by echolocation in bats. J Acoust Soc Am 110:2207-2226.
19.
Moss CF, Surlykke A (2010): Probing the natural scene by echolocation in bats. Front Behav Neurosci 4:33.
20.
Simmons JA (1973): The resolution of target range by echolocating bats. J Acoust Soc Am 54:157-173.
21.
Simmons JA (1979): Perception of echo phase information in bat sonar. Science 204:1336-1338.
22.
Simmons JA (1989): A view of the world through the bat's ear: the formation of acoustic images in echolocation. Cognition 33:155-199.
23.
Simmons JA, Eastman KM, Horowitz SS, O'Farrell MJ, Lee DN (2001): Versatility of biosonar in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus. Acoust Res Lett Online 2:43-48.
24.
Simmons JA, Kick SA, Lawrence BD, Hale C, Bard C, Escudie B (1983): Acuity of horizontal angle discrimination by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Comp Physiol 153:321-330.
25.
Simmons JA, Saillant PA, Wotton JM, Haresign T, Ferragamo MJ, Moss CF (1995): Composition of biosonar images for target recognition by echolocating bats. Neural Netw 8:1239-1261.
26.
Simmons JA, Vernon JA (1971): Echolocation: discrimination of targets by the bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Exp Zool 176:315-328.
27.
Surlykke A, Ghose K, Moss CF (2009): Acoustic scanning of natural scenes by echolocation in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Exp Biol 212:1011-1020.
28.
Surlykke A, Moss CF (2000): Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory. J Acoust Soc Am 108:2419-2429.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.