Abstract
This study examined how weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii, integrate multiple sensory modalities (passive and active electrosenses, and vision) to maintain proximity to tubular structures, serving as the fish’s hiding place or shelter during the daytime. By moving the shelter along a linear 2-meter path, causing a mechanical disturbance, we challenged the fish’s shelter-seeking behavior and used the length of travel that shelter proximity was maintained (contact distance) as an indicator of how well the animal maintained its shelter. In order to determine the contribution of vision and electrosense to this behavior, four groups of fish were tested in which: (1) all three modalities were intact; (2) vision alone was eliminated by optic nerve transection; (3) the active electrosense was silenced by spinal cord transection rendering the electric organ inoperative; and (4) both vision and active electrosense were deactivated. Further elimination or minimization of various sensory cues was achieved by testing the fish with optically transparent, acrylic shelters (Plexiglas) that stimulate active, but not passive, electrosense, and aluminum shelters that theoretically stimulate all three modalities. As expected, performance was optimal when all three modalities were operating, but better than expected from quantitative models based on additive processes alone. Although the absence of one sense (vision or active electrosense) caused initial deficits, these were fully compensated for over repeated daily exposure to the task, suggesting that learning might generate sensory substitution and/or the formation of sensory expectation. Finally, environmental conditions, such as shelter opacity, also affected shelter-seeking performance, sometimes in a negative direction. These results demonstrate that: (1) the integration of multiple sensory inputs in G. petersii can be synergistic, additive, redundant, or even inhibitory, and (2) multisensory processes also take into account the respective sensory cues; i.e. (a) the prevailing ambient light intensity and optical qualities of the object; (b) the geometry and strength of the DC potential emanating from the object (‘battery effect’); and (c) the complex perceived impedance differential with the surrounding medium.
References
1.
Bastian, J. (1986) Electrolocation: behavior, anatomy and physiology. In Electroreception (ed. by T.H. Bullock and W. Heiligenberg), John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 577–612.
2.
Bell, C.C. (1986) Electroreception in mormyrid fish. Central Physiology. In Electroreception (ed. by T.H. Bullock and W. Heiligenberg), John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 423–451.
3.
Bell, C.C. (1989) Sensory coding and corollary discharge effects in mormyrid electric fish. J. Exp. Biol., 146: 229–253.
4.
Bell, C. C. (1993) The generation of expectations in the electrosensory lobe of mormyrid fish. In Contributions of Electrosensory Systems to Neurobiology and Neuroethology. Proceedings in honor of the scientific career of Thomas Szabo (ed. by C.C. Bell, C.D. Hopkins and K. Grant). J. Comp. Physiol. A, 173: 677–680.
5.
Bell, C.C., C.D. Hopkins, and K. Grant (eds.) (1993a) Contributions of Electrosensory Systems to Neurobiology and Neuroethology. Proceedings in honor of the scientific career of Thomas Szabo. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 173: 657–763.
6.
Bell, C.C., A. Caputi, K. Grant, and J. Serrier (1993b) Storage of a sensory pattern by anti-Hebbian synaptic plasticity in an electric fish. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 4650–4654.
7.
Blaxter, J.H.S. (1988) Sensory performance, behavior and ecology of fish. In Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals, (ed. by J. Atema, R.R. Fay, A.N. Popper and W.N. Tavolga), Springer, New York, pp. 203–232.
8.
Bleckmann, H. (1993) Role of the lateral line in fish behavior. In Behavior of Teleost Fishes (ed. by T.J. Pitcher), Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 201–246.
9.
Bullock, T.H. and W. Heiligenberg (eds.) (1986) Electroreception. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
10.
Cain, P. (1995) Navigation in familiar environments by the weakly electric elephant nose fish, Gnathonemus petersii L. (Mormyridae, Teleostei). Ethology, 99: 332–349.
11.
Cain, P., W. Gerin, and P. Moller (1994) Short-range navigation of the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii L. (Mormyridae, Teleostei) in novel and familiar environments. Ethology, 96: 33–46.
12.
Ciali, P., J. Gordon, and P. Moller (1997) Spectral sensitivity of the weakly discharging electric fish Gnathonemus petersii using its electric organ discharges as the response measure. J. Fish Biol., 50: 1074–1087.
13.
Crawford, J.D., M. Hagedorn, and C.D. Hopkins (1986) Acoustic communication in an electric fish Pollimyrus isidori (Mormyridae). J. Comp. Physiol. A, 159: 297–310.
14.
Crawford, J.D., and X. Huang (1999) Communications signals and sound production mechanisms of mormyrid electric fish. J. Exp. Biol., 202: 1417–1426.
15.
De Fazio, A. (1979) Object discrimination in a weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii (Mormyriformes). Ph.D. thesis, The City University of New York, NY.
16.
Hopkins, C.D., K.-T. Shieh, D.W. McBride Jr., and M. Winslow (1997) A quantitative analysis of passive electrolocation behavior in electric fish. Brain Behav. Evol., 50 (suppl. 1): 32–59.
17.
Kalmijn, A.J. (1974) The detection of electric field from inanimate and animate sources other than electric organs. In Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. III/3 (ed. by A. Fessard), Springer, Berlin, pp. 148–200.
18.
Keeton, W.T. (1974) The orientational and navigational basis of homing in birds. In Advances in the Study of Animal Behavior, Vol. 5 (ed. by D.S. Lehrman, J.S. Rosenblatt, R.A. Hinde and E. Shaw), Academic Press, New York, pp. 47–132.
19.
Kirschbaum, F. (1987) Reproduction and development of the weakly electric fish, Pollimyrus isidori (Mormyridae, Teleostei) in captivity. Env. Biol. Fishes, 20: 11–31.
20.
Kramer, B. (1990) Electrocommunication in Teleost Fishes: Behavior and Experiments. Springer, New York.
21.
Kramer, B. (1997) Electric organ discharges and their relation to sex in mormyrid fishes. Naturwissenschaften, 84: 119–121.
22.
Lamb, C.F., and T.E. Finger (1995) Gustatory control of feeding behavior in goldfish. Physiol. Behav., 57: 483–488.
23.
Lorenz, K. (1939) Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung. Zool. Anz. Suppl., 12: 69–102.
24.
Meek, J. (1990) Tectal morphology: connections, neurons and synapses. In The Visual System of Fish (ed. by R. Douglas and M. Djamgoz), Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 239–277.
25.
Mittelstaedt, H. (1985) Analytical cybernetics of spider navigation. In Neurobiology of Arachnids (ed. by F.G. Barth), Springer, Berlin, pp. 298–316.
26.
Moller, P. (1995) Electric Fishes: History and Behavior. Chapman and Hall, London.
27.
Moller, P., and J. Serrier (1986) Species recognition in mormyrid weakly electric fish. Anim. Behav., 34: 333–339.
28.
Moller, P., J. Serrier, P. Belbenoit, and S. Push (1979) Notes on the ethology and ecology of the Swashi river mormyrids (Lake Kainji, Nigeria). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 4: 357–368.
29.
Moller, P., J. Serrier, A. Squire, and M. Boudinot (1982). Social spacing in the mormyrid fish Gnathonemus petersii (Mormyriformes): A multisensory approach. Anim. Behav., 30: 641–650.
30.
Moller, P., J. Serrier, and D. Bowling (1989) Electric organ discharge displays during social encounter in the weakly electric fish Brienomyrus niger L. (Mormyridae). Ethology, 82: 177–191.
31.
Nelson, M.E. and M.A. MacIver (1999) Prey capture in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus albifrons: sensory acquisition strategies and electrosensory consequences. J. Exp. Biol., 202: 1195–1203.
32.
New, J.G. (2002) Multimodal integration in the feeding behaviors of predatory teleost fishes. Brain Behav. Evol., 59: 177–189.
33.
Prechtl, J.C., G. von der Emde, J. Wolfart, S. Karamürsel, G.N. Akoev, Y.N. Andrianov, and T.H. Bullock (1998) Sensory processing in the pallium of a mormyrid fish. J. Neurosci., 18: 7381–7393.
34.
Rasnow, B. (1996) The effects of simple objects on the electric field of Apteronotus. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 178: 397–411.
35.
Rooney, D.J., J.G. New, T. Szabo, and M. Ravaille-Veron (1989) Central connections of the olfactory bulb in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii. Cell Tissue Res. 257: 423–436.
36.
Schellart, N.A.M. (1990) The visual pathways and central non-tectal processing. In The Visual System of Fish (ed. by R. Douglas and M. Djamgoz), Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 345–372.
37.
Schellart, N.A.M., and R.J. Wubbels (1998) The auditory and mechanosensory lateral line system. In The Physiology of Fishes (ed. by D.H. Evans), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 283–312.
38.
Seitz, A. (1940/1941) Die Paarbildung bei einigen Cichliden: I. Z. Tierpsychol., 4: 40–84.
39.
Seitz, A. (1943) Die Paarbildung bei einigen Cichliden: II. Z. Tierpsychol., 5: 74–101.
40.
Shieh, K.-T., W. Wilson, M. Winslow, D.W. McBride Jr., and C.D. Hopkins (1996) Short-range orientation in electric fish: an experimental study of passive electrolocation. J. Exp. Biol., 199: 2383–2393.
41.
Teyssèdre, C., and P. Moller (1982) The optomotor response in weakly electric mormyrid fish: can they see? Z. Tierpsychol., 60: 306–312.
42.
Tinbergen, N. (1951) The Study of Instinct. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
43.
Toerring, M.-J. and P. Moller (1984) Locomotor and electric displays associated with electrolocation during exploratory behavior in mormyrid fish. Brain Behav. Res., 12: 291–306.
44.
Turner, R.W., L. Maler, and M. Burrows (eds.) (1999) Electrolocation and electrocommunication. J. Exp. Biol., 202: 1167–1458.
45.
Valentinčic, T.B., and J. Caprio (1994) Chemical and visual control of feeding and escape behaviours in the channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus. Physiol. Behav., 55: 845–855.
46.
von der Emde, G. (1994) Active electrolocation helps Gnathonemus petersii to find its prey. Naturwissenschaften, 81: 367–369.
47.
von der Emde, G. (1995) Sensory information used during food search in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii. In Nervous Systems and Behavior. Proc. 4th Int. Cong. Neuroethology (ed. by M. Burrows, T. Matheson, P. L. Newland and H. Schuppe), Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, p. 410.
48.
von der Emde, G. (1998) Electroreception. In The Physiology of Fishes (ed. by D.H. Evans), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 313–343.
49.
von der Emde, G., and H. Bleckmann (1998) Finding food: senses involved in foraging for insect larvae in the electric fish Gnathonemus petersii. J. Exp. Biol., 201: 969–980.
50.
Zakon, H.H. (1986) The electroreceptive periphery. In Electroreception (ed. by T.H. Bullock and W. Heiligenberg), John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp.103–156.
51.
Zakon, H.H. (1987) The electroreceptors: diversity in structure and function. In Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals (ed. by A. Atema, R.R. Fay, A.N. Popper and W.N. Tavolga), Springer, New York, pp. 813–850.
© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
2002
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
