The cyto- and chemoarchitecture of the cerebral cortex has been examined in three small (mouse-sized) polyprotodont marsupial carnivores from Australia (the stripe-faced dunnart, Sminthopsis macroura; the brown antechinus, Antechinus stuartii; and the red-tailed phascogale, Phascogale calura) in order to compare the cortical topography of these marsupials with that of diprotodontids, didelphids and eutherians. All three species studied had similar cortical cytoarchitecture. The isocortical surface was dominated by primary somatosensory (S1) and visual (V1) areas. Putative secondary sensory areas (S2, V2M, V2L) were also identified. The primary somatosensory cortex demonstrated clumps of granule cells in the presumptive mystacial field, whereas the primary visual area showed a distinctive chemical signature of intense calbindin immunoreactivity in layer IV. On the other hand, the primary auditory area was small and indistinct, but flanked by a temporal association area (TeA). A cytoarchitecturally distinct primary motor cortex (M1) with prominent pyramidal neurons in layer V and poor layer IV was identified medially to S1, and at rostral levels a putative secondary motor area was identified medial to M1. Transitional areas between isocortex and allocortical regions showed many cyto- and chemoarchitectural similarities to those reported for eutherian (and in particular rodent) cortex. Medially, two cingulate regions were found at rostral levels, with dysgranular and granular ‘retrosplenial’ areas identified caudally. Laterally, granular and agranular areas surrounded the rostral rhinal fissure, to be replaced by ectorhinal and perirhinal areas caudally. The findings indicate that the cyto- and chemoarchitectural features which characterize the iso- and allocortex in these small marsupial carnivores are similar to those reported in didelphids and eutherians and our findings suggest the existence of putative dedicated motor areas medial to the S1 field.

1.
Ashwell KWS (2008) Encephalization of Australian and New Guinean marsupials. Brain Behav Evol 71:181–199.
2.
Ashwell KWS, Zhang L-L, Marotte LR (2005) Cyto- and chemoarchitecture of the cortex of the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii): areal organization. Brain Behav Evol 66:114–136.
3.
Beck PD, Pospichal MW, Kaas JH (1996) Topography, architecture and connections of somatosensory cortex in opossums: evidence for five somatosensory areas. J Comp Neurol 366:109–133.
4.
Bradley AJ (1997) Reproduction and life history in the red-tailed phascogale, Phascogale calura (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae): the adaptive-stress senescence hypothesis. J Zool (Lond) 241:739–755.
5.
Celio MR (1990) Calbindin D-28k and parvalbumin in the rat nervous system. Neuroscience 35:375–475.
6.
Coleman GT, Zhang HQ, Murray GM, Zazhariah MK, Rowe MJ (1999) Organization of somatosensory areas I and II in marsupial cerebral cortex: Parallel processing in the possum sensory cortex. J Neurophysiol 81:2316–2324.
7.
Elston G, Manger P (1999) The organization and connections of somatosensory cortex in the brush-tailed possum (Trichosurus vulpecula): evidence for multiple, topographically organized and interconnected representations in an Australian marsupial. Somato Motor Res 16:312–337.
8.
Franklin KBJ, Paxinos G (2007) The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
Frost SB, Garrett WM, Plautz EJ, Masterton RB, Nudo RJ (2000) Somatosensory and motor representations in cerebral cortex of a primitive mammal (Monodelphis domestica): A window into early evolution of sensorimotor cortex. J Comp Neurol 421:29–51.
10.
Garrett B, Osterballe R, Slomianka L, Geneser FA (1994) Cytoarchitecture and staining for acetylcholinesterse and zinc in the visual cortex of the parma wallaby (Macropus parma). Brain Behav Evol 43:162–172.
11.
Haight JR, Neylon L (1978) The organization of neocortical projections from the ventroposterior thalamic complex in the marsupial brush-tailed possum, Trichosurus vulpecula: a horseradish peroxidase study. J Anat 126:459–485.
12.
Haight JR, Neylon L (1979) The organization of neocortical projections from the ventrolateral thalamic nucleus in the brush-tailed possum, Trichosurus vulpecula, and the problem of motor and somatic sensory convergence within the mammalian brain. J Anat 129:673–694.
13.
Haight JR, Neylon L (1981) An analysis of some thalamic projections to parietofrontal neocortex in the marsupial native cat, Dasyurus viverrinus (Dasyuridae). Brain Behav Evol 19:193–204.
14.
Haight JR, Sanderson KJ, Neylon L, Patten GS (1980) Relationships of the visual cortex in the marsupial brush-tailed possum, Trichosurus vulpecula, a horseradish peroxidase and autoradiographic study. J Anat 131:387–413.
15.
Huffman KJ, Nelson J, Clarey J, Krubitzer L (1999) Organization of somatosensory cortex in three species of marsupials, Dasyurus hallucatus, Dactylopsila trivirgata and Monodelphis domestica: neural correlates of morphological specializations. J Comp Neurol 403:5–32.
16.
Hutcheon JM, Kirsch JAW, Garland Jr. T (2002) A comparative analysis of brain size in relation to foraging ecology and phylogeny in the chiroptera. Brain Behav Evol 60:165–181.
17.
Joschko MA, Sanderson KJ (1987) Cortico-cortical connections of the motor cortex in the brushtailed possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). J Anat 150:31–42.
18.
Karlen SJ, Krubitzer L (2006) Phenotypic diversity is the cornerstone of evolution: variation in cortical field size within short-tailed opossums. J Comp Neurol 499:990–999.
19.
Karlen SJ, Krubitzer L (2007) The functional and anatomical organization of marsupial neocortex: evidence for parallel evolution across mammals. Prog Neurobiol 82:122–141.
20.
Kirsch JAW, Krajewski C, Springer MS, Archer M (1990) DNA-DNA hybridisation studies of carnivorous marsupials. 2. Relationships among dasyurids (Marsupialia, Dasyuridae). Aust J Zool 38:673–696.
21.
Krajewski C, Wroe S, Westerman M (2000) Molecular evidence for the pattern and timing of cladogenesis in dasyurid marsupials. Zool J Linn Soc 130:375–404.
22.
Ksiezak-Reding H, Dickson DW, Davies P, Yen SH (1987) Recognition of tau epitopes by anti-neurofilament antibodies that bind to Alzheimer neurofibrillary tangles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:3410–3414.
23.
Kudo M, Aitken LM, Nelson JE (1989) Auditory forebrain organization of an Australian marsupial, the northern native cat (Dasyurus hallucatus). J Comp Neurol 279:28–42.
24.
Lee VM, Otvos L, Carden MJ, Hollosi M, Dietzschold B, Lazzarini RA (1988) Identification of the major multiphosphorylation site in mammalian neurofilaments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:1998–2002.
25.
Lende RA (1963a) Sensory representations in the cerebral cortex of the opossum (Didelphis virginiana). J Comp Neurol 121:395–403.
26.
Lende RA (1963b) Motor representation in the cerebral cortex of the opossum (Didelphis virginiana). J Comp Neurol 121:405–415.
27.
Lende RA (1963c) Cerebral cortex. A sensorimotor amalgam in the marsupialia. Science 141:730–732.
28.
Lippolis G, Westman W, McAllan BM, Rogers LJ (2005) Lateralization of escape responses in the stripe-faced dunnart, Sminthopsis macroura (Dasyuridae: Marsupialia). Laterality 10:457–470.
29.
Mann MD, Towe AL (2003) Brain-body size relations in grasshopper mice. Brain Behav Evol 62:13–18.
30.
Mayner L (1989) A cytoarchitectonic study of the cortex of the tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii. Brain Behav Evol 33:303–316.
31.
McAllan BM (2003) Timing of reproduction in carnivorous marsupials. In: Predators with Pouches: The Biology of Carnivorous Marsupials (Jones M, Dickman C, Archer M, eds) pp 147–164. Sydney: CSIRO.
32.
McAllan BM (2006) Dasyurid marsupials as models for the physiology of ageing in humans. Aust J Zool 54:159–172.
33.
McAllan BM, Hobbs S, Norris DO (2006) Effects of stress on the neuroanatomy of a marsupial. J Exp Zool A 305:154.
34.
Naylor R, Richardson SJ, McAllan BM (2008) Boom and bust: a review of the physiology of the marsupial genus Antechinus. J Comp Physiol B 178:545–562.
35.
Paxinos G, Watson CRR (1986) The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Co-ordinates. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36.
Paxinos G, Watson CRR (2005) The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 5th ed. London: Elsevier.
37.
Paxinos G, Kus L, Ashwell KWS, Watson CRR (1999) Chemoarchitectonic Atlas of the Rat Forebrain. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38.
Reep RL (2000) Cortical layer VII and persistent subplate cells in mammalian brains. Brain Behav Evol 56:212–234.
39.
Rosa MGP, Krubitzer LA, Molnár Z, Nelson JE (1999) Organization of visual cortex in the northern quoll, Dasyurus hallucatus: evidence for a homologue of the second visual area in marsupials. Eur J Neurosci 11:907–915.
40.
Rowe MJ (1990) Organization of the cerebral cortex in monotremes and marsupials. In: Cerebral Cortex (Jones EG, Peters A, eds), pp 263–334. New York: Plenum Press.
41.
Sternberger LA, Sternberger NH (1983) Monoclonal antibodies distinguish phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of neurofilaments in situ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 80:6126–6130.
42.
Tyler CJ, Dunlop SA, Lund RD, Harman AM, Dann JF, Beazley LD, Lund JS (1998) Anatomical comparison of the macaque and marsupial visual cortex: Common features that may reflect retention of essential cortical elements. J Comp Neurol 400:449–468.
43.
Tyndale-Biscoe H (2005) Life of Marsupials. Collingwood: CSIRO.
44.
Van der Gucht E, Hof PR, van Brussel L, Burnat K, Arckens L (2007) Neurofilament protein and neuronal activity markers define regional architectonic parcellation in the mouse visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex 17:2805–2819.
45.
Vidyasagar TR, Wye Dvorak J, Henry GH, Mark RF (1992) Cytoarchitecture and visual field representation in area 17 of the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii). J Comp Neurol 325:291–300.
46.
Weller WL (1993) SmI cortical barrels in an Australian marsupial, Trichosurus vulpecula (brush-tailed possum): structural organization, patterned distribution, and somatotopic relationships. J Comp Neurol 337:471–492.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.