Few displays of complex cognition are as intriguing as nonhuman tool use. Long thought to be unique to humans, evidence for tool use and manufacture has now been gathered in chimpanzees, dolphins, and elephants. Outside of mammals, tool use is most common in birds, especially in corvids and parrots. The present paper reviews the evidence for avian tool use, both in the wild and in laboratory settings. It also places this behavioral evidence in the context of longstanding debates about the kinds of mental processes nonhumans can perform. Descartes argued that animals are unable to think because they are soulless machines, incapable of flexible behavior. Later, as human machines became more sophisticated and psychologists discovered classical and instrumental conditioning, skepticism about animal thinking decreased. However, behaviors that involve more than simple conditioning continued to elicit skepticism, especially among behaviorists. Nonetheless, as reviewed here, strong behavioral data now indicate that tool use in some birds cannot be explained as resulting entirely from instrumental conditioning. The neural substrates of tool use in birds remain unclear, but the available data point mainly to the caudolateral nidopallium, which shares both functional and structural features with the mammalian prefrontal cortex. As more data on the neural mechanisms of complex cognition in birds accrue, skepticism about those mental capacities should continue to wane.

Keywords:
Songbirds, HVC, Mirror test, Prefrontal cortex, Nidopallium, Corvids, Parrots, Willis, Köhler, Brain
1.
Aesop (1871): Three Hundred Aesop's Fables. London, Routledge.
2.
Anderson JR, Gallup GG Jr (2011) Do rhesus monkeys recognize themselves in mirrors? Am J Primatol 73:603-606.
3.
Atoji Y, Wild JM (2012). Afferent and efferent projections of the mesopallium in the pigeon (Columba livia). J Comp Neurol 520:717-741.
4.
Auersperg AM, Bayern von AM, Gajdon GK, Huber L, Kacelnik A (2011a): Flexibility in problem solving and tool use of kea and New Caledonian crows in a multi access box paradigm. PLoS One 6:e20231.
5.
Auersperg AM, Huber L, Gajdon GK (2011b): Navigating a tool end in a specific direction: stick-tool use in kea (Nestor notabilis). Biol Lett 7:825-828.
6.
Auersperg AM, Szabo B, von Bayern AM, Kacelnik A (2012) Spontaneous innovation in tool manufacture and use in a Goffin's cockatoo. Curr Biol 22:R903-R904.
7.
Bayern von AM, Heathcote RJ, Rutz C, Kacelnik A (2009): The role of experience in problem solving and innovative tool use in crows. Curr Biol 19:1965-1968.
8.
Bennett MR, Hacker PMS (2008): History of Cognitive Neuroscience. West Sussex, Wiley.
9.
Bentley-Condit VK, Smith EO (2011): Animal tool use: current definitions and an updated comprehensive catalog. Behaviour 147:185-221.
10.
Bird CD, Emery NJ (2009a): Insightful problem solving and creative tool modification by captive nontool-using rooks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10370-10375.
11.
Bird CD, Emery NJ (2009b): Rooks use stones to raise the water level to reach a floating worm. Curr Biol 19:1410-1414.
12.
Brown C (2011): Tool use in fishes. Fish Fish 13:105-115.
13.
Charlesworth JD, Warren TL, Brainard MS (2012): Covert skill learning in a cortical-basal ganglia circuit. Nature 486:251-255.
14.
Cheke LG, Bird CD, Clayton NS (2011): Tool-use and instrumental learning in the Eurasian jay (Garrulus glandarius). Anim Cogn 14:441-455.
15.
Choudhari KA, Sharma D, Leyon JJ (2008): Thomas Willis of the ‘circle of Willis'. Neurosurgery 66:1185-1190.
16.
Clayton NS, Bussey TJ, Dickinson A (2003): Can animals recall the past and plan for the future? Nat Rev Neurosci 4:685-691.
17.
Clayton NS, Dickinson A (1998): Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature 395:272-274.
18.
Costall A (1998): Lloyd Morgan, and the rise and fall of ‘animal psychology'. Soc Anim 6:13-29.
19.
Dias R, Robbins TW, Roberts AC (1996): Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts. Nature 380:69-72.
20.
Diekamp B, Gagliardo A, Güntürkün O (2002a): Nonspatial and subdivision-specific working memory deficits after selective lesions of the avian prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 22:9573-9580.
21.
Diekamp B, Kalt T, Güntürkün O (2002b): Working memory neurons in pigeons. J Neurosci 22:RC210.
22.
Diekamp B, Kalt T, Ruhm A, Koch M, Güntürkün O (2000): Impairment in a discrimination reversal task after D1 receptor blockade in the pigeon ‘prefrontal cortex'. Behav Neurosci 114:1145-1155.
23.
Divac I, Mogensen J (1985): The prefrontal ‘cortex' in the pigeon catecholamine histofluorescence. Neuroscience 15:677-682.
24.
Dow RS (1940): Thomas Willis (1621-1675) as a comparative neurologist. Ann Med Hist 2:181-194.
25.
Doya K, Sejnowski TJ, Gazzaniga MS (1999): A computational model of avian song learning; in Gazzaniga MS (ed): The New Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MIT Press, pp 469-482.
26.
Dugas-Ford J, Rowell JJ, Ragsdale CW (2012): Cell-type homologies and the origins of the neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:16974-16979.
27.
Durstewitz D, Kröner S, Hemmings HC, Güntürkün O (1998): The dopaminergic innervation of the pigeon telencephalon: distribution of DARPP-32 and co-occurrence with glutamate decarboxylase and tyrosine hydroxylase. Neuroscience 83:763-779.
28.
Eichenbaum H, Fortin NJ, Ergorul C, Wright SP, Agster KL (2005): Episodic recollection in animals: ‘If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck…'. Learn Motiv 36:190-207.
29.
Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2004): The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science 306:1903-1907.
30.
Epstein R (1985): On the Columban simulations: a reply to Gallup. Contemp Psychol 30:417-419.
31.
Epstein R, Kirshnit CE, Lanza RP, Rubin LC (1984): ‘Insight' in the pigeon: antecedents and determinants of an intelligent performance. Nature 308:61-62.
32.
Epstein R, Lanza R, Skinner B (1981): ‘Self-awareness' in the pigeon. Science 212:695-696.
33.
Epstein R, Medalie SD (1983): The spontaneous use of a tool by a pigeon. Behav Anal Lett 3:241-247.
34.
Farries M (2006): The avian song system in comparative perspective. Ann NY Acad Sci 1016:61-76.
35.
Fiete IR, Fee MS, Seung HS (2007): Model of birdsong learning based on gradient estimation by dynamic perturbation of neural conductances. J Neurophysiol 98:2038-2057.
36.
Finger S (2000): Minds behind the Brain. New York, Oxford University Press.
37.
Fuster JM, Alexander GE (1971): Neuron activity related to short-term memory. Science 173:652-654.
38.
Gagliardo A, Bonadonna F, Divac I (1996): Behavioural effects of ablations of the presumed ‘prefrontal cortex' or the corticoid in pigeons. Behav Brain Res 78:155-162.
39.
Gallup G (1970): Chimpanzees: self-recognition. Science 167:86-87.
40.
Goodall J (1964): Tool-using and aimed throwing in a community of free-living chimpanzees. Nature 201:1264-1266.
41.
Güntürkün O (2005): The avian ‘prefrontal cortex' and cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:686-693.
42.
Güntürkün O (2011): The convergent evolution of neural substrates for cognition. Psychol Res 76:212-219.
43.
Hackett SJ, Kimball RT, Reddy S, Bowie RCK, Braun EL, Braun MJ, Chojnowski JL, Cox WA, Han KL, Harshman J, Huddleson CJ, Marks BD, Miglia KJ, Moore WS, Sheldon FH, Steadman DW, Witt CC, Yuri T (2008): A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 320:1763-1768.
44.
Hart BL, Hart LA, McCoy M, Sarath CR (2001): Cognitive behaviour in Asian elephants: use and modification of branches for fly switching. Anim Behav 62:839-847.
45.
Hartmann B, Güntürkün O (1998): Selective deficits in reversal learning after neostriatum caudolaterale lesions in pigeons: possible behavioral equivalencies to the mammalian prefrontal system. Behav Brain Res 96:125-133.
46.
Hatfield G (2007): The passions of the soul and Descartes's machine psychology. Stud Hist Philos Sci A 38:1-35.
47.
Heinrich B (1995): An experimental investigation of insight in common ravens (Corvus corax). Auk 112:994-1003.
48.
Helduser S, Güntürkün O (2012): Neural substrates for serial reaction time tasks in pigeons. Behav Brain Res 230:132-143.
49.
Heyes C (2012): Simple minds: a qualified defence of associative learning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367:2695-2703.
50.
Heyes C, Saggerson A (2002): Testing for imitative and nonimitative social learning in the budgerigar using a two-object/two-action test. Anim Behav 64:851-859.
51.
Hikosaka K, Watanabe M (2000): Delay activity of orbital and lateral prefrontal neurons of the monkey varying with different rewards. Cereb Cortex 10:263-271.
52.
Holzhaider JC, Hunt GR, Gray RD (2010): Social learning in New Caledonian crows. Learn Behav 38:206-219.
53.
Houk JL, Geibel JJ (1974): Observation of underwater tool use by the sea otter, Enhydra lutris Linnaeus. Calif Fish Game 60:207-208.
54.
Hull CL (1943): Principles of Behavior. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts.
55.
Hunt G (1996): Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows. Nature 379:249-251.
56.
Hunt GR, Gray RD (2002): Species-wide manufacture of stick-type tools by New Caledonian crows. Emu 102:349-353.
57.
Hunt GR, Gray RD (2004): Direct observations of pandanus-tool manufacture and use by a New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides). Anim Cogn 7:114-120.
58.
Hunt GR, Gray RD, Taylor AH (2013): Why is tool use rare in animals? In Sanz C, Call J, Boesch C (eds): Tool Use in Animals. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 89-118.
59.
Hunt GR, Rutledge RB, Gray RD (2006): The right tool for the job: what strategies do wild New Caledonian crows use? Anim Cogn 9:307-316.
60.
Huxley TH (1863): Evidence as to Man's place in nature. London, Williams and Norgate.
61.
Huxley TH (1870): Has a frog a soul, and of what nature is that soul, supposing it to exist? http://aleph0.clarku.edu/huxley/Mss/FROG.html.
62.
Jones TB, Kamil AC (1973): Tool-making and tool-using in the northern blue jay. Science 180:1076-1078.
63.
Kacelnik A (2009): Tools for thought or thoughts for tools? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10071-10072.
64.
Kaplan G (1999): Song structure and function of mimicry in the Australian magpie compared to the lyrebird. Intl J Comp Psychol 12:219-241.
65.
Karin-D'Arcy M (2005): The modern role of Morgan's canon in comparative psychology. Intl J Comp Psychol 18:179-201.
66.
Kenward B, Rutz C, Weir AA, Kacelnik A (2006): Development of tool use in New Caledonian crows: inherited action patterns and social influences. Anim Behav 72:1329-1343.
67.
Kenward B, Weir AA, Rutz C, Kacelnik A (2005): Behavioural ecology: tool manufacture by naive juvenile crows. Nature 433:121.
68.
Kesner RP, Churchwell JC (2011): An analysis of rat prefrontal cortex in mediating executive function. Neurobiol Learn Mem 96:417-431.
69.
Köhler W (1927): The Mentality of Apes, ed 2. New York, Vintage Books.
70.
Kröner S, Güntürkün O (1999): Afferent and efferent connections of the caudolateral neostriatum in the pigeon (Columba livia): a retro- and anterograde pathway tracing study. J Comp Neurol 407:228-260.
71.
Krützen M, Mann J, Heithaus MR, Connor RC, Bejder L, Sherwin WB (2005): Cultural transmission of tool use in bottlenose dolphins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:8939-8943.
72.
Lefebvre L, Nicolakakis N, Boire D (2002): Tools and brains in birds. Behaviour 139:939-973.
73.
Lega BC (2006): An essay concerning human understanding: how the Cerebri Anatome of Thomas Willis influenced John Locke. Neurosurgery 58:567-576.
74.
Lissek S, Diekamp B, Güntürkün O (2002): Impaired learning of a color reversal task after NMDA receptor blockade in the pigeon (Columbia livia) associative forebrain (Neostriatum Caudolaterale). Behav Neurosci 116:523-529.
75.
Lorenz H (2009): Ancient theories of soul; in Zalta EN (ed): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/ancient-soul/.
76.
MacLean PD (1990): The Triune Brain. New York, Plenum Press.
77.
Medina L, Abellán A, Desfilis E (2013): A never-ending search for the evolutionary origin of the neocortex: rethinking the homology concept. Brain Behav Evol DOI: 10.1159/ 000348282.
78.
Mehlhorn J, Hunt GR, Gray RD, Rehkamper G, Güntürkün O (2010): Tool-making New Caledonian crows have large associative brain areas. Brain Behav Evol 75:63-70.
79.
Metzger M, Jiang S, Braun K (1998): Organization of the dorsocaudal neostriatal complex: a retrograde and anterograde tracing study in the domestic chick with special emphasis on pathways relevant to imprinting. J Comp Neurol 395:380-404.
80.
Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001): An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:167-202.
81.
Molnár Z (2004): Thomas Willis (1621-1675), the founder of clinical neuroscience. Nature Rev Neurosci 5:329-335.
82.
Mooney R (2009): Neural mechanisms for learned birdsong. Learn Mem 16:655-669.
83.
Morgan CL (1894): An Introduction to Comparative Psychology. London, Scott.
84.
Morgan CL (1903): An Introduction to Comparative Psychology, ed 2. New York, Scribners.
85.
Morita K, Morishima M, Sakai K, Kawaguchi Y (2012): Reinforcement learning: computing the temporal difference of values via distinct corticostriatal pathways. Trends Neurosci 35:457-467.
86.
Nakamori T, Maekawa F, Sato K, Tanaka K, Ohki-Hamazaki H (2013): Neural basis of imprinting behavior in chicks. Dev Growth Differ 55:198-206.
87.
Northcutt RG (2013): Variation in reptilian brains and cognition. Brain Behav Evol, in press.
88.
O'Keefe J, Nadel L (1978): The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. New York, Oxford University Press.
89.
Overington SE, Morand-Ferron J, Boogert NJ, Lefebvre L (2009): Technical innovations drive the relationship between innovativeness and residual brain size in birds. Anim Behav 78:1001-1010.
90.
Passingham RE, Wise SP (2012): The Neurobiology of the Prefrontal Cortex. New York, Oxford University Press.
91.
Patterson EM, Mann J (2011): The ecological conditions that favor tool use and innovation in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). PLoS One 6:e22243.
92.
Plotnik JM, de Waal FB, Reiss D (2006): Self-recognition in an Asian elephant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:17053-17057.
93.
Plummer TK, Striedter GF (2002): Brain lesions that impair vocal imitation in adult budgerigars. J Neurobiol 53:413-428.
94.
Prior H, Schwarz A, Güntürkün O (2008): Mirror-induced behavior in the magpie (Pica pica): evidence of self-recognition. Plos Biol 6:e202.
95.
Pruetz JD, Bertolani P (2007): Savanna chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus, hunt with tools. Curr Biol 17:412-417.
96.
Puelles L, Kuwana E, Puelles E, Bulfone A, Shimamura K, Keleher J, Smiga S, Rubenstein JL (2000): Pallial and subpallial derivatives in the embryonic chick and mouse telencephalon, traced by the expression of the genes Dlx-2, Emx-1, Nkx-2.1, Pax-6, and Tbr-1. J Comp Neurol 424:409-438.
97.
Reiner A (2013) You are who you talk with - a commentary on Dugas-Ford et al. PNAS, 2012. Brain Behav Evol DOI: 10.1159/ 000348281.
98.
Reiner A, Perkel DJ, Bruce LL, Butler AB, Csillag A, Kuenzel W, Medina L, Paxinos G, Shimizu T, Striedter G, Wild M, Ball GF, Durand S, Güntürkün O, Lee DW, Mello CV, Powers A, White S, Hough G, Kubikova LM Smulders TV, Wada K, Dugas-Ford J, Husband S, Yamamoto K, Yu J, Siang C, Jarvis ED (2004): Revised nomenclature for avian telencephalon and some related brainstem nuclei. J Comp Neurol 473:377-414.
99.
Reiss D, Marino L (2001): Mirror self-recognition in the bottlenose dolphin: a case of cognitive convergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5937-5942.
100.
Riters LV, Bingman VP (1999): The effects of lesions to the caudolateral neostriatum on sun compass based spatial learning in homing pigeons. Behav Brain Res 98:1-15.
101.
Romanes GJ (1884): Animal Intelligence. New York, Appleton.
102.
Rose J, Colombo M (2005): Neural correlates of executive control in the avian brain. PLoS Biol 3:e190.
103.
Rutz C, St Clair JJ (2012): The evolutionary origins and ecological context of tool use in New Caledonian crows. Behav Processes 89:153-165.
104.
Sarasohn LT (1985): Motion and morality: Pierre Gassendi, Thomas Hobbes and the mechanical world-view. J Hist Ideas 46:363-379.
105.
Scarl JC, Bradbury JW (2009): Rapid vocal convergence in an Australian cockatoo, the galah Eolophus roseicapillus. Anim Behav 77:1019-1026.
106.
Schiller PH (1952): Innate constituents of complex responses in primates. Psych Rev 59:177-191.
107.
Scoville WB, Milner B (1957): Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 20:11-21.
108.
Shields C (2011): Aristotle's psychology; in Zalta EN (ed): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/aristotle-psychology/.
109.
Shumaker RW, Walkup KR, Beck BB (2011): Animal Tool Behavior: The Use and Manufacture of Tools by Animals. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
110.
Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1990): Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution. New Haven, Yale University Press.
111.
Skinner (1938): The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. Cambridge, B.F. Skinner Foundation.
112.
Smith CU (2010): The triune brain in antiquity: Plato, Aristotle, Erasistratus. J Hist Neurosci 19:1-14.
113.
Striedter GF (1997): The telencephalon of tetrapods in evolution. Brain Behav Evol 49:179-213.
114.
Taylor AH, Elliffe DM, Hunt GR, Emery NJ, Clayton NS, Gray RD (2011): New Caledonian crows learn the functional properties of novel tool types. PLoS One 6:e26887.
115.
Taylor AH, Gray RD (2009): Animal cognition: Aesop's fable flies from fiction to fact. Curr Biol 19:R731-R732.
116.
Taylor AH, Hunt GR, Medina FS, Gray RD (2009): Do New Caledonian crows solve physical problems through causal reasoning? Proc Biol Sci 276:247-254.
117.
Taylor AH, Knaebe B, Gray RD (2012): An end to insight? New Caledonian crows can spontaneously solve problems without planning their actions. Proc Biol Sci 279:4977-4981.
118.
Teschke I, Cartmill EA, Stankewitz S, Tebbich S (2011): Sometimes tool use is not the key: no evidence for cognitive adaptive specializations in tool-using woodpecker finches. Anim Behav 82:945-956.
119.
Thorndike EL (1911): Animal Intelligence. New York, Macmillan.
120.
Tolman EC (1948): Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psych Rev 55:189-208.
121.
Tracy T (1986): Two views of soul: Aristotle and Descartes. Ill Classic Stud 11:247-264.
122.
Veenman CL, Medina L, Reiner A (1997): Avian homologues of mammalian intralaminar, mediodorsal and midline thalamic nuclei: immunohistochemical and hodological evidence. Brain Behav Evol 49:78-98.
123.
Weir A, Chappell J, Kacelnik A (2002): Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows. Science 297:981-981.
124.
Windholz G (1984): Pavlov vs. Köhler: Pavlov's little-known primate research. Pavlov J Biol Sci 19:23-31.
125.
Windholz G (1995): Pavlov on the conditioned reflex method and its limitations. Am J Psychol 108:575-588.
126.
Zentall TR (2006): Imitation: definitions, evidence, and mechanisms. Anim Cogn 9:335-353.
127.
Zimmer C (2004): Soul Made Flesh. New York, Free Press.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.