For both humans and other animals, the abilities to integrate separate sound elements over time into coherent perceptual representations, or ‘auditory streams’, and to segregate these auditory streams from other interleaved sounds are critical for hearing and vocal communication. In humans and European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) the ability to perceptually segregate a simple interleaved tone sequence comprised of two alternating tones differing in frequency (ABA–ABA–ABA–...) into separate auditory streams of A and B tones is promoted at larger frequency separations (ΔF) between the A and B tones. In humans, segregating A and B tones into different streams also appears to be promoted at shorter interstimulus intervals (ISI) between tones within a stream (e.g., between consecutive A tones). Here, we used the ABA experimental paradigm to investigate the influence of different time intervals between A and B tones in repeated ABA triplets on neural responses in the starling forebrain. The main finding from the study is that a ΔF-dependent effect of ISI had a large influence on the relative responses to A and B tones. Responses to B tones were suppressed, relative to A-tone responses, when the A and B tones were more similar in frequency (smaller ΔFs) and occurred at shorter ISIs. We attribute these suppressive effects to physiological forward masking and suggest that forward masking functions as a mechanism for segregating neural responses to interleaved tones in tonotopic space. We discuss the relevance of our physiological data with respect to previous electrophysiological studies of auditory stream segregation in mammals and previous perceptual studies in humans.

Keywords:
Auditory scene analysis, Auditory stream segregation, Field L, Frequency selectivity, Forward masking, Starling, Streaming effect, Sturnus vulgaris
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
2005
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.