The marine environment presents unique visual challenges for a range of organisms, particularly those dwelling at great depths, where sunlight may either be absent or drop to very low levels. Under these environmental conditions, the visual system must maximise light absorption in order to enhance the detection of prey, predators and potential mates. Using stereological analysis of retinal wholemounts, the distribution and number of photoreceptors (rods) was determined for 5 deep-sea shark species from a range of depths (46-1,500 m). All species possessed areas of increased photoreceptor density (with peaks between 41,000 and 82,000 rods/mm2) within discrete regions of the retina. The total number of rods in the photoreceptor layer also varied between 17 × 106 and 63 × 106. It is evident that increasing sensitivity of the retina is an important adaptation to life in the deep sea. The location of discrete areas of high cell density within the photoreceptor layer of the retina corresponds to discrete areas of the visual field that are sampled at a higher intensity, hence increasing sensitivity. The location of these areas of increased sensitivity differed between the species of this study. The disparity of areas of increased sensitivity seen between species is thought to reflect distinctive predator avoidance and prey capture strategies. This study reveals that the visual demands of deep-sea sharks vary interspecifically and that sampling of each species' visual field is not solely determined by its habitat.

Keywords:
Photoreceptor, Sharks, Stereology, Retinal topography, Retinal wholemount
1.
Andrade da Costa BLS, Hokoç JN (2000): Photoreceptor topography of the retina in the new world monkey Cebus apella. Vision Res 40:2395-2409.
2.
Arrese CA, Dunlop SA, Harman AM, Braekevelt CR, Ross WM, Shand J, Beazley LD (2000): Retinal structure and visual acuity in a polyprotodont marsupial, the fat-tailed dunnart (Sminthopsis crassicaudata). Brain Behav Evol 53:111-126.
3.
Arrese CA, Oddy AY, Runham PB, Hart NS, Shand J, Hunt DM, Beazley LD (2005): Cone topography and spectral sensitivity in two potentially trichromatic marsupials, the quokka (Setonix brachyurus) and quenda (Isoodon obesulus). Proc Biol Sci 272:791-796.
4.
Arrese CA, Rodger J, Beazley LD, Shand J (2003): Topographies of retinal cone photoreceptors in two Australian marsupials. Vis Neurosci 20:307-312.
5.
Beaudet L, Flamarique IN, Hawryshyn CW (1997): Cone photoreceptor topography in the retina of sexually mature Pacific salmonid fishes. J Comp Neurol 383:49-59.
6.
Bonthius DJ, McKim R, Koele L, Harb H, Karacay B, Mahoney J, Pantazis NJ (2004): Use of frozen sections to determine neuronal number in the murine hippocampus and neocortex using the optical dissector and optical fractionator. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc 14:45-57.
7.
Bozzano A (2004): Retinal specialisations in the dogfish Centroscymnus coelolepis from the Mediterranean deep-sea. Sci Mar 68:185-195.
8.
Bozzano A, Collin SP (2000): Retinal ganglion cell topography in elasmobranchs. Brain Behav Evol 55:191-208.
9.
Bozzano A, Murgia R, Vallerga S, Hirano J, Archer S (2001): The photoreceptor system in the retinae of two dogfishes, Scyliorhinus canicula and Galeus melastomus: possible relationship with depth distribution and predatory lifestyle. J Fish Biol 59:1258-1278.
10.
Braekevelt CR (1986): Fine structure of the tapetum cellulosum of the grey seal (Halichoerus grypus). Acta Anat (Basel) 127:81-87.
11.
Braekevelt CR (1994): Fine structure of the choroidal tapetum lucidum in the Port Jackson shark (Heterodontus phillipi). Anat Embryol (Berl) 190:591-596.
12.
Cavanagh R, Kyne PM (2005): The conservation status of deep-sea chondrichthyan fishes; in Shotton R (ed): Deep Sea 2003: Conference on the Governance and Management of Deep-Sea Fisheries. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, pp 366-380.
13.
Clarke GL, Denton EJ (1962): Light and Animal Life. New York, Interscience.
14.
Clarke GL, Kelly MG (1965): Measurements of diurnal changes in bioluminescence from the sea surface to 2,000 meters using a new photometric device. Limnol Oceanogr 10:54-66.
15.
Coimbra JP, Marceliano MLV, Andrade-da-Costa BLS, Yamada ES (2006): The retina of tyrant flycatchers: topographic organization of neuronal density and size in the ganglion cell layer of the great kiskadee, Pitangus sulphuratus and the rusty margined flycatcher, Myiozetetes cayanensis (Aves: Tyrannidae). Brain Behav Evol 68:15-25.
16.
Coimbra JP, Trévia N, Marceliano MLV, Andrade-da-Costa BLS (2009): Number and distribution of neurons in the retinal ganglion cell layer in relation to foraging behaviors of tyrant flycatchers. J Comp Neurol 514:66-73.
17.
Collin SP (1988): The retina of the shovel-nosed ray, Rhinobatos batillum (Rhinobatidae): morphology and quantitative analysis of the ganglion, amarine and bipolar cell populations. Exp Biol 47:195-207.
18.
Collin SP (2009): Early evolution of vertebrate photoreception: lessons from lampreys and lungfishes. Integr Zool 4:87-98.
19.
Collin SP, Pettigrew JD (1988): Retinal topography in reef teleosts. 1. Some species with well-developed areae but poorly-developed streaks. Brain Behav Evol 31:269-282.
20.
Compagno LJV, Dando M, Fowler S (2005): Sharks of the World. London, Harper Collins.
21.
Crescitelli F (1991): Adaptations of visual pigments to the photic environment of the deep sea. J Exp Zool Suppl 5:66-75.
22.
Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE (1990): Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol 292:497-523.
23.
Curcio CA, Sloan Jr KR, Packer O, Hendrickson AE, Kalina RE (1987): Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. Science 236:579-582.
24.
Dowling JE (1970): Organization of vertebrate retinas: the Jonas M. Friedenwald Memorial Lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 9:655-680.
25.
Dowling JE, Ripps H (1970): Visual adaptation in the retina of the skate. J Gen Physiol 56:491-520.
26.
Fileta JB, Huang W, Kwon GP, Filippopoulos T, Ben Y, Dobberfuhl A, Grosskreutz CL (2008): Efficient estimation of retinal ganglion cell number: a stereological approach. J Neurosci Methods 170:1-8.
27.
Finlay BL, Franco EC, Yamada ES, Crowley JC, Parsons M, Muniz JA, Silveira LC (2008): Number and topography of cones, rods and optic nerve axons in new and old world primates. Vis Neurosci 25:289-299.
28.
Fritsches KA, Marshall NJ, Warrant EJ (2003): Retinal specializations in the blue marlin: eyes designed for sensitivity to low light levels. Mar Freshw Res 54:333-341.
29.
Gianni M (2004): High Seas Bottom Trawl Fisheries and Their Impacts on the Biodiversity of Vulnerable Deep-Sea Ecosystems: Options for International Action. Gland, IUCN.
30.
Gilbert PW (1963): The visual apparatus of sharks; in Gilbert PW (ed): Sharks and Survival. Boston, Heath.
31.
Glaser EM, Wilson PD (1998): The coefficient of error of optical fractionator population size estimates: a computer simulation comparing three estimators. J Microsc 192:163-171.
32.
Gruber SH (1963): Cones in the retina of the lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris). Vision Res 61:397-399.
33.
Gruber SH (1977): The visual system of sharks: adaptations and capability. Am Zool 17:453-469.
34.
Gruber SH, Cohen JL (1985): Visual system of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, with emphasis on retinal structure. Mem Cal Acad Sci 9:61-72.
35.
Gruber SH, Gulley RL, Brandon J (1975): Duplex retina in seven elasmobranch species. Bull Mar Sci 25:353-358.
36.
Gundersen HJG, Jensen EB (1987): The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. J Microsc 147:229-263.
37.
Guthrie DM, Muntz WRA (1993): Role of vision in fish behaviour; in Pitcher TJ (ed): Behaviour of Teleost Fishes. London, Chapman & Hall.
38.
Hardy GS (1985): A new species of catshark in the genus Parmaturus Garman (Scyliorhinidae), from New Zealand. NZ J Zool 12:119-124.
39.
Hart NS, Lisney TJ, Collin SP (2006): Visual communication in elasmobranchs; in Ladich F, Collin SP, Moller P, Kapoor BG (eds): Communication in Fishes. Enfield, Science, pp 337-392.
40.
Hart NS, Lisney TJ, Marshall NJ, Collin SP (2004): Multiple cone visual pigments and the potential for trichromatic colour vision in two species of elasmobranch. J Exp Biol 207:4587-4594.
41.
Hemmi JM, Gruenert U (1999): Distribution of photoreceptor types in the retina of a marsupial, the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii). Vis Neurosci 16:291-302.
42.
Hendrickson A, Djajadi HR, Nakamura L, Possin DE, Sajuthi D (2000): Nocturnal tarsier retina has both short and long/medium wavelength cones in an unusual topography. J Comp Neurol 424:718-730.
43.
Hobson ES (1963): Feeding behaviour in three different species of sharks. Pac Sci 17:171-194.
44.
Hughes A (1977): The topography of vision in mammals of contrasting life style: comparative optics and retinal organization; in Crescitelli F (ed): Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Berlin, Springer, vol 7/5, pp 63-756.
45.
Ivanoff A (1975): Introduction à l'Océanographie: Propriétés Physiques et Chimiques des Eaux de Mer. Paris, Vuibert.
46.
Kato S (1962): Histology of the Retinas of the Pacific Sharks Carcharhinus melanopterus and Triaenodon obesus; MSc thesis, The University of Hawaii, Oahu.
47.
Kohbara J, Niwa H, Oguri M (1987): Comparative light microscopic studies on the retina of some elasmobranch fishes. Nippon Suisan Gakk 53:2117-2125.
48.
Kuchnow KP (1971): The elasmobranch pupillary response. Vision Res 11:1395-1406.
49.
Last PR, White WT, Caira JN, Jensen K, Lim APK, Manjaji-Matsumoto BM, Naylor GJP, Pogonoski JJ, Stevens JD, Yearsley GK (2010): Sharks and Rays of Borneo. Melbourne, CSIRO.
50.
Lisney TJ, Collin SP (2007): Relative eye size in elasmobranchs. Brain Behav Evol 69:266-279.
51.
Lisney TJ, Hawryshyn CW (2010): Ocular dimensions and cone photoreceptor topography in adult Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Environ Biol Fish 88:369-376.
52.
Litherland L, Collin SP (2008): Comparative visual function in elasmobranchs: spatial arrangement and ecological correlates of photoreceptor and ganglion cell distributions. Vis Neurosci 25:549-561.
53.
Litherland L, Collin SP, Fritsches KA (2009): Eye growth in sharks: ecological implications for changes in retinal topography and visual resolution. Vis Neurosci 26:397-409.
54.
Lythgoe JN (1968): Visual pigments and visual range underwater. Vision Res 8:997-1012.
55.
Lythgoe JN (1980): Vision in fishes: ecological adaptations. Environ Physiol Fish: 431-445.
56.
Mayhew TM, Astle D (1997): Photoreceptor number and outer segment disk membrane surface area in the retina of the rat: stereological data for whole organ and average photoreceptor cell. J Neurocytol 26:53-61.
57.
McCulloch AR (1915): Report on Some Fishes Obtained by the F.I.S. ‘Endeavour' on the coasts of Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania, South and South Western Australia. 3. Zoological Results of the Fishing Experiments carried on by the F.I.S. ‘Endeavour' 1909-14. Sydney, Direction of the Minister for Trade and Customs, pp 97-172.
58.
McFarland WN (1986): Light in the sea: correlations with behaviors of fishes and invertebrates. Am Zool 26:389-401.
59.
Ogilby JD (1893): Edible Fishes and Crustaceans of New South Wales. Sydney, Government Printer.
60.
Packer O, Hendrickson AE, Curcio CA (1989): Photoreceptor topography of the retina in the adult pigtail macaque (Macaca nemestrina). J Comp Neurol 288:165-183.
61.
Schieber NL, Collin SP, Hart NS (2012): Comparative retinal anatomy in four species of elasmobranch. J Morphol 273:423-440.
62.
Schwartz SH (2004): Visual Perception: A Clinical Orientation, ed 2. New York, McGraw-Hill Medical.
63.
Séret B, Last PM (2007): Four new species of deep-water catsharks of the genus Parmaturus (Carcharhiniformes: Scyliorhinidae) from New Caledonia, Indonesia and Australia. Zootaxa 1657:23-39.
64.
Sillman AJ, Letsinger GA, Patel S, Loew ER, Klimley AP (1996): Visual pigments and photoreceptors in two species of shark, Triakis semifasciata and Mustelus henlei. J Exp Zool 276:1-10.
65.
Sivak JG (1976): The accommodative significance of the ramp retina of the eye of the stingray. Vision Res 16:945-950.
66.
Slomianka L, West MJ (2005): Estimators of the precision of stereological estimates: an example based on the CA1 pyramidal cell layer of rats. Neuroscience 136:757-767.
67.
Stell WK (1972): The structure and morphologic relations of rods and cones in the retina of the spiny dogfish, Squalus. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol 42:141-151.
68.
Stell WK, Witkovsky P (1973): Retinal structure in the smooth dogfish, Mustelus canis: general description and light microscopy of giant ganglion cells. J Comp Neurol 148:1-31.
69.
Stevens JD, Bonfil R, Dulvy NK, Walker PA (2000): The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES J Mar Sci 57:476-494.
70.
Stone J (1981): The Wholemount Handbook: A Guide to the Preparation and Analysis of Retinal Wholemounts. Sydney, Maitland Publications.
71.
Szamier RB, Ripps H (1983): The visual cells of the skate retina: structure, histochemistry, and disc shedding properties. J Comp Neurol 215:51-62.
72.
Tanaka S (1908): Notes on some Japanese fishes, with descriptions of fourteen new species. J Coll Sci Tokyo Imp Univ 23:1-54.
73.
Theiss SM, Lisney TJ, Collin SP, Hart NS (2007): Colour vision and visual ecology of the blue-spotted maskray, Dasyatis kuhlii Müller & Henle, 1814. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 193:67-79.
74.
Troilo D, Rowland HC, Judge SJ (1993): Visual optics and retinal cone topography in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Vision Res 33:1301-1310.
75.
Walls GL (1942): The Vertebrate Eye and Its Adaptive Radiation. Bloomfield Hills, Mich., Cranbrook Institute of Science.
76.
Warrant EJ (2000): The eyes of deep-sea fishes and the changing nature of visual scenes with depth. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355:1155-1159.
77.
Warrant EJ, Locket NA (2004): Vision in the deep sea. Biol Rev 79:671-712.
78.
West MJ, Slomianka L, Gundersen HJG (1991): Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of neurons in the subdivisions of the rat hippocampus using the optical fractionator. Anat Rec 231:482-497.
79.
Wikler KC, Rakic P (1990): Distribution of photoreceptor subtypes in the retina of diurnal and nocturnal primates. J Neurosci 10:3390-3401.
80.
Wikler KC, Williams RW, Rakic P (1990): Photoreceptor mosaic: number and distribution of rods and cones in the rhesus monkey retina. J Comp Neurol 297:499-508.
81.
Wilder HD, Gruenert U, Lee BB, Martin PR (1996): Topography of ganglion cells and photoreceptors in the retina of a New World monkey: the marmoset Callithrix jacchus. Vis Neurosci 13:335-352.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.