Sciaenid fishes (Family Sciaenidae) could potentially serve as models for understanding the relationship between structure and function in the teleost auditory system, as they show a broad range of variation in not only the structure of the ear but also in the relationship between the ear and swim bladder. In this study, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to investigate inner ear ultrastructure of the Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus), spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus), kingfish (Menticirrhusamericanus) and spot (Leiostomus xanthurus). These species reflect the diversity of otolith and swim bladder morphology in sciaenids. The distribution of different hair cell bundle types, as well as hair cell orientation patterns on the saccular and lagenar maculae of these fishes were similar to one another. The rostral ends of the saccular sensory epithelia (maculae) were highly expanded in a dorsal-ventral direction in the Atlantic croaker and spotted seatrout as compared to the kingfish and spot. Also, ciliary bundles of the saccular maculae contained more stereocilia in the Atlantic croaker and spotted seatrout as compared with kingfish and spot. The shapes of the lagenar maculae were similar in all four species. In the Atlantic croaker and spotted seatrout lagenar maculae, the number of stereocilia per bundle was greater than those for the kingfish and spot. Given that saccular macula shape and numbers of stereocilia per bundle correlate with swim bladder proximity to the ear in the studied species, it is possible that inner ear ultrastructure could be indicative of auditory ability in fishes.

1.
Blaxter, J.H.S., and P. Tytler (1978) Physiology and function of the swim bladder. Adv. Comp. Physiol. Biochem., 7: 311–367.
2.
Chao, L.N. (1978) A basis for classifying western Atlantic sciaenidae. NOAA Tech. Rep. Cir. 415.
3.
Chapman, C. J., and O. Sand (1974) Field studies of hearing in two species of flatfish, Pleuronectes platessa and Limanda limanda. Biol. Physiol., 47A: 371–385.
4.
Chu, Y., Y. Lo, and H. Wu (1963) A study of the classification of the sciaenid fishes of China, with description of new genera and species. Monographs of Fishes of China. Reprinted (1972), Antiquariaat Junk, Lochem, Netherlands.
5.
Coombs S., and A.N. Popper (1979) Hearing differences among Hawaiian squirrelfishes (family Holocentridae) related to differences in peripheral auditory system. J. Comp. Physiol., 132:203–207.
6.
Correia, M.J. (1992) Filtering properties of hair cells. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 656: 49–57.
7.
Correia, M.J., and D.G. Lang (1990) An electrophysiological comparison of solitary type I and type II vestibular hair cells. Neurosci. Lett., 116: 106–111.
8.
Corwin, J.T. (1983) Postembryonic growth of the macula neglecta auditory detector in the ray, Raja clavata: Continual increases in hair cell number, neural convergence and physiological sensitivity. J. Comp. Neurol., 217: 345–356.
9.
Davorec, J.E. (1983) Sciaenid fishes of Western Peninsula Florida. FL Dept. Nat. Res. MRL, St. Petersburg, FL.
10.
Edds-Walton, P.L., R.R. Fay, and S. Highstein (1999) Dendritic arbors and central projections of physiologically characterized auditory fibers from the saccule of the toadfish, Opsanus tau. J. Comp. Neurol., 411: 212–238.
11.
Fay, R.R. (1978) Coding of information in single auditory-nerve fibers of the goldfish. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 63: 136–146.
12.
Fay, R.R. (1988) Hearing in Vertebrates: A Psychophysics Databook. Hill-Fay Associates, Winnetka, IL, pp. 26–156.
13.
Fay, R.R. (1992) Analytic listening by the goldfish. Hearing Res., 59: 101–107.
14.
Fay, R.R. (1995) Perception of spectrally and temporally complex sounds by the goldfish (Carassius auratus). Hearing Res., 89: 146–154.
15.
Fay, R.R., and A.N. Popper (1974) Acoustic stimulation of the ear of the goldfish. J. Exp. Biol., 61: 243–260.
16.
Fay, R.R., and A.N. Popper (1975) Modes of stimulation of the teleost ear. J. Exp. Biol., 62: 379–387.
17.
Fay, R.R., and A.N. Popper (1980) Structure and function in teleost auditory systems. In Comparative Studies of Hearing in Vertebrates (ed. by R.R. Fay and A.N. Popper), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 3–42.
18.
Fay, R.R., and A.N. Popper (2000) Evolution of hearing in vertebrates: The inner ears and processing. Hearing Res., 149: 1–10.
19.
Furukawa, T., and Y. Ishii (1967) Neuropysiological studies on hearing in goldfish. J. Neurophysiol., 30: 1377–1407.
20.
Gleich, O., and G.A. Manley (2000) Hearing organs of birds and crocodilian. In Comparative Hearing: Birds and Reptiles (ed. by R.J. Dooling, R.R. Fay and A.N. Popper), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 70–138.
21.
Higgs, D.M., M.J. Souza, H.R. Wilkins, J.C. Presson, and A.N. Popper (2002) Age- and size-related changes in the inner ear and hearing ability of the adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). JARO, 3 (in press).
22.
Hudspeth, A.J., and D.P. Corey (1977) Sensitivity, polarity and conductance change in response of vertebrate hair cells to controlled mechanical stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 74: 2407–2411.
23.
Köppl, C., O. Gleich, G. Schwabedissen, E. Siegl, and G.A. Manley (1998) Fine structure of the basillar papilla of the emu: implications for the evolution of avian hair cell types. Hearing Res., 126: 99–112.
24.
Lu, Z., and A.N. Popper (2001). Neural response directionality correlates of hair cell orientation in a teleost fish. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 187: 453–465.
25.
Platt, C. (1977) Hair cell distribution and orientation in goldfish otolith organs. J. Comp. Neurol., 172: 283–297.
26.
Platt, C., and A.N. Popper (1984) Variations in lengths of ciliary bundles on hair cells along the macula of the sacculus in two species of teleost fishes. SEM/1984/IV: 1915–1924.
27.
Popper, A.N. (1977) A scanning electron microscope study of the sacculus and lagena in the ears of fifteen species of teleost fishes. J. Morphol., 153: 397–418.
28.
Popper, A.N. (1978) Scanning electron microscope study of the otolith organs in the birchir (Polypterus bichir) and shovel-nose sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus platorhynchus). J. Comp. Neurol., 18:117–128.
29.
Popper, A.N. (1981) Comparative scanning electron microscopic investigations of the sensory epithelia in the teleost sacculus and lagena. J. Comp. Neurol., 200: 357–374.
30.
Popper, A.N. (1983) Organization of the inner ear and auditory processing. In Fish Neurobiology (ed. by R.E. Davis and R.G. Northcutt), University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 125–178.
31.
Popper, A.N., and S. Coombs (1982) The morphology and evolution of the ear in actinopterygian fishes. Am. Zool., 22: 311–328.
32.
Popper, A.N., and R.R. Fay (1999) The auditory periphery in fishes. In Comparative Hearing: Fish and Amphibians (ed. by R.R. Fay and A.N. Popper), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 43–100.
33.
Popper A.N., and Z. Lu (2000) Structure-function relationships in fish otolith organs. Fish. Res., 46: 15–25.
34.
Popper, A.N., P.H. Rogers, W.M. Saidel, and M. Cox (1988) The role of the fish ear in sound processing. In Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals (ed. by J. Atema, R.R. Fay, A.N. Popper and W.N. Tavolga), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 687–710.
35.
Schellart, N.A.M., and A.N. Popper (1992) Functional aspects of the evolution of the auditory system of actinopterygian fish. In The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing. (ed. by R.R. Fay, A.N. Popper and D.B. Webster), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 295–322.
36.
Schuijf, A., and A.D. Hawkins (1983) Acoustic distance discrimination by the cod. Nature, 302:143–144.
37.
Sneary, M., and D. Bellin (2000) Scanning electron microscopy of the turtle saccule. ARO, Winter Meeting Abstract # 586.
38.
Steen, J.B. (1970) The swim bladder as a hydrostatic organ. In Fish Physiology, Vol. IV (ed. by W.S. Hoar and D.J. Randall), Academic Press, New York, pp. 413–443.
39.
Sugihara, I., and T. Furukawa (1989) Morphological and functional aspects of two different types of hair cells in the goldfish sacculus. J. Neurophysiol., 62 (6): 1330–1343.
40.
Trewavas, E. (1962) A basis for classifying the sciaenid fishes of tropical West Africa. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 13 (5): 167–176.
41.
Zar, J.H. (1984) Biostatistical Analysis (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.