Abstract
The class Reptilia is monophyletic, if all synapsid tetrapods are excluded and birds are included. The phylogenetic position of turtles within the reptilian clade is still problematic, but recent microRNA data suggest that turtles are the sister group to lepidosaurians. Brain-body data for approximately 60 reptilian taxa indicate that the relative brain size for a given body weight varies some six-fold among reptiles, with some turtles and lizards having relatively large brains and other turtles and lizards having relatively small brains. Snakes appear to be characterized by relatively small brains, and crocodilians appear to possess the largest brains among living reptiles, with the exception of birds. Data on the relative size of major brain divisions among tetrapods are limited, but the telencephalic and cerebellar hemispheres account for much of the variation. Telencephalic hemispheres in reptiles are approximately twice as large as those in amphibians, and the relative size of the telencephalic hemispheres in monitor lizards and crocodilians approaches that in basal birds and mammals. New data on the relative volumes of telencephalic pallial divisions in tetrapods reveal that the dorsal ventricular ridge, a ventral pallial derivative, accounts for much of the increase in pallial size that characterizes reptiles. Studies of spatial and visual cognition in nonavian reptiles reveal that they learn mazes and make visual discriminations as rapidly as most birds and mammals. Studies of social cognition and novel behavior, including play, reveal levels of complexity not previously believed to exist among nonavian reptiles. Given this level of neural and cognitive complexity, it is possible that consciousness has evolved numerous times, independently, among reptiles.
References
1.
Bruce LL (2007): Evolution of the nervous system in reptiles; in Kaas JH, Bullock THB (eds): Evolution of Nervous Systems. San Diego, Academic/Elsevier, vol 2, pp 125-156.
2.
Bruce LL, Neary TJ (1995): The limbic system of tetrapods: a comparative analysis of cortical and amygdalar populations. Brain Behav Evol 46:224-234.
3.
Bull MC, Griffin CL, Bonnett M, Gardner MG, Cooper SJ (2001): Discrimination between related and unrelated individuals in the Australian lizard Egernia striolata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:173-179.
4.
Burghardt GM (1977): Learning processes in reptiles; in Gans C, Tinkle DW (eds): Biology of the Reptilia. London, Academic, vol 7, pp 555-681.
5.
Burghardt GM, Chiszar D, Murphy JB, Romano J Jr, Walsh T, Manrod J (2002): Behavioral complexity, behavioral development, and play; in Murphy JB, Ciofi C, de la Panouse C, Walsh T (eds): Komodo Dragons: Biology and Conservation. Washington, Smithsonian Institution Press, pp 78-117.
6.
Burghardt GM, Ward B, Rosscoe R (1996): Problem of reptile play: environmental enrichment and play behavior in a captive Nile soft-shelled turtle, Trionyx triunguis. Zool Biol 15:223-238.
7.
Butler AB (1994): The evolution of the dorsal pallium in the telencephalon of amniotes: cladistic analysis and a new hypothesis. Brain Res Rev 19:66-101.
8.
Butler AB (2012): Hallmarks of consciousness; in López-Larrea C (ed): Sensing in Nature. New York, Landes Bioscience and Springer Science, pp 291-309.
9.
Butler AB, Molnár Z (2002): Development and evolution of the collopallium in amniotes: a new hypothesis of field homology. Brain Res Bull 57:475-479.
10.
Caldwell MW, Lee MS (1997): A snake with legs from the marine Cretaceous of the Middle East. Nature 386:705-709.
11.
Chapple DG (2003): Ecology, life-history, and behavior in the Australian scincid genus Egernia, with comments on the evolution of complex sociality in lizards. Herpetol Monog 17:145-180.
12.
Domínguez Alonso P, Milner AC, Ketcham RA, Cookson MJ, Rowe TB (2004): The avian nature of the brain and inner ear of Archaeopteryx. Nature 430:666-669.
13.
Dubbeldam JL (1998): Birds; in Nieuwenhuys R, ten Donkelaar HJ, Nicholson C (eds): The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates. Berlin, Springer, vol 3, pp 1525-1636.
14.
Dugas-Ford J, Rowell JJ, Ragsdale CW (2012): Cell-type homologies and the origins of the neocortex. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2012, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1204773109.
15.
Gill FB (1995): Ornithology, ed 2. New York, Freeman.
16.
Healy SD, Rowe C (2007): A critique of comparative studies of brain size. Proc Roy Soc B: 274:453-464.
17.
Hedges SB, Poling LL (1999): A molecular phylogeny of reptiles. Science 283:998-1001.
18.
Holding MI, Frazier JA, Taylor EN, Strand CR (2012): Experimentally altered Northern Pacific rattlesnakes (Crotalus o. oreganus). Brain Behav Evol 79:144-154.
19.
Hopson JA (1979): Paleoneurology; in Gans C, Northcutt RG, Ulinski P (eds): Biology of the Reptilia. Academic, New York, vol 9, pp 39-146.
20.
Karnovsky MJ, Roots L (1964): A ‘direct-coloring' thiocholine method for cholinesterases. J Histochem Cytochem 12:219-221.
21.
Karten H (1969): The organization of the avian telencephalon and some speculations on the phylogeny of the amniote telencephalon. Ann NY Acad Sci 167:164-179.
22.
Karten HJ, Hodos W (1967): A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Brain of the Pigeon. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press.
23.
Kumazawa Y, Nishida M (1999): Complete mitochondrial DNA sequences of the green turtle and blue-tailed mole skink: statistical evidence for archosaurian affinity of turtles. Mol Biol Evol 16:784-792.
24.
Leal M, Powell BJ (2012): Behavioural flexibility and problem-solving in a tropical lizard. Biol Lett 8:28-30.
25.
Longrich NR, Bhullar BA, Gauthier JA (2012): A transitional snake from the Late Cretaceous period of North America. Nature 488:205-208.
26.
López JC, Vargas JP, Gómez Y, Salas C (2003): Spatial and non-spatial learning in turtles: the role of medial cortex. Behav Brain Res 143:109-120.
27.
Lyson TR, Sperling EA, Heimberg AM, Gauthier JA, King BL, Peterson KJ (2012): MicroRNAs support a turtle + lizard clade. Biol Lett 8:104-107.
28.
Macphail EM (1982): Brain and Intelligence in Vertebrates. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
29.
Manrod JD, Hartdegen R, Burghardt GM (2008): Rapid solving of a problem apparatus by juvenile black-throated monitor lizards (Varanus albigularis albigularis). Anim Cog 11:267-273.
30.
Marín O, Smeets WJ, González A (1998): Basal ganglia organization in amphibians: chemoarchitecture. J Comp Neurol 392:285-312.
31.
Martínez-García F, Novejarque A, Lanuza E (2007): Evolution of the amygdala in vertebrates; in Kaas JH, Bullock THB (eds): Evolution of Nervous Systems. San Diego, Academic/Elsevier, vol 2, pp 255-334.
32.
McAlpin S, Duckett P, Stow A (2011): Lizards cooperatively tunnel to construct a long-term home for family members. PloS One 6:e19041.
33.
Northcutt RG (1974): Some histochemical observations on the telencephalon of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana Shaw. J Comp Neurol 157:379-390.
34.
Northcutt RG (1978): Forebrain and midbrain organization in lizards and its phylogenetic significance; in Greenberg N, MacLean PD (eds): Behavior and Neurology of Lizards. Rockville, NIMH, pp 11-64.
35.
Northcutt RG, Kaas JH (1995): The emergence and evolution of mammalian neocortex. Trends Neursci 18:373-379.
36.
Northcutt RG, Kicliter E (1980): Organization of the amphibian telencephalon; in Ebbesson SOE (ed): Comparative Neurology of the Telencephalon. New York, Plenum, pp 203-255.
37.
O'Connor D, Shine R (2003): Lizards in ‘nuclear families': a novel reptilian social system in Egernia saxatilis (Scincidae). Mol Ecol 12:743-752.
38.
O'Connor DE, Shine R (2006): Kin discrimination in the social lizard Egernia saxatilis (Scincidae). Behav Ecol 17:206-211.
39.
Platel R (1975): Nouvelles donnés sur l'encéphalisation des reptiles squamates. Z Zool Syst Evol Forsch 13:161-184.
40.
Platel R (1976): Analyse volumétrique comparée des principales subdivisions encéphaliques chez les Reptiles Sauriens. J Hirnforsch 17:513-537.
41.
Platel R (1979): Brain weight-body weight relationships; in Gans C, Northcutt RG, Ulinski P (eds): Biology of the Reptilia. Academic, New York, vol 9, pp 147-171.
42.
Platel R (1980): Analyse volumétrique comparée des principales subdivisions télencéphaliques chez les Reptiles Sauriens. J Hirnforsch 21:271-291.
43.
Platel R (1989): L'encéphalisation chez le tuatara de Nouvelle-Zélande Sphenodon punctatus Gray (Lepidosauria, Sphenodonta): etude quantifiée des principales subdivisions encéphaliques. J Hirnforsch 30:325-337.
44.
Powers AS (1990): Brain mechanisms of learning in reptiles; in Kesner RP, Olton DS (eds): Neurobiology of Comparative Cognition. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp 157-177.
45.
Powers AS, Reiner A (1980): A stereotaxic atlas of the forebrain and midbrain of the eastern painted turtle (Chrysemys picta picta). J Hirnforsch 21:125-159.
46.
Puelles L (2001): Thoughts on the development, structure and evolution of the mammalian and avian telencephalic pallium. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356:1583-1598.
47.
Puelles L, Kuwana E, Puelles E, Bulfone A, Shimamura K, Keleher J, Smiga S, Rubenstein JL (2000): Pallial and subpallial derivatives in the embryonic chick and mouse telencephalon, traced by the expression of the genes Dlx-2, Emx-1, Nkx-2.1, Pax-6, and Tbr-1. J Comp Neurol 424:409-438.
48.
Puelles L, Martinez-de-la-Torre M, Paxinos G, Watson C, Martínez S (2007): The Chick Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates: An Atlas Featuring Neuromeric Subdivisions and Mammalian Homologies. London, Elsevier.
49.
Redies C, Medina L, Puelles L (2001): Cadherin expression by embryonic divisions and derived gray matter structures in the telencephalon of the chicken. J Comp Neurol 438:253-285.
50.
Rehkämper G, Kart E, Frahm HD, Werner CW (2003): Discontinuous variability of brain composition among domestic chicken breeds. Brain Behav Evol 61:59-69.
51.
Reiner A, Karten HJ (1985): Comparison of olfactory bulb projections in pigeons and turtles. Brain Behav Evol 27:11-27.
52.
Reiner A, Northcutt RG (2000): Succinic dehydrogenase histochemistry reveals the location of the putative primary visual and auditory areas within the dorsal ventricular ridge of Sphenodon punctatus. Brain Behav Evol 55:26-36.
53.
Scalia F, Halpern M, Riss W (1969): Olfactory bulb projections in the South American Caiman. Brain Behav Evol 2:238-262.
54.
Smith-Fernández A, Pieau C, Reperant J, Boncinelli E, Wassef M (1998): Expression of the Emx-1 and Dix-1 homeobox genes define three molecularly distinct domains in the telencephalon of mouse, chick, turtle and frog embryos: implications for the evolution of the telencephalic subdivisions in amniotes. Development 125:2099-2111.
55.
Striedter G (1997): The telencephalon of tetrapods in evolution. Brain Behav Evol 49:179-213.
56.
ten Donkelaar HJ (1998a): Anurans; in Nieuwenhuys R, ten Donkelaar HJ, Nicholson C (eds): The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates. Berlin, Springer, vol 2, pp 1151-1314.
57.
ten Donkelaar HJ (1998b): Reptiles; in Nieuwenhuys R, ten Donkelaar HJ, Nicholson C (eds): The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates. Berlin, Springer, vol 2, pp 1315-1524.
58.
Timmel JF, Platel R (1988): L'encéphalisation chez les serpents de la famille des Colubridae (Ophidia). CR Acad Sci Paris 306:479-482.
59.
Ulinski PS (1983): Dorsal Ventricular Ridge. New York, Wiley.
60.
van Dongen PAM (1998): Brain size in vertebrates; in Nieuwenhuys R, ten Donkelaar HJ, Nicholson C (eds): The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates. Berlin, Springer, vol 3, pp 2099-2134.
61.
Vidal N, Hedges SB (2009): The molecular evolutionary tree of lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians. CR Biol 332:129-139.
62.
Vitt LJ, Caldwell JP (2009): Herpetology, ed 3. San Diego, Academic Press/Elsevier.
63.
Wilkinson A, Huber L (2012): Cold-blooded cognition: reptilian cognitive abilities; in Vonk J, Shackelford TK (eds): The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Evolutionary Psychology. New York, Oxford, pp 129-141.
64.
Wilkinson A, Kuenstner K, Mueller J, Huber L (2010): Social learning in a non-social reptile (Geochelone carbonaria). Biol Lett 6:614-616.
65.
Witmer LM, Chatterjee S, Franzosa J, Rowe T (2003): Neuroanatomy of flying reptiles and implications for flight, posture and behaviour. Nature 425:950-953.
66.
Witmer LM, Ridgely RC (2009): New insights into the brain, braincase, and ear region of tryannosaurs (Dinosauria, Theropoda), with implications for sensory organization and behavior. Anat Rec 292:1266-1296.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
