We examined the chemoarchitecture of layer 4 isocortex and the number of myelinated nerve fibers of selected cranial nerves in the American water shrew (Sorex palustris). This study took advantage of the opportunity to examine juvenile brain tissue, which often reveals the most distinctive cortical modules related to different sensory representations. Flattened cortical sections were processed for the metabolic enzyme cytochrome oxidase, revealing a number of modules and septa. Subdivisions related to sensory representations were tentatively identified by performing microelectrode recordings in a single adult shrew in this study, combined with microelectrode recordings and anatomical findings from a previous investigation. Taken together, these results suggest that characteristic chemoarchitectonic borders in the shrew neocortex can be used to delineate and quantify cortical areas. The most obvious subdivisions in the water shrew include a relatively small primary visual cortex which responded to visual stimuli, a larger representation of vibrissae in the primary somatosensory cortex, and a prominent representation of oral structures apparent in the more rostral-lateral cortex. A presumptive auditory area was located in the far caudal cortex. These findings for the cortex are consistent with counts from optic, auditory and trigeminal nerves, suggesting that somatosensory inputs dominate the shrew’s senses whereas visual and auditory inputs play a small role in navigation and in finding prey. More generally, we find that shrews share unusual features of cortical organization with moles, supporting their close taxonomic relationship.

Keywords:
Insectivore, Somatosensory cortex, Brain, Evolution, Cranial nerve
1.
Akers RM, Killackey HP (1978): Organization of corticocortical connections in the parietal cortex of the rat. J Comp Neurol 181:513–538.
2.
Albers K, Perrone T, Goodness T, Jones M, Green M, Davis B (1996): Cutaneous overexpression of NT-3 increases sensory and sympathetic neuron number and enhances touch dome and hair follicle innervation. J Cell Biol 134:487–497.
3.
Anjum F, Turni H, Mulder PGH, van der Burg J, Brecht M (2006): Tactile guidance of prey capture in Etruscan shrews. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA103:16544–16549.
4.
Anniko M, Arnesen AR (1988): Cochlear nerve topography and fiber spectrum in the pigmented mouse. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 245:155–159.
5.
Calder WA (1969): Temperature relations and underwater endurance of the smallest homeothermic diver, the water shrew. Comp Biochem Physiol 30:1075–1082.
6.
Catania KC (2000). Cortical organization in moles: evidence of new areas and a specialized S2. Somatosens Mot Res 17:335–347.
7.
Catania KC (2006) Olfaction: Underwater ‘sniffing’ by semi-aquatic mammals. Nature 444:1024–1025.
8.
Catania KC, Collins CE, Kaas JH (2000): Organization of sensory cortex in the East African hedgehog (Atelerix albiventris). J Comp Neurol 421:256–274.
9.
Catania KC, Hare JF, Campbell KL (2008): Water shrews detect movement, shape, and smell to find prey underwater. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:571–576.
10.
Catania KC, Kaas JH (1997): Somatosensory fovea in the star-nosed mole: behavioral use of the star in relation to innervation patterns and cortical representation. J Comp Neurol 387:215–233.
11.
Catania KC, Lyon DC, Mock OB, Kaas JH (1999): Cortical organization in shrews: evidence from five species. J Comp Neurol 410:55–72.
12.
Catania KC, Northcutt RG, Kaas JH, Beck PD (1993): Nose stars and brain stripes. Nature 6437:493.
13.
Churchfield S (1990): The Natural History of Shrews. Ithaca, Comstock/Cornell University Press.
14.
Conaway CH (1952): Life history of the water shrew (Sorex palustris navigator). Am Midland Nat 48:219–248.
15.
Dehnhardt G, Hyvärinen H, Palviainen A, Klauer G (1999): Structure and innervation of the vibrissal follicle-sinus complex in the Australian water rat, Hydromys chrysogaster. J Comp Neurol 411:550–562.
16.
Ebner FF (1969): A comparison of primitive forebrain organization in metatherian and eutherian mammals. Ann NY Acad Sci 167:241–257.
17.
Friedman DP, Jones EG (1981): Thalamic input to areas 3a and 2 in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 45:59–85.
18.
Gebo DL (2004): A shrew-sized origin for primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 47:40–62.
19.
Glezer II, Jacobs MS, Morgane PJ (1988): Implications of the ‘initial brain’ concept for brain evolution in Cetacea. Behav Brain Sci 11:75–116.
20.
Hamilton WJ (1930): The food of the Soricidae. J Mammalogy 11:26–39.
21.
Huffman KJ, Nelson J, Clarey J, Krubitzer L (1999): Organization of somatosensory cortex in three species of marsupials, Dasyurus hallucatus, Dactylopsila trivirgata, and Monodelphis domestica: neural correlates of morphological specialization. J Comp Neurol 403:5–32.
22.
Jeon C, Strettoi E, Masland RH (1998): The major cell populations of the mouse retina. J Neurosci 18:8936–8946.
23.
Johnson JI (1990): Comparative development of somatic sensory cortex; in Jones EG, Peters A (eds): Cerebral Cortex. New York, Plenum, pp 335–449.
24.
Kaas JH (2005): From mice to men: the evolution of the large, complex human brain. J Biosciences 30:155–165.
25.
Kaas JH, Hall WC, Diamond IT (1970): Cortical visual area I and II in the hedgehog: the relation between evoked potential maps and architectonic subdivisions. J Neurophysiol 33:273–306.
26.
Kielan-Jaworowska Z, Cifelli RL, Luo ZX (2004): Mammals from the age of the dinosaurs: origins, evolution, and structure. New York, Columbia University Press.
27.
Koralek KA, Olavarria J, Killackey HP (1990): Areal and laminar organization of corticocortical projections in the rat somatosensory cortex. J Comp Neurol 299:133–150.
28.
Kössl M, Vater M (1985): The cochlear frequency map of the mustache bat, Pteronotus parnellii. J Comp Physiol A 157:687–697.
29.
Krubitzer (2009): In search of a unifying theory of complex brain evolution. Ann NY Acad Sci 1156: 44–67.
30.
Krubitzer L, Huffman K, Molnar Z (1998): Constructing the neocortex: influences on the pattern of organization in mammals; in Gazzaniga M, Altman J (eds): Brain and Mind: Evolutionary Perspectives. Human Frontier Science Program, Strasbourg, pp 19–33.
31.
Krubitzer LA, Kaas JH (1992): The somatosensory thalamus of monkeys: cortical connections and a redefinition of nuclei in marmosets. J Comp Neurol 319:123–140.
32.
Krubitzer LA, Sesma MA, Kaas JH (1986): Microelectrode maps, myeloarchitecture, and cortical connections of three somatotopically organized representations of the body surface in the parietal cortex in squirrels. J Comp Neurol 250:403–430.
33.
Lende RA (1969): A comparative approach to the neocortex: localization in monotremes, marsupials, and insectivores. Ann NY Acad Sci 167:262–276.
34.
Michaloudi H, Dinopoulos A, Karamanlidis AN, Papadopoulos GC, Antonopoulos J (1988): Cortical and brain stem projections to the spinal cord of the hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus): a horseradish peroxidase study. Anat Embryol 178:259–270.
35.
Northcutt RG, Kaas JH (1995): The emergence and evolution of mammalian neocortex. Trends Neurosci 18:373–379.
36.
Prusky GT, Douglas RM (2003): Developmental plasticity of mouse visual acuity. Eur J Neurosci 17:167–173.
37.
Prusky GT, West PWR, Douglas RM (2000): Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats. Vis Res 40:2201–2209.
38.
Regidor J, Divac I (1992): Bilateral thalamocortical projection in hedgehogs: evolutionary implications. Brain Behav Evol 39:265–269.
39.
Remple MS, Henry EH, Catania KC (2003): Organization of somatosensory cortex in the laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus): evidence for two lateral areas joined at the representation of the teeth. J Comp Neurol 467:105–118.
40.
Rosa MG, Krubitzer LA (1999): The evolution of visual cortex: where is V2? Trends Neurosci 22:242–248.
41.
Roth-Alpermann C, Anjum F, Naumann R, Brecht M (2010): Cortical organization in the Etruscan shrew (Suncus etruscus). J Neurophysiol 104:2389–2406.
42.
Rychlik L (2005): Overlap of temporal niches among four sympatric species of shrews. Acta Theriol 50:175–188.
43.
Siemers BM, Schauermann G, Turni H, von Merten S (2009): Why do shrews twitter? Communication or simple echo-based orientation. Biol Lett 5:593–596.
44.
Simeonovska-Nikolova DM (2004): Vocal communication in the bicoloured white-toothed shrew Crocidura leucodon. Acta Theriol 49:157–165.
45.
Sorenson MW (1962): Some aspects of water shrew behavior. Am Midland Nat 68:445–462.
46.
Symonds MRE (2005): Phylogeny and life histories of the ‘Insectivora’: controversies and consequences. Biol Rev 80:93–128.
47.
Stephan H, Baron G, Frahm HD (1991): Insectivora: comparative brain research in mammals. New York, Springer, vol 1.
48.
Suga N, Niwa H, Taniguchi I, Margoliash D (1987): The personalized auditory cortex of the mustached bat: adaptation for echolocation. J Neurophysiol 58:643–654.
49.
Valverde F, Facal-Valverde MV (1986): Neocortical layers I and II of the hedgehog (Erinaceous europaeus). I. Intrinsic connections. Anat Embryol 173:413–430.
50.
Vater M, Feng AS, Betz M (1985): An HRP study of the frequency-place map of the horseshoe bat cochlea: morphological correlates of the sharp tuning to a narrow frequency band. J Comp Physiol A 157:671–686.
51.
Wallace CN (1987): Histochemical demonstration of sensory maps in the rat and mouse cerebral cortex. Brain Res 418:178–182.
52.
Williams RW, Strom RC, Rice DS, Goldowitz D (1996) Genetic and environmental control of variation in retinal ganglion cell number in mice. J Neurosci 16:7193–7205.
53.
Wong-Riley MT, Carroll EW (1984): Quantitative light and electron microscopic analysis of cytochrome oxidase-rich zones in V II prestriate cortex of the squirrel monkey. J Comp Neurol 222:18–37.
54.
Woolsey TA, Van der Loos H (1970): The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex: the description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. Brain Res 17:205–242.
55.
Woolsey TA, Welker C, Schwartz RH (1975): Comparative anatomical studies of the SmL face cortex with special reference to the occurrence of ‘barrels’ in layer IV. J Comp Neurol 164:79–94.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.