Comparisons of homologous elements in neurobehavioral circuits that have diverged during speciation to mediate different behaviors should reveal the nature of evolutionary changes in nervous systems. When the pedigree of a particular behavior can be traced – by comparing motor patterns and their neural substrates in related taxa whose phylogeny is known from other (non-neurobehavioral) criteria – divergent and convergent evolutionary changes can be distinguished and the order of their occurrence reconstructed. An example of reconstructing a behavioral pedigree (for the novel mode of swimming in the crab Emerita [Hippidae]) is presented, and implications about the evolution and organization of neurobehavioral circuits engendered by this and some other studies of functionally defined neuronal networks are reviewed. Specific neural differences in related animals can only be attributed to natural selection when they can be related to species differences in function or behavior. Differences that cannot be so related, as well as apparently non-adaptive characters in individual nervous systems, are attributed to ontogenetic processes, which apparently, in some cases, introduced and, in other cases, resisted change through evolutionary time. More expressly-comparative investigations of discrete neurobehavioral circuits are needed for an understanding of the interdependence of evolutionary processes and ontogenetic and functional constraints on the organization of neuronal systems.

Keywords:
Neuron homology, Neural evolution, Behavioral phylogeny, Identified neurons, Preadaptation, Emerita, Anomura, Crustacean neuromusculature
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1991 S. Karger AG, Basel
1991
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.