The hippocampal formation of mammals and birds mediates spatial orientation behaviors consistent with a map-like representation, which allows the navigator to construct a new route across unfamiliar terrain. This cognitive map thus appears to underlie long-distance navigation. Its mediation by the hippocampal formation and its presence in birds and mammals suggests that at least one function of the ancestral medial pallium was spatial navigation. Recent studies of the goldfish and certain reptile species have shown that the medial pallium homologue in these species can also play an important role in spatial orientation. It is not yet clear, however, whether one type of cognitive map is found in these groups or indeed in all vertebrates. To answer this question, we need a more precise definition of the map. The recently proposed parallel map theory of hippocampal function provides a new perspective on this question, by unpacking the mammalian cognitive map into two dissociable mapping processes, mediated by different hippocampal subfields. If the cognitive map of non-mammals is constructed in a similar manner, the parallel map theory may facilitate the analysis of homologies, both in behavior and in the function of medial pallium subareas.

1.
Able KP (1996) The debate over olfactory navigation by homing pigeons. J Exp Biol 199:121–124.
2.
Alyan S, McNaughton BL (1999) Hippocampectomized rats are capable of homing by path integration. Behav Neurosci 113:19–31.
3.
Amaral DG, Witter MP (1995) Hippocampal formation. In: The Rat Nervous System, 2nd Edition (Paxinos G, ed), pp 443–493. San Diego: Academic Press.
4.
Atoji Y, Wild JM, Yamamoto Y, Suzuki Y (2002) Intratelencephalic connections of the hippocampus in pigeons (Columba livia). J Comp Neurol 447:177–199.
5.
Baker RR (1984) Bird Navigation: Solution of a Mystery? New York: Holmes and Meier Publishers, Inc.
6.
Bannerman DM, Good MA, Butcher SP, Ramsay M, Morris RGM (1995) Distinct components of spatial learning revealed by prior training and NMDA receptor blockade. Nature 378:182–186.
7.
Bennett ATD (1996) Do animals have cognitive maps? J Exp Biol 199:219–224.
8.
Bennett AT, Cuthill IC, Norris K (1994) Sexual selection and the mismeasure of color. Am Nat 144:848–860.
9.
Berthold P, ed (1991) Orientation in Birds. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.
10.
Berthold P (1993) Bird Migration: A General Survey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Best PJ, White AM (1999) Placing hippocampal single-unit studies in a historical context. Hippocampus 9:346–351.
12.
Biegler R, Morris RGM (1993) Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning. Nature 361:631–633.
13.
Bilbo SD, Day LB, Wilczynski W (2000) Anticholinergic effects in frogs in a Morris water maze analog. Physiol Behav 69:351–357.
14.
Bingman VP, Yates G (1992) Hippocampal lesions impair navigational learning in experienced homing pigeons. Behav Neurosci 106:229–232.
15.
Bingman VP (1990) Spatial navigation in birds. In: Neurobiology of Comparative Cognition (Kesner RP, Olton DS, eds), pp 423–447. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Bingman VP, Able KP (2002) Maps in birds: representational mechanisms and neural bases. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:745–750.
17.
Bingman VP, Ioalé P, Casini G, Bagnoli P (1990) The avian hippocampus: evidence for a role in the development of the homing pigeon navigational map. Behav Neurosci 104:906–911.
18.
Bingman VP, Hough GI, Kahn M, Siegel JJ (2003) The homing pigeon hippocampus and space: In search of adaptive specialization. Brain Behav Evol 62:117–127.
19.
Bingman VP, Jones TJ, Strasser R, Gagliardo A, Ioale P (1995) Homing pigeons, hippocampus and spatial cognition. In: Behavioural Brain Research in Naturalistic and Semi-naturalistic Settings (Alleva E, Fasolo A, Lipp H-P, Nadel L, eds), pp 207–223. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20.
Boal JG, Dunham AW, Williams KT, Hanlon RT (2000) Experimental evidence for spatial learning in octopuses (Octopus bimaculoides). J Comp Psychol 114:246–252.
21.
Boal JG, Karson MA, Hanlon RT (2003) Spatial learning in cephalopods. In: 10th Annual International Conference on Comparative Cognition, p 20. Melbourne, FL: Comparative Cognition Society.
22.
Bovet J (1992) Mammals. In: Animal Homing (Papi F, ed), pp 321–361. London: Chapman and Hall.
23.
Brodbeck DR (1994) Memory for spatial and local cues: A comparison of a storing and a nonstoring species. Anim Learn Behav 22:119–133.
24.
Brown MF (1992) Does a cognitive map guide choices in the radial-arm maze? J Exp Psych: Anim Behav Proc 18:56–66.
25.
Bruce LL, Butler AB (1984) Telencephalic connections in lizards. I. Projections to cortex. J Comp Neurol 229:585–601.
26.
Burgess N, Jeffery KJ, O’Keefe J (1999a) Integrating hippocampal and parietal functions: a spatial point of view. In: The Hippocampal and Parietal Foundations of Spatial Cognition (Burgess N, Jeffery KJ, O’Keefe J, eds), pp 3–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
Burgess N, Jeffery KJ, O’Keefe J (1999b) The Hippocampal and Parietal Foundations of Spatial Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
Butler AB, Hodos W (1996) Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy: Evolution and Adaptation. New York: Wiley-Liss.
29.
Casini G, Fontanesi G, Bingman VP, Jones TJ, Gagliardo A, Ioalé P, Bagnoli P (1997) The neuroethology of cognitive maps: Contributions from research on the hippocampus and homing pigeon navigation. Archiv Ital Biol 135:73–92.
30.
Chappell J, Guilford T (1995) Homing pigeons primarily use the sun compass rather than fixed directional visual cues in an open-field arena food-searching task. Proc R Soc Biol Sci B 260:59–63.
31.
Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1994) Memory for spatial and object-specific cues in food-storing and non-storing birds. J Comp Physiol A 174:371–379.
32.
Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1995) Memory in food-storing birds: From behaviour to brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5:149–154.
33.
Collett TS (1996) Insect navigation en route to the goal: Multiple strategies for the use of landmarks. J Exp Biol 199:227–235.
34.
Colombo M, Broadbent N (2000) Is the avian hippocampus a functional homologue of the mammalian hippocampus? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24:465–484.
35.
Day LB (2003) The importance of hippocampus-dependent non-spatial tasks in analyses of homology and homoplasy. Brain Behav Evol 62:96–107.
36.
Day LB, Crews D, Wilczynski W (1999a) Spatial and reversal learning in congeneric lizards with different foraging strategies. Anim Behav 57:393–407.
37.
Day LB, Crews D, Wilczynski W (1999b) Relative medial and dorsal cortex volume in relation to foraging ecology in congeneric lizards. Brain Behav Evol 54:314–322.
38.
Day LB, Crews D, Wilczynski W (2001) Effects of medial and dorsal cortex lesions on spatial memory in lizards. Behav Brain Res 118:27–42.
39.
Duff SJ, Brownlie LA, Sherry DF, Sangster M (1998) Sun compass and landmark orientation by black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 24:243–253.
40.
Durier V, Rivault C (2001) Effects of spatial knowledge and feeding experience on foraging choices in German cockroaches. Anim Behav 62:681–688.
41.
Dusenbery DB (1992) Sensory Ecology. New York: Freeman.
42.
Eichenbaum H, Dudchenko P, Wood E, Shapiro M, Tanila H (1999) The hippocampus, memory, and place cells: Is it spatial memory or a memory space? Neuron 23:209–226.
43.
Gagliardo A, Mazzotto M, Bingman VP (1997) Piriform cortex ablations block navigational map learning in homing pigeons. Behav Brain Res 86:143–148.
44.
Gallistel CR (1990) The Organization of Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
45.
Giurfa M, Capaldi EA (1999) Vectors, routes and maps: New discoveries about navigation in insects. Trends Neurosci 22:237–242.
46.
Glickman SE (1985) Some thoughts on the evolution of comparative psychology. In: A Century of Psychology as Science (Koch S, Leary DE, eds), pp 738–782. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47.
Hagstrum JT (2000) Infrasound and the avian navigational map. J Exp Biol 203:1103–1111.
48.
Hall WC, Ebner FF (1970) Thalamotelencephalic projections in the turtle (Pseudemys scripta). J Comp Neurol 140:101–122.
49.
Holtzman DA, Harris TW, Aranguren G, Bostock E (1999) Spatial learning of an escape task by young corn snakes, Elaphe guttata guttata. Anim Behav 57:51–60.
50.
Hoogland PV, Martinez-Garcia F, Geneser FA, Vermeulen-Vanderzee E (1998) Convergence of thalamic and cholinergic projections in the ‘dentate area’ of lizards. Brain Behav Evol 51:113–122.
51.
Hough GEI, Pang KCH, Bingman VP (2002) Intrahippocampal connections in the pigeon (Columba livia) as revealed by stimulation evoked field potentials. J Comp Neurol 452:297–309.
52.
Jacobs LF (1995) The ecology of spatial cognition: Adaptive patterns of space use and hippocampal size in wild rodents. In: Behavioural Brain Research in Naturalistic and Semi-naturalistic Settings (Alleva E, Fasolo A, Lipp H-P, Nadel L, eds), pp 207–223. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
53.
Jacobs LF, Schenk F (2003) Unpacking the cognitive map: the parallel map theory of hippocampal function. Psych Rev 110:285–315.
54.
Jacobs LF, Shiflett MW (1999) Spatial orientation on a vertical maze in free-ranging fox squirrels (Sciurus niger). J Comp Psychol 113:116–127.
55.
Kahn MC, Hough GEI, Ten Eych GR, Bingman VP (2003) Internal connectivity of the homing pigeon (Columba livia) hippocampal formation: an anterograde and retrograde tracer study. J Comp Neurol 459:127–141.
56.
Kamil AC, Balda RP, Olson DJ (1994) Performance of four seed-caching corvid species in the radial-arm maze analog. J Comp Psychol 108:385–393.
57.
Keeton WT (1974) The mystery of pigeon homing. Sci Am 231:96–107.
58.
Kramer G (1952) Experiments on bird orientation. Ibis 94:265–285.
59.
Kramer G (1953) Wird die Sonnenhöhe bei der Heimfindeorientierung verwertet? J Ornithol 94:201–219.
60.
Krayniak PF, Siegel A (1978a) Efferent connections of the septal area in the pigeon. Brain Behav Evol 15:389–404.
61.
Krayniak PF, Siegel A (1978b) Efferent connections of the hippocampus and adjacent regions in the pigeon. Brain Behav Evol 15:372–388.
62.
Leonard B, McNaughton BL (1990) Spatial representation in the rat: conceptual, behavioral, and neurophysiological perspectives. In: Neurobiology of Comparative Cognition (Kesner RP, Olton DS, eds), pp 363–422. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63.
Lohmann KJ, Lohmann CMF (1996) Orientation and open-sea navigation in sea turtles. J Exp Biol 199:73–81.
64.
Lohmann KJ, Hester JT, Lohmann CMF (1999) Long-distance navigation in sea turtles. Ethol Ecol Evol 11:1–23.
65.
Long JM, Kesner RP (1998) Effects of hippocampal and parietal cortex lesions on memory for egocentric distance and spatial location information in rats. Behav Neurosci 112:480–495.
66.
Lopez JC, Rodriguez F, Gomez Y, Vargas JP, Broglio C, Salas C (2000) Place and cue learning in turtles. Anim Learn Behav 28:360–372.
67.
Lopez JC, Gomez Y, Rodriguez F, Broglio C, Vargas JP, Salas C (2001) Spatial learning in turtles. Anim Cogn 4:49–59.
68.
McNaughton BL, Barnes CA, Gerrard JL, Gothard K, Jung MW, Knierim JJ, Kudrimoti H, Qin Y, Skaggs WE, Suster M, Weaver KL (1996) Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: The hippocampus as a path integration system. J Exp Biol 199:173–185.
69.
Menzel R (1985) Learning in honey bees in an ecological and behavioral context. In: Experimental Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology: In Memoriam Karl von Frisch 1886–1982 (Holldobler B, Lindauer M, eds), pp 55–74. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
70.
Mizunami M, Weibrecht JM, Strausfeld NJ (1998) Mushroom bodies of the cockroach: their participation in place memory. J Comp Neurol 402:520–537.
71.
Morris RGM, Garrud P, Rawlins JNP, O’Keefe J (1982) Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297:681–863.
72.
Northcutt RG, Kaas JH (1995) The emergence and evolution of mammalian neocortex. Trends Neurosci 18:373–379.
73.
O’Keefe J, Nadel L (1978) The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74.
Olton DS, Becker JT, Handelmann GE (1980) Hippocampal function: working memory or cognitive mapping? Physiol Psychol 8:239–246.
75.
Papi F (1990) Olfactory navigation in birds. Experientia 46:352–363.
76.
Prior H, Lingenauber F, Nitschke J, Güntürkün O (2002) Orientation and lateralized cue use in pigeons navigating a large indoor environment. J Exp Biol 205:1795–1805.
77.
Rodriguez F, Lopez JC, Vargas JP, Gomez Y, Broglio C, Salas C (2002) Conservation of spatial memory function in the pallial forebrain of reptiles and ray-finned fishes. J Neurosci 22:2894–2903.
78.
Rodriguez R, Duran E, Vargas JP, Torres B, Salas C (1994) Performance of goldfish trained in allocentric and egocentric maze procedures suggests the presence of a cognitive mapping system in fishes. Anim Learn Behav 22:409–420.
79.
Salas C, Broglio C, Rodríguez F (2003) Evolution of forebrain and spatial cognition in vertebrates: conservation across diversity. Brain Behav Evol 62:72–82.
80.
Schenk F, Grobety MC, Lavenex P, Lipp H-P (1995) Dissociation between basic components of spatial memory in rats. In: Behavioural Brain Research in Naturalistic and Semi-naturalistic Settings (Alleva E, Fasolo A, Lipp H-P, Nadel L, eds), pp 207–223. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
81.
Schmidt-Koenig K (1979) Avian Orientation and Navigation. London: Academic Press.
82.
Sherry DF, Schacter DL (1987) The evolution of multiple memory systems. Psych Rev 94:439–469.
83.
Sherry DF, Jacobs LF, Gaulin SJC (1992) Adaptive specialization of the hippocampus. Trends Neurosci 15:298–303.
84.
Siegel JJ, Nitz D, Bingman VP (2002) Electrophysiological profile of avian hippocampal unit activity: a basis for regional subdivisions. J Comp Neurol 445:256–268.
85.
Squire LR (1992) Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psych Rev 99:195–231.
86.
Szekely AD (1999) The avian hippocampal formation: Subdivisions and connectivity. Behav Brain Res 98:219–225.
87.
Tinbergen N (1963) On the aims and methods of ethology. Z Tierpsychol 20:410–433.
88.
Tolman EC (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psych Rev 55:189–208.
89.
Walcott C (1996) Pigeon homing: observations, experiments and confusions. J Exp Biol 199:21–27.
90.
Wallraff HG (1991) Conceptual approaches to avian navigation systems. In: Orientation in Birds (Berthold P, ed), pp 128–165. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.
91.
Wallraff HG (1996) Seven theses on pigeon homing deduced from empirical findings. J Exp Biol 199:105–111.
92.
Wehner R, Michel B, Antonsen P (1996) Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. J Exp Biol 199:129–140.
93.
Whishaw IQ, Gorny B (1999) Path integration absent in scent-tracking fimbria-fornix rats: Evidence for hippocampal involvement in ‘sense of direction’ and ‘sense of distance’ using self-movement cues. J Neurosci 19:4662–4673.
94.
Whishaw IQ, Jarrard LE (1995) Similarities vs. differences in place learning and circadian activity in rats after fimbria-fornix section or ibotenate removal of hippocampal cells. Hippocampus 5:595–604.
95.
Wiltschko R (1996) The function of olfactory input in pigeon orientation: Does it provide navigational information or play another role? J Exp Biol 199:113–119.
96.
Wiltschko R, Balda RP (1989) Sun compass orientation in seed-caching scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens). J Comp Physiol A 164:717–721.
97.
Wiltschko W, Wiltschko R (1996) Magnetic orientation in birds. J Exp Biol 199:29–38.
98.
Wiltschko W, Wiltschko R, Grueter M, Kowalski U (1987) Pigeon homing: early experiences determines what factors are used for navigation. Naturwissenschaften 74:196–198.
99.
Witter MP, Wouterlood FG, Naber PA, van Haeften T (2000) Anatomical organization of the parahippocampal-hippocampal network. In: The Parahippocampal Region: Implications for Neurological and Psychiatric Diseases (Scharfman HE, Witter M, Schwarcz R, eds), pp 1–24. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
100.
Zardoya R, Meyer A (2001) The evolutionary position of turtles revised. Naturwissenschaften 88:193–200.
101.
Zhang SW, Bartsch K, Srinivasan MV (1996) Maze learning by honeybees. Neurobiol Learn Mem 66:267–282.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.