Weakly electric fish are good model animals to study the evolution of interspecific and sexual differences in communication signals. This is because the neural circuits producing these signals are simple and conserved among related species while the signals are highly species-specific, sexually-dimorphic, and under hormonal control. Here we focus on two related species of weakly electric gymnotiform fish that emit a wave-type discharge. These species differ in the direction of the sexual dimorphism of their electric organ discharge (EOD) frequencies and their propensity to produce aggressive communication signals called ‘chirps’. Brown ghost (Apteronotus leptorhynchus) males produce high frequency EODs while females produce low frequency EODs. When presented with an EOD mimic, males chirp frequently, while females seldom chirp. By contrast, black ghost (A. albifrons) males discharge at lower EOD frequencies than females, and there is no sex difference in chirping in this species. Accordingly, non-aromatizable androgens raise EOD frequency in brown ghosts, but lower it in black ghosts. Androgens induce chirping in female brown ghosts, but do not increase the propensity to chirp in female black ghosts. Thus, the difference in sexually-dimorphic communication signals between these two species can be explained by differences in their responses to sex steroids. Future studies will elucidate how the neural circuits generating these signals are differentially sensitive to steroids in these species.

Keywords:
Estrogen, Testosterone, Dihydrotestosterone, Electric fish, Apteronotus, EOD, Pacemaker neurons, Species differences
1.
Albert, J.S., M.J. Lannoo, and T. Yuri (1998) Testing hypotheses of neural evolution in gymnotiform electric fishes using phylogenetic character data. Evolution, 52: 1760–1780.
2.
Alves-Gomes, J.A. (1998) The phylogenetic position of the South American electric fish genera Sternopygus and Archolaemus (Ostariophysi: Gymnotiformes) according to 12S and 16S mitochondrial DNA sequences. In Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. Part 4. Gymnotiformes (ed. by L.R. Malabarba, R.E. Reis, R.P. Vari, Z.M. Lucena, and C.A.S. Lucena), Edipucrs, Porto Alegre, pp. 447–460.
3.
Alves-Gomes, J.A., G. Orti, M. Haygood, A. Meyer, and W. Heiligenberg (1995) Phylogenetic analysis of the South American electric fishes (order gymnotiformes) and the evolution of their electrogenic system: a synthesis based on morphology, electrophysiology, and mitochondrial sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol., 12: 298–318.
4.
Bennett, M.V.L., G.D. Pappas, M. Gimenez, and Y. Nakajima (1967) Physiology and ultrastructure of electrotonic junctions. IV. Medullary electromotor nuclei in gymnotid fish. J. Neurophysiol., 30: 236–300.
5.
Bullock, T.H. (1969) Species differences in effect of electroreceptor input on electric organ pacemakers and other aspects of behavior in electric fish. Brain Behav. Evol., 2: 85–118.
6.
Demski, L.S., and J.G. Dulka (1986) Thalamic stimulation evokes sex-color change and gamete release in a vertebrate hermaphrodite. Experientia, 42: 1285–1287.
7.
Dulka, J., and L. Maler (1994) Testosterone modulates female chirping behavior in the weakly electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 174: 331–343.
8.
Dulka, J.G. (1997) Androgen-induced neural plasticity and the regulation of electric-social behavior in the brown ghost knifefish: current status and future directions. Fish Physiol. Biochem., 17: 195–202.
9.
Dulka, J.G., L. Maler, and W. Ellis (1995) Androgen-induced changes in electrocommunicatory behavior are correlated with changes in substance P-like immunoreactivity in the brain of the electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus. J. Neurosci., 15: 1879–1890.
10.
Dunlap, K., and H.H. Zakon (1998a) Chirping responses of male electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus, to conspecifics and to playback of electric signals. Abstr. Fifth Int. Congress of Neuroethol. Abstr., 325.
11.
Dunlap, K.D., and H.H. Zakon (1998b) Behavioral actions of androgens and androgen receptor expression in the electrocommunication system of an electric fish, Eigenmannia virescens. Horm. and Behav., 34: 30–38.
12.
Dunlap, K., P. Thomas, and H.H. Zakon (1998) Diversity of sexual dimorphism in electrocommunication signals and its androgen regulation in a genus of electric fish, Apteronotus. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 183: 77–86.
13.
Dye, J. (1987) Dynamics and stimulus-dependence of pacemaker control during behavioral modulations in the weakly electric fish, Apteronotus. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 161: 175–185.
14.
Dye, J. (1991) Ionic and synaptic mechanisms underlying a brainstem oscillator: an in vitro study of the pacemaker nucleus of Apteronotus. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 168: 521–532.
15.
Hagedorn, M., and W. Heiligenberg (1985) Court and speark: electric signals in the courtship and mating of gymnotid fish. Anim. Behav., 32: 254–265.
16.
Hohn, E.O. (1969) The phalarope. Sci. Amer., 220: 105–111.
17.
Juranek, J., and W. Metzner (1997) Cellular characterization of synaptic modulations of a neuronal oscillator in electric fish. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 181: 393–414.
18.
Kawasaki, M., and W. Heiligenberg (1988) Individual prepacemaker neurons can modulate the pacemaker cycle of the gymnotiform electric fish, Eigenmannia. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 162: 13–21.
19.
Kawasaki, M., and W. Heiligenberg (1989) Distinct mechanisms of modulation in a neuronal oscillator generate different social signals in the electric fish Hypopomus. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 165: 731–741.
20.
Kawasaki, M., and W. Heiligenberg (1990) Different classes of glutamate receptors and GABA mediate distinct modulations of a neuronal oscillator, the medullary pacemaker of a gymnotiform electric fish. J. Neurosci., 10: 3896– 3904.
21.
Kirschbaum, F. (1983) Myogenic electric organ precedes the neurogenic organ in Apteronotid fish. Naturwiss., 70: 205–206.
22.
Larimer, J.L., and J.A. Macdonald (1968) Sensory feedback from electroreceptors to electromotor centres in gymnotids. Am. J. Physiol., 214: 1253–1261.
23.
Metzner, W. (1993) The jamming avoidance response in Eigenmannia is controlled by two separate motor pathways. J. Neurosci., 13: 1862–1878.
24.
Meyer, J.H., M. Leong, and C.H. Keller (1987) Hormone-induced and ontogenetic changes in electric organ discharge and electroreceptor tuning in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 160: 385–394.
25.
Murray, J.A. (1995) Spectral and temporal analysis of male and female courtship signals in the gymnotiform electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus. Abstr. 4th Int. Congr. Neuroethol. Abstr., 412.
26.
Norman, A.W., and G. Litwack (1987) Hormones, Academic Press, New York, p. 806.
27.
Pasmanik, M., and G. Callard (1988) A high abundance androgen receptor in goldfish brain: characteristics and seasonal changes. Endocrinol., 123: 1162–1171.
28.
Schaefer, J., and H.H. Zakon (1996) Opposing actions of androgen and estrogen on in vitro firing frequency of neuronal oscillators in the electromotor system. J. Neurosci., 16: 2860– 2868.
29.
Sperry, T.S., and P. Thomas (1999) Characterization of two nuclear androgen receptors in Atlantic Croaker: comparison of their biochemical properties and binding specificities. Endocrinol., 140: 1602–1611.
30.
Turner, R.W., and L.L. Moroz (1995) Localization of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-diaphorase activity in electrosensory and electromotor systems of a gymnotiform teleost, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. J. Comp. Neurol., 356: 261–274.
31.
Watson, J.T., and D.B. Kelley (1992) Testicular masculinization of vocal behavior in juvenile female Xenopus laevis reveals periods for song duration, rate, and frequency spectra. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 171: 343–350.
32.
Watson, J.T., J. Robertson, U. Sachdev, and D.B. Kelley (1993) Laryngeal muscle and motor neuron plasticity in Xenopus laevis: testicular masculinization of a developing neuromuscular system. J. Neurobiol., 24: 1615–1625.
33.
Waxman, S.G., G.D. Pappas, and M.V.L. Bennett (1972) Morphological correlates of functional differentiation of nodes of Ranvier along single fibers in the neurogenic electric organ of the knife fish Sternarchus. J. Cell Biol., 53: 210– 244.
34.
Weld, M.M., and L. Maler (1992) Substance P-like immunoreactivity in the brain of the gymnotiform fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus: presence of sex differences. J. Chem. Neuroanat., 7: 123–139.
35.
Weld, M.M., S. Kar, L. Maler, and R. Quirion (1994) The distribution of tachykinin binding sites in the brain of an electric fish (Apteronotus leptorhynchus). J. Chem. Neuroanat., 5: 107– 129.
36.
Weld, M.M., L. Maler, R. Quirion, and S. Kar (1991) Sexually dimorphic distribution of substance P and its role in the regulation of communication in an electric fish. Abstr. Soc. Neurosci., 17: 1407.
37.
Wong, C.J. (1997) Afferent and efferent connections of the diencephalic prepacemaker nucleus in the weakly electric fish, Eigenmannia virescens: interactions between the electromotor system and the neuroendocrine axis. J. Comp. Neurol., 383: 18–41.
38.
Zakon, H. (1999) Sex steroids and weakly electric fish: a model system for activational mechanisms of hormone action. In Sexual Differentiation of the Brain (ed. by A. Matsumoto), CRC Press, Boca Raton (in press).
39.
Zakon, H.H., P. Thomas, and H.-Y. Yan (1991) Electric organ discharge frequency and plasma sex steroid levels during gonadal recrudescence in a natural population of the weakly electric fish Sternopygus macrurus. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 169: 493–499.
40.
Zucker, M.S. (1997) Hormonal basis of sexual dimorphism in and steroid sensitivity of the electric organ discharge frequency of the gymnotiform fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
41.
Zupanc, G.K.H., and W. Heiligenberg (1992) The structure of the diencephalic prepacemaker nucleus revisited: light microscopic and ultrastructural studies. J. Comp. Neurol., 323: 558– 569.
42.
Zupanc, G., and L. Maler (1993) Evoked chirping in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus: a quantitative biophysical analysis. Canadian J. Zool., 71: 2301–2310.
1999
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.