In seasonally breeding adult male songbirds, the volumes of several song control regions (SCRs) change seasonally in parallel with plasma testosterone (T) levels and decrease following gonadectomy. Testosterone treatment to castrates prevents this decrease, indicating T dependency. During the breeding season, second-year (SY: birds entering their first breeding season) free-ranging male Dark-eyed Juncos (Junco hyemalis) have smaller testes than older (after second-year, ASY: birds entering at least their second breeding season) birds. SY males also have lower plasma T concentrations than ASY males at the beginning of the breeding season. We investigated differences in song structure of the two age groups and the relationship between age differences in gonadal function and SCR sizes. The average number of syllables per song, syllable duration, trill rate, song duration, and variability in song duration were age-independent. Two brain regions that are thought to be involved primarily in song learning and perception were 13 and 18% larger, respectively, in SY than in ASY males, the opposite of what would be expected based solely on reproductive measures (testis mass and cloacal protuberance width). In contrast, the volumes of two regions that directly control song expression did not differ with age. The lack of age-related size differences in regions that are required for song production may indicate that male juncos of all ages have similar brain space requirements for motor production. Where there were size differences, they were restricted to regions primarily controlling vocal behavior acquisition/perception, suggesting that first time breeders need more brain space than experienced breeders to acquire crystallized song and/or acoustically perceive aspects of their environment.

1.
Airey DC, Kroodsma DE, DeVoogd TJ (2000) Differences in the complexity of song tutoring cause differences in the amount learned and in dendritic spine density in a songbird telencephalic song control nucleus. Neurobiol Learn Mem 73:274–281.
2.
Alvarez-Buylla A, Ling CY, Nottebohm F (1992) High vocal center growth and its relation to neurogenesis, neuronal replacement and song acquisition in juvenile canaries. J Neurobiol 23:396–406.
3.
Benton S, Nelson DA, Marler P, DeVoogd TJ (1998) Anterior forebrain pathway is needed for stable song expression in adult male white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys). Behav Brain Res 96:135–150.
4.
Bernard DJ, Eens M, Ball GF (1996) Age- and behavior-related variation in volumes of song control nuclei in male European starlings. J Neurobiol 30:329–339.
5.
Bottjer SW, Hewer SJ (1992) Castration and antisteroid treatment impair vocal learning in male zebra finches. J Neurobiol 23:337–353.
6.
Bottjer SW, Miesner EA, Arnold AP (1984) Forebrain lesions disrupt development but not maintenance of song in passerine birds. Science 224:901–903.
7.
Brainard MS, Doupe AJ (2001) Postlearning consolidation of birdsong: stabilizing effects of age and anterior forebrain lesions. J Neurosci 21:2501–2517.
8.
Brenowitz EA, Baptista LF, Lent K, Wingfield JC (1998) Seasonal plasticity of the song control system in wild Nuttall’s white-crowned sparrows. J Neurobiol 34:69–82.
9.
Brenowitz EA, Lent K, Kroodsma DE (1995) Brain space for learned song in birds develops independently of song learning. J Neurosci 15:6281–6286.
10.
Brenowitz EA, Margoliash D, Nordeen KW (1997) An introduction to birdsong and the avian song system. J Neurobiol 33:495–500.
11.
Brenowitz EA, Nalls B, Wingfield JC, Kroodsma DE (1991) Seasonal changes in avian song nuclei without seasonal changes in song repertoire. J Neurosci 11:1367–1374.
12.
Burt JM, Lent KL, Beecher MD, Brenowitz EA (2000) Lesions of the anterior forebrain song control pathway in female canaries affect song perception in an operant task. J Neurobiol 42:1–13.
13.
Chandler CR, Ketterson ED, Nolan V, Jr., Ziegenfus C (1994) Effects of testosterone on spatial activity in free-ranging male dark-eyed juncos, Junco hyemalis. Anim Behav 47:1445–1455.
14.
Conover W, Iman R (1981) Rank-transformations as a bridge between parametric and non-parametric statistics. Am Stat 35:124–129.
15.
Deviche P (1992) Testosterone and opioids interact to regulate feeding in a male migratory songbird. Horm Behav 26:394–405.
16.
Deviche P, Gulledge CC (2000) Vocal control region sizes of an adult female songbird change seasonally in the absence of detectable circulating testosterone concentrations. J Neurobiol 42:202–211.
17.
Deviche P, Sharp PJ (2001) Reproductive endocrinology of a free-living, opportunistically breeding passerine (white-winged crossbill, Loxia leucoptera). Gen Comp Endocrinol 123:268–279.
18.
Deviche P, Wingfield JC, Sharp PJ (2000) Year-class differences in the reproductive system, plasma prolactin and corticosterone concentrations, and onset of prebasic molt in male Dark-Eyed Juncos (Junco hyemalis) during the breeding period. Gen Comp Endocrinol 118:425–435.
19.
Dloniak SM, Deviche P (2001) Effects of testosterone and photoperiodic condition on song production and vocal control region volumes in adult male dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Horm Behav 39:95–105.
20.
Enstrom DA, Ketterson ED, Nolan V, Jr. (1997) Testosterone and mate choice in the dark-eyed junco. Anim Behav 54:1135–1146.
21.
Garamszegi LZ, Eens M (2004) Brain space for a learned task: strong intraspecific evidence for neural correlates of singing behavior in songbirds. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 44:187–193.
22.
Gil D, Cobb JLS, Slater PJB (2001) Song characteristics are age dependent in the willow warbler, Phylloscopus trochilus. Anim Behav 62:689–694.
23.
Godard R (1991) Long-term memory of individual neighbours in a migratory songbird. Nature 350:228–229.
24.
Godard R (1993) Tit for tat among neighboring hooded warblers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:45–50.
25.
Gulledge CC, Deviche P (1997) Androgen control of vocal control region volumes in a wild migratory songbird (Junco hyemalis) is region and possibly age dependent. J Neurobiol 32:391–402.
26.
Hamilton KS, King AP, Sengelaub DR, West MJ (1997) A brain of her own: a neural correlate of song assessment in a female songbird. Neurobiol Learn Mem 68:325–332.
27.
Hessler NA, Doupe AJ (1999) Singing-related neural activity in a dorsal forebrain-basal ganglia circuit of adult zebra finches. J Neurosci 19:10461–10481.
28.
Jarvis ED, Scharff C, Grossman MR, Ramos JA, Nottebohm F (1998) For whom the bird sings: context-dependent gene expression. Neuron 21:775–788.
29.
Jarvis ED, Smith VA, Wada K, Rivas MV, McElroy M, Smulders TV, Carninci P, Hayashizaki Y, Dietrich F, Wu X, McConnell P, Yu J, Wang PP, Hartemink AJ, Lin S (2002) A framework for integrating the songbird brain. J Comp Physiol A 188:961–980.
30.
Ketterson ED, Nolan V, Jr (1985) Intraspecific variation in avian migration: evolutionary and regulatory aspects. In: Migration: Mechanisms and Adaptive Significance (Rankin MA, ed), pp 553–579. Port Aransas, TX: The University of Texas Marine Science Institute.
31.
Ketterson ED, Nolan V, Jr (1992) Hormones and life histories: an integrative approach. Am Nat 140:S33–S62.
32.
Ketterson ED, Nolan V, Jr, Cawthorn MJ, Parker PG, Ziegenfus C (1996) Phenotypic engineering: using hormones to explore the mechanistic and functional bases of phenotypic variation in nature. Ibis 138:70–86.
33.
Konishi M (1964a) Effects of deafening on song development in two species of juncos. Condor 66:85–102.
34.
Konishi M (1964b) Song variation in a population of Oregon juncos. Condor 66:423–436.
35.
Kroodsma DE, Byers BE (1991) The function(s) of bird song. Am Zool 31:318–328.
36.
MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Ball GF, Edmonds E, Sul R, Hahn TP (2005) Age- and sex-related variation in song-control regions in Cassin’s finches, Carpodacus cassinii. Brain Behav Evol 65:261–266.
37.
Marler P, Peters S (1982) Long-term storage of learned birdsong prior to production. Anim Behav 30:479–482.
38.
Marler P, Kreith M, Tamura M (1962) Song development in hand-raised Oregon Juncos. Auk 79:12–30.
39.
Marler P, Peters S, Ball GF, Dufty AM, Jr, Wingfield JC (1988) The role of sex steroids in the acquisition and production of birdsong. Nature 336:770–772.
40.
Morton ML, Peterson LE, Burns DM, Allan N (1990) Seasonal and age-related changes in plasma testosterone levels in mountain White-crowned Sparrows. Condor 92:166–173.
41.
Nordeen KW, Nordeen EJ (1992) Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches. Behav Neural Biol 57:58–66.
42.
Nordeen KW, Marler P, Nordeen EJ (1989) Addition of song-related neurons in swamp sparrows coincides with memorization, not production, of learned songs. J Neurobiol 20:651–661.
43.
Nottebohm F (1981) A brain for all seasons: cyclical anatomical changes in song control nuclei of the canary brain. Science 214:1368–1370.
44.
Nottebohm F, Nottebohm ME, Crane L (1986) Developmental and seasonal changes in canary song and their relation to changes in the anatomy of song-control nuclei. Behav Neural Biol 46:445–471.
45.
Nottebohm F, Stokes TM, Leonard CM (1976) Central control of song in the canary, Serinus canarius. J Comp Neurol 165:457–486.
46.
Pyle P (1997) Identification Guide to North American Birds. Bolinas CA: Slate Creek Press.
47.
Reeves BJ, Beecher MD, Brenowitz EA (2003) Seasonal changes in avian song control circuits do not cause seasonal changes in song discrimination in song sparrows. J Neurobiol 57:119–129.
48.
Reiner A, Perkel DJ, Bruce LL, Butler AB, Csillag A, Kuenzel W, Medina L, Paxinos G, Shimizu T, Striedter G, Wild M, Ball GF, Durand S, Gütürkün O, Lee DW, Mello CV, Powers A, White SA, Hough G, Kubikova L, Smulders TV, Wada K, Dugas-Ford J, Husband S, Yamamoto K, Yu J, Siang C, Jarvis ED (2004) Revised nomenclature for avian telencephalon and some related brainstem nuclei. J Comp Neurol 473:377–414.
49.
Samson FB (1978) Vocalizations of Cassin’s Finch in northern Utah. Condor 80:203–210.
50.
Scharff C, Nottebohm F (1991) A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning. J Neurosci 11:2896–2913.
51.
Smith GT, Brenowitz EA, Wingfield JC, Baptista LF (1995) Seasonal changes in song nuclei and song behavior in Gambel’s white- crowned sparrows. J Neurobiol 28:114–125.
52.
Smith GT, Brenowitz EA, Beecher MD, Wingfield JC (1997) Seasonal changes in testosterone, neural attributes of song control nuclei, and song structure in wild songbirds. J Neurosci 17:6001–6010.
53.
Smulders TV, Casto JM, Nolan V, Jr, Ketterson ED, DeVoogd TJ (2000) Effects of captivity and testosterone on the volumes of four brain regions in the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis). J Neurobiol 43:244–253.
54.
Solis MM, Brainard MS, Hessler NA, Doupe AJ (2000) Song selectivity and sensorimotor signals in vocal learning and production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:11836–11842.
55.
Stokes TM, Leonard CM, Nottebohm F (1974) The telencephalon, diencephalon, and mesencephalon of the canary, Serinus canaria, in stereotaxic coordinates. J Comp Neurol 156:337–374.
56.
Titus RC (1998) Short-range and long-range songs: use of two acoustically distinct song classes by Dark-eyed Juncos. Auk 115:386–393.
57.
Titus RC, Ketterson ED, Nolan V, Jr (1997) High testosterone prior to song crystallization inhibits singing behavior in captive yearling dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Horm Behav 32:133–140.
58.
Tramontin AD, Brenowitz EA (2000) Seasonal plasticity in the adult brain. Trends Neurosci 23:251–258.
59.
Tramontin AD, Perfito N, Wingfield JC, Brenowitz EA (2001) Seasonal growth of song control nuclei precedes seasonal reproductive development in wild adult song sparrows. Gen Comp Endocrinol 122:1–9.
60.
Wennstrom KL, Reeves BJ, Brenowitz EA (2001) Testosterone treatment increases the metabolic capacity of adult avian song control nuclei. J Neurobiol 48:256–264.
61.
Williams L, MacRoberts MH (1977) Individual variation in songs of dark-eyed juncos. Condor 79:106–112.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.