Abstract
Over the past 20 years, cladistic analyses have revolutionized our understanding of brain evolution by demonstrating that many structures, some of which had previously been assumed to be homologous, have evolved many times independently. These and other studies demonstrate that evolutionary convergence in brain anatomy and function is widespread. Although there are relatively few neuroethological studies in which brain and behavior have be studied within an evolutionary framework, three relatively well studied cases are reviewed here: electric communication among gymnotiform and mormyriform fishes, prey capture among frogs, and sound localization among owls. These three examples reveal similar patterns of brain evolution. First, it is clear that novel abilities have evolved many times independently in taxa whose common ancestors lack these abilities. Second, it is apparent that small changes in neural pathways can lead to dramatic changes in an organism’s abilities. Brain evolution at this small scale is quite common. The behavioral importance of small scale changes on one hand, and the pervasiveness of convergent evolution on the other, have several implications for understanding brain evolution. First, similar abilities may be conferred by convergent rather than homologous circuits, even among closely related species. Furthermore, closely related species may use the same information in different ways, or they may use different means to obtain the same information. One reason that convergence is so common in the biological world may be that the evolutionary appearance of novel functions is associated with constraints, for example in the algorithms used for a given neural computation. Convergence in functional organization may thus reveal basic design features of neural circuits in species that possess unique evolutionary histories but use similar algorithms to solve basic computational problems.
References
1.
Alves-Gomes, J.A. (1999) Systematic biology of gymnotiform and mormyriform electric fishes: phylogenetic relationships, molecular clocks and rates of evolution in the mitochondrial rRNA genes. J. Exp. Biol., 202: 1167–1183.
2.
Alves-Gomes, J.A., G. Ortí, M. Haygood, W. Heiligenberg, and A. Meyer (1995) Phylogenetic analysis of the South American electric fishes (Order Gymnotiformes) and the evolution of their electrogenic system: A synthesis based on morphology, electrophysiology, and mitochondrial sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol., 12: 298–318.
3.
Anderson, C.W., and K.C. Nishikawa (1993) A prey-type dependent hypoglossal feedback system in the frog, Rana pipiens. Brain Behav. Evol., 42: 189–196.
4.
Anderson, C.W., and K.C. Nishikawa (1997) The functional anatomy and evolution of hypoglossal afferents in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens. Brain Res., 771: 285–291.
5.
Ariens-Kappers, C.U., G.C. Huber, and E.C. Crosby (1936) The Comparative Anatomy of the Nervous System of Vertebrates, including Man. MacMillan, New York.
6.
Basil, J A., A.C. Kamil, R.P. Balda, and K.V. Fite (1996) Differences in hippocampal volume among food storing corvids. Brain Behav. Evol., 47: 156–164.
7.
Bell, C.C. (2002) Evolution of cerebellum-like structures. Brain Behav. Evol., 59: 312–326.
8.
Bullock, T.H. (1970) Reliability of neurons. J. Gen. Physiol., 55: 565–584.
9.
Bullock, T.H., and W. Heiligenberg (eds.) (1986) Electroreception. Wiley, New York.
10.
Bullock, T.H., K. Behrend, and W. Heiligenberg (1975) Comparison of the jamming avoidance response in gymnotoid and gymnarchid electric fish: A case of convergent evolution of behavior and its sensory basis. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 103: 97–121.
11.
Bullock, T.H., R.H. Hamstra, and H. Scheich (1972) The jamming avoidance response of high frequency electric fish. I. General features. J. Comp. Physiol., 77: 1–22.
12.
Carr, C.E., and M.A. Friedman (1999) Evolution of time coding systems. Neural Comput., 11: 1–20.
13.
Carr, C.E., and M. Konishi (1990) A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brainstem of the barn owl. J. Neurosci., 10: 3227–3246.
14.
Carr, C.E., and D. Soares (2002) Evolutionary convergence and shared computational principles in the auditory system. Brain Behav. Evol., 59: 294–311.
15.
Carr, C.E., D. Soares, S. Parameshwaran, and T. Perney (2001) Evolution and development of time coding systems. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 11: 727–733.
16.
Deacon, T.W. (1988) Human brain evolution. I. Evolution of language circuits. In Intelligence and Evolutionary Biology (ed. by H.J. Jerison and I. Jerison), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 363–381.
17.
Deban, S.M., and K.C. Nishikawa (1992) The kinematics of prey capture and the mechanism of tongue protraction in the green tree frog, Hyla cinerea. J. Exp. Biol., 170: 235–256.
18.
Edwards, J.S., and J. Palka (1991) Insect neural evolution – a fugue or an opera? Sem. Neurosci., 3: 391–398.
19.
Eisthen, H.L. (2002) Why are olfactory systems of different animals so similar? Brain Behav. Evol., 59: 273–293.
20.
Fay, R.R. (1988) Hearing in Vertebrates: A Psychophysics Databook. Hill-Fay Associates, Winnetka, IL.
21.
Ford, L., and D.C. Cannatella (1993) The major clades of frogs. Herpetologica, 7: 94–117.
22.
Geschwind, N. (1965) Disconnection syndromes in animal and man. Part 1. Brain, 88: 237–294.
23.
Harris, W.A. (1997) Pax-6: Where to be conserved is not conservative. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 94: 2098–2100.
24.
Harwood, D.V., and C.W. Anderson (2000) Evidence for the anatomical origins of hypoglossal afferents in the tongue of the Leopard frog, Rana pipiens. Brain Res., 862: 288–291.
25.
Healy, S.D., and J.R. Krebs (1993) Food storing and the hippocampus in corvids: Amount and size are correlated. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 248: 241–245.
26.
Heiligenberg, W. (1977) Principles of Electrolocation and Jamming Avoidance in Electric Fish: A Neuroethological Approach. Springer, New York.
27.
Heiligenberg, W., W. Metzner, C.J.H. Wong, and C.H. Keller (1996) Motor control of the jamming avoidance response of Apteronotus leptorhynchus: Evolutionary changes of a behavior and its neuronal substrates. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 197: 653–674.
28.
Hopkins, C.D. (1988) Neuroethology of electric communication. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 11: 497–535.
29.
Kaas, J. (2002) Convergences in the modular and areal organization of the forebrain of mammals: Implications for the reconstruction of forebrain evolution. Brain Behav. Evol., 59: 262–272.
30.
Kandel, E.R., J.H. Schwartz, and T.M. Jessell (2000) Principles of Neural Science. McGraw-Hill, New York.
31.
Katz, P.S., and R.M. Harris-Warrick (1999) The evolution of neuronal circuits underlying species-specific behavior. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 9: 628–633.
32.
Kawasaki, M. (1993) Independently evolved jamming avoidance responses employ identical computational algorithms: A behavioral study of the African electric fish, Gymnarchus niloticus. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 173: 9–22.
33.
Kawasaki, M. (1997) Sensory hyperacuity in the jamming avoidance response of weakly electric fish. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 7: 473–479.
34.
Lappin, A.K., K.C. Nishikawa, and D.J. Pierotti (2002) A proposed mechanism for high power output during feeding in toads. Am. Zool., 42: in press.
35.
Lowe, A.A. (1981) The neural regulation of tongue movements. Prog. Neurobiol., 15: 295–344.
36.
Mallett, E.S., G. Yamaguchi, J.M. Birch, and K.C. Nishikawa (2001) Feeding motor patterns in anurans: Insights from biomechanical modeling. Am. Zool., 41: 1364–1374.
37.
Metzner, W. (1993) Neural circuitry for communication and jamming avoidance in gymnotiform electric fish. J. Exp. Biol., 202: 1365–375.
38.
Metzner, W. (1999) Neural circuitry for communication and jamming avoidance in gymnotiform electric fish. J. Exp. Biol., 202: 1365–1375.
39.
Moiseff, A. (1989) Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 164: 637–644.
40.
Monroy, J.A., C.W. Anderson, and K.C. Nishikawa (2001) Neuroanatomy of a muscular hydrostatic tongue in microhylid frogs. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 27: 440.
41.
Nishikawa, K.C. (1997) Emergence of novel functions during brain evolution. Bioscience, 47: 341–354.
42.
Nishikawa, K.C. (1999) Neuromuscular control of prey capture in frogs. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 354: 941–954.
43.
Nishikawa, K.C., and C. Gans (1992) The role of hypoglossal sensory feedback during feeding in the marine toad, Bufo marinus. J. Exp. Zool., 264: 245–252.
44.
Norberg, R.A. (1977) Occurrence and independent evolution of bilateral ear asymmetry in owls and implications on owl taxonomy. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 280: 375–408.
45.
Northcutt, R.G. (1984) Evolution of the vertebrate nervous system: patterns and processes. Amer. Zool., 24: 701–716.
46.
Northcutt, R.G., and J.H. Kaas (1995) The emergence and evolution of the mammalian neocortex. Trends Neurosci., 18: 373–379.
47.
Nottebohm, F. (1972) The origin of vocal learning. Am. Nat., 106: 116–140.
48.
Payne, R.S. (1971) Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba). J. Exp. Biol., 54: 535–573.
49.
Phelps, S.M. (2002) Like minds: evolutionary convergence in nervous systems. Trends Ecol. Evol., 17: 158–159.
50.
Pichaud, F., A. Briscoe, and C. Desplan (1999) Evolution of color vision. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 9: 622–627.
51.
Randi, E., G. Fusco, R. Lorenzini, and F. Spina (1991) Allozyme divergence and phylogenetic relationships within the Strigiformes. Condor, 93: 295–301.
52.
Rebholz, W.E.R., L.E.M. De Boer, M. Sasaki, R.H.R. Belterman, and C. Nishida-Umehara (1993) The chromosomal phylogeny of owls (Strigiformes) and new karyotypes of seven species. Cytologia, 58: 403–416.
53.
Rose, G., C. Keller, and W. Heiligenberg (1987) ‘Ancestral’ neural mechanisms of electrolocation suggest a substrate for the evolution of the jamming avoidance response. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 160: 491–500.
54.
Strausfeld, N.J., and J.G. Hildebrand (1999) Olfactory systems: Common design, uncommon origins? Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 9: 634–639.
55.
Striedter, G.F. (1994) The vocal control pathways in budgerigars differ from those in songbirds. J. Comp. Neurol., 343: 35–56.
56.
Sullivan, J.P., S. Lavoué, and C.D. Hopkins (2000) Molecular systematics of the African electric fishes (Mormyroidea: Teleostei) and a model for the evolution of their electric organs. J. Exp. Biol., 203: 665–683.
57.
Volman, S.F. (1994) Directional hearing in owls: Neurobiology, behavior and evolution. In Perception and Motor Control in Birds (ed. by M.N.O. Davies and P.R. Green), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 292–314.
58.
Volman, S.F., and M. Konishi (1990) Comparative physiology of sound localization in four species of owls. Brain Behav. Evol., 36: 196–215.
59.
Wild, J.M. (1990) Peripheral and central terminations of hypoglossal afferents innervating lingual tactile mechanoreceptor complexes in Fringillidae. J. Comp. Neurol., 298: 157–171.
60.
Wray, G.A. (2002) Do convergent developmental mechanisms underlie convergent phenotypes? Brain Behav. Evol., 59: 327–336.
61.
Zakon, H. (2002) Convergent evolution on the molecular level. Brain Behav. Evol., 59: 250–261.
© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
2002
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
