The superior colliculus (SC) in the mammalian mesencephalon is involved in avoidance or escape behaviors, but little is known about the response properties of collicular neurons to an object approaching on a collision course towards the animal. The present study identified two classes of looming-sensitive neurons, rho and eta cells, in the SC of the cat, but did not find any tau cell, which has been observed in the pigeon tectofugal pathway. The looming responses were characterized by distinct firing patterns, in which the neuronal discharge steadily increased as the object was approaching, and peaked approximately at the time of collision (rho cell) or some time earlier (eta cell). The response onset time of both rho and eta cells was linearly related to the square root of the diameter/velocity ratio of looming objects; whereas for eta cells, the response peak time was linearly related to the diameter/velocity ratio. The receptive fields of these collicular cells were composed of an excitatory center and a suppressive surround, but the occurrence and development of neuronal responses to looming stimuli were independent of the receptive-field organization. Although the cell number was relatively small in the deep layers of the SC, the proportion of looming-sensitive neurons was close to that in the superficial layers. These results suggest that a population of collicular cells is involved in signaling impending collision of a looming object with the animal and the neural mechanisms underlying the collision avoidance behaviors are to some extent conservative across species from insects to mammals.

1.
Ball W, Tronick E (1971): Infant responses to impending collision: optical and real. Science 171:818–820.
2.
Billington J, Wilkie RM, Field DT, Wann JP (2011): Neural processing of imminent collision in humans. Proc R Soc B 278:1476–1481.
3.
Brandão ML, Cardoso SH, Melo LL, Motta V, Coimbra NC (1994): Neural substrate of defensive behavior in the midbrain tectum. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 18:339–346.
4.
Dean P, Redgrave P, Westby GWM (1989): Event or emergency? Two response systems in the mammalian superior colliculus. Trends Neurosci 12:137–147.
5.
Fotowat H, Gabbiani F (2007): Relationship between the phases of sensory and motor activity during a looming-evoked multistage escape behavior. J Neurosci 27:10047–10059.
6.
Fotowat H, Fayyazuddin A, Bellen HJ, Gabbiani F (2009): A novel neuronal pathway for visually guided escape in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurophysiol 102:875–885.
7.
Fotowat H, Harrison RR, Gabbiani F (2011): Multiplexing of motor information in the discharge of a collision detecting neuron during escape behaviors. Neuron 69:147–158.
8.
Frost BJ (2010): A taxonomy of different forms of visual motion detection and their underlying neural mechanisms. Brain Behav Evol 75:218–235.
9.
Gabbiani F, Krapp HG, Laurent G (1999): Computation of object approach by a wide- field, motion-sensitive neuron. J Neurosci 19:1122–1141.
10.
Gabbiani F, Mo C, Laurent G (2001): Invariance of angular threshold computation in a wide-field looming-sensitive neuron. J Neurosci 21:314–329.
11.
Gabbiani F, Krapp HG, Koch C, Laurent G (2002): Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming. Nature 420:320–324.
12.
Gabbiani F, Krapp HG, Hatsopoulos N, Mo CH, Koch C, Laurent G (2004): Multiplication and stimulus invariance in a looming-sensitive neuron. J Physiol (Paris) 98:19–34.
13.
Gallagher SP, Northmore DPM (2006): Responses of the teleostean nucleus isthmi to looming objects and other moving stimuli. Vis Neurosci 23:209–219.
14.
Gray JR, Lee JK, Robertson RM (2001): Activity of descending contralateral movement detector neurons and collision avoidance behaviour in response to head-on visual stimuli in locusts. J Comp Physiol A 187:115–129.
15.
Gray JR, Blincow E, Robertson RM (2010): A pair of motion-sensitive neurons in the locust encode approaches of a looming object. J Comp Physiol A 196:927–938.
16.
Hammond S, O’Shea M (2007): Escape flight initiation in the fly. J Comp Physiol A 193:471–476.
17.
Hashemi-Nezhad M, Wang C, Burke W, Dreher B (2003): Area 21a of cat visual cortex strongly modulates neuronal activities in the superior colliculus. J Physiol (Lond) 550:535–552.
18.
Hatsopoulos N, Gabbiani F, Laurent G (1995): Elementary computation of object approach by a wide-field visual neuron. Science 270:1000–1003.
19.
Hemmi JM (2005): Predator avoidance in fiddler crab. 2. The visual cues. Animal Behav 69:615–625.
20.
Holmqvist MH, Srinivasan MV (1991): A visually evoked escape response of the housefly. J Comp Physiol A 169:451–459.
21.
Isa T, Hall WC (2009): Exploring the superior colliculus in vitro. J Neurophysiol 102:2581–2593.
22.
Ishikane H, Gangi M, Honda S, Tachibana M (2005): Synchronized retinal oscillations encode essential information for escape behavior in frogs. Nat Neurosci 8:1087–1095.
23.
Jabłoński PG, Strausfeld NJ (2001): Exploitation of an ancient escape circuit by an avian predator: relationships between taxon-specific prey escape circuits and the sensitivity to visual cues from the predator. Brain Behav Evol 58:218–240.
24.
Kang HJ, Li XH (2010): Response properties and receptive field organization of collision-sensitive neurons in the optic tectum of bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Neurosci Bull 26:304–316.
25.
Liu RF, Niu YQ, Wang SR (2008): Thalamic neurons in the pigeon compute distance-to-collision of an approaching surface. Brain Behav Evol 72:37–47.
26.
Maier JX, Neuhoff JG, Logothetis NK, Ghazanfar AA (2004): Multisensory integration of looming signals by rhesus monkeys. Neuron 43:177–181.
27.
May PJ (2005): The mammalian superior colliculus: laminar structure and connections. Prog Brain Res 151:321–378.
28.
Medan V, Oliva D, Tomsic D (2007): Characterization of lobula giant neurons responsive to visual stimuli that elicit escape behaviors in the crab Chasmagnathus. J Neurophysiol 98:2414–2428.
29.
Münch TA, da Silveira RA, Siegert S, Viney TJ, Awatramani GB, Roska B (2009): Approach sensitivity in the retina processed by a multifunctional neural circuit. Nat Neurosci 12:1308–1316.
30.
Nakagawa H, Hongjian K (2010): Collision-sensitive neurons in the optic tectum of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. J Neurophysiol 104:2487–2499.
31.
Oliva D, Medan V, Tomsic D (2007): Escape behavior and neuronal responses to looming stimuli in the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus (Decapoda: Grapsidae). J Exp Biol 210:865–880.
32.
Poljac E, Neggers B, van den Berg AV (2006): Collision judgment of objects approaching the head. Exp Brain Res 171:35–46.
33.
Preuss T, Osei-Bonsu PE, Weiss SA, Wang C, Faber DS (2006): Neural representation of object approach in a decision-making motor circuit. J Neurosci 29:3454–3464.
34.
Regan D, Gray R (2000): Visually guided collision avoidance and collision achievement. Trends Cogn Sci 4:99–107.
35.
Rind FC, Simmons PJ (1992): Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. I. Selective responses to approaching objects. J Neurophysiol 68:1654–1666.
36.
Rind FC, Simmons PJ (1997): Signaling of object approach by the DCMD neuron of the locust. J Neurophysiol 77:1029–1033.
37.
Rind FC, Simmons PJ (1999): Seeing what is coming: building collision-sensitive neurones. Trends Neurosci 22:215–220.
38.
Robertson RM, Johnson AG (1993): Collision avoidance of flying locusts: steering torques and behaviour. J Exp Biol 183:35–60.
39.
Rogers SM, Harston GWJ, Kilburn-Toppin F, Matheson T, Burrows M, Gabbiani F, Krapp HG (2010): Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of a looming-sensitive neuron in solitarious and gregarious phases of the desert locust. J Neurophysiol 103:779–792.
40.
Santer RD, Rind FC, Stafford R, Simmons PJ (2006): Role of an identified looming-sensitive neuron in triggering a flying locust’s escape. J Neurophysiol 95:3391–3400.
41.
Santer RD, Yamawaki Y, Rind FC, Simmons PJ (2008): Preparing for escape: an examination of the role of the DCMD neuron in locust escape jumps. J Comp Physiol A 194:69–77.
42.
Schenberg LC, Póvoa RMF, Costa ALP, Caldellas AV, Tufik S, Bittencourt AS (2005): Functional specializations within the tectum defense systems of the rat. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:1279–1298.
43.
Schiff W, Caviness JA, Gibson JJ (1962): Persistent fear responses in rhesus monkeys to the optical stimulus of ‘looming’. Science 136:982–983.
44.
Shimizu T, Bowers AN (1999): Visual circuits of the avian telencephalon: evolutionary implications. Behav Brain Res 98:183–191.
45.
Simmons PJ, Rind FC, Santer RD (2010): Escapes with and without preparation: the neuroethology of visual startle in locusts. J Insect Physiol 56:876–883.
46.
Sparks DL (1999): Conceptual issues related to the role of the superior colliculus in the control of gaze. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:698–707.
47.
Stein BE, Meredith MA (1991): Functional organization of the superior colliculus; in Leventhal AG (ed): Vision and Visual Dysfunction. The Neural Basis of Visual Function. London, Macmillan, vol 4, pp 85–110.
48.
Sun H, Frost BJ (1998): Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons. Nat Neurosci 1:296–303.
49.
Tammero LF, Dickinson MH (2002): Collision-avoidance and landing responses are mediated by separate pathways in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol 205:2785–2798.
50.
Tresilian JR (1999): Visually timed action: time-out for ‘tau’? Trends Cogn Sci 3:301–310.
51.
van der Weel FR, van der Meer ALH (2009): Seeing it coming: infants’ brain responses to looming danger. Naturwissenschaften 96:1385–1391.
52.
Waleszczyk WJ, Wang C, Burke W, Dreher B (1999): Velocity response profiles of collicular neurons: parallel and convergent visual information channels. Neuroscience 93:1063–1076.
53.
Wang Y, Frost BJ (1992): Time to collision is signalled by neurons in the nucleus rotundus of pigeons. Nature 356:236–238.
54.
Westby GWM, Keay KA, Redgrave P, Dean P, Bannister M (1990): Output pathways from the rat superior colliculus mediating approach and avoidance have different sensory properties. Exp Brain Res 81:626–638.
55.
Wicklein M, Strausfeld NJ (2000): Organization and significance of neurons that detect change of visual depth in the hawk moth Manduca sexta. J Comp Neurol 424:356–376.
56.
Wu LQ, Niu YQ, Yang J, Wang SR (2005): Tectal neurons signal impending collision of looming objects in the pigeon. Eur J Neurosci 22:2325–2331.
57.
Wurtz RH, Albano JE (1980): Visual-motor function of the primate superior colliculus. Annu Rev Neurosci 3:189–226.
58.
Xiao Q, Li DP, Wang SR (2006): Looming-sensitive responses and receptive field organization of telencephalic neurons in the pigeon. Brain Res Bull 68:322–328.
59.
Yamamoto K, Nakata M, Nakagawa H (2003): Input and output characteristics of collision avoidance behavior in the frog Rana catesbeiana. Brain Behav Evol 62:201–211.
60.
Yamawaki Y, Toh Y (2009): Responses of descending neurons to looming stimuli in the praying mantis Tenodera aridifolia. J Comp Physiol A 195:253–264.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.