We have examined the cyto- and chemoarchitecture of the isocortex of a diprotodontid marsupial, the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii), using Nissl staining in combination with enzyme histochemical (acetylcholinesterase – AChE, NADPH-diaphorase – NADPHd, cytochrome oxidase) and immunohistochemical (non-phosphorylated neurofilament – SMI-32) markers. The primary sensory cortex showed distinctive patterns of reactivity in cytochrome oxidase, acetylcholinesterase and NADPH diaphorase. For example, in AChE material, S1 showed a heterogeneous appearance, with regions exhibiting a double layer of AChE activity (layers II and IV) adjacent to poorly reactive regions. In NADPHd preparations, activity in S1 was strongest in layers I to IV although, as in AChE material, there were consistent patches of reduced NADPHd activity which corresponded to poorly reactive regions in the AChE sections. Each of the primary sensory areas of the isocortex showed a different pattern of distribution of SMI-32+ neurons. In V1, SMI-32+ neurons were distributed in two layers (III and V) throughout the tangential extent of that region. In S1, SMI-32+ neurons were concentrated in layer V, but large and discrete patches within S1 had additional SMI-32+ neurons in layer III. In primary auditory cortex there was a dense band of SMI-32+ neurons in layer V, with only occasional labeled pyramidal neurons in layer III. In the secondary sensory areas (V2 and S2) SMI-32+ neurons were either distributed in layers III and V (V2) or solely within layer V (S2). The tangential and laminar distribution of Type I reactive NADPH diaphorase neurons in the tammar wallaby cortex was more like that seen in eutheria than in polyprotodontid metatheria.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.