The presence of seven cervical vertebrae is an almost universal mammalian trait. The posterior boundary of the cervical series is traditionally defined osteologically, but its location is also predictable using neurological markers of the brachial plexus. The existence of three living mammalian genera with osteologi-cally defined cervical counts other than seven offers the opportunity to examine the coincidence of osteological and neurological definitions of the term ''cervical''. Despite variations in rib and articular processes of cervical vertebrae, dissections of the brachial plexuses of these genera reveal that neurological and osteological markers of the cervical series define the same, nontraditional, posterior boundaries of the series. Subdivision of the predetermined cervical mesoderm into a nontraditional number of segments has not altered the relationship of the limb or its innervation to the cervical/thoracic boundary. This nontraditional subdivision appears to have evolved separately at least three times.

Keywords:
Mammals, Cervical, Brachial plexus, Vertebrae
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel
1996
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.