An in vitro brain stem preparation from turtles exhibits a neural correlate of eyeblink classical conditioning during pairing of auditory (CS) and trigeminal (US) nerve stimulation while recording from the abducens nerve. The premotor neuronal circuits controlling abducens nerve-mediated eyeblinks in turtles have not been previously described, which is a necessary step for understanding cellular mechanisms of conditioning in this preparation. The purpose of the present study was to neuroanatomically define the premotor pathways that underlie the trigeminal and auditory nerve-evoked abducens eyeblink responses. The results show that the principal sensory trigeminal nucleus forms a disynaptic pathway from both the trigeminal and auditory nerves to the principal and accessory abducens motor nuclei. Additionally, the principal abducens nucleus receives vestibular inputs, whereas the accessory nucleus receives input from the cochlear nucleus. The late R2-like component of abducens nerve responses is mediated by the spinal trigeminal nucleus in the medulla. Both the principal sensory trigeminal nucleus and the abducens motor nuclei receive CS-US convergence and therefore both, or either, might be considered potential sites of synapse modification during in vitro abducens conditioning. Further data are required to determine the role of the principal sensory trigeminal nucleus in in vitro conditioning.

Keywords:
Eyeblink, Conditioning, in vitro, Abducens, Trigeminal, Auditory, Turtles, Reptiles
1.
Anderson CW, Keifer J (1999) Properties of conditioned abducens nerve responses in a highly reduced in vitro brain stem preparation from the turtle. J Neurophysiol 81:1242–1250.
2.
Baker R, McCrea RA, Spencer, RF (1980) Synaptic organization of cat accessory abducens nucleus. J Neurophysiol 43:771–791.
3.
Barbas-Henry HA, Lohman AHM (1988) The motor nuclei and sensory neurons of the IIIrd, IVth, and VIth cranial nerves in the monitor lizard, Varanus exanthematicus. J Comp Neurol 267:370–386.
4.
Barbas-Henry HA, Wouterlood, FG (1988) Synaptic connections between primary trigeminal afferents and accessory abducens motoneurons in the monitor lizard, Varanus exanthematicus. J Comp Neurol 267:387–397.
5.
Berthier NE, Moore JW (1983) The nictitating membrane response: An electrophysiological study of the abducens nerve and nucleus and the accessory abducens nucleus in rabbit. Brain Res 258:201–210.
6.
Bloedel JR, Bracha V (1995) On the cerebellum, cutaneomuscular reflexes, movements control and the elusive engrams of memory. Behav Brain Res 68:1–44.
7.
Cabrera B, Pasaro R, Delgado-Garcia JM (1993) A morphological study of the principal and accessory abducens nuclei in the Caspian terrapin (Mauremys caspica). Brain Behav Evol 41:6–13.
8.
Cruce WLR, Nieuwenhuys R (1974) The cell masses in the brain stem of the turtle Testudo hermanni; A topographical and topological analysis. J Comp Neurol 156:277–306.
9.
Dauvergne C, Zerari-Mailly F, Buisseret P, Buisseret-Delmas C, Pinganaud G (2002) The sensory trigeminal complex projects contralaterally to the facial motor and the accessory abducens nuclei in the rat. Neurosci Lett 329:169–172.
10.
Disterhoft JF, Quinn KJ, Weiss C, Shipley MT (1985) Accessory abducens nucleus and conditioned eye retraction/nictitating membrane extension in rabbit. J Neurosci 5:941–950.
11.
Durand J, Grogan P, Gueritaud JP, Horcholle-Bossavit G, Tyc-Dumont S (1983) Morphological and electrophysiological properties of trigeminal neurones projecting to the accessory abducens nucleus of the cat. Exp Brain Res 53:118–128.
12.
Evinger C, Manning KA (1993) Pattern of extraocular muscle activation during reflex blinking. Exp Brain Res 92:502–506.
13.
Evinger C, Sibony PA, Manning KA, Fiero RA (1988) A pharmacological distinction between the long- and short-latency pathways of the human blink reflex revealed with tobacco. Exp Brain Res 73:477–480.
14.
Faulkner B, Brown TH, Evinger C (1997) Identification and characterization of rat orbicularis oculi motoneurons using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Exp Brain Res 116:10–19.
15.
Harvey JA, Land T, McMaster SE (1984) Anatomical study of the rabbit’s corneal-VIth nerve reflex: Connections between cornea, trigeminal sensory complex, and the abducens and accessory abducens nuclei. Brain Res 301:307–321.
16.
Herrick JL, Keifer J (1998) Central trigeminal and posterior eighth nerve projections in the turtle Chrysemys picta studied in vitro. Brain Behav Evol 51:183–201.
17.
Holstege G, Tan J, Van Ham JJ, Graveland GA (1986) Anatomical observations on the afferent projections to the retractor bulbi motoneuronal cell group and other pathways possibly related to the blink reflex in the cat. Brain Res 374:321–334.
18.
Keifer J (1993) In vitro eye-blink reflex model: Role of excitatory amino acids and labeling of network activity with sulforhodamine. Exp Brain Res 97:239–253.
19.
Keifer J (2001) In vitro eye-blink classical conditioning is NMDA receptor dependent and involves redistribution of AMPA receptor subunit GluR4. J Neurosci 21:2434–2441.
20.
Keifer J (2003) In vitro classical conditioning of the turtle eyeblink reflex: Approaching cellular mechanisms of acquisition. Cerebellum 2:55–61.
21.
Keifer J, Carr MT (2000) Immunocytochemical localization of glutamate receptor subunits in the brain stem and cerebellum of the turtle Chrysemys picta. J Comp Neurol 427:455–468.
22.
Keifer J, Clark TG (2003) Abducens conditioning in in vitro turtle brain stem without cerebellum requires NMDA receptors and involves upregulation of GluR4-containing AMPA receptors. Exp Brain Res 151:405–410.
23.
Keifer J, Mokin M (2004) Distribution of anterogradely labeled trigeminal and auditory nerve boutons on abducens motor neurons in turtles: Implications for in vitro classical conditioning. J Comp Neurol 471:144–152.
24.
Keifer J, Armstrong KE, Houk JC (1995) In vitro classical conditioning of abducens nerve discharge. J Neurosci 15:5036–5048.
25.
Keifer J, Brewer BT, Meehan PE, Brue RJ, Clark TG (2003) Role for calbindin-D28K in in vitro classical conditioning of abducens nerve responses in turtles. Synapse 49:106–115.
26.
Kim JJ, Thompson RF (1997) Cerebellar circuits and synaptic mechanisms involved in classical eyeblink conditioning. Trends Neurosci 20:177–181.
27.
Morcuende S, Delgado-Garcia J-M, Ugolini G (2002) Neuronal premotor networks involved in eyelid responses: Retrograde transneuronal tracing with rabies virus from the orbicularis oculi muscle in the rat. J Neurosci 22:8808–8818.
28.
Pellegrini JJ, Horn AKE, Evinger C (1995) The trigeminally evoked blink reflex. I. Neuronal circuits. Exp Brain Res 107:166–180.
29.
Ten Donkelaar HJ, Nieuwenhuys R (1979) The brainstem. In: Biology of the Reptilia, Vol 10, Neurology B (Gans C, Northcutt RG, Ulinski P, eds), London: Academic press pp 59–109.
30.
Van Ham JJ, Yeo CH (1996) Trigeminal inputs to eyeblink motoneurons in the rabbit. Exp Neurol 142:244–257.
31.
Weiss C, Disterhoft JF (1985) Connections of the rabbit abducens nucleus. Brain Res 326:172–178.
32.
Wild JM (1999) Trigeminal disynaptic circuit mediating corneal afferent input to M. depressor palpebrae inferioris motoneurons in the pigeon (Columbia livia). J Comp Neurol 403:391–406.
33.
Zhu D, Keifer J (2003) Pathways controlling trigeminal and auditory-evoked abducens eyeblink reflexes in turtles. Soc Neurosci Abs 29:78.6.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.