Evidence from the early paleontological record of mammalian evolution has often been interpreted as supporting the idea that mammals were nocturnal for most of their early history. Multiple features of extant mammal sensory systems, such as evolutionary modifications to the light-regulated circadian system, photoreceptor complement, and retinal morphology, support this nocturnal hypothesis for mammalian evolution. Here, we synthesize data on eye shape and orbit orientation in mammals as these data compare to other amniotes. Most mammals differ from other amniotes in retaining an eye design optimized for high visual sensitivity, with the requisite reduction in acuity, which is typically restricted to scotopically (i.e. low light) adapted amniotes. Mammals also possess the more convergent (similarly facing) orbits and, on average, the largest binocular visual fields among amniotes. Based on our analyses, we propose that extant mammals retain a scotopic eye design as well as expanded binocular zones as a result of their nocturnal origin. Only anthropoid primates notably differ from general mammalian patterns, and possibly have evolved an eye shape more typical of the ancestral amniote condition.

Keywords:
Binocular vision, Birds, Eye shape, Lizards, Mammals, Orbit orientation
1.
Ali MA, Klyne MA (1985): Vision in Vertebrates. New York, Plenum Press.
2.
Allman J (1977): Evolution of the visual system in early primates; in Sprague JM, Epstein AN (eds): Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology. New York, Academic Press, pp 1–53.
3.
Allman JM (1999): Evolving Brains. New York, W.H. Freeman and Company.
4.
Arrese CA, Hart NS, Thomas N, Beazley LD, Shand J (2002): Trichromacy in Australian marsupials. Curr Biol 12:657–660.
5.
Barrett J (1938): Accommodation in the eyes of mammals. Brit J Ophthalmol 22:148–153.
6.
Bellingham J, Chaurasia SS, Melyan Z, Liu C, Cameron MA, Tarttelin EE, Iuvone PM, Hankins MW, Tosini G, Lucas RJ (2006): Evolution of melanopsin photoreceptors: discovery and characterization of a new melanopsin in nonmammalian vertebrates. PLoS Biol 4:e254.
7.
Blake R, Sloane M, Fox R (1981): Further developments in binocular summation. Percept Psychophys 30:266–276.
8.
Bowmaker JK (2008): Evolution of vertebrate visual pigments. Vis Res 48:2022–2041.
9.
Butler AB, Hodos W (2005): Comparative Vertebrate Neuroanatomy: Evolution and Adaptation, ed 2. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons.
10.
Carranza S, Arnold EN, Mateo JA, Geniez P (2002): Relationships and evolution of the North African geckos, Geckonia and Tarentola (Reptilia: Gekkonidae), based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Mol Phylo Evol 23:244–256.
11.
Cartmill M (1974): Rethinking primate origins. Science 184:436–443.
12.
Cartmill M (1992): New views on primate origins. Evol Anthropol 3:105–111.
13.
Crompton AW, Taylor CR, Jagger JA (1978): Evolution of homeothermy in mammals. Nature 272:333–336.
14.
DeAngelis GC (2000): Seeing in three dimensions: the neurophysiology of stereopsis. TINS 4:80–90.
15.
Djamgoz MBA, Vallerga S, Wagner H-J (1999): Functional organization of the outer retina in aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates: comparative aspects and possible significance to the ecology of vision; in Archer SN, Djamgoz MBA, Loew ER, Partridge JC, Vallerga S (eds): Adaptive Mechanisms in the Ecology of Vision. Norwell, Kluwer Academic, pp 329–382.
16.
Donnellan SC, Hutchinson MN, Saint KM (1999): Molecular evidence for the phylogeny of Australian gekkonid lizards. Biol J Linn Soc 67:97–118
17.
Douglas RH, Marshall NJ (1999): A review of vertebrate and invertebrate ocular filters; in Archer SN, Djamgoz MBA, Loew ER, Partridge JC, Vallerga S (eds): Adaptive Mechinisms in the Ecology of Vision. Norwell, Kluwer Academic, pp 95–162.
18.
Estes R, de Queiroz K, Gauthier J (1988): Phylogenetic relationships within Squamata; in Estes R, Pregill G (eds): Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families. Stanford, Stanford University Press, pp 119–281.
19.
Foster R, Soni B (1998): Extraretinal photoreceptors and their regulation of temporal physiology. Revs Reproduc 3:145–150.
20.
Frost SB, Masterton RB (1994): Hearing in primitive mammals: Monodelphis domestica and Marmosa elegans. Hearing Res 76:67–72.
21.
Hall MI (2005): The roles of function and phylogeny in the morphology of the diapsid visual system. PhD dissertation. Stony Brook University, New York.
22.
Hall MI (2008): Comparative analysis of the size and shape of the lizard eye. Zoology 111:62–75.
23.
Hall MI, Ross CF (2007): Eye shape and activity pattern in birds. J Zool (Lond) 271:437–444.
24.
Hall M, Iwaniuk A, Gutiérrez-Ibáñez C (2009): Optic foramen morphology and activity pattern in birds. Anat Rec 292:1827–1845.
25.
Hankins MW, Peirson SN, Foster RG (2008): Melanopsin: an exciting photopigment. TINS 31:27–36.
26.
Harmening WM, Nikolay P, Orlowski J, Wagner H (2009): Spatial contrast sensitivity and grating acuity of barn owls. J Vis 9:1–12.
27.
Heesy CP (2003): The Evolution of Orbit Orientation in Mammals and the Function of the Primate Postorbital Bar. PhD dissertation. Stony Brook University, New York.
28.
Heesy CP (2004): On the relationship between orbit orientation and binocular visual field overlap in mammals. Anat Rec 281A:1104–1110.
29.
Heesy CP (2005): Function of the mammalian postorbital bar. J Morphol 264:363–380.
30.
Heesy CP (2008): Ecomorphology of orbit orientation and the adaptive significance of binocular vision in primates and other mammals. Brain Behav Evol 71:54–67.
31.
Heesy CP (2009): Seeing in stereo: the ecology and evolution of primate binocular vision and stereopsis. Evol Anthropol 18:21–35.
32.
Heesy CP, Ross CF (2001): Evolution of activity patterns and chromatic vision in primates: morphometrics, genetics and cladistics. J Hum Evol 40:111–149.
33.
Heesy CP, Ross CF, Demes B (2007): Oculomotor stability and the functions of the postorbital bar and septum; in Ravosa M, Dagosto M (eds): Primate Origins: Adaptations and Evolution. New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp 257–283.
34.
Husband S, Shimizu T (2001): Evolution of the avian visual system; in Cook RG (ed): Avian Visual Cognition. www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/husband.
35.
Iwaniuk AN, Heesy CP, Hall MI, Wylie DRW (2008): Relative Wulst volume is correlated with orbit orientation and binocular visual field in birds. J Comp Physiol A 194:267–282.
36.
Jacobs GH (1993): The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals. Biol Rev 68:413–471.
37.
Jacobs GH (1994/95): Variations in primate color vision: mechanisms and utility. Evol Anthropol 3:196–205.
38.
Jerison HJ (1973): The Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. New York, Academic Press.
39.
Julesz B (1971): Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
40.
Kiltie RA (2000): Scaling of visual acuity with body size in mammals and birds. Func Ecol 14:226–234.
41.
Kirk EC (2004): Comparative morphology of the eye in primates. Anat Rec 281A:1095–1103.
42.
Kirk EC (2006): Effects of activity pattern on eye size and orbital aperture size in primates. J Hum Evol 51:159–170.
43.
Kirk EC, Kay RF (2004): The evolution of high acuity in the Anthropoidea; in Ross CF, Kay RF (eds): Anthropoid Origins: New Visions. New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp 539–602.
44.
Land MF (1981): Optics and vision in invertebrates; in Autrum H (ed): Handbook of Sensory Physiology. New York, Springer-Verlag, vol VII/6B, pp 471–592.
45.
Land MF, Nilsson D-E (2002): Animal Eyes. New York, Oxford University Press.
46.
Legge G (1984): Binocular contrast summation. I. Detection and discrimination. Vis Res 24:373–383.
47.
Luo Z-X (2007): Transformation and diversification in early mammal evolution. Nature 450:1011–1019.
48.
Lythgoe JN (1979): The Ecology of Vision. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
49.
Martin GR (1982): An owl’s eye: schematic optics and visual performance in Strix aluco. J Comp Physiol A 145:341–349.
50.
Martin GR (1985): Eye; in King AS, McLelland J (eds): Form and Function in Birds. New York, Academic Press, volume 3, pp 311–373.
51.
Martin GR (1990): Birds by Night. San Diego, Academic Press.
52.
Martin G (2007): Visual fields and their functions in birds. J Ornithol 148:547–562.
53.
Martin GR (2009): What is binocular vision for? A birds’ eye view. J Vis 9:1–19.
54.
Masterton B, Heffner H, Ravizza R (1969): The evolution of human hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 45:966–985.
55.
McNeill DS, Altimus CM, Hattar S (2008): Retina-clock relations dictate nocturnal to diurnal behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:12645–12646.
56.
Moradi F, Heeger DJ (2009): Inter-ocular contrast normalization in human visual cortex. J Vis 9:1–22.
57.
Nguyen AP, Spetch ML, Crowder NA, Winship IR, Hurd PL, Wylie DRW (2004): A dissociation of motion and spatial-pattern vision in the avian telencephalon: implications for the evolution of ‘visual streams’. J Neurosci 24:4962.
58.
Peirson SN, Halford S, Foster RG (2009): The evolution of irradiance detection: melanopsin and the non-visual opsins. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:2849–2865.
59.
Pettigrew JD (1978): Comparison of the retinotopic organization of the visual wulst in nocturnal and diurnal raptors, with a note on the evolution of frontal vision; in Cool SJ, Smith EL (eds): Frontiers of Visual Science. New York, Springer Verlag, pp 328–335.
60.
Pettigrew JD (1986): The evolution of binocular vision; in Pettigrew JD, Sanderson KJ, Levick WR (eds): Visual Neuroscience. London, Cambridge University Press, pp 208–222.
61.
Pirenne MH (1943): Binocular and uniocular threshold of vision. Nature 152:698–699.
62.
Qian N (1997): Binocular disparity and the perception of depth. Neuron 18:359–368.
63.
Ravosa MJ, Savakova DG (2004): Euprimate origins: the eyes have it. J Hum Evol 46:355–362.
64.
Ritland S (1982): The Allometry of the Vertebrate Eye. PhD dissertation. University of Chicago.
65.
Ross CF (2000): Into the light: the origin of Anthropoidea. Ann Rev Anthropol 29:147–194.
66.
Ross CF, Kirk EC (2007): Evolution of eye size and shape in primates. J Hum Evol 52:294–313.
67.
Ross CF, Hall MI, Heesy CP (2007): Were basal primates nocturnal? Evidence of eye and orbit shape; in Ravosa MJ, Dagosto M (eds): Primate Origins: Adaptations and Evolution. New York, Springer, pp 233–256.
68.
Rowe MP (2000): Inferring the retinal anatomy and visual capacities of extinct vertebrates. Palaeontologia Electronica 3:43.
69.
Sollars P, Smeraski C, Kaufman J, Ogilvie M, Provencio I, Pickard G (2003): Melanopsin and non-melanopsin expressing retinal ganglion cells innervate the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus. Vis Neurosci 20:601–610.
70.
Sparks D (2004): Commands for coordinated eye and head movements in the primate superior colliculus; in Hall W, Moschovakis A (eds): The Superior Colliculus: New Approaches for Studying Sensorimotor Integration. Boca Raton, CRC Press, pp 303–318.
71.
Striedter GF (2005): Principles of Brain Evolution. Sutherland, Sinauer.
72.
Tan Y, Li W-H (1999): Trichromatic vision in prosimians. Nature 402:36.
73.
Tsai JW, Hannibal J, Hagiwara G, Colas D, Ruppert E, Ruby NF, Heller HC, Franken P, Bourgin P (2009): Melanopsin as a sleep modulator: circadian gating of the direct effects of light on sleep and altered sleep homeostasis in Opn4–/– mice. PLoS Biol 7:e1000125.
74.
Walls GL (1942): The Vertebrate Eye and Its Adaptive Radiation. New York, Hafner.
75.
Warrant E (2004): Vision in the dimmest habitats on Earth. J Comp Physiol A 190:765–789.
76.
Warrant E (2008): Nocturnal vision; in Basbaum AI, Kaneko A, Shepherd GM, Westheimer G (eds): The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference. San Diego, Academic Press, vol 2, vision II, pp 53–86.
77.
Warrant E, Locket N (2004): Vision in the deep sea. Biol Rev 79:671–712.
78.
Wink, M, Sauer-Gurth H, Elsayed A-A, Gonzales J (2008): Molecular phylogeny and systematics of owls (Strigiformes); in Konig C, Weick F (eds): Owls of the World. London, Christopher Helm, pp 42–63.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.