Abstract
Interspecific variation in relative brain size (encephalization), the relative size of the five major brain areas (the telencephalon, diencephalon, mesencephalon, cerebellum, and medulla) and the level of cerebellar foliation was assessed in over 20 representative species of batoid (skates and rays), from eight families. Using species as independent data points and phylogenetically independent contrasts, relationships among each of the neuroanatomical variables and two ecological variables, habitat and lifestyle, were assessed. Variation in relative brain size and brain organization appears to be strongly correlated with phylogeny. Members of the basal orders Rajiformes and Torpediniformes tend to have relatively small brains, with relatively small telencephalons, large medullas, and smooth, unfoliated cerebellums. More advanced Myliobatiformes possess relatively large brains, with relatively large telencephalons, small medullas, and complex, heavily foliated cerebellums. Increased brain size, telencephalon size, and cerebellar foliation also correlate with living in a complex habitat (such as in association with coral reefs) and an active, benthopelagic lifestyle, but as primary habitat and lifestyle also closely match phylogenetic relationships in batoids, it is difficult to separate the influence of phylogeny and ecological factors on brain organization in these animals. However, the results of two forms of multivariate analysis (principal component analysis and cluster analysis) reveal that certain species are clustered with others that share ecological traits, rather than with more closely related species from the same order. This suggests that ecological factors do play a role in defining patterns of brain organization and there is some evidence for ‘cerebrotypes’ in batoids.
References
1.
Barton RA (1998) Visual specialization and brain evolution in primates. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1933–1937.
2.
Barton RA, Harvey PH (2000) Mosaic evolution of brain structure in mammals. Nature 405:1055–1058.
3.
Barton RA, Purvis A, Harvey PH (1995) Evolutionary radiation of visual and olfactory brain systems in primates, bats and insectivores. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 348:381–392.
4.
Bauchot R, Platel R, Ridet JM (1976) Brain weight body weight relationships in Selachii. Copeia 2:305–310.
5.
Bauchot R, Bauchot ML, Platel R, Ridet JM (1977) The brains of Hawaiian tropical fishes: brain size and evolution. Copeia 1:42–46.
6.
Bauchot R, Ridet JM, Bauchot ML (1989) The brain organization of butterflyfishes. In: Environmental Biology of Fishes (Balon EK, Motta PJ, eds), pp 205–219. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7.
Blake RW (1983) Fish Locomotion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Brandstätter R, Kotrschal K (1990) Brain growth patterns in four European cyprinid fish species (Cyprinidae, Teleostei): roach (Rutilus rutilus), bream (Abramis brama), common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and sabre carp (Pelecus cultratus). Brain Behav Evol 35:195–211.
9.
Chapman DD, Corcoran MJ, Harvey GM, Malan S, Shivji MS (2003) Mating behavior of southern stingrays, Dasyatis americana (Dasyatidae). Environ Biol Fish 68:241–245.
10.
Chu YT, Wen MC (1979) A Study of the Lateral-Line Canals System and That of Lorenzini Ampullae and Tubules of Elasmboranchiate Fishes of China. Shanghai: Academic Press (In Chinese with English Abstract).
11.
Clark DA, Mitra PP, Wang SS-H (2001) Scalable architecture in mammalian brains. Nature 411:189–193.
12.
Compagno LJV (1990) Alternative life-history styles of cartilaginous fishes in time and space. Environ Biol Fish 28:33–75.
13.
Compagno LJV (1997) Myliobatidae. Eagle rays. In: FAO Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes. The Western Central Pacific. (Carpenter KE, Niem V, eds). Rome: FAO Fisheries Synopsis.
14.
Compagno LJV (1999) Checklist of living elasmobranches. In: Sharks, Skates, and Rays. The Biology of Elasmobranch Fishes (Hamlet WC, ed), pp 471–498. Baltimore, MD: The John’s Hopkin’s University Press.
15.
Compagno LJV, Ebert DA, Smale MJ (1989) Guide to the Sharks and Rays of Southern Africa. London: New Holland Ltd.
16.
Daniel TL, Jordan C, Grunbaum D (1992) Hydromechanics of swimming. In: Advances in Comparative and Environmental Physiology. Vol II. Mechanics of Animal Locomotion (Alexander RM, ed), pp 17–49. Berlin: Springer.
17.
de Winter W, Oxnard CE (2001) Evolutionary radiations and convergences in the structural organization of mammalian brains. Nature 409:710–714.
18.
Dean MN, Bizzarro JJ, Summers AP (2007) The evolution of cranial design, diet, and feeding mechanisms in batoid fishes. Integr Comp Biol 47:70–78.
19.
Demski LS, Beaver JA (2001) Brain and cognitive function in teleost fishes. In: Brain Evolution and Cognition (Roth G, Wullimann MF, eds), pp 297–332. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
20.
Demski LS, Northcutt RG (1996) The brain and cranial nerves of the white shark: an evolutionary perspective. In: Great White Sharks: The Biology of Carcharodon carcharias (Klimley AP, Ainley DG, eds), pp 121–130. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21.
Ebbesson SOE (1980) On the organization of the telencephalon in elasmobranchs. In: Comparative Neurology of the Telencephalon (Ebbesson SOE, ed), pp 1–16. New York: Plenum Press.
22.
Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15.
23.
Garland T Jr, Ives AR (2000) Using the past to predict the present: Confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am Nat 155:346–364.
24.
Garland T Jr, Dickerman AW, Janis CM, Jones JA (1993) Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst Biol 42:265–292.
25.
Garland T, Harvey PH, Ives AR (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst Biol 41:18–32.
26.
Garland T Jr, Midford PE, Ives AR (1999) An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. Am Zool 39:374–388.
27.
Garman S (1913) The Plagiostomia (Sharks, Skates, and Rays). Vol XXXVI. Cambridge, MA: Harvard College.
28.
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Palaeontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. 4: 9 pp. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm
29.
Hart NS, Lisney TJ, Collin SP (2006) Visual communication in elasmobranchs. In: Communication in Fishes (Ladich F, Collin SP, Moller P, Kapoor BG, eds), pp 337–392. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers Inc.
30.
Harvey MJ, Krebs JR (1990) Comparing brains. Science 249:140–146.
31.
Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
Heine C (1992) Mechanics of flapping fin locomotion in the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus (Elasmobranchi: Myliobatidae). PhD Thesis, Durham, NC: Duke University.
33.
Hildebrand M (2001) Nervous System: Brain. In: Analysis of Vertebrate Structure (Hildebrand M, Goslow G, eds), pp 319–344. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
34.
Hofmann MH (1999) Nervous System. In: Sharks, Skates, & Rays: The Biology of Elasmobranch Fishes (Hamlet WC, ed), pp 273–299. Baltimore, MD: John’s Hopkins University Press.
35.
Hofmann MH (2001) The role of the fish telencephalon in sensory information processing. In: Sensory Biology of Jawed Fishes: New Insights (Kapoor BG, Hara TJ, eds), pp 255–274. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers Inc.
36.
Holmgren N (1940) Studies on the head in fishes. I. Development of the skull in sharks and rays. Acta Zool – Stockholm 21:51–257.
37.
Huber R, van Staaden MJ, Kaufman LS, Liem KF (1997) Microhabitat use, trophic patterns and the evolution of brain structure in African cichlids. Brain Behav Evol 50:167–182.
38.
Hueter RE, Mann DE, Maruska KP, Sisneros JA, Demski LS (2004) Sensory biology of elasmobranchs. In: Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives (Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR, eds), pp 325–368. London, UK: CRC Press.
39.
Hutcheon JM, Kirsch JW, Garland T Jr (2002) A comparative analysis of brain size in relation to foraging ecology and phylogeny in the Chiroptera. Brain Behav Evol 60:165–180.
40.
Ito H, Ishikawa Y, Yoshimoto M, Yamamoto N (2007) Diversity of brain morphology in teleosts: Brain and ecological niche. Brain Behav Evol 69:76–86.
41.
Ito H, Yoshimoto M, Somiya H (1999) External brain form and cranial nerves of the megamouth shark, Megachasma pelagios. Copeia 1999:210–213.
42.
Iwaniuk AN, Hurd PL (2005) The evolution of cerebrotypes in birds. Brain Behav Evol 65:215–230.
43.
Iwaniuk AN, Hurd PL, Douglas RWW (2006) Comparative morphology of the avian cerebellum: I. Degree of foliation. Brain Behav Evol 68:45–62.
44.
Iwaniuk AN, Hurd PL, Wylie DRW (2007) Comparative morphology of the cerebellum: II. Size of folia. Brain Behav Evol 69:196–219.
45.
Jerison HJ (1973) Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. New York: Academic Press.
46.
Kajiura SM, Sebastian AP, Tricas TC (2000) Dermal bite wounds as indicators of reproductive seasonality and behaviour in the Atlantic stingray, Dasyatis sabina. Environ Biol Fish 58:23–31.
47.
Kappers CUA, Huber GC, Crosby E (1936) The Comparative Anatomy of the Nervous System of Vertebrates, Including Man. New York: Macmillan.
48.
Klausewitz W (1964) Der Lokomotionsmodus der Flügelrochen (Myliobatoidei). Zool Anz 173:110–120.
49.
Kotrschal K, Palzenberger M (1992) Neuroecology of cyprinids: comparative, quantitative histology reveals diverse brain patterns. Environ Biol Fish 33:135–152.
50.
Kotrschal K, van Staaden MJ, Huber R (1998) Fish brains: evolution and environmental relationships. Rev Fish Biol Fish 8:373–408.
51.
Larsell O (1967) The Comparative Anatomy and Histology of the Cerebellum from Myxinoids through Birds. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
52.
Last PR, Stevens JD (1994) Sharks and Rays of Australia. Melbourne: CSIRO.
53.
Lighthill J, Blake RW (1990) Biofluid dynamics of balistiform and gymnotiform locomotion. Part I. Biological background and analysis of elongated-body theory. J Fluid Mech 212:183–207.
54.
Lisney TJ, Collin SP (2006) Brain morphology in large pelagic fishes: a comparison between sharks and teleosts. J Fish Biol 68:532–554.
55.
Lisney TJ, Bennett MB, Collin SP (2007) Volumetric analysis of sensory brain areas indicates ontogenetic shifts in the relative importance of sensory systems in elasmobranchs. Raff Bull Zool Suppl 14:7–15.
56.
McEachran JD, Aschliman N (2004) Phylogeny of Batoidea. In: Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives (Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR, eds), pp 79–113. London, UK: CRC Press.
57.
Michael SW (1993) Reef Sharks and Rays of the World. A Guide to Their Identification, Behavior, and Ecology. Monterey, CA: Sea Challengers.
58.
Montgomery JC (1988) Sensory physiology. In: Physiology of Elasmobranch Fishes (Shuttleworth T, ed), pp 79–98. Berlin: Springer.
59.
Myagkov NA (1991) The brain sizes of living Elasmobranchii as their organization level indicator. I. General Analysis. J Hirnforsch 32:553–561.
60.
New JG (2001) Comparative neurobiology of the elasmobranch cerebellum: Theme and variations on a sensorimotor interface. Environ Biol Fish 60:93–108.
61.
Northcutt RG (1977) Elasmobranch central nervous system organization and its possible evolutionary significance. Am Zool 17:411–429.
62.
Northcutt RG (1978) Brain Organization in the cartilaginous fishes. In: Sensory Biology of Sharks, Skates, and Rays (Hodgson ES, Mathewson RF, eds), pp 117–194. Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research.
63.
Northcutt RG (1989) Brain variation and phylogenetic trends in elasmobranch fishes. J Exp Zool Suppl 2:83–100.
64.
Pagel MD (1992) A method for the analysis of comparative data. J Theor Biol 156:431–442.
65.
Pearson R, Pearson L (1976) The Vertebrate Brain. London: Academic Press.
66.
Pollen AA, Dobberfuhl AP, Scace J, Igulu MM, Renn SCP, Shumway CA, Hofmann HA (2007) Environmental complexity and social organization sculpt the brain in Lake Tanganyikan cichlid fish. Brain Behav Evol 70:21–39.
67.
Purvis A, Rambaut A (1995a) Comparative Analysis by Independent Contrasts (CAIC): a Statistical Package for the Apple Macintosh. User’s Guide.
68.
Purvis A, Rambaut A (1995b) Comparative Analysis by Independent Contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analyzing comparative data. Comp Appl Biosci 11:247–251.
69.
Puzdrowski RL, Leonard RB (1992) Variations in cerebellar morphology of the Atlantic stingray, Dasyatis sabina. Neurosci Lett 135:196–200.
70.
Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71.
Riddell WI, Corl KG (1977) Comparative investigation and relationship between cerebral indices and learning abilities. Brain Behav Evol 14:305–308.
72.
Riede K (2004) Global register of migratory species: From global to regional scales. In: Final Report of the R&D-Projekt 808.05.081, pp 1–329. Bonn: Federal Agency for Nature Conservation.
73.
Roberts BL (1969) The buoyancy and locomotory movements of electric rays. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 49:621–640.
74.
Rosenberger LJ (2001a) Pectoral fin locomotion in batoid fishes: Undulation versus oscillation. J Exp Biol 204:379–394.
75.
Rosenberger LJ (2001b) Phylogenetic relationships within the stingray genus Dasyatis (Chondrichthyes: Dasyatidae). Copeia 2001:615–627.
76.
Rosenberger LJ, Westneat MW (1999) Functional morphology of undulatory pectoral fin locomotion in the stingray Taeniura lymna. J Exp Biol 202:3523–3539.
77.
Semeniuk CAD, Dill LM (2005) Cost/benefit analysis of group and solitary resting in the cowtail stingray, Pastinachus sephen. Behav Ecol 16:417–426.
78.
Senglaub K (1963) Das Kleinhirn der Vögel in Beziehung zu phylogenetischer Stellung, Lebensweise and Körpergrösse. Z Wiss Zool Abt A 169:1–63.
79.
Smeets WJAJ (1998) Cartilaginous Fishes. In: The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates (Nieuwenhuys R, ten Donkelaar HJ, Nicholson C, eds), pp 551–654. New York: Springer.
80.
Smeets WJAJ, Nieuwenhuys R, Roberts BL (1983) The Central Nervous System of Cartilaginous Fishes: Structural and Functional Correlations. New York: Springer.
81.
Sol D, Szekely T, Liker A, Lefebvre L (2007) Big-brained birds survive better in nature. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:763–769.
82.
Striedter GF (2005) Principles of Brain Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
83.
Tricas TC (1980) Courtship and mating-related behaviors in myliobatid rays. Copeia 1980:553–556.
84.
Tricas TC, Gruber SH (eds) (2001) The Behavior and Sensory Biology of Elasmobranch Fishes: An Anthology in Memory of Donald Richard Nelson. Developments in Environmental Biology of Fishes. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
85.
Tricas TC, Deacon K, Last P, McCosker JE, Walker TI, Taylor L (1997) Sharks and rays. Sydney, Australia: Reader’s Digest.
86.
Vogel S (1994) Life in Moving Fluids. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
87.
Wagner HJ (2001a) Brain areas in abyssal demersal fishes. Brain Behav Evol 57:301–316.
88.
Wagner HJ (2001b) Sensory brain areas in mesopelagic fishes. Brain Behav Evol 57:117–133.
89.
Walker JA, Westneat MW (2000) Mechanical performance of aquatic rowing and flying. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1875–1881.
90.
Yano K, Sato F, Takahashi T (1999) Observation of the mating behavior of the manta ray, Manta birostris, at the Ogasawara Islands, Japan. Ichthyol Res 46:289–296.
91.
Yopak KE, Frank LR (2007) Variation in cerebellar foliation in cartilaginous fishes: Ecological and behavioral considerations. Brain Behav Evol 70:210.
92.
Yopak KE, Montgomery JC (2008) Brain organization and specialization in deep-sea chondrichthyans. Brain Behav Evol 71:287–304.
93.
Yopak KE, Lisney TJ, Collin SP, Montgomery JC (2007) Variation in brain organization and cerebellar foliation in chondrichthyans: Sharks and holocephalans. Brain Behav Evol 69:280–300.
94.
Zilles K, Armstrong E, Moser KH, Schleicher A, Stephan H (1989) Gyrification in the cerebral cortex of primates. Brain Behav Evol 34:143–150.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
