In social insects, both task performance (foraging) and dominance are associated with increased brain investment, particularly in the mushroom bodies. Whether and how these factors interact is unknown. Here we present data on a system where task performance and social behavior can be analyzed simultaneously: the small carpenter bee Ceratina australensis. We show that foraging and dominance have separate and combined cumulative effects on mushroom body calyx investment. Female C. australensis nest solitarily and socially in the same populations at the same time. Social colonies comprise two sisters: the social primary, which monopolizes foraging and reproduction, and the social secondary, which is neither a forager nor reproductive but rather remains at the nest as a guard. We compare the brains of solitary females that forage and reproduce but do not engage in social interactions with those of social individuals while controlling for age, reproductive status, and foraging experience. Mushroom body calyx volume was positively correlated with wing wear, a proxy for foraging experience. We also found that, although total brain volume did not vary among reproductive strategies (solitary vs. social nesters), socially dominant primaries had larger mushroom body calyx volumes (corrected for both brain and body size variation) than solitary females; socially subordinate secondaries (that are neither dominant nor foragers) had the least-developed mushroom body calyces. These data demonstrate that sociality itself does not explain mushroom body volume; however, achieving and maintaining dominance status in a group was associated with mushroom body calyx enlargement. Dominance and foraging effects were cumulative; dominant social primary foragers had larger mushroom body volumes than solitary foragers, and solitary foragers had larger mushroom body volumes than nonforaging social secondary guards. This is the first evidence for cumulative effects on brain development by dominance and task performance.

Keywords:
Mushroom bodies, Bee, Social experience, Brain development, Brain evolution, Foraging, Social dominance, Insect brain, Insect behavior, Evolution
1.
Aiello LC, Wheeler P (1995): The expensive tissue hypothesis. Curr Anthropol 36:199-221.
2.
Alexander RD (1974): The evolution of social behavior. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5:325-383.
3.
Amador-Vargas S, Gronenberg W, Wcislo WT, Mueller U (2015): Specialization and group size: brain and behavioural correlates of colony size in ants lacking morphological castes. Proc Biol Sci 282:2014502.
4.
Byrne RW, Bates LA (2007): Sociality, evolution, and cognition. Curr Biol 17:R714-R723.
5.
Cartar R (1992): Morphological senescence and longevity: an experiment relating wing wear and life span in foraging wild bumble bees. J Anim Ecol 61:225-231
6.
Dunbar RIM, Shultz S (2007): Evolution in the social brain. Science 317:1344-1347.
7.
Edelman GM, Changeux JP (2001): The Brain. New Brunswick, Transaction.
8.
Fahrbach SE, Dobrin S (2009): The how and why of structural plasticity in the honey bee brain; in Dukas R, Ratcliffe J (eds): Cognitive Ecology II. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
9.
Fahrbach SE, Farris SM, Sullivan JP, Robinson GE (2003): Limits on volume changes in the mushroom bodies of the honey bee brain. J Neurobiol 57:141-151.
10.
Fahrbach SE, Giray T, Robinson GE (1995): Volume changes in the mushroom bodies of adult honey bee queens. Neurobiol Learn Mem 63:181-191.
11.
Fahrbach SE, Moore D, Capaldi EA, Farris SM, Robinson GE (1998): Experience-expectant plasticity in the mushroom bodies of the honey bee. Learn Mem 5:115-123.
12.
Farris SM, Robinson GE, Fahrbach SE (2001): Experience- and age-related outgrowth of intrinsic neurons in the mushroom bodies of the adult worker honeybee. J Neurosci 21:6395-6404.
13.
Farris SM, Schulmeister S (2011): Parasitoidism, not sociality, is associated with the evolution of elaborate mushroom bodies in the brains of hymenopteran insects. Proc Biol Sci 278:940-951.
14.
Fiala JC (2005): Reconstruct: a free editor for serial section microscopy. J Microsc 218:52-61.
15.
Gronenberg W, Riveros AJ (2009): Social brains and behavior-past and present; in Gadau J, Fewell J (eds): Organization of Insect Societies from Genome to Sociocomplexity. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
16.
Heisenberg M (1998): What do the mushroom bodies do for the insect brain? An introduction. Learn Mem 5:1-10.
17.
Hogendoorn K, Velthuis HHW (1999): Task allocation and reproductive skew in social mass provisioning carpenter bees in relation to age and size. Insect Soc 46:198-207.
18.
Humphrey NK (1976): The social function of intellect; in Bateson PPG, Hinde RA (eds.): Growing Points in Ethology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
19.
Lihoreau M, Latty T, Chittka L (2012): An exploration of the social brain hypothesis in insects. Front Physiol 3:442.
20.
Michener CD (1974): The Social Behavior of the Bees. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
21.
Michener CD (1985): From solitary to eusocial: need there be a series of intervening species? in Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds): Experimental Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. New York, Sinauer.
22.
Molina Y, Harris RM, O'Donnell S (2009): Brain organization mirrors caste differences, colony founding and nest architecture in paper wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Proc Biol Sci 276:3345-3351.
23.
Molina Y, O'Donnell S (2007): Mushroom body volume is related to social aggression and ovary development in the paper wasp Polistes instabilis. Brain Behav Evol 70:137-144.
24.
Molina Y, O'Donnell S (2008): Age, sex, and dominance-related mushroom body plasticity in the paper wasp Mischocyttarus mastigophorus. Dev Neurobiol 68:950-959.
25.
Niven JE, Laughlin SB (2008): Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems. J Exp Biol 211:1792-1804.
26.
O'Donnell S, Clifford MR, DeLeon S, Papa C, Zahedi N, Bulova SJ (2013): Brain size and visual environment predict species differences in paper wasp sensory processing brain regions (Hymenoptera: Vespidae, Polistinae). Brain Behav Evol 82:177-184.
27.
O'Donnell S, Donlan NA, Jones TA (2006): Organizational and dominance associated differences in mushroom body organization in the paper wasp, Mischocyttarus mastigophorus. J Neurobiol 67:39-46.
28.
Rehan SM, Berens AJ, Toth AL (2014): At the brink of eusociality: transcriptomic correlates of worker behaviour in a small carpenter bee. BMC Evol Biol 14:260.
29.
Rehan SM, Leys R, Schwarz MP (2012): A mid-cretaceous origin of sociality in xylocopine bees with only two origins of true worker castes. PLoS One 7:e34690.
30.
Rehan SM, Richards MH (2010): Nesting biology and subsociality in Ceratina calcarata (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Can Entomol 142:65-74.
31.
Rehan SM, Richards MH (2013): Reproductive aggression and nestmate recognition in a subsocial bee. Anim Behav 85:733-741.
32.
Rehan SM, Richards MH, Adams M, Schwarz MP (2014): The costs and benefits of sociality in a facultatively social bee. Anim Behav 97:77-85.
33.
Rehan SM, Richards MH, Schwarz MP (2009): Evidence of social nesting in the Ceratina of Borneo. J Kans Entomol Soc 82:194-209.
34.
Rehan SM, Richards MH, Schwarz MP (2010): Social polymorphism in the Australian small carpenter bee, Ceratina (Neoceratina) australensis. Insect Soc 57:403-412.
35.
Rehan SM, Schwarz MP, Richards MH (2011): Fitness consequences of ecological constraints and implications for the evolution of sociality in an incipiently social bee. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 103:57-67.
36.
Ricklefs RE (2004): The cognitive face of avian life histories: the 2003 Margaret Morse Nice Lecture. Wilson Bull 116:119-133.
37.
Riveros AJ, Gronenberg W (2010): Brain allometry and neural plasticity in the bumblebee Bombus occidentalis. Brain Behav Evol 75:138-148.
38.
Sakagami SF, Maeta Y (1977): Some presumably presocial habits of Japanese Ceratina bees, with notes on various social types in Hymenoptera. Insect Soc 24:319-343.
39.
Sakagami SF, Maeta Y (1995): Task allocation in artificially induced colonies of a basically solitary bee Ceratina (Ceratinidia) okinawana, with a comparison of sociality between Ceratina and Xylocopa (Hymenoptera, Anthophoridae, Xylocopinae). Jap J Ecol 63:115-150.
40.
Smith AR, Seid MA, Jimenez LC, Wcislo WT (2010): Socially induced brain development in a facultatively eusocial sweat bee Megalopta genalis (Halictidae). Proc Biol Sci 277:2157-2163.
41.
Strausfeld NJ, Sinakevitch I, Brown SM, Farris SM (2009): Ground plan of the insect mushroom body: functional and evolutionary implications. J Comp Neurol 513:265-291.
42.
Withers GS, Day NF, Talbot F, Dobson HE, Wallace CS (2007): Experience-dependent plasticity in the mushroom bodies of the solitary bee Osmia lignaria (Megachilidae). Dev Neurobiol 68:73-82.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.