The thalamofugal and tectofugal pathways in birds are two parallel visual pathways to the telencephalon and might be comparable to the geniculocortical and colliculo-pulvinar-cortical pathways in mammals, respectively. It is known that some tectal neurons in the tectofugal pathway can signal the time-to-collision of an approaching object. Here we show by single cell recording in the pigeon that a population of visual neurons in the nucleus opticus principalis thalami (nOPT) in the thalamofugal pathway is able to detect the distance-to-collision of a large surface approaching towards the animal. These neurons began response firing when the surface reached a threshold distance to the viewing eye and thereafter their firing rates increased exponentially until collision occurred at distance = zero. The response onset distance is nearly constant for a wide range of stimulus velocities and is equal to the product of velocity of approaching stimulus and response onset time of a nOPT cell. Furthermore, onset distance of looming responses in nOPT cells is close to that causing cardioacceleration in the pigeon viewing the approaching surface. It appears that nOPT and tectal neurons are dichotomized functionally to a large extent for detecting imminent dangers, and the pigeon’s ability to compute the distance-to-collision of an approaching surface may benefit avoiding large obstacles during flight.

Keywords:
Distance-to-collision, Extracellular recording, Receptive field, Thalamus
1.
Bloch S, Martinoya C (1982) Comparing frontal and lateral viewing in the pigeon. I. Tachistoscopic visual acuity as a function of distance. Behav Brain Res 5:231–244.
2.
Cao P, Gu Y, Wang SR (2004) Visual neurons in the pigeon brain encode the acceleration of stimulus motion. J Neurosci 24:7690–7698.
3.
Cao P, Yang Y, Yang Y, Wang SR (2006) Differential modulation of thalamic neurons by optokinetic nuclei in the pigeon. Brain Res 1069:159–165.
4.
Catania AC (1964) On the visual acuity of the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav 7:361–366.
5.
Chen H, Li B, Diao YC (2004) Response properties of neurons in cat dorsal lateral suprasylvian cortex to optic flow fields. Neuroreport 15:1019–1023.
6.
Churchland AK, Lisberger SG (2005) Discharge properties of MST neurons that project to the frontal pursuit area in macaque monkeys. J Neurophysiol 94:1084–1090.
7.
Diekamp B, Hellmann B, Troje NF, Wang SR, Güntürkün O (2001) Electrophysiological and anatomical evidence for a direct projection from the nucleus of the basal optic root to the nucleus rotundus in pigeons. Neurosci Lett 305:103–106.
8.
Ellard CG (2004) Visually guided locomotion in the gerbil: a comparison of open- and closed-loop control. Behav Brain Res 149:41–48.
9.
Erichsen JT, Hodos W, Evinger C, Bessette BB, Phillips SJ (1989) Head orientation in pigeon: postural, locomotor and visual determinants. Brain Behav Evol 33:268–278.
10.
Fite KV, Reiner A, Hunt SP (1979) Optokinetic nystagmus and the accessory optic system of pigeon and turtle. Brain Behav Evol 16:192–202.
11.
Frost BJ, Wylie DR, Wang YC (1990) The processing of object and self-motion in the tectofugal and accessory optic pathways of birds. Vision Res 30:1677–1688.
12.
Fu YX, Gao HF, Guo MW, Wang SR (1998) Receptive field properties of visual neurons in the avian nucleus lentiformis mesencephali. Exp Brain Res 118:279–285.
13.
Gabbiani F, Krapp HG, Koch C, Laurent G (2002) Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming. Nature 420:320–324.
14.
Gallagher SP, Northmore DP (2006) Responses of the teleostean nucleus isthmi to looming objects and other moving stimuli. Vis Neurosci 23:209–219.
15.
Gibbs CM, Cohen DH, Broyles JL (1986) Modification of the discharge of lateral geniculate neurons during visual learning. J Neurosci 6:627–636.
16.
Gioanni H, Rey J, Villalobos J, Richard D, Dalbera A (1983a) Optokinetic nystagmus in the pigeon (Columba livia). II. Role of the pretectal nucleus of the accessory optic system (AOS). Exp Brain Res 50:237–247.
17.
Gioanni H, Villalobos J, Rey J, Dalbera A (1983b) Optokinetic nystagmus in the pigeon (Columba livia). III. Role of the nucleus ectomamillaris (nEM): interactions in the accessory optic system (AOS). Exp Brain Res 50:248–258.
18.
Goodale MA, Ellard CG, Booth L (1990) The role of image size and retinal motion in the computation of absolute distance by the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Vision Res 30:399–413.
19.
Gu Y, Wang Y, Wang SR (2000) Regional variation in receptive field properties of tectal neurons in pigeons. Brain Behav Evol 55:221–228.
20.
Gu Y, Wang Y, Wang SR (2002) Visual responses of neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root to stationary stimuli in pigeons. J Neurosci Res 67:698–704.
21.
Gu Y, Watkins PV, Angelaki DE, DeAngelis GC (2006) Visual and nonvisual contributions to three-dimensional heading selectivity in the medial superior temporal area. J Neurosci 26:73–85.
22.
Güntürkün O, Hahmann U (1999) Functional subdivisions of the ascending visual pathways in the pigeon. Behav Brain Res 98:193–201.
23.
Hatsopoulos N, Gabbiani F, Laurent G (1995) Elementary computation of object approach by a wide-field visual neuron. Science 270:1000–1003.
24.
Howard IP (2003) Neurons that respond to more than one depth cue. Trends Neurosci 26:515–517.
25.
Karten HJ (1969) The organization of the avian telencephalon some speculations on the phylogeny of the amniote telencephalon. Ann NY Acad Sci 167:164–180.
26.
Karten HJ, Hodos W (1967) A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Brain of the Pigeon (Columba livia). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
27.
Krützfeldt NO, Wild JM (2005) Definition and novel connections of the entopallium in the pigeon (Columba livia). J Comp Neurol 490:40–56.
28.
Li B, Li BW, Chen Y, Wang LH, Diao YC (2000) Response properties of PMLS and PLLS neurons to simulated optic flow patterns. Eur J Neurosci 12:1534–1544.
29.
Li DP, Xiao Q, Wang SR (2007) Feedforward construction of the receptive field and orientation selectivity of visual neurons in the pigeon. Cereb Cortex 17:885–893.
30.
Miceli D, Reperant J, Medina M, Volle M, Rio JP (2006) Distribution of ganglion cells in the pigeon retina labeled via retrograde transneuronal transport of the fluorescent dye rhodamine beta-isothiocyanate from the telencephalic visual Wulst. Brain Res 1098:94–105.
31.
Niu YQ, Xiao Q, Liu RF, Wu LQ, Wang SR (2006) Response characteristics of the pigeon’s pretectal neurons to illusory contours and motion. J Physiol (Lond) 577:805–813.
32.
Olberg RM, Worthington AH, Fox JL, Bessette CE, Loosemore MP (2005) Prey size selection and distance estimation in foraging adult dragonflies. J Comp Physiol A 191:791–797.
33.
Oliva D, Medan V, Tomsic D (2007) Escape behavior and neuronal responses to looming stimuli in the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus. J Exp Biol 210:865–880.
34.
Remy M, Güntürkün O (1991) Retinal afferents to the tectum opticum and the nucleus opticus principalis thalami in the pigeon. J Comp Neurol 305:57–70.
35.
Rind FC, Simmons PJ (1999) Seeing what is coming: building collision-sensitive neurons. Trends Neurosci 22:215–220.
36.
Shimizu T, Bowers AN (1999) Visual circuits of the avian telencephalon: evolutionary implications. Behav Brain Res 98:183–191.
37.
Schuster S, Strauss R, Gotz KG (2002) Virtual-reality techniques resolve the visual cues used by fruit flies to evaluate object distances. Curr Biol 12:1591–1594.
38.
Sobel EC (1990) The locust’s use of motion parallax to measure distance. J Comp Physiol A 167:579–588.
39.
Sun HJ, Frost BJ (1998) Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons. Nat Neurosci 1:296–303.
40.
Tammero LF, Dickinson MH (2002) Collision-avoidance and landing responses are mediated by separate pathways in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol 205:2785–2798.
41.
Tanaka K, Fukada Y, Saito HA (1989) Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 62:642–656.
42.
Wang Y, Xiao J, Wang SR (2000) Excitatory and inhibitory receptive fields of tectal cells are differentially modified by magnocellular and parvocellular divisions of the pigeon nucleus isthmi. J Comp Physiol A 186:505–511.
43.
Wang Y, Gu Y, Wang SR (2000) Modulatory effects of the nucleus of the basal optic root on rotundal neurons in pigeons. Brain Behav Evol 56:287–292.
44.
Wang YC, Frost BJ (1992) ‘Time to collision’ is signaled by neurons in the nucleus rotundus of pigeon. Nature 356:236–238.
45.
Wicklein M, Strausfeld NJ (2000) Organization and significance of neurons that detect change of visual depth in the hawk moth Manduca sexta. J Comp Neurol 424:356–376.
46.
Wild JM (1989) Pretectal and tectal projections to the homologue of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the pigeon: an anterograde and retrograde tracing study with cholera toxin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Brain Res 479:130–137.
47.
Wolf-Oberhollenzer F, Kirschfeld K (1994) Motion sensitivity in the nucleus of the basal optic root of the pigeon. J Neurophysiol 71:1559–1573.
48.
Wu LQ, Niu YQ, Yang J, Wang SR (2005) Tectal neurons signal impending collision of looming objects in the pigeon. Eur J Neurosci 22:2325–2331.
49.
Wylie DR, Glover RG, Lau KL (1998) Projections from the accessory optic system and pretectum to the dorsolateral thalamus in the pigeon (Columbia livia): A study using both anterograde and retrograde tracers. J Comp Neurol 391:456–469.
50.
Xiao Q, Li DP, Wang SR (2006) Looming sensitive responses and receptive field organization of telencephalic neurons in the pigeon. Brain Res Bull 68:322–328.
51.
Yang J, Zhang C, Wang SR (2005) Comparisons of visual properties between tectal and thalamic neurons with overlapping receptive fields in the pigeon. Brain Behav Evol 65:33–39.
52.
Yang Y, Cao P, Yang Y, Wang SR (2008) Corollary discharge circuits for saccadic modulation of the pigeon visual system. Nat Neurosci 11:595–602.
53.
Zhang T, Fu YX, Hu J, Wang SR (1999) Receptive field characteristics of neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root in pigeons. Neuroscience 91:33–40.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.