As apex predators, chondrichthyans, or cartilaginous fishes, hold an important position within a range of aquatic ecosystems and influence the balance between species’ abundance and biodiversity. Having been in existence for over 400 million years and representing the earliest stages of the evolution of jawed vertebrates, this group also covers a diverse range of eco-morphotypes, occupying both marine and freshwater habitats. The class Chondrichthyes is divided into two subclasses: the Elasmobranchii (sharks, skates, and rays) and the Holocephali (elephant sharks and chimaeras). However, many of their life history traits, such as low fecundity, the production of small numbers of highly precocious young, slow growth rates, and late maturity, make them highly susceptible to human exploitation. To mitigate the negative effects of human impacts, it is important that we understand the sensory strategies that elasmobranchs use for navigating within their environment, forming reproductive aggregations, feeding, and even communicating. One approach to investigate the sensory bases of their behavior is to examine the peripheral sense organs mediating vision, olfaction, gustation, lateral line, electroreception, and audition in a large range of species in order to identify specific adaptations, the range of sensitivity thresholds, and the compromise between sensory spatial resolution and sensitivity. In addition, we can quantitatively assess the convergence of sensory input to the central nervous system and the relative importance of different sensory modalities. Using a comparative approach and often a combination of anatomical, electrophysiological, and molecular techniques, significant variation has been identified in the spatial and chromatic sampling of the photoreceptors in the eye, the surface area and the number of olfactory lamellae within the nasal cavity, the level of gustatory sampling within the oral cavity, the type and innervation of neuromasts of the lateral line system, the distribution of electroreceptive pores over the head, and the morphology of the inner ear. These results are presented in the context of predictions of sensory capabilities for species living in a range of ecological niches, what further research is needed, and how this sensory input may be a predictor of behavior.

1.
Abel RL, Maclaine JS, Cotton R, Xuan VB, Nickels TB, Clark TH, Wang Z, Cox JPL (2010): Functional morphology of the nasal region of a hammerhead shark. Comp Biochem Physiol A 155:464–475.
2.
Atkinson CJL, Collin SP (2010): Taste: Vertebrates; in Breed MD, Moore J (eds): Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, vol III. Oxford, Academic Press, pp 386–393.
3.
Atkinson CJL (2011): The gustatory system of elasmobranchs: morphology, distribution and development of oral papillae and oral denticles; PhD thesis, University of Queensland.
4.
Atkinson CJL, Collin SP (2012): Structure and topographic distribution of oral denticles in elasmobranch fishes. Biol Bull 222:26–34.
5.
Baird IL (1974): Some aspects of comparative anatomy and evolution of inner-ear in submammalian vertebrates. Brain Behav Evol 10:11–36.
6.
Banner A (1972): The use of sound in predation by young lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris (Poey). Bull Marine Sci 22:251–283.
7.
Barber VC, Emerson CJ (1980): Scanning electron microscopic observations on the inner ear of the skate, Raja ocellata. Cell Tissue Res 205:199–215.
8.
Barry MA (1987): Afferent and efferent connections of the primary octaval nuclei in the clearnose skate, Raja eglanteria. J Comp Neurol 266:457–477.
9.
Bodznick D, Schmidt AW (1984): Somatotopy within the medullary electrosensory nucleus of the little skate, Raja erinacea. J Comp Neurol 225:581–590.
10.
Boord RL, Campbell CBG (1977): Structural and functional organization of the lateral line systems of sharks. Am Zool 17:431–441.
11.
Bowmaker JK (1995): The visual pigments of fish. Prog Ret Eye Res 15:1–31.
12.
Bozzano A, Collin SP (2000): Retinal ganglion cell topography in elasmobranchs. Brain Behav Evol 55:191–208.
13.
Breder CM (1952): On the utility of the saw of the sawfish. Copeia 2:90–91.
14.
Bridges CDB (1972): The rhodopsin-porphyropsin visual system; in Dartnall HJA (ed): Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Photochemistry of Vision, vol VII/I. Berlin, Springer, pp 417–480.
15.
Bruch RC, Rulli RD (1988): Ligand binding specificity of a neutral l-amino acid olfactory receptor. Comp Biochem Physiol 91B:535–540.
16.
Bruckmoser P, Dieringer N (1973): Evoked-potentials in primary and secondary olfactory projection areas of forebrain in elasmobranchia. J Comp Physiol 87:65–74.
17.
Carey, FG, Scharold JV (1990): Movements of blue sharks (Prionace glauca) in depth and course. Mar Biol 106:329–342.
18.
Casper BM, Mann DA (2006): Dipole hearing measurements in elasmobranch fishes. J Exp Biol 210:75–81.
19.
Casper BM, Mann DA (2010): Field hearing measurements of the Atlantic sharpnose shark Rhizoprionodon terraenovae. J Fish Biol 75:2768–2776.
20.
Chu YT, Wen MC (1979): A Study of the Lateral-Line Canal System and that of the Lorenzini Ampullae and Tubules of Elasmobranchiate Fishes of China. Shanghai, Academic Press.
21.
Collin SP, Pettigrew JD (1988a): Retinal topography in reef teleosts. I. Some species with well-developed areas but poorly developed streaks. Brain Behav Evol 31:269–282.
22.
Collin SP, Pettigrew JD (1988b): Retinal topography in reef teleosts. II. Some species with prominent horizontal streaks and high density areas. Brain Behav Evol 31:283–295.
23.
Collin SP, Whitehead D (2004): The functional roles of passive electroreception in non-electric fishes. Anim Biol 54:1–25.
24.
Collin SP (2010): Electroreception in vertebrates and invertebrates; in Breed MD, Moore J (eds): Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior. Oxford, Academic Press, vol I, pp 611–620.
25.
Compagno LJV (1990): Relationships of the megamouth shark Megachasma pelagios (Lamniformes: Megachasmidae), with comments on its feeding habits; in Pratt HL Jr, Gruber SH, Taniuchi T (eds): Elasmobranchs as Living Resources: Advances in the Biology, Ecology, Systematics, and the Status of the Fisheries. NOAA Technical Report 90, pp 357–379.
26.
Cook MH, Neal HV (1921): Are the taste-buds of elasmobranchs endodermal in origin? J Comp Neurol 33:45–63.
27.
Coombs S, Janssen J (1990): Water flow detection by the mechanosensory lateral line; in Stebbins C, Berkley MA (eds): Comparative Perception, vol II. Complex Signals. New York, Wiley and Sons, pp 89–123.
28.
Coombs S, Montgomery JC (1999): The enigmatic lateral line system; in Fay RR, Popper AN (eds): Comparative Hearing: Fish and Amphibians. New York, Springer, pp 319–362.
29.
Corwin JT (1978): The relation of inner ear structure to the feeding behavior in sharks and rays. Scan Electr Microsc 2:1105–1112.
30.
Corwin JT (1981): Peripheral auditory physiology in the lemon shark: evidence of parallel otolithic and non-otolithic sound detection. J Comp Physiol 142:379–390.
31.
Corwin JT (1989): Functional anatomy of the auditory system in sharks and rays. J Exp Zool (suppl 2):62–74.
32.
Crescitelli F (1972): The visual cells and visual pigments of the vertebrate eye; in Dartnall HAS (ed): Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Photochemistry of Vision, vol VII/1. Berlin, Springer, pp 245–363.
33.
Davies WL, Carvalho LS, Tay BH, Brenner S, Hunt DM, Venkatesh B (2009): Into the blue: gene duplication and loss underlie colour vision adaptations in a deep-sea chimaera, the elephant shark Callorhinchus milii. Genome Res 19:415–426.
34.
Davies WL, Hankins MW, Foster RG (2010): Vertebrate ancient opsin and melanopsin: divergent irradiance detectors. Photochem Photobiol Sci 9:1444–1457.
35.
Davies WL, Collin SP, Hunt DM (2012): Molecular ecology and adaptation of the vertebrate visual system. Mol Ecol. In press.
36.
Dijkgraaf S (1963): Functioning and significance of lateral-line organs. Biol Revs Camb Phil Soc 38:51–105.
37.
Dijkgraaf S, Kalmijn AJ (1963): Untersuchungen über die Funktion der Lorenzinischen Ampullen an Haifischen. Z Vgl Physiol 47:438–456.
38.
Donley JM, Sepulveda CA, Konstantinidis P, Gemballa S, Shadwick RE (2004): Convergent evolution in mechanical design of lamnid sharks and tunas. Nature 429:61–65.
39.
Dryer L, Graziadei PPC (1993): A pilot study on morphological compartmentalization and heterogeneity in the elasmobranch olfactory bulb. Anat Embryol 188:41–51.
40.
Evangelista C, Mills M, Siebeck UE, Collin SP (2010): A comparison of the external morphology of the membranous inner ear in elasmobranchs. J Morph 271:483–495.
41.
Fahrenholz C (1915): Über die Verbreitung von Zahnbildungen und Sinnesorganen im Vorderdarm der Selachier und ihre phylogenetische Beurteilung. Jen Z Natur 53:389–444.
42.
Fine ML, Horn MH, Cox B (1987): Acanthonus armatus, a deep-sea teleost fish with a minute brain and large ears. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 230:257–265.
43.
Finger TE (1988): Organization of the chemosensory systems within the brains of bony fishes; in Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN (eds): Sensory Biology of Aquatic Organisms. Berlin, Springer, pp 337–363.
44.
Finger TE (1997): Evolution of taste and solitary chemoreceptor cell systems. Brain Behav Evol 50:234–243.
45.
Finger TE (2007): Evolution of taste; in Kaas JH, Bullock TH (eds): Evolution of the Nervous Systems: A Comprehensive Reference, vol II. Oxford, Elsevier, pp 423–441.
46.
Foster RG, Bellingham J (2002): Opsins and melanopsins. Curr Biol 12:R543–R544.
47.
Gardiner JM, Atema J (2007): Sharks need the lateral line to locate odor sources: rheotaxis and eddy chemotaxis. J Exp Biol 210:1925–1934.
48.
Gardiner JM, Atema J (2010): The function of bilateral odor arrival time differences in olfactory orientation of sharks. Curr Biol 20:1187–1191.
49.
Gardiner JM, Hueter RE, Maruska KP, Sisneros JA, Casper BM, Mann DA, Demski LS (2012): Sensory Physiology and Behavior of Elasmobranchs; in Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds): Biology of Sharks and their Relatives, ed 2. Boca Raton, CRC Press, pp 349–402.
50.
Govardovskii VI, Fyhrquist N, Reuter T, Kuzmin DG, Donner K (2000): In search of the visual pigment template. Vis Neurosci 17:509–528.
51.
Gruber SH, Hamasaki DI, Bridges CDB (1963): Cones in the retina of the lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris). Vision Res 3:397–399.
52.
Gruber SH (1975): Duplex vision in the elasmobranchs: histological, electrophysiological and psychophysical evidence; in Ali MA (ed): Vision in Fishes: New Approaches in Research. New York, Plenum Press, pp 525–540.
53.
Gruber SH, Gulley RL, Brandon J (1975): Duplex retina in seven elasmobranch species. Bull Mar Sci 25:353–358.
54.
Gruber SH, Cohen JL (1978): Visual system of the elasmobranchs: state of the art 1960–1975; in Hodgson ES, Mathewson RF (eds): Sensory Biology of Sharks, Skates and Rays. Washington, US Government Printing Office, pp 11–116.
55.
Gruber SH, Loew ER, McFarland WN (1991): Rod and cone pigments of the Atlantic guitarfish, Rhinobatos lentiginosus Garman. J Exp Zool (suppl)5:85–87.
56.
Haine OS, Ridd PV, Rowe RJ (2001): Range of electrosensory detection of prey by Carcharhinus melanopterus and Himantura granulata. Mar Fresh Res 52:291–296.
57.
Hamdani EH, Døving KB (2007): The functional organization of the fish olfactory system. Prog Neurobiol 82:80–86.
58.
Harahush BK, Hart, NS, Green K, Collin SP (2009): Retinal neurogenesis and ontogenetic changes in the visual system of the brown banded bamboo shark, Chiloscyllium punctatum (Hemiscyllidae, Elasmobranchii). J Comp Neurol 513:83–97.
59.
Harahush BK, Green K, Webb R, Collin SP (2012): Optimal preservation of the shark retina for ultrastructural analysis: an assessment of chemical, microwave and high-pressure freezing fixation techniques. Micros Res Tech. In press.
60.
Hart NS, Lisney TJ, Marshall NJ, Collin SP (2004): Multiple cone visual pigments and the potential for trichromatic colour vision in two species of elasmobranch. J Exp Biol 207:4587–4594.
61.
Hart NS, Lisney TJ, Collin SP (2006): Visual communication in elasmobranchs; in Ladich F, Collin SP, Moller P, Kapoor BG (eds): Communication in Fishes. Enfield, Science Publishers, pp 337–392.
62.
Hart NS, Theiss SM, Harahush BK, Collin SP (2011): Microspectrophotometric evidence for cone monochromacy in sharks. Naturwissenschaften 98:193–201.
63.
Herrick CJ (1901): The cranial nerves and cutaneous sense organs of the North American silurid catfishes. J Comp Neurol Psychol 11:177–249.
64.
Holland KN, Wetherbee BM, Lowe CG, Meyer C (1999): Movements of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in coastal Hawaiian waters. Mar Biol 134:665–673.
65.
Hueter RE (1980): Physiological optics of the eye of the juvenile lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris); MSc thesis, University of Miami, USA.
66.
Hueter RE, Gruber SH (1980): Retinoscopy of aquatic eyes. Vision Res 20:197–200.
67.
Hueter RE, Gruber SH (1982): Recent advances in studies of the visual system of the juvenile lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris). Fla Sci 45:11–25.
68.
Hueter RE (1988): The organization of spatial vision in the juvenile lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris): retinotectal projection, retinal topography and implications for the visual ecology of sharks; PhD thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
69.
Hueter RE (1991): Adaptations for spatial vision in sharks. J Exp Zool Suppl 5:130–141.
70.
Hueter RE, Murphy CJ, Howland M, Sivak JG, Paul-Murphy JR, Howland HC (2001): Refractive state and accommodation in the eyes of free-swimming versus restrained juvenile lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris). Vision Res 41:1885–1889.
71.
Hueter RE, Mann DE, Maruska KP, Sisneros JA, Demiski LS (2004): Sensory biology of elasmobranchs; in Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds): Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives. Boca Raton, CRC Press, pp 325–368.
72.
Hullar TE (2006): Semicircular canal geometry, afferent sensitivity, and animal behavior. Anat Rec A 288A:466–472.
73.
Jerlov NH (1976): Marine Optics. Amsterdam, Elsevier.
74.
Johnsen PB, Teeter JH (1985): Behavioral responses of the bonnethead (Sphyrna tiburo) to controlled olfactory stimulation. Mar Behav Physiol 11:283–291.
75.
Jones GM, Spells KE (1963): A theoretical and comparative study of the functional dependence of the semicircular canal upon its physical dimensions. Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 157:403–419.
76.
Jordan L (2008): Comparative morphology of stingray lateral line canal and electrosensory systems. J Morph 269:1325–1339.
77.
Jordan LK, Kajiura SM, Gordon MS (2009): Functional consequences of structural differences in stingray sensory systems. I. Mechanosensory lateral line canals. J Exp Biol 212:3037–3043.
78.
Jordan LK, Mandelman JW, Kajiura SM (2011): Behavioral responses to weak electric fields and a lanthanide metal in two shark species. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 409:345–350.
79.
Jørgensen JM (2005): Morphology of electroreceptive sensory organs; in Bullock TH, Hopkins CD, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds): Electroreception. New York, Springer, pp 47–67.
80.
Kajiura S (2001): Head morphology and electrosensory pore distribution of carcharhinid and sphyrnid sharks. Environ Biol Fish 61:125–133.
81.
Kajiura SM, Holland KN (2002): Electroreception in juvenile scalloped hammerhead and sandbar sharks. J Exp Biol 205:3609–3621.
82.
Kajiura SM (2003): Electroreception in neonatal bonnethead sharks, Sphyrna tiburo. Mar Biol 143:603–611.
83.
Kajiura SM, Fitzgerald TP (2009): Response of juvenile scalloped hammerhead sharks to electric stimuli. Zool 112:241–250.
84.
Kajiura SM, Cornett AD, Yopak KE (2010): Sensory adaptations to the environment: electroreceptors as a case study; in Carrier J, Heithaus M, Musick J (eds): Sharks and Their Relatives. II. Biodiversity, Adaptive Physiology and Conservation. London, CRC Press, pp 393–433.
85.
Kalmijn A (1971): The electric sense of sharks and rays. J Exp Biol 55:371–383.
86.
Kalmijn AJ (1972): Bioelectric fields in sea water and the function of the ampullae of Lorenzini in elasmobranch fishes. Scripps Inst Ocean La Jolla, Cal USA Ref Ser 72–83:1–21.
87.
Kalmijn AJ (1974): The detection of electric fields from inanimate and animate sources other than electric organs; in Fessard A (ed): Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol III. Berlin, Springer, pp 147–200.
88.
Kalmijn A (1978): Electric and magnetic sensory world of sharks, skates and rays; in Hodgson ES, Mathewson RF (eds): Sensory Biology of Sharks, Skates and Rays. Washington, US Government Printing Office, pp 507–528.
89.
Kalmijn A, Weinger M (1981): An electrical simulator of moving prey for the study of feeding strategies in sharks, skates, and rays. Ann Biomed Eng 9:363–367.
90.
Kalmijn A (1982): Electric and magnetic field detection in elasmobranch fishes. Science 218:916.
91.
Kalmijn AJ (1989): Functional evolution of the lateral line and inner ear sensory systems; in Coombs S, Goerner P, Muenz H (eds): The Mechanosensory Lateral Line: Neurobiology and Evolution. New York, Springer, pp 187–216.
92.
Kasumyan AO (2003): The lateral line in fish: Structure, function and role in behavior. J Ichthyol Res 43:S175–S203.
93.
Kasumyan AO, Døving KB (2003): Taste preferences in fishes. Fish Fisher 4:289–347.
94.
Kelly JC, Nelson DR (1975): Hearing thresholds of the horn shark, Heterodontus francisci. J Acoust Soc Am 58:905–909.
95.
Kempster RM, McCarthy ID, Collin SP (2012): Phylogenetic and ecological factors influencing the number and distribution of electroreceptors in elasmobranchs. J Fish Biol 80:2055–2088.
96.
Kimber JA, Sims DW, Bellamy PH, Gill AB (2011): The ability of a benthic elasmobranch to discriminate between biological and artificial fields. Mar Biol 158:1–8.
97.
Kirschvink JL,Walker MM, Diebel CE (2001): Magnetite-based magnetoreception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:462–467.
98.
Klimley AP (1993): Highly directional swimming by scalloped hammerhead sharks, Sphyrna lewini, and subsurface irradiance, temperature, bathymetry, and geomagnetic field. Mar Biol 117:1–22.
99.
Klimley AP, Beavers SC, Curtis TH, Jorgensen SJ (2002): Movements and swimming behavior of three species of sharks in La Jolla Canyon, California. Environ Biol Fish 63:117–135.
100.
Koyanagi MK, Kubokawa K, Tsukamoto H, Shichida Y, Terakita A (2005): Cephalochordate melanopsin: evolutionary linkage between invertebrate visual cells and vertebrate photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. Curr Biol 15:1065–1069.
101.
Langlois TJ, Harvey ES, Fitzpatrick B, Meeuwig JJ, Shedrawi G, Watson DL (2010): Cost-efficient sampling of fish assemblages: comparison of baited video stations and diver video transects. Aquat Biol 9:155–168.
102.
Laverack MS (1988): The diversity of chemoreceptors; in Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN (eds): Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals. New York, Springer, pp 287–312.
103.
Levine JS, MacNichol EF Jr (1982): Color vision in fishes. Scient Am 246:108–117.
104.
Lisney TJ, Collin SP (2006): Brain morphology in large pelagic fishes: a comparison between sharks and teleosts. J Fish Biol 68:532–554.
105.
Lisney TJ, Collin SP (2007): Relative eye size in elasmobranchs. Brain Behav Evol 69:266–279.
106.
Lisney TJ, Collin SP, Bennett MB (2007): Volumetric analysis of sensory brain areas indicates ontogenetic shifts in the relative importance of sensory systems in elasmobranchs. Raffles Bull Zool Suppl 14:7–15.
107.
Lisney TJ, Collin SP (2008): Retinal ganglion cell distribution and spatial resolving power in elasmobranchs. Brain Behav Evol 72:59–77.
108.
Lisney TJ, Yopak KE, Montgomery JC, Collin SP (2008): Variation in brain organization and cerebellar foliation in chondrichthyans: batoids. Brain Behav Evol 72:262–282.
109.
Lisney TJ (2010): A review of the sensory biology of chimaerid fishes (Chondrichthyes; Holocephali). Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 20;571–590.
110.
Lisney TJ, Theiss SM, Collin SP, Hart NS (2012): Vision in elasmobranchs and their relatives: 21st century advances. J Fish Biol 80:2024–2054.
111.
Litherland L, Collin SP (2008): Comparative visual function in elasmobranchs: spatial arrangement and ecological correlates of photoreceptor and ganglion cell distributions. Visual Neurosci 25:549–561.
112.
Litherland L, Collin SP, Fritsches KA (2009a): Eye growth in sharks: Ecological implications for changes in retinal topography and visual resolution. Vis Neurosci 26:397–409.
113.
Litherland L, Collin SP, Fritsches KA (2009b): Visual optics and ecomorphology of the growing shark eye: a comparison between deep and shallow water species. J Exp Biol 212:3583–3594.
114.
Lowenstein O, Osborne M, Wersall J (1964): Structure and innervation of the sensory epithelia of the labyrinth in the thornback ray (Raja clavata). Proc Roy Soc Lond B 160:1–12.
115.
Martin AP, Naylor GJP, Palumbi SR (1992): Rates of mitochondrial DNA evolution in sharks are slow compared with mammals. Nature 357: 153–155.
116.
Maruska KP (2001): Morphology of the mechanosensory lateral line system in elasmobranch fishes: ecological and behavioral considerations. Environ Biol Fishes 60:47–75.
117.
Maruska KP, Tricas TC (2004): Test of the mechanotactile hypothesis: neuromast morphology and response dynamics of mechanosensory lateral line primary afferents in the stingray. J Exp Biol 207:3463–3476.
118.
Marzullo TA, Wueringer BE, Squire LS Jr, Collin SP (2011): Description of the mechanoreceptive lateral line and electroreceptive ampullary systems in the freshwater whipray, Himantura dalyensis. Mar Fresh Res 62:771–779.
119.
McEachran JD, Aschliman N (2004): Phylogeny of Batoidea; in Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds): Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives. Boca Raton, CRC Press, pp 79–113.
120.
McGowan DW, Kajiura SM (2009): Electroreception in the euryhaline stingray, Dasyatis sabina. J Exp Biol 212:1544–1552.
121.
Meredith TL, Kajiura SM (2010): Olfactory morphology and physiology of elasmobranchs. J Exp Biol 213:3449–3456.
122.
Mills M, Rash R, Siebeck UE, Collin SP (2011): Exogenous material in the inner ear of the adult Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni (Elasmobranchii). Anat Rec A 294:373–378.
123.
Montgomery JC (1984): Frequency response characteristics of primary and secondary neurons in the electrosensory system of the thornback ray. Comp Biochem Physiol 79A:189–195.
124.
Montgomery J, Coombs S, Halstead M (1995): Biology of the mechanosensory lateral line in fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish 5:399–416.
125.
Montgomery JC, Baker CF, Carton AG (1997): The lateral line can mediate rheotaxis in fish. Nature 389:960–963.
126.
Montgomery JC, Skipworth E (1997): Detection of weak water jets by the short-tailed stingray Dasyatis brevicaudata (Pisces: Dasyatidae). Copeia 1997:881–883.
127.
Montgomery JC, Bodznick D, Yopak KE (2012): The cerebellum and cerebellum-like structures of cartilaginous fishes. Brain Behav Evol 80:152–165.
128.
Murray RW (1974): The ampullae of Lorenzini; in Fessard A (ed): Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol III/3. New York, Springer, pp 125–146.
129.
Musick JA, Harbin MM, Compagno LJV (2004): Historical zoogeography of the Selachii; in Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds): Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives. London, CRC Press, pp 33–78.
130.
Myers TS, Atkinson IM, Johnstone R (2010): Semantically enabling the SEMAT Project: extending marine sensor networks for decision support and hypothesis testing. Proc of CISIS, pp 974–979.
131.
Myrberg AA Jr (2001): The acoustical biology of elasmobranchs. Environ Biol Fish 60:31–45.
132.
New JG, Bodznick D (1985): Segregation of electroreceptive and mechanoreceptive lateral line afferents in the hindbrain of chondrostean fishes. Brain Res 336:89–98.
133.
New JG, Tricas TC (1998): Electroreceptors and magnetoreceptors: morphology and function; in Sperelakis N (ed): Cell Physiology Source Book, ed 2. San Diego, Academic Press, pp 741–758.
134.
Nickel E, Fuchs S (1974): Organization and ultrastructure of mechanoreceptors (Savi vesicles) in the elasmobranch Torpedo. J Neurocytol 3:161–177.
135.
Northcutt RG (1978): Brain organization in the cartilaginous fishes; in Hodgson ES, Mathewson RF (eds): Sensory Biology of Sharks, Skates and Rays. Arlington, Office of Naval Research, pp 117–193.
136.
Park D, McGuire JM, Majchrzak AL, Ziobro JM, Eisthen HL (2004): Discrimination of conspecific sex and reproductive condition using chemical cues in axolotls (Ambystoma mexicanum). J Comp Physiol A 190:415–427.
137.
Peach M, Marshall NJ (2009): The comparative morphology of pit organs in elasmobranchs. J Morph 270:688–701.
138.
Peters RC, Eeuwes LB, Bretschneider F (2007): On the electrodetection threshold of aquatic vertebrates with ampullary or mucous gland electroreceptor organs. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 82:361–373.
139.
Popper AN, Fay RR (1977): Structure and function of the elasmobranch auditory system. Amer Zool 17:443–452.
140.
Porter ML, Blasic JR, Bok MJ, Cameron EG, Pringle T, Cronin TW, Robinson PR (2012): Shedding new light on opsin evolution. Proc Biol Sci 279:3–14.
141.
Puzdrowski RL, Leonard RB (1993): The octavolateral systems in the stingray, Dasyatis sabina. I. Primary projections of the octaval and lateral line nerves. J Comp Neurol 332:21–37.
142.
Raschi W (1986): A morphological analysis of the ampullae of Lorenzini in selected skates (Pisces, Rajoidei). J Morph 189:225–247.
143.
Raschi W, Aadlond C, Keithar E (2001): A morphological and functional analysis of the ampullae of Lorenzini in selected galeoid sharks; in Kapoor BG, Hara TJ (eds): Sensory Biology of Jawed Fishes – New Insights. Enfield, Science Publishers, pp. 297–316.
144.
Reutter K, Breipohl W, Bijvank GJ (1974): Taste bud types in fishes. II. Scanning electron miscoscopical investigations on Xiphophorus helleri Heckel (Poeciliidae, Cyprinodontiformes, Teleostei). Cell Tiss Res 153:151–165.
145.
Reutter K (1992): Structure of the peripheral gustatory organ, represented by the siluroid fish, Plotosus lineatus (Thunberg); in Hara TJ (ed): Fish Chemoreception. London, Chapman & Hall, pp 60–78.
146.
Reutter K, Boudriot F, Witt M (2000): Heterogeneity of fish taste bud ultrastructure as demonstrated in the holosteans Amia calva and Lepisosteus oculatus. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 355:1225–1228.
147.
Rivera-Vicente AC, Sewell J, Tricas TC (2011): Electrosensitive spatial vectors in elasmobranch fishes: implications for source localization. PLoS ONE 6:e16008.
148.
Robbins WD, Peddemors VM, Kennelly SJ (2011): Assessment of permanent magnets and electropositive metals to reduce the line-based capture of Galapagos sharks, Carcharhinus galapagensis. Fish Res 109:100–106.
149.
Sand A (1937): The mechanism of the lateral sense organs of fishes. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 123:472–495.
150.
Sand O, Enger PS, Karlsen E, Knudsen FR (2011): Detection of infrasound in fish and behavioral responses to intense infrasound in juvenile salmonids and European silver eels: a minireview. Am Fish Soc Sympos 26:183–193.
151.
Schluessel V, Bennett MB, Bleckmann H, Blomberg S, Collin SP (2008): Morphometric and ultrastructural comparison of the olfactory system in elasmobranchs: the significance of structure-function relationships based on phylogeny and ecology. J Morph 269:1365–1386.
152.
Schluessel V, Bennett MB, Bleckmann H, Collin SP (2010): The role of olfaction throughout juvenile development: functional adaptations in elasmobranchs. J Morph 271:451–461.
153.
Schreiber NL, Collin SP, Hart NS (2012): Comparative retinal anatomy and visual ecology in four species of elasmobranch. J Morph 273:423–440.
154.
Sheldon RE (1909): The reactions of the dogfish to chemical stimuli. J Comp Neurol Psychol 19:273–311.
155.
Silver WL (1979): Olfactory responses from a marine elasmobranch, the Atlantic stingray, Dasyatis sabina. Mar Behav Physiol 6:297–305.
156.
Sims DW (2010): Tracking and analysis techniques for understanding free-ranging shark movements and behavior; in Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds): Sharks and Their Relatives. II. Biodiversity, Adaptive Physiology, and Conservation. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 351–392.
157.
Sisneros JA, Tricas TC, Luer CA (1998): Response properties and biological function of the skate electrosensory system during ontogeny. J Comp Physiol A 183:87–99.
158.
Sisneros JA, Tricas TC (2000): Androgen-induced changes in the response dynamics of ampullary electrosensory primary afferent neurons. J Neurosci 20:8586–8595.
159.
Smeets WJAJ (1983): A survey of the central nervous system of cartilaginous fishes, with special emphasis on the sensory systems. J Anat 137:391–392.
160.
Stell WK (1972): The morphological organization of the vertebrate retina; in Fuortes M, (ed): Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Physiology of Photoreceptor Organs, vol V11/2. Berlin, Springer, pp 111–213.
161.
Tester AL (1963): Olfaction, gustation, and the common chemical sense in sharks; in Gilbert PW (ed): Sharks and Survival. Boston, Heath, pp 255–285.
162.
Tester AL, Kendall J, Milisen W (1972): Morphology of the ear of the shark genus Carcharhinus, with particular reference to the macula neglecta. Pacific Sci 26:264–274.
163.
Theiss SM, Lisney TJ, Collin SP, Hart NS (2007): Colour vision and visual ecology of the blue-spotted maskray, Dasyatis kuhlii (Müller and Henle, 1814). J Comp Physiol A 193:67–79.
164.
Theiss SM, Hart NS, Collin SP (2009): Morphological indicators of olfactory ability in wobbegong sharks (family Orectolobidae). Brain Behav Evol 73:91–101.
165.
Theiss SM, Collin SP, Hart NS (2011): Morphology and distribution of the ampullary electroreceptors in wobbegong sharks: implications for feeding behaviour. Mar Biol 158: 723–735.
166.
Thwaites CF (1999): Variations in the morphology of elasmobranch inner ear; MSc thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland.
167.
Tricas TC (1982): Bioelectric-mediated predation by swell sharks Cephaloscyllium ventriosum. Copeia 4:948–952.
168.
Tricas TC, Michael SW, Sisneros JA (1995): Electrosensory optimization to conspecific phasing signals for mating. Neurosci Letts 202:129–132.
169.
Tricas T (2001): The neuroecology of the elasmobranch electrosensory world: why peripheral morphology shapes behavior. Environ Biol Fish 60:77–92.
170.
Tricas TC, Kajiura SM, Summers AP (2009): Response of the hammerhead shark olfactory epithelium to amino acid stimuli. J Comp Physiol A 195:947–954.
171.
Van-Eyk SM, Siebeck UE, Champ CM, Marshall J, Hart NS (2011): Behavioural evidence for colour vision in an elasmobranch. J Exp Biol 214:4186–4192.
172.
Walker MT, Brown RL, Cronin TW, Robinson PR (2008): Photochemistry of retinal chromophore in mouse melanopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:8861–8865.
173.
Walls GL (1942): The Vertebrate Retina and Its Adaptive Radiation. Bloomfield Hills, Cranbrook Institute of Science.
174.
Weng KC, Block BA (2004): Diel vertical migration of the bigeye thresher shark (Alopias superciliosus), a species possessing orbital retia mirabilia. Fish Bull 102:221–229.
175.
Whitear M, Moate RM (1994): Chemosensory cells in the oral epithelium of Raja clavata. J Zool 232:295–312.
176.
Wilkens LA, Russell DF, Pei X, Gurgens C (1997): The paddlefish rostrum functions as an electrosensory antenna in plankton feeding. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 264:1723–1729.
177.
Wueringer BE, Tibbetts IR (2008): Comparison of the lateral line and ampullary systems of two species of shovelnose ray. Rev Fish Biol Fish 18:47–64.
178.
Wueringer BE, Peverell SC, Seymour J, Squire Jr L, Kajiura SM, Collin SP (2011a): Sensory systems in sawfishes. 1. The ampullae of Lorenzini. Brain Behav Evol 78:139–149.
179.
Wueringer BE, Peverell SC, Seymour J, Squire L Jr, Collin SP (2011b) Sensory systems in sawfishes. 2. The lateral line. Brain Behav Evol 78:150–161.
180.
Wueringer BE, Squire L Jr, Kajiura SM, Hart NS, Collin SP (2012): The function of the sawfish’s saw. Curr Biol 22:R150–R151.
181.
Wueringer BE (2012): Electroreception in elasmobranchs: sawfish as a case study. Brain Behav Evol 80:97–107.
182.
Yokoyama S, Yokoyama R (1996): Adaptive evolution of photoreceptors and visual pigments in vertebrates. Ann Rev Ecol System 27:543–567.
183.
Yopak KE, Lisney TJ, Collin SP, Montgomery JC (2007): Variation in brain organization and cerebellar foliation in Chondrichthyans: sharks and holocephalans. Brain Behav Evol 69:280–300.
184.
Yopak KE (2012): Neuroecology of cartilaginous fishes: the functional implications of brain scaling. J Fish Biol 80:1968–2023.
185.
Yopak KE, Lisney TJ (2012): Allometric scaling of the optic tectum in cartilaginous fishes. Brain Behav Evol 80:108–126.
186.
Zippel HP, Hansen A, Caprio J (1997): Renewing olfactory receptor neurons in goldfish do not require contact with the olfactory bulb to develop normal chemical responsiveness. J Comp Physiol A 181:425–437.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.