Cephalopods such as the octopus show the most advanced behavior among invertebrates, which they accomplish with an exceptionally flexible body plan. In this review I propose that the embodied organization approach, developed by roboticists to design efficient autonomous robots, is useful for understanding the evolution and development of the efficient adaptive interaction of animals with their environment, using the octopus as the leading example. The embodied organization approach explains adaptive behavior as emerging from the continuous dynamical and reciprocal physical and informational interactions between four elements: the controller, the mechanical and the sensory systems and the environment. In contrast to hierarchical organization, in embodied organization, self-organization processes can take part in the emergence of the adaptive properties. I first discuss how the embodiment concept explains covariation of body form, nervous system organization, and level of behavioral complexity using the Mollusca as an example. This is an ideal phylum to test such a qualitative correlation between body/brain/behavior, because they show the greatest variations of body plan within a single phylum. In some cases the covariation of nervous system and body structure seems to arise independently of close phylogenetic relationships. Next, I dwell on the octopus as an ideal model to test the embodiment concept within a single biological system. Here, the unusual body morphology of the octopus exposes the uniqueness of the four components comprising the octopus' embodiment. Considering together the results from behavioral, physiological, anatomical, and motor control research suggests that these four elements mutually influence each other. It is this mutual interactions and self-organization which have led to their unique evolution and development to create the unique and highly efficient octopus embodiment.

Keywords:
Embodiment, Self-organization, Motor control, Evolution, Molluscs, Cephalopod
1.
Batten D, Salthe S, Boschetti F (2008): Visions of evolution: self-organization proposes what natural selection disposes. Biol Theory 3:17-29.
2.
Boycott BB (1961): The functional organization of the brain of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 153:503-534.
3.
Brooks RA (1991): New approaches to robotics. Science 253:1227-1232.
4.
Bullock TH, Horridge GA (1965): Structure and Function in the Nervous Systems of Invertebrates. San Francisco, Freeman.
5.
Calisti M, Giorelli M, Levy G, Mazzolai B, Hochner B, Laschi C, Dario P (2011): An octopus-bioinspired solution to movement and manipulation for soft robots. Bioinspir Biomim 6:036002.
6.
Collins S, Ruina A, Tedrake R, Wisse M (2005): Efficient bipedal robots based on passive-dynamic walkers. Science 307:1082-1085.
7.
Collins SH, Wisse M, Ruina A (2001): A three-dimensional passive-dynamic walking robot with two legs and knees. Int J Robot Res 20:607-615.
8.
Cossart R, Aronov D, Yuste R (2003): Attractor dynamics of network up states in the neocortex. Nature 423:283-288.
9.
Feinstein N, Nesher N, Hochner B (2011): Functional morphology of the neuromuscular system of the Octopus vulgaris arm. Vie Milieu 61:219-229.
10.
Flash T, Hochner B (2005): Motor primitives in vertebrates and invertebrates. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:660-666.
11.
Friedrich S, Wanninger A, Brückner M, Haszprunar G (2002): Neurogenesis in the mossy chiton, Mopalia muscosa (Gould) (Polyplacophora): evidence against molluscan metamerism. J Morph 253:109-117.
12.
Glanzman DL (2010): Common mechanisms of synaptic plasticity in vertebrates and invertebrates. Curr Biol 20:R31-R36.
13.
Goaillard JM, Taylor AL, Schulz DJ, Marder E (2009): Functional consequences of animal-to-animal variation in circuit parameters. Nat Neurosci 12:1424-1430.
14.
Graziano MS, Aflalo TN (2007): Rethinking cortical organization: moving away from discrete areas arranged in hierarchies. Neuroscientist 13:138-147.
15.
Gutfreund Y, Flash T, Fiorito G, Hochner B (1998): Patterns of arm muscle activation involved in octopus reaching movements. J Neurosci 18:5976-5987.
16.
Gutfreund Y, Flash T, Yarom Y, Fiorito G, Segev I, Hochner B (1996): Organization of octopus arm movements: a model system for studying the control of flexible arms. J Neurosci 16:7297-7307.
17.
Gutfreund Y, Matzner H, Flash T, Hochner B (2006): Patterns of motor activity in the isolated nerve cord of the octopus arm. Biol Bull 211:212-222.
18.
Hanlon R (2007): Cephalopod dynamic camouflage. Cur Biol 17:R400-R404.
19.
Hanlon RT, Messenger JB (1996): Cephalopod Behaviour. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
20.
Hanlon RT, Naud MJ, Shaw PW, Havenhand JN (2005): Behavioural ecology - transient sexual mimicry leads to fertilization. Nature 433:212.
21.
Haszprunar G, Wanninger A (2012): Molluscs. Curr Biol 22:R510-R514.
22.
Hochner B (2012): An embodied view of octopus neurobiology. Curr Biol 22:R887-R892.
23.
Hochner B, Shomrat T, Fiorito G (2006): The octopus: a model for a comparative analysis of the evolution of learning and memory mechanisms. Biol Bull 210:308-317.
24.
Hopfield JJ (1982): Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc Nat Acad Sci 79:2554-2558.
25.
Huffard CL, Boneka F, Full RJ (2005): Underwater bipedal locomotion by octopuses in disguise. Science 307:1927.
26.
Kandel ER (2001): The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses. Science 294:1030-1038.
27.
Kaschube M, Schnabel M, Löwel S, Coppola DM, White LE, Wolf F (2010): Universality in the evolution of orientation columns in the visual cortex. Science 330:1113-1116.
28.
Kocot KM, Cannon JT, Todt C, Citarella MR, Kohn AB, Meyer A, Santos SR, Schander C, Moroz LL, Lieb B, Halanych KM (2011): Phylogenomics reveals deep molluscan relationships. Nature 477:452-456.
29.
Kondo S, Miura T (2010): Reaction-diffusion model as a framework for understanding biological pattern formation. Science 329:1616-1620.
30.
Lee PN, Callaerts P, de Couet HG, Martindale MQ (2003): Cephalopod Hox genes and the origin of morphological novelties. Nature 424:1061-1065.
31.
Li T, Nakajima K, Kuba M, Gutnick T, Hochner B, Pfeifer R (2011): From the octopus to soft robots control: an octopus inspired behavior control architecture for soft robots. Vie Milieu 61:211-217.
32.
Matzner H, Gutfreund Y, Hochner B (2000): Neuromuscular system of the flexible arm of the octopus: physiological characterization. J Neurophysiol 83:1315-1328.
33.
Miller KD (2010): Neuroscience: π = visual cortex. Science 330:1059-1060.
34.
Moroz LL (2009): On the independent origins of complex brains and neurons. Brain Behav Evol 74:177-190.
35.
Nesher N, Feinstein N, Finkel E, Anglister LL, Hochner B (2011): Characterization of the cholinergic motor innervation in the neuromuscular system of the octopus arm (program No 037.10). Neuroscience Meeting Planner, Washington, Society for Neuroscience.
36.
Norman MD, Finn J, Tregenza T (2001): Dynamic mimicry in an Indo-Malayan octopus. Proc Biol Sci 268:1755-1758.
37.
Nowotny T, Huerta R, Abarbanel HDI, Rabinovich MI (2005): Self-organization in the olfactory system: one shot odor recognition in insects. Biol Cybern 93:436-446.
38.
Ogura A, Ikeo K, Gojobori T (2004): Comparative analysis of gene expression for convergent evolution of camera eye between octopus and human. Genome Res 14:1555-1561.
39.
Packard A (1972): Cephalopods and fish: the limits of convergence. Biol Rev 47:241-307.
40.
Packard A (2006): Contribution to the whole (H): can squids show us anything that we did not know already? Biol Philos 21:189-211.
41.
Pfeifer R, Iida F, Gómez G (2006): Morphological computation for adaptive behavior and cognition. Int Congr Ser 1291:22-29.
42.
Pfeifer R, Lungarella M, Iida F (2007): Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics. Science 318:1088-1093.
43.
Prinz AA, Bucher D, Marder E (2004) Similar network activity from disparate circuit parameters. Nat Neurosci 7:1345-1352.
44.
Rokni D, Hochner B (2002): Ionic currents underlying fast action potentials in the obliquely striated muscle cells of the octopus arm. J Neurophysiol 88:3386-3397.
45.
Sasai Y (2013): Cytosystems dynamics in self-organization of tissue architecture. Nature 493:318-326.
46.
Shomrat T, Zarrella I, Fiorito G, Hochner B (2008): The octopus vertical lobe modulates short-term learning rate and uses LTP to acquire long-term memory. Curr Biol 18:337-342.
47.
Shomrat T, Graindorge N, Bellanger C, Fiorito G, Loewenstein Y, Hochner B (2011): Alternative sites of synaptic plasticity in two homologous fan-out fan-in learning and memory networks. Curr Biol 21:1773-1782.
48.
Sumbre G, Fiorito G, Flash T, Hochner B (2005): Neurobiology motor control of flexible octopus arms. Nature 433:595-596.
49.
Sumbre G, Fiorito G, Flash T, Hochner B (2006): Octopuses use a human-like strategy to control precise point-to-point arm movements. Curr Biol 16:767-772.
50.
Sumbre G, Gutfreund Y, Fiorito G, Flash T, Hochner B (2001): Control of octopus arm extension by a peripheral motor program. Science 293:1845-1848.
51.
Swenson R (2010): Selection is entailed by self-organization and natural selection is a special case. Biol Theory 5:167-181.
52.
Todorov E (2000): Direct cortical control of muscle activation in voluntary arm movements: a model. Nat Neurosci 3:391-398.
53.
Walker ID, Dawson DM, Flash T, Grasso FW, Hanlon RT, Hochner B, Kier WM, Pagano CC, Rahn CD, Zhang QM (2005): Continuum robot arms inspired by cephalopods. Enhanced Synth Vis 5804:303-314.
54.
Weber B, Depew D (1996): Natural selection and self-organization. Biol Philos 11:33-65.
55.
Young JZ (1962): The optic lobes of octopus vulgaris. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 245:19-58.
56.
Young JZ (1971): The Anatomy of the Nervous System of Octopus vulgaris. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
57.
Zullo L, Hochner B (2011): A new perspective on the organization of an invertebrate brain. Commun Integr Biol 4:26-29.
58.
Zullo L, Sumbre G, Agnisola C, Flash T, Hochner B (2009): Nonsomatotopic organization of the higher motor centers in octopus. Curr Biol 19:1632-1636.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.