Frequency alternation in the echolocation of insectivorous bats has been interpreted in relation to ranging and duty cycle, i.e. advantages for echolocation. The shifts in frequency of the calls of these so-called two-tone bats, however, may also play its role in the success of their hunting behavior for a preferred prey, the tympanate moth. How the auditory receptors (e.g. the A1 and A2 cells) in the moth's ear detect such frequency shifts is currently unknown. Here, we measured the auditory responses of the A1 cell in the noctuid Spodoptera frugiperda to the echolocation hunting sequence of Molossus molossus, a two-tone bat. We also manipulated the bat calls to control for the frequency shifts by lowering the frequency band of the search and approach calls. The firing response of the A1 receptor cell significantly decreases with the shift to higher frequencies during the search and approach phases of the hunting sequence of M. molossus; this could be explained by the receptor's threshold curve. The frequency dependence of the decrease in the receptor's response is supported by the results attained with the manipulated sequence: search and approach calls with the same minimum frequency are detected by the moth at the same threshold intensity. The two-tone bat M. molossus shows a call frequency alternation behavior that may enable it to overcome moth audition even in the mid-frequency range (i.e. 20-50 kHz) where moths hear best.

Keywords:
Echolocation, Frequency alternation, Molossus molossus, Moth hearing, Spodoptera frugiperda, Tone-deaf ears
1.
Asi NS, Fullard JH, Whitehead S, Dawson JW (2009): No neural evidence for dynamic auditory tuning of the A1 receptor in the ear of the noctuid moth, Noctua pronuba. J Comp Physiol A 195:955-960.
2.
Bogdanowicz W, Fenton MB, Daleszczyk K (1999): The relationship between echolocation calls, morphology and diet in insectivorous bats. J Zool Lond 247:381-393.
3.
Boonman A, Jones G (2002): Intensity control during target approach in echolocating bats; stereotypical sensory-motor behaviour in Daubenton's bats, Myotis daubentonii. J Exp Biol 205:2865-2874.
4.
Corcoran AJ, Wagner RD, Conner WE (2013): Optimal predator risk assessment by the sonar-jamming arctiine moth Bertholdia trigona. PLoS ONE 8:e63609.
5.
Coro F, Pérez M (1984): Intensity coding by auditory receptors in Empyreuma pugione (Lepidoptera, Ctenichudae). J Comp Physiol A 154:287-295.
6.
Coro F, Pérez M, Mora E, Boada D, Conner WE, Sanderford MV, Avila H (1998): Receptor cell habituation in the A1 auditory receptor of four noctuoid moths. J Exp Biol 201:2879-2890.
7.
Denzinger A, Siemers BM, Schaub A, Schnitzler HU (2001): Echolocation by the barbastelle bat, Barbastella barbastellus. J Comp Physiol A 187:521-528.
8.
Esbérard CEL, Bergallo HG (2010): Foraging activity of the free-tailed bat Molossus molossus (Chiroptera; Molossidae) in southeastern Brazil. Braz J Biol 70:1011-1014.
9.
Fenton MB (2013): Questions, ideas and tools: lessons from bat echolocation. Anim Behav 85:869-879.
10.
Fenton MB, Fullard JH (1979): The influence of moth hearing on bat echolocation strategies. J Comp Physiol A 132:77-86.
11.
Fenton MB, Portfors CV, Rautenbach IL, Waterman JM (1998): Compromises: sound frequencies used in echolocation by aerial-feeding bats. Can J Zool 76:1174-1182.
12.
Fullard JH (1988): The tuning of moth ears. Experientia 44:423-428.
13.
Fullard JH, Dawson JW (1997): The echolocation calls of the spotted bat Euderma maculatum are relatively inaudible to moths. J Exp Biol 200:129-137.
14.
Fullard JH, Dawson JW, Otero D, Surlykke A (1997): Bat-deafness in day-flying moths (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae, Dioptinae). J Comp Physiol A 181:477-483.
15.
Fullard JH, Muma KE, Dawson JW (2003a): Quantifying an anti-bat flight response by eared moths. Can J Zool 81:395-399.
16.
Fullard JH, Dawson JW, Jacobs DS (2003b): Auditory encoding during the last moment of a moth's life. J Exp Biol 206:281-294.
17.
Goerlitz HR, Hofstede HM, Zeale MRK, Jones G, Holderied MV (2010): An aerial-hawking bat uses stealth echolocation. Current Biol 20:1568-1572.
18.
Guillén-Servent A, Ibáñez C (2007): Unusual echolocation behavior in a small molossid bat, Molossops temminckii, that forages near background clutter. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1599-1613.
19.
Habersetzer J (1981): Adaptive echolocation sounds in the bat Rhinopoma hardwickei. J Comp Physiol 144:559-566.
20.
Heller KG (1995): Echolocation and body size in insectivorous bats: the case of the giant naked bat Cheiromeles torquatus (Molossidae). Le Rhinolophe 11:27-38.
21.
Heller KG, von Helversen O (1989): Resource partitioning of sonar frequency bands in rhinolophoid bats. Oecology 80:178-186.
22.
Hiryu S, Hagino T, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y (2007): Echo-intensity compensation in echolocating bats (Pipistrellus abramus) during flight measured by a telemetry microphone. J Acoust Soc Am 121:1749-1757.
23.
Hiryu S, Shiori Y, Hosokawa T, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y (2008): On-board telemetry of emitted sounds from free-flying bats: compensation for velocity and distance stabilizes echo frequency and amplitude. J Comp Physiol A 194:841-851.
24.
Jackson ME, Asi NS, Fullard JH (2010): Auditory sensitivity and ecological relevance: the functional audiogram as modeled by the bat detecting moth ear. J Comp Physiol A 196:453-462.
25.
Jakobsen L, Ratcliffe JM, Surlykke A (2013): Convergent acoustic field of view in echolocating bats. Nature 493:93-96.
26.
Jones G (1999): Scaling of echolocation call parameters in bats. J Exp Biol 202:3359-3367.
27.
Jones G, Waters DA (2000): Moth hearing in response to bat echolocation calls manipulated independently in time and frequency. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1627-1632.
28.
Jung K, Kalko EKV, von Helversen O (2007): Echolocation calls in Central American emballonurid bats: signal design and call frequency alternation. J Zool 272:125-137.
29.
Kingston T, Jones G, Akbar Z, Kunz TH (2003): Alternation of echolocation calls in 5 species of aerial feeding insectivorous bats from Malaysia. J Mammal 84:205-215.
30.
Kobler JB, Wilson BS, Henson OW Jr, Bishop AL (1985): Echo intensity compensation by echolocating bats. Hear Res 20:99-108.
31.
Kössl M, Mora EC, Vater M, Coro F (1999): Two tone echolocation calls in the Cuban bat Molossus molossus. J Mammal 80:929-932.
32.
Lawrence BD, Simmons JA (1982): Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats. J Acoust Soc Am 71:585-590.
33.
Lee YF, McCracken GF (2005): Dietary variation of Brazilian free-tailed bats links to migratory populations of pest insects. J Mammal 86:67-76.
34.
Lockwood AP (1961): ‘Ringer' solutions and some notes on the physiological basis of their ionic composition. Comp Biochem Physiol 2:241-289.
35.
Miller LA, Degn HJ (1981): The acoustic behaviour of four species of vespertilionid bats studied in the field. J Comp Physiol A 142:67-74.
36.
Miller LA, Surlykke A (2001): How some insects detect and avoid being eaten by bats: tactics and countertactics of prey and predator. Bioscience 51:570-581.
37.
Mora EC, Macías S, Hechavarría JC, Vater M, Kössl M (2013): Evolution of the heteroharmonic strategy for target-range computation in the echolocation of Mormoopidae. Front Physiol 4:1-13.
38.
Mora EC, Macías S, Vater M, Coro F, Kössl M (2004): Specializations for aerial-hawking in the echolocation system of Molossus molossus (Molossidae, Chiroptera). J Comp Physiol A 190:561-574.
39.
Norman AP, Jones G (2000): Size, peripheral auditory tuning and target strength in noctuid moths. Physiol Entomol 25:346-353.
40.
Pavey CR, Burwell CJ (1998): Bat predation on eared moths: a test of the allotonic frequency hypothesis. Oikos 81:143-151.
41.
Pavey CR, Burwell CJ, Milne DJ (2006): The relationship between echolocation-call frequency and moth predation of a tropical bat fauna. Can J Zool 84:425-433.
42.
Ratcliffe JM, Jakobsen L, Kalko EKV, Surlykke A (2011): Frequency alternation and an offbeat rhythm indicate foraging behavior in the echolocating bat, Saccopteryx bilineata. J Comp Physiol A 197:413-423.
43.
Roeder KD (1964): Aspects of the noctuid tympanic nerve response having significance in the avoidance of bats. J Insect Physiol 10:529-546.
44.
Roeder KD (1966): Interneurons of the thoracic nerve cord activated by tympanic nerve fibres in noctuid moths. J Insect Physiol 12:1227-1244.
45.
Roeder KD (1967): Turning tendency of moths exposed to ultrasound while in stationary flight. J Insect Physiol 13:873-888.
46.
Roeder KD, Treat AE (1961): The detection and evasion of bats by moths. Am Sci 49:135-148.
47.
Rojas JC, Virgen A, Malo EA (2004): Seasonal and nocturnal flight activity of Spodoptera frugiperda males (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) monitored by pheromone traps in the coast of Chiapas, Mexico. Florida Entomol 87:496-503.
48.
Rolfe AK (2011): Diet of three mormoopid bats (Mormoops blainvillei, Pteronotus quadridens, and Pteronotus portoricensis) on Puerto Rico. Masters Theses and Doctoral Dissertations, Eastern Michigan University, 349 pp.
49.
Rydell J, Arlettaz R (1994): Low-frequency echolocation enables the bat Tadarida teniotis to feed on tympanate insects. Proc R Soc Lond B 257:175-178.
50.
Schnitzler HU, Kalko EKV (2001): Echolocation by insect eating bats. Bioscience 51:557-569.
51.
Schoeman MC, Jacobs DS (2003): Support for the allotonic frequency hypothesis in an insectivorous bat community. Oecologia 134:154-162.
52.
Silva G (1979): Los Murciélagos de Cuba. La Habana, Editorial Academia, 423 pp.
53.
Skals N, Anderson P, Kanneworff M, Löfstedt C, Surlykke A (2005): Her odours make him deaf: crossmodal modulation of olfaction and hearing in a male moth. J Exp Biol 208:595-601.
54.
Surlykke A, Kalko EKV (2008): Echolocating bats cry out loud to detect their prey. PLoS ONE 3:e2036.
55.
Surlykke A, Treat AE (1995): Hearing in winter moths. Naturwissenschaften 82:382-384.
56.
ter Hofstede HM, Goerlitz HR, Ratcliffe JM, Holderied MW, Surlykke A (2013): The simple ears of noctuoid moths are tuned to the calls of their sympatric bat community. J Exp Biol 216:3954-3962.
57.
Tougaard J (1998): Detection of short pure-tone stimuli in the noctuid ear: what are temporal integration and integration time all about? J Comp Physiol A 183:563-572.
58.
Treat AE, Roeder KD (1959): A nervous element of unknown function in the tympanic organs of moths. J Insect Physiol 3:262-270.
59.
Waters DA (2003): Bats and moths: what is there left to learn? Physiol Entomol 28:237-250.
60.
Waters DA, Jones G (1996): The peripheral auditory characteristics of noctuid moths: responses to the search-phase echolocation calls of bats. J Exp Biol 199:857-868.
61.
Windmill JFC, Jackson JC, Tuck EJ, Robert D (2006): Keeping up with bats: dynamic auditory tuning in a moth. Curr Biol 16:2418-2423.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.