Segmentation is crucial to the development of the vertebrate body plan. Underlying segmentation in the head is further revealed when cranial neural crest cells emerge from even numbered rhombomeres in the hindbrain to form three stereotypical migratory streams that lead to the peripheral branchial arches. To test the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues in influencing an individual cell’s trajectory, we implanted physical barriers in the chick mesoderm, distal to emerging neural crest cell stream fronts. We analyzed the spatio-temporal dynamics as individual neural crest cells encountered and responded to the barriers, using time-lapse confocal imaging. We find the majority of neural crest cells reach the branchial arch destinations following a repeatable series of events by which the cells overcome the barriers. Even though the lead cells become temporarily blocked by a barrier, cells that follow from behind find a novel pathway around a barrier and become de novo leaders of a new stream. Surprisingly, quantitative analyses of cell trajectories show that cells that encounter an r3 barrier migrate significantly faster but less directly than cells that encounter an r4 barrier, which migrate normally. Interestingly, we also find that cells temporarily blocked by the barrier migrate slightly faster and change direction more often. In addition, we show that cells can be forced to migrate into normally repulsive territory. These results suggest that cranial neural crest cell trajectories are not intrinsically determined, that cells can respond to minor alterations in the environment and re-target a peripheral destination, and that both intrinsic and extrinsic cues are important in patterning.

Keywords:
Chick, Neural crest, Cranial, Cell migration, Time-lapse imaging
1.
Bak M, Fraser SE (2003) Axon fasciculation and differences in midline kinetics between pioneer and follower axons within commissural fascicles. Development 130:4999–5008.
2.
Birgbauer E, Sechrist J, Bronner-Fraser M, Fraser S (1995) Rhombomeric origin and rostrocaudal reassortment of neural crest cells revealed by intravital microscopy. Development 121:935–945.
3.
Farlie PG, Kerr R, Thomas P, Symes T, Minichiello J, Hearn CJ, Newgreen D (1999) A paraxial exclusion zone creates patterned cranial neural crest cell outgrowth adjacent to rhombomeres 3 and 5. Dev Biol 213:70–84.
4.
Golding JP, Trainor P, Krumlauf R, Gassmann M (2000) Defects in pathfinding by cranial neural crest cells in mice lacking the neuregulin receptor ErbB4. Nat Cell Biol 2:103–109.
5.
Golding JP, Dixon M, Gassmann M (2002) Cues from the neuroepithelium and surface ectoderm maintain neural crest-free regions within cranial mesenchyme of the developing chick. Development 129:1095–1105.
6.
Golding JP, Sobieszczuk D, Dixon M, Coles E, Christiansen J, Wilkinson D, Gassmann M (2004) Roles of erbB4, rhombomere-specific, and rhombomere-independent cues in maintaining neural crest-free zones in the embryonic head. Dev Biol 266:361–372.
7.
Guthrie S. (1996) Patterning the hindbrain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 6:41–48.
8.
Hamburger V, Hamilton HL (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88:49–92.
9.
Hunt P, Wilkinson D, Krumlauf R (1991) Patterning the vertebrate head: murine Hox 2 genes mark distinct subpopulations of premigratory and migrating cranial neural crest. Development 112:43–50.
10.
Itasaki N, Bel-Vialar S, Krumlauf R (1999) Shocking’ developments in chick embryology: electroporation and in ovo gene expression. Nat Cell Biol 1:E203–E207.
11.
Kontges G, Lumsden A (1996) Rhombencephalic neural crest segmentation is preserved throughout craniofacial ontogeny. Development 122:3229–3242.
12.
Kulesa P, Fraser S (1998) Neural crest cell dynamics revealed by time-lapse video microscopy of whole embryo chick explant cultures. Dev Biol 204:327–344.
13.
Kulesa PM, Fraser SE (2000) In ovo time-lapse analysis of chick hindbrain neural crest cell migration shows cell interactions during migration to the branchial arches. Development 127:1161–1172.
14.
Kulesa P, Bronner-Fraser M, Fraser SE (2000) In ovo time-lapse analysis of chick hindbrain neural crest cell migration shows cell interactions during migration to the branchial arches. Development 127:1161–1172.
15.
Kulesa P, Ellies DL, Trainor PA (2004) Comparative analysis of neural crest cell death, migration, and function during vertebrate embryogenesis. Dev Dyn 229:14–29.
16.
Le Douarin N, Kalcheim C (1982) The Neural Crest. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Le Douarin N, Kalcheim C (1999) The Neural Crest, 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Lumsden A, Krumlauf R (1996) Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science 274:1109–1115.
19.
Newgreen DF, Ritterman M, Peters EA (1979) Morphology and behaviour of neural crest cells of chick embryo in vitro. Cell Tissue Res 203:115–140.
20.
Osborne NJ, Begbie J, Chilton JK, Schmidt H, Eickholt BJ (2005) Semaphorin/neuropilin signaling influences the positioning of migratory neural crest cells within the hindbrain region of the chick. Dev Dyn 232:939–949.
21.
Rasband WS, Bright DS (1995) NIH Image: A public domain image processing program for the Macintosh. Microbeam Anal 4:137–149.
22.
Saldivar JR, Sechrist JW, Krull CE, Ruffins S, Bronner-Fraser M (1997) Dorsal hindbrain ablation results in rerouting of neural crest migration and changes in gene expression, but normal hyoid development. Development 124:2729–2739.
23.
Sechrist J, Serbedzija GN, Scherson T, Fraser SE, Bronner-Fraser M (1993) Segmental migration of the hindbrain neural crest does not arise from its segmental generation. Development 118:691–703.
24.
Schilling TF, Kimmel CB (1994) Segment and cell type lineage restrictions during pharyngeal arch development in the zebrafish embryo. Development 120:483–494.
25.
Smith A, Robinson V, Patel K, Wilkinson DG (1997) The EphA4 and EphB1 receptor tyrosine kinases and ephrin-B2 ligand regulate targeted migration of branchial neural crest cells. Curr Biol 7:561–570.
26.
Teddy JM, Kulesa PM (2004) In vivo evidence for short- and long-range cell communication in cranial neural crest cells. Development 131:6141–6151.
27.
Trainor PA, Krumlauf R (2000) Patterning the cranial neural crest: hindbrain segmentation and Hox gene plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 1:116–124.
28.
Trainor PA, Krumlauf R. (2001) Hox genes, neural crest cells and branchial arch patterning. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13:698–705.
29.
Trainor PA, Sobieszczuk D, Wilkinson D, Krumlauf R (2002) Signaling between the hindbrain and paraxial tissues dictates neural crest migration pathways. Development 129:433–442.
30.
Vaage S (1969) The segmentation of the primitive neural tube in chick embryos (Gallus domesticus). A morphological, histochemical and autoradiographical investigation. Ergeb Anat Entwicklungsgesch 41:3–87.
31.
Yu HH, Moens CB (2005) Semaphorin signaling guides cranial neural crest cell migration in zebrafish. Dev Biol 280:373–385.
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
2005
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.