There are several reasons why we lack detailed and comprehensive theories of how isocortex evolved in the various lines of mammalian evolution. Although current methods allow cortical areas to be defined with a high degree of assurance, few taxa have been studied in detail, and even the most-studied taxa are incompletely understood. In addition, concepts persist from early studies, based on limited data, that confound current theories, and some theories of isocortical evolution have been based on questionable premises. Nevertheless, some conclusions are clearly supportable. Early mammals had small brains with proportionately little isocortex. Mammals with larger brains and proportionately more isocortex evolved in several lines of descent. All mammals appear to have roughly 20 cortical areas, 'the organs of the brain', in common as retentions from an early ancestor, with primary and secondary sensory fields occupying much of cortex. Some of these cortical areas have been greatly modified in some taxa to become significantly expanded in size, highly laminated structurally, or both. Numbers of areas have increased independently in several branches of mammalian evolution, and the functioning of large brains may be enhanced by having more subdivisions. Finally, over many generations new areas may emerge from old by the formation of functionally distinct modules within areas, followed by the fusion of modules to ultimately form separate areas.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.