Nucleus taenia (Tn) in birds is a discrete component of a loosely defined archistriatal structure, the posterior and medial archistriatum. By virtue of its hypothalamic projections, the posterior and medial archistriatum is thought to be an avian homolog of the amygdala in mammals. A recent fluorogold (FG) study of avian hippocampus revealed backfilled labels in nucleus Tn, suggesting that this nucleus may indeed be the homolog of mammalian amygdala. In the present study, we sought to characterize nucleus Tn in terms of its connections and function. We used the anterograde tracers Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHAL) and biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) to map the efferent projections of Tn. The retrograde tracers FG and BDA were used to corroborate the efferent projections and to explore the pattern of afferent inputs to Tn. Finally, we explored the role of Tn in social behavior by observing behavioral changes associated with electrolytic lesions to Tn. The subjects of our studies were ring doves and European starlings, representing two avian orders. When a deposit of anterograde tracer was centered in Tn, it revealed projections to the hypothalamus, following the course of the hypothalamic-occipitomesencephalic tract previously reported in pigeons. The projections were bilateral in ring doves and ipsilateral in starlings. The BDA injections in the archistratum intermedium, lateral to Tn, did not yield the same projectional pattern. Together with corroborative data from FG retrograde experiments, these findings suggest that Tn is probably the primary origin of the hypothalamic projection. A robust projection to the hyperstriatal region was present along the lateral wall of the lateral ventricle, continuing into the anteroventral pole of the ventricle. Highly arborized terminal fields were found all along this pathway, notably in the medial parolfactory lobe (corresponding to the basal ganglia) and along the dorsal roof of the rostral hyperstriatum ventrale just ventral to the laminal frontalis superior (in ring doves) and the lamina frontalis suprema (in starlings). Projections to the hippocampal complex were mostly restricted to the parahippocampus. The FG data suggest the presence of afferent projections from the ovoidais shell and nucleus subrotundus region, the hippocampal complex in both species, and high vocal nucleus in starlings. Behavioral effects of Tn lesions suggest that nucleus taenia is involved in the control of social behavior through its influence on the affective state. Nucleus taenia thus exhibits many of the structural and functional features of the amygdaloid complex in mammals – that is, subcortical sensory inputs, hippocampal complex connections, and a functional role in adaptive patterns of social behavior.

Keywords:
Nucleus taenia, Amygdala, Hippocampus, Emotion, Ring doves, Starlings
1.
Aggleton, J.P. (1992) The functional effects of amygdala lesions in human: a comparison with findings from monkeys. In The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion. Memory, and Mental Dysfunction (ed. by J.P. Aggleton), Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 485–503.
2.
Alvarez-Buylla, A., M. Theelen, and F. Nottebohm (1990) Proliferation ‘hot spots’ in adult avian ventricular zone reveal radial glial cell divisions. Neuron, 5: 101–109.
3.
Amaral, D.G., and W.M. Cowan (1980) Subcortical afferents to the hippocampal formation in the monkey. J. Comp. Neurol., 189: 573–591.
4.
Brown, T.H., and A.M. Zador (1990) Hippocampus. In The Synaptic Organization of the Brain (ed. by G.M. Shepherd), Oxford Press, New York, pp. 346–388.
5.
Casini, G., V.P. Bingman, and P. Bagnoli (1986) Connections of the pigeon forebrain studied with WGA-HRP and 3H-proline. J. Comp. Neurol., 245: 454–470.
6.
Cheng, M.F. (1992) For whom does the female dove coo? A case for the role of vocal self-stimulation. Anim. Behav., 43: 1035–1044.
7.
Cheng, M.F., and M. Zuo (1994) Proposed pathways for vocal self-stimulation: met-enkephalinergic projections linking the midbrain vocal nucleus, auditory-responsive thalamic regions and neurosecretory hypothalamus. J. Neurobiol., 25: 361–379.
8.
Cheng, M.F., T.R. Akesson, and N.C. de Lanerolle (1987) Retrograde HRP demonstration of afferent projections to the midbrain and nest calls in the ring dove. Brain Res. Bull., 18: 45–48.
9.
Cheng, M.F., J.P. Peng, and P. Johnson (1998) Hypothalamic neurons preferentially respond to female nest coo stimulation: demonstration of direct acoustic stimulation of luteinizing hormone release. J. Neurosci., 18(14): 5477–5489.
10.
Cohen, D.H., and R.L. Macdonald (1974) A selective review of central neural pathways involved in cardiovascular control. In Cardiovascular Psychophysiology-Current Issues in Response Mechanisms, Biofeedback and Methodology (ed. by P.A. Orbrist, A.H. Black, J. Brener, and L.V. DiCara), Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago, pp. 24–56.
11.
Cohen, D.H. (1976) Involvement of the avian amygdalar homologue (archistriatum posterior and medial) in defensively conditioned heart rate change. J. Comp. Neurol., 160: 13–36.
12.
Cohen, J., and M.F. Cheng (1981) The role of the midbrain in courtship behavior of the female ring dove (Streptopelia risoria): evidence from radiofrequency lesion and hormone implant studies. Brain Res., 207: 279–301.
13.
Csillag, A., A.D. Szekely, and D.C. Davies (1994) Termination pattern of medial hyperstriatum ventrale efferents in the archistriatum of the domestic chick. J. Comp. Neurol., 348: 394– 402.
14.
Damasio, A.R. (1994) Descartes’ Error-Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. A Grosset/Putnam Book, New York.
15.
Deviche, P., and O. Gunturkun (1992) Peptides for calling? An immunohistochemical study of the avian n. intercollicularis. Brain Res., 569: 93– 99.
16.
Durand, S., J. Tepper, and M.F. Cheng (1992) The shell region of the nucleus ovoidalis: a subdivision of the avian thalamus. J. Comp. Neurol., 323: 495–518.
17.
Ellis, C.R. (1966) Agnostic behavior in the male starling. Wilson Bull., 78: 208–224.
18.
Feare, C. (1984) The Starling. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19.
Karten, H.J., and J.L. Dubbeldam (1973) The organization and projections of the paleostriatal complex in the pigeon (Columba livia). J. Comp. Neurol., 148: 61–89.
20.
Karten, H.J., and W. Hodos (1967) A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Brain of the Pigeon. The John Hopkins press, Baltimore, Maryland.
21.
Kling, A.S., and L.A. Brothers (1992) The amygdala and social behavior. In The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory, and Mental Dysfunction (ed. by J.P. Aggleton), Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 353–377.
22.
Korzeniewska, E., and O. Gunturkin (1990) Sensory properties and afferents of the nucleus dorsolaterallis posterior thalami of the pigeon. J. Comp. Neurol., 292: 457–479.
23.
de Lanerolle, N.C., R.P. Elde, S.B. Sparkes, and M. Frick (1981) Distribution of methionine-enkephalin immunoreactivity in the chick brain: an immunohistochemical study. J. Comp. Neurol., 199: 513–533.
24.
LeDoux, J.E., A. Sakaguchi, and D.J. Reis (1984) Subcortical efferent projections of the medial geniculate nucleus mediate emotional responses conditioned to acoustic stimuli. J. Neurosci., 4: 683–698.
25.
LeDoux, J.E., J. Iwata, D. Pearl, and D.J. Reis (1986) Interrruption of projections from the medial geniculate body to an archi-neostriatal field disrupts the classical conditioning of emotional responses to acoustic stimuli. Neuroscience, 17: 615–627.
26.
LeDoux, J.E., L. Iwata, P. Cicchetti, and D.J. Reis (1988) Different projections of the central amygdaloid nucleus mediate autonomic and behavioral correlates of conditioned fear. J. Neurosci., 8: 2517–2529.
27.
LeDoux, J.E., P. Cicchetti, A. Xagoraris, and L.M. Romanski (1990) The lateral amygdaloid nucleus: sensory interface of the amygdala in fear conditioning. J. Neurosci., 10: 1062–1069.
28.
Leutgeb, S., S. Husband, L.V. Riters, T. Shimizu, and V.P. Bingman (1996) Telencephalic afferents to the caudolateral neostriatum of the pigeon. Brain Res., 730: 173–181.
29.
Ling, C., M. Zuo, A. Alvarez-Buylla, and M.F. Cheng (1997) Neurogenesis in juvenile and adult ring doves. J. Comp. Neurol., 379: 300– 312.
30.
Lowndes, M., D.C. Davies, and M.H. Johnson (1994) Archistriatal lesions impair the acquisition of filial preferences during imprinting in the domestic chick. Eur. J. Neurosci., 6: 1143– 1148.
31.
Martinez-Vargas, M.C., W.E. Stumpf, and M. Sar (1976) Anatomical distribution of estrogen target cells in the avian CNS: a comparison with mammalian CNS. J. Comp. Neurol., 167: 83– 104.
32.
Morgensen, J., and I. Divac (1982) The prefrontal ‘cortex’ in the pigeon. Behavioral evidence. Brain Behav. Evol., 21: 60–66.
33.
Ottersen, O.P. (1982) Connections of the amygdala of the rat. IV: Cortico-amygdaloid and intra-amygdaloid connections as studied with axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase. J. Comp. Neurol., 205: 30–48.
34.
Puelles, L., C. Robles, M. Martinez-de-la-Torre, and S. Martinez (1994) New subdivision schema for the avian torus semicircularis: neurochemical maps in the chick. J. Comp. Neurol., 340: 98–125.
35.
Reiner, A., and H.J. Karten (1985) Comparison of olfactory bulb projections in pigeons and turtles. Brain Behav. Evol., 27: 22–27.
36.
Rose, S.P. (1991) How chicks make memories: the cellular cascade frp, c-fos to dendritic remodeling. Trends Neurosci., 14: 390–397.
37.
Russchen, F.T. (1982) Amygdalopetals in the cat. I. Cortical afferent connections. A study with retrograde and anterograde tracing techniques. J. Comp. Neurol., 206: 159–179.
38.
Stokes, T.M., C.M. Leonard, and F. Nottebohm (1974) The telencephalon, diencephalon, and mesencephalon of the canary, Serinus canaria, in stereotaxic coordinates. J. Comp. Neurol., 156: 337–374.
39.
Szekely, A.D., and J.R. Krebs (1996) Efferent connectivity of the hippocampal formation of the zebra finch (Taenopygia guttata): an anterograde pathway tracing study using Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. J. Comp. Neurol., 368: 198–214.
40.
Templeton, J.J., and L.-A. Giraldeau (1995) Public information cues affect the scrounging decisions of starlings. Anim. Behav., 49: 1617– 1626.
41.
Templeton, J.J., and L.-A. Giraldeau (1995) Patch assessment in foraging flocks of European starlings: evidence for the use of public information. Behav. Ecol., 6: 65–72.
42.
Thompson, R.R., J.L. Goodson, M.G. Ruscio, and E. Adkins-Regan (1998) Role of the archistriatal nucleus taeniae in the sexual behavior of male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica): a comparison of function with the medial nucleus of the amygdala in mammals. Brain Behav. Evol., 51: 215–229.
43.
Wild, J.M. (1987) Nuclei of the lateral lemniscus project directly to the thalamic auditory nuclei in the pigeon. Brain Res., 408: 303–307.
44.
Wild, J.M., J.J.A. Arends, and Zeigler (1990) Projections of the parabrachial nucleus in the pigeon (Columba livia). J. Comp. Neurol., 293: 499–523.
45.
Zeier, H., and H.J. Karten (1971) The archistriatum of the pigeon: organization of afferent and efferent connections. Brain Res., 31: 313–326.
1999
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.